ESG inventor says Trump its 'best possible advert'
Paul Clements-Hunt, a former United Nations official, said the Republican leader was illustrative of the pitfalls of "getting economics wrong" by fuelling social inequality.
"Trump is the best possible advert for ESG, particularly the "G" at the governance level," he told a sustainable investment forum on Wednesday.
The Blended Capital Group chief executive officer was pressed for his views on the percolating ESG backlash at the two-day Responsible Investment Association Australasia conference in Sydney.
He spoke alongside Maria Lettini, chief executive officer at the US Sustainable Investment Forum and on the front line of the anti-ESG sentiment taking root in America.
Ms Lettini said it was hard to keep up with efforts in the US to unwind and undermine climate change and ESG polices, such as potential roll-backs to renewable and clean tech incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Asked if responsible investment advocates were doing enough to defend ESG as a useful lens for delivering risk-adjusted returns, Ms Lettini recommended going "back to basics" on communication.
"We need basic data, we are responding to clients wishes, we're responding to our fiduciary duty obligations," she said.
"And it sounds a bit rolling back a couple of decades to be very dry with our responses, but that's what we are doing more."
University of Melbourne professor of US politics Timothy Lynch was critical of ESG, describing it as a "terrible advert for what it is trying to do", reliant on "huge subsidy" and "management by elites".
Prof Lynch posited the popular perception of ESG was of elites taking up incentives for clean energy while "forgetting the lived experience of many people that don't benefit".
"It's too much concern with posturing and less with economic realities," he said.
Mr Clements-Hunt said responsible investment was about identifying for-profit business models that delivered impact, including sanitation and clean energy in Sub-Saharan Africa.
"I can't agree with that suggestion of lecturing to poor people," Mr Clements-Hunt countered.
ESG was never intended as a political slogan to appeal to ordinary people, he said, but rather devised to change cultures within asset owner organisations.
"It was just to ask the question, how do these systemic risks chew up your capital? And how do you unlock value in the long term?"
Mr Clements-Hunt said it had largely "done its job" and was now embedded into the prudential oversight system and other financial frameworks.
The man credited for coining "ESG" - environmental, social and governance - considers US President Donald Trump the ideal advertisement for responsible investment.
Paul Clements-Hunt, a former United Nations official, said the Republican leader was illustrative of the pitfalls of "getting economics wrong" by fuelling social inequality.
"Trump is the best possible advert for ESG, particularly the "G" at the governance level," he told a sustainable investment forum on Wednesday.
The Blended Capital Group chief executive officer was pressed for his views on the percolating ESG backlash at the two-day Responsible Investment Association Australasia conference in Sydney.
He spoke alongside Maria Lettini, chief executive officer at the US Sustainable Investment Forum and on the front line of the anti-ESG sentiment taking root in America.
Ms Lettini said it was hard to keep up with efforts in the US to unwind and undermine climate change and ESG polices, such as potential roll-backs to renewable and clean tech incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Asked if responsible investment advocates were doing enough to defend ESG as a useful lens for delivering risk-adjusted returns, Ms Lettini recommended going "back to basics" on communication.
"We need basic data, we are responding to clients wishes, we're responding to our fiduciary duty obligations," she said.
"And it sounds a bit rolling back a couple of decades to be very dry with our responses, but that's what we are doing more."
University of Melbourne professor of US politics Timothy Lynch was critical of ESG, describing it as a "terrible advert for what it is trying to do", reliant on "huge subsidy" and "management by elites".
Prof Lynch posited the popular perception of ESG was of elites taking up incentives for clean energy while "forgetting the lived experience of many people that don't benefit".
"It's too much concern with posturing and less with economic realities," he said.
Mr Clements-Hunt said responsible investment was about identifying for-profit business models that delivered impact, including sanitation and clean energy in Sub-Saharan Africa.
"I can't agree with that suggestion of lecturing to poor people," Mr Clements-Hunt countered.
ESG was never intended as a political slogan to appeal to ordinary people, he said, but rather devised to change cultures within asset owner organisations.
"It was just to ask the question, how do these systemic risks chew up your capital? And how do you unlock value in the long term?"
Mr Clements-Hunt said it had largely "done its job" and was now embedded into the prudential oversight system and other financial frameworks.
The man credited for coining "ESG" - environmental, social and governance - considers US President Donald Trump the ideal advertisement for responsible investment.
Paul Clements-Hunt, a former United Nations official, said the Republican leader was illustrative of the pitfalls of "getting economics wrong" by fuelling social inequality.
"Trump is the best possible advert for ESG, particularly the "G" at the governance level," he told a sustainable investment forum on Wednesday.
The Blended Capital Group chief executive officer was pressed for his views on the percolating ESG backlash at the two-day Responsible Investment Association Australasia conference in Sydney.
He spoke alongside Maria Lettini, chief executive officer at the US Sustainable Investment Forum and on the front line of the anti-ESG sentiment taking root in America.
Ms Lettini said it was hard to keep up with efforts in the US to unwind and undermine climate change and ESG polices, such as potential roll-backs to renewable and clean tech incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Asked if responsible investment advocates were doing enough to defend ESG as a useful lens for delivering risk-adjusted returns, Ms Lettini recommended going "back to basics" on communication.
"We need basic data, we are responding to clients wishes, we're responding to our fiduciary duty obligations," she said.
"And it sounds a bit rolling back a couple of decades to be very dry with our responses, but that's what we are doing more."
University of Melbourne professor of US politics Timothy Lynch was critical of ESG, describing it as a "terrible advert for what it is trying to do", reliant on "huge subsidy" and "management by elites".
Prof Lynch posited the popular perception of ESG was of elites taking up incentives for clean energy while "forgetting the lived experience of many people that don't benefit".
"It's too much concern with posturing and less with economic realities," he said.
Mr Clements-Hunt said responsible investment was about identifying for-profit business models that delivered impact, including sanitation and clean energy in Sub-Saharan Africa.
"I can't agree with that suggestion of lecturing to poor people," Mr Clements-Hunt countered.
ESG was never intended as a political slogan to appeal to ordinary people, he said, but rather devised to change cultures within asset owner organisations.
"It was just to ask the question, how do these systemic risks chew up your capital? And how do you unlock value in the long term?"
Mr Clements-Hunt said it had largely "done its job" and was now embedded into the prudential oversight system and other financial frameworks.
The man credited for coining "ESG" - environmental, social and governance - considers US President Donald Trump the ideal advertisement for responsible investment.
Paul Clements-Hunt, a former United Nations official, said the Republican leader was illustrative of the pitfalls of "getting economics wrong" by fuelling social inequality.
"Trump is the best possible advert for ESG, particularly the "G" at the governance level," he told a sustainable investment forum on Wednesday.
The Blended Capital Group chief executive officer was pressed for his views on the percolating ESG backlash at the two-day Responsible Investment Association Australasia conference in Sydney.
He spoke alongside Maria Lettini, chief executive officer at the US Sustainable Investment Forum and on the front line of the anti-ESG sentiment taking root in America.
Ms Lettini said it was hard to keep up with efforts in the US to unwind and undermine climate change and ESG polices, such as potential roll-backs to renewable and clean tech incentives under the Inflation Reduction Act.
Asked if responsible investment advocates were doing enough to defend ESG as a useful lens for delivering risk-adjusted returns, Ms Lettini recommended going "back to basics" on communication.
"We need basic data, we are responding to clients wishes, we're responding to our fiduciary duty obligations," she said.
"And it sounds a bit rolling back a couple of decades to be very dry with our responses, but that's what we are doing more."
University of Melbourne professor of US politics Timothy Lynch was critical of ESG, describing it as a "terrible advert for what it is trying to do", reliant on "huge subsidy" and "management by elites".
Prof Lynch posited the popular perception of ESG was of elites taking up incentives for clean energy while "forgetting the lived experience of many people that don't benefit".
"It's too much concern with posturing and less with economic realities," he said.
Mr Clements-Hunt said responsible investment was about identifying for-profit business models that delivered impact, including sanitation and clean energy in Sub-Saharan Africa.
"I can't agree with that suggestion of lecturing to poor people," Mr Clements-Hunt countered.
ESG was never intended as a political slogan to appeal to ordinary people, he said, but rather devised to change cultures within asset owner organisations.
"It was just to ask the question, how do these systemic risks chew up your capital? And how do you unlock value in the long term?"
Mr Clements-Hunt said it had largely "done its job" and was now embedded into the prudential oversight system and other financial frameworks.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sydney Morning Herald
17 minutes ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out
New York: A Manhattan appeals court struck down a roughly $US500 million ($780 million) fraud penalty against US President Donald Trump and his company, even as it upheld the finding that he broke the law by inflating the value of assets such as Mar-a-Lago. A five-judge panel on Thursday, New York time, agreed with Trump that the size of the fine was unconstitutionally 'excessive'. The long-awaited ruling by New York's intermediate appeals court is a major victory for Trump over New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, though other aspects of the April 2024 judgment remain intact. On top of the financial penalty, Trump and his sons faced a temporary ban on serving as corporate officers in New York. The company was also ordered to submit its financial records for review by an independent monitor. Those sanctions stand, though they remain on hold for possible further appeal by Trump. In a statement, James said her office would challenge the ruling at the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. She also stressed that 'yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law'. Still, the massive fine had been the heart of Justice Arthur Engoron's judgment. The judge had ordered Trump last year to pay $US355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $US515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organisation, including sons Eric and Donald Trump jnr, have brought the total to $US527 million with interest. The elimination of the fine adds to the list of Trump's legal woes that have essentially melted away since he won re-election as president. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases agaist him, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Though he was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, he was sentenced to no jail time.
The Age
17 minutes ago
- The Age
‘Excessive': Trump rejoices as $700m New York fraud fine tossed out
New York: A Manhattan appeals court struck down a roughly $US500 million ($780 million) fraud penalty against US President Donald Trump and his company, even as it upheld the finding that he broke the law by inflating the value of assets such as Mar-a-Lago. A five-judge panel on Thursday, New York time, agreed with Trump that the size of the fine was unconstitutionally 'excessive'. The long-awaited ruling by New York's intermediate appeals court is a major victory for Trump over New York Attorney General Letitia James, whose office brought the case, though other aspects of the April 2024 judgment remain intact. On top of the financial penalty, Trump and his sons faced a temporary ban on serving as corporate officers in New York. The company was also ordered to submit its financial records for review by an independent monitor. Those sanctions stand, though they remain on hold for possible further appeal by Trump. In a statement, James said her office would challenge the ruling at the New York Court of Appeals, the state's highest court. She also stressed that 'yet another court has ruled that the president violated the law'. Still, the massive fine had been the heart of Justice Arthur Engoron's judgment. The judge had ordered Trump last year to pay $US355 million in penalties after finding that he flagrantly padded financial statements provided to lenders and insurers. With interest, the sum has topped $US515 million. Additional penalties for executives at his company, the Trump Organisation, including sons Eric and Donald Trump jnr, have brought the total to $US527 million with interest. The elimination of the fine adds to the list of Trump's legal woes that have essentially melted away since he won re-election as president. The Justice Department dropped two federal criminal cases agaist him, citing a longstanding policy against prosecuting a sitting president. Though he was convicted of falsifying business records to conceal hush-money payments to porn star Stormy Daniels, he was sentenced to no jail time.
Sydney Morning Herald
2 hours ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Fight back': Trump airs support for Ukraine going on offensive against Russia
London: US President Donald Trump has slammed American policies that prevented Ukraine from launching full-scale attacks on Russia in order to win the war, posting a picture of himself pointing at the chest of Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin to reinforce his point. Trump suggested Ukraine should have been able to fight with few restrictions over more than three years of war, in a startling post during a period of sensitive negotiations over a peace deal. He also drew a direct parallel with assertive American policy against Russia during the Cold War by adding a photograph of then US vice-president Richard Nixon pointing his finger at the chest of then Russian leader Nikita Khrushchev in 1959. Russia bombarded Ukrainian cities with more missile and drone attacks in the early hours of Thursday, local time, despite calls from European leaders for a ceasefire so that the US, Ukraine and Russia could negotiate a settlement to the war. The latest bombings included a strike against an American electronics plant in Ukraine, prompting Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky to cite this as proof of a deliberate Russian attack on US interests. Ukraine estimates that Russia has fired nearly 1000 long-range drones and missiles at Ukraine since talks on Monday when Zelensky and European leaders spoke with Trump for hours at the White House. Former US President Joe Biden placed restrictions on the way Ukraine could use some of the arms supplied since Russia launched its full-scale invasion in February 2022, such as preventing long-range artillery being fired at targets on Russian soil.
