NZ to spend $2 billion on new maritime helicopters
New Zealand will spend billions replacing the Defence Force's aging maritime helicopters, as global tensions increase.
Along with the $NZ2 billion ($A1.85b) for the helicopters, the government said it would increase baseline spending by $NZ239 million ($A207m) for the Defence Force each year over the next four years.
"It is very clear that New Zealand is not immune from the increasing tensions being felt throughout the world," New Zealand Defence Minister Judith Collins said in a statement on Monday.
"(This) sets us on our path for defence spending to reach two per cent of GDP by 2032-33," she said.
New Zealand's Defence Force has struggled with systemic underspending over the past several decades, which amounts to just over one per cent of GDP now.
In April, the government said it would boost defence spending with $NZ9 billion ($A8b) of new funding over the next four years.
"There is no economic security without national security. Global tensions are increasing rapidly, and Defence personnel need the right equipment and conditions to do their jobs," Collins said.
"As a maritime nation we are prioritising naval capability," she said.
New Zealand's first national security review in 2023 called for more military spending and stronger ties with Indo-Pacific nations to tackle climate change and strategic competition among the West, China and Russia. New Zealand has eight SH-2G(I) Seasprite maritime helicopters.
Collins said replacing these will increase the defensive and offensive capabilities and surveillance range of New Zealand's frigates.
Collins added she will have more to say about defence investments in the coming year when the government unveils its budget.
New Zealand's budget is scheduled for May 22, and will outline spending for the 12-month period to June 30, 2026.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
13 hours ago
- ABC News
Canada boosts defence spending to 2 per cent of GDP amid growing threats
Canada will ramp up defence spending and work more closely with Europe's defence industry amid pressure from allies, including the United States, to boost its contribution to NATO. Recently re-elected Prime Minister Mark Carney announced the move on Monday, local time, vowing to increase Canada's defence spending from 1.4 per cent of GDP to 2 per cent this year. The new funds will be spent on increased pay for the armed forces as well as on buying new submarines, aircraft, ships, armed vehicles and artillery. Canada will also acquire new radar, drones and sensors to monitor the sea floor and the Arctic, and last month announced it would be buying defence radar technology from Australia. The spending increase is five years earlier than previously planned by the country's Liberal government. "Now is the time to act with urgency, force, and determination," Mr Carney said in a speech in Toronto. "Rising great powers are now in strategic competition with America. A new imperialism threatens. Middle powers compete for interests and attention, knowing that if they are not at the table, they will be on the menu." Mr Carney also vowed the increase in spending would boost Canada's economy and manufacturing, but said much of the new equipment and weapons would be acquired by working closely with Europe's military industrial complex. Australia has also faced pressure from the US to up its defence spending, with US Secretary of Defence Pete Hegseth last week urging the Albanese government to up its military budget by $40 billion a year. Canada's bolstering of its military capabilities came as NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte called on European nations to dramatically bolster their defence budgets. In a speech at London's Chatham House on Monday local time, Mr Rutte said that for NATO to maintain credible deterrence and defence, it needs "a 400% increase in air and missile defence". "We see in Ukraine how Russia delivers terror from above, so we will strengthen the shield that protects our skies," he said. "The fact is, we need a quantum leap in our collective defence." His comments came as he pushed for NATO members to commit to ramping up defence spending at a key summit of the western military alliance later this month. The proposal is a compromise deal designed to satisfy US President Donald Trump, who has demanded that allies each spend 5 per cent of economic output on defence, up from a current commitment of two per cent. Russia condemned Mr Rutte's comments before he took to the stage, denouncing NATO as "an instrument of aggression". NATO "is demonstrating itself as an instrument of aggression and confrontation", Kremlin spokesperson Dmitry Peskov told reporters in
News.com.au
a day ago
- News.com.au
ASPI senior defence analyst says Australia needs to be prepared for ‘protracted war'
A senior security expert has warned of the 'very clear threat' of China invading Taiwan, urging Australia to upgrade its defence capabilities and warning that Australia 'needs to be ready for the prospect' of war. Malcolm Davis, a senior defence strategy analyst at conservative think tank the Australian Strategic Policy Institute, urged the government to increase spending to safeguard against China's rising aggression and influence in the Pacific. The comments come as US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth called on Australia to uplift its spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP, with levels currently set to increase to 2.33 per cent by 2033-34. Australia's defence budget is expected to come under further scrutiny with Anthony Albanese expected to have a face-to-face meeting with US President Donald Trump on the sidelines of this weekend's G7 Leaders Summit in Canada. Speaking to Sky on Monday, Mr Davis agreed with comments from US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and said there was 'very clear threat that China is going to move on Taiwan within the next to three years'. He said Australia needed to ensure that our military assets were up to the task of responding to a 'protracted war,' flagging the need for improved resilience against 'integrated air and missile defence systems'. '(Defence spending) needs to include sustainability and building sustainability for protracted war that could last months or years in our region, and ensure that we can stay in the fight, a high intensity fight, for that period of time,' he said. 'And it includes preparedness and essentially, the ability to respond to challenges and attacks on our society and our country. 'I think that we do need to be ready for the prospect that if war does happen, Australia will be attacked directly.' Mr Davis said the spending needed to be accelerated 'not in 10 years' but in a 'year or two,' adding that investment needs to also be 'smart and targeted'. The defence expert also said critical infrastructure in Australia's north, like RWF Tindall, ports, oil and energy facilities were all 'essentially undefended'. 'The government talks about building integrated air and missile defence systems, and they have developed the command and control system for that, but they don't have any missiles to shoot with,' he continued. 'They talk about possibly using a naval based missile or an air based missile, but those platforms have to be in the right place at the right time.' Although Defence Minister Richard Marles has left the door open for further discussions with the US, stating that the government was 'clearly willing to have the conversation with America,' he said the outcome will be based on Australia's 'national interest'. 'We will work it through from there and make sure that we do the appropriate defence spending based on meeting the strategic moment,' he told Sky. Mr Albanese has recently clashed with the conservative think tank after it released a report stating a 'generational investment' in defence has been 'put off for another generation'. Report author and former home affairs deputy secretary Mark Ablong said a failure to boost defence 'will make all Australians less secure,' and 'risks a brittle and hollowed defence force' and a 'paper ADF'. However Mr Albanese rubbished the report as 'predictable' and political and stood by the government's plan. 'ASPI regularly produce these sort of reports, you know, run by people who have been in a position to make a difference in the past as part of former governments,' he told ABC radio. 'You know, I think it's predictable, frankly.'
Sky News AU
a day ago
- Sky News AU
Majority of Australians back boost to defence spending amid US pressure and security concerns
The majority of voters support lifting Australia's military budget, as former PM Scott Morrison and US officials push for a sharp increase in defence investment ahead of Anthony Albanese's expected meeting with Donald Trump. The majority of Australians support an increase to the nation's military budget, amid demands from the United States for allies to lift defence spending to 3 per cent of GDP. According to new analysis from News Corp's Lighthouse Consumer Sentiment Tracker, 57 per cent of voters said military spending should increase beyond its current level. Eight per cent of people supported spending cuts and 35 per cent believed the status quo was sufficient. The majority of respondents (39 per cent) also indicated a willingness to fund increased defence spending through higher taxes on high income earns and corporations. Thirty-seven per cent were willing to fund spending through efficiency savings within government departments and 28 per cent through cuts to foreign aid or partnerships. The data was based on a representative sample of nearly 5,000 respondents collected between April 1 and May 31. The survey comes as pressure mounts from the United States for Australia to spend at least 3 per cent of GDP on defence. The Albanese government has currently invested about 2 per cent of GDP, rising to 2.3 per cent by 2033. US Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth recently called on Australia to lift defence spending to 3.5 per cent of GDP. The appeal was made during a public meeting alongside Australian Defence Minister Richard Marles at the Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore. Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has not ruled out further spending, but maintains additional investment must be aligned with specific needs—not 'arbitrary targets'. However, Defence Chief Admiral David Johnston told a defence summit on Wednesday that his department would likely ask for a funding boost in the next biennial review. 'The opportunity we have with the biennial cycle now is to keep coming back and reviewing the strategy,' he said. 'Looking at the opportunities or where the investments are required, putting the case to government to increase the defence expenditure where we believe it is needed.' Admiral Johnston also expressed concern about the possibility of Australia waging war in the future on home soil, rather than overseas. However, inside the government there has been a belief that they do not expect a direct military invasion of Australia by China. Rather, insiders view strategic assets like submarines and long-range missiles as tools to protect critical trade routes, not to repel a land invasion. — ASPI (@ASPI_org) May 28, 2025 The defence issue is set to feature prominently at the G7 summit in Kananaskis, Canada between June 15 and 17, where Mr Albanese is expected to meet President Trump. Former prime minister Scott Morrison has added his voice to calls for more robust military investment, reiterating the Coalition's support for a 3 per cent of GDP target. 'I'm on the record for some time now of supporting a 3 per cent target and that target obviously has to be filled out with the right capabilities,' Mr Morrison said. 'This is a common requirement that has been put forward across all Allies and partners, not just Australia. 'The significant change we're seeing in the security environment necessitates such a response.' The independent defence and strategic policy think tank, Australian Strategic Policy Institute, recently called on the Albanese government to spend more. ASPI Executive Director Justin Bassi told Sky News that the public deserves transparency on the country's strategic vulnerabilities. 'Unfortunately, the world has these threats that do impact Australia and to counter these threats we need to, unfortunately, spend more money in the area,' he said. Mr Albanese publicly dismissed the think tank's recent report warning of a 'hollow' Australian Defence Force, calling ASPI's criticisms 'predictable'. The Lighthouse Tracker data also revealed strong generational and political divides. Seventy per cent of baby boomers support more defence spending, compared with 49 per cent of millennials and 47 per cent of Gen Z. Coalition and One Nation voters were most supportive (69 per cent), while only 40 per cent of Greens voters backed increased funding. Labor voters were more evenly split, with 52 per cent in favour. Among potential funding sources, Coalition voters preferred cuts to climate programs (38 per cent), foreign aid (36 per cent), and the arts (30 per cent). Labor and Greens voters favoured progressive tax reform, with 45 per cent calling for higher taxes on wealthy individuals and corporations. Only 4 per cent of respondents were willing to consider diverting funds from Medicare, or 10 per cent from cuts to welfare or the NDIS.
