Apheresis May Sweep Microplastics From Veins
These particles can originate from the breakdown of larger plastic items or be intentionally manufactured for use in products, such as cosmetics, synthetic fabrics, and pharmaceuticals. Recent studies suggest that the human brain may contain up to a teaspoon of microplastics and nanoplastics, with the tiniest fragments primarily composed of polyethylene, the same material commonly used in plastic bags and food packaging.
These particles have been detected in areas such as the walls of blood vessels in the brain and within immune cells. However, it remains unclear whether microplastics contribute to the progression of neurological diseases or whether these conditions render the brain more susceptible to particle infiltration. In animal studies involving fish and rodents, prolonged exposure to nanoplastics has been linked to memory impairment, brain inflammation, and alterations in synaptic protein levels.
Beyond the brain, microplastics have been found in human feces, arterial plaques, and even the placenta. A study published in The New England Journal of Medicine linked the presence of microplastics in the arteries to a heightened risk for heart attack, stroke, and overall mortality.
Therapeutic Apheresis
According to a preliminary study published in Brain Medicine by researchers at Technische Universität Dresden in Dresden, Germany, therapeutic apheresis, a medical procedure that filters tiny particles from the blood, may help remove microplastics from the human body. The technique can capture particles as small as 200 nanometers, which is approximately 5000 times smaller than a millimeter.
In this study, the researchers evaluated the procedure in patients with myalgic encephalomyelitis, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome. They analyzed the waste fluid discarded during apheresis using a specialized infrared spectroscopy technique.
The analysis detected substances that matched the chemical signatures of polyamide and polyurethane, two common types of industrial plastics. This suggests that microplastics may have been successfully removed from the blood of patients during the procedure.
Notably, this study did not measure the total amount of microplastics removed or compare their levels in patients before and after apheresis. What has been demonstrated so far is the presence of microplastics in the waste material discarded by the device — an observation that suggests, but does not yet confirm, the effective removal of these substances from the human body.
Researchers have cautioned that the detected materials may reflect chemical structures common to proteins, meaning that further analysis is required to verify the exact nature of the removed particles. Nonetheless, the findings offer hope to researchers seeking to address the growing accumulation of microplastics in the human body.
The authors recommended conducting studies with larger groups and quantitative analyses comparing the levels of microplastics in the blood before and after the procedures. The authors concluded that 'such analyses will help determine particle removal from blood and tissues and assess correlations with symptom improvement in conditions like myalgia encephalomyelitis/chronic fatigue syndrome.'
Alternative Approaches
Currently, evidence that microplastics are effectively removed from the human body after ingestion is limited.
A 2011 study examined bisphenol A (BPA) levels in blood, sweat, and urine samples from 20 individuals. In 16 cases, BPA appeared only in sweat, suggesting that induced perspiration may help eliminate certain compounds from the body. However, more studies are needed to assess its long-term safety and efficacy.
'That is why we focus on reducing exposure to microplastics in the first place,' said Nicholas Fabiano, MD, a psychiatry resident at the University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, and co-author of a related article in Brain Medicine .
The challenge of this research began with tracking the effects of microplastic particles. 'From a clinical perspective, it is very difficult to establish a direct link between exposure to microplastics and adverse health outcomes,' said Fabiano.
To address this, he advocated the creation of new tools to measure dietary risks, such as a dietary microplastic index. 'We propose the development of a Dietary Microplastic Index that could be integrated with existing dietary risk assessment tools to estimate microplastic exposure based on the types of food consumed,' he said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNN
2 hours ago
- CNN
US and Mexico agree to long-term wastewater treatment plan in the San Diego-Tijuana region
The governments of Mexico and the United States signed a memorandum of understanding on Thursday to fund and expedite several wastewater treatment projects in the Tijuana River basin. Untreated wastewater continually affects residents living along the river, which flows across the border from Tijuana and through several of San Diego's southern neighborhoods. Residents living along the river have long battled severe health issues which researchers say stem from the river's contamination. One research team based at the University of California San Diego found that trace amounts of waterborne chemicals from tires, personal care products, and even illicit drugs present in the Tijuana River are being introduced into the air — exacerbating health concerns for tens of thousands of residents living on its banks. In Thursday's event celebrated in Mexico City, US Environmental Protection Agency Secretary Lee Zeldin and Mexico's Secretary of the Environment and National Resources of Mexico Alicia Bárcena agreed to a series of actions to be taken by both governments by 2027 to address the deteriorating wastewater treatment crisis. The agreement stipulates that both Mexico and the US will re-commit to funding the construction and renovation of water treatment infrastructure on both sides of the border. The document also accelerates several projects to be completed over the next two years. 'What we are doing, in reality, is trying to resolve once and for all the problem of wastewater from the Tijuana River,' Bárcena said during her speech on Thursday. Zeldin concurred, saying the agreement represented 'a huge win for millions of Americans and Mexicans.' He attributed the success to President Trump's distinct interest in the issue and noted that addressing the water contamination crisis will ensure a safer environment for residents and Navy SEALS training on nearby beaches. Former Commissioner of the International Water and Boundary Commission (IBWC) Maria-Elena Giner called the agreement 'excellent news' toward reaffirming commitments made by the US and Mexican officials in Minute 328, which outlines how Mexico and the US will share the costs of operating and maintaining water treatment infrastructure on the border. Permanent and continued diplomacy, transparency of information, and defined concrete action with Mexico will be needed. Former IBWC Commissioner Maria-Elena Giner Funding wastewater treatment facilities and their continued operation has posed a constant challenge; this agreement sets expectations for construction and rehabilitation projects that haven't yet been financed. But given that Bárcena's and Mexican President Claudia Sheinbaum's Morena party currently controls the country's legislature, it is likely the funds could be allocated in the 2026 and 2027 budgets. At the Mexican President's daily press briefing on Friday, Bárcena noted that she is working to secure an agreement where the US and Mexico each cover half the costs of upgrading the critical San Antonio de los Buenos treatment plant, located southwest of Tijuana. She estimates the improvements for this project alone will cost $67 million or 1.2 billion pesos. CNN's Verónica Calderón and Isa Cardona contributed to this report.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Study Says That 'Micro-Walks' May Be More Effective Than Longer Ones—Even For Weight Loss
"Hearst Magazines and Yahoo may earn commission or revenue on some items through these links." For years, doctors have stressed the importance of being active during your day—after all, research has found that sitting for too long raises your risk of a slew of serious health conditions, including cardiovascular disease and type 2 diabetes. But the idea of going for hour-long walks can be overwhelming. Now, new research suggests you don't need to jam in a massive stroll into each day: Instead, you can go for 'micro-walks.' That's the main takeaway from a study published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B, which found that micro-walks may be even better for you than long ones. Here's the deal. Interested in making walks part of your regular fitness routine? Check out the exclusive WH+ 4-Week Walking Plan that burns fat and builds muscle at the same time. What are 'micro-walks'? In this study, a 'micro-walk' is defined as walking between 10 and 30 seconds at a time (with breaks in between your next walk). Are 'micro-walks' more beneficial for your health? Why? It depends on how you're looking at it. In this particular study, volunteers walked on a treadmill or climbed a short flight of stairs for different periods of time, ranging from 10 seconds to four minutes. The study participants wore masks to measure their oxygen intake (which can be used to calculate energy or calorie consumption). The researchers discovered that people who walked in short bursts used up to 60 per cent more energy than longer ones, despite the walks covering the same distance. (The more energy you expend, the more calories you can burn.) Basically, you may be able to rev up your metabolism and burn more calories if you do short bursts of walking versus longer cruises around. Albert Matheny, RD, CSCS, a co-founder of SoHo Strength Lab, says there's something to this. 'Getting activity throughout the day, in general, is better for people,' he says. 'It's better for circulation, mental health, and digestive health.' You're also more likely to have a faster pace when you do shorter bursts of walking than if you're going on, say, a five-mile walk, he points out. How many steps should I get per day? This is debatable, and research has shown that the often-quoted 10,000 steps a day may not be necessary. Instead, 7,500 steps or so is ideal—but everyone is different. If you've already been walking, Matheny says that aiming for 10,000 steps a day is great. But if not or if you don't have many opportunities to walk during your day, 7,500 steps may be a better goal. 'It's really about doing what you can,' he says. 'If you're not a big walker and you think, 'I don't want to walk five miles,' then just do 30-second bursts. It's more attainable.'DMX Comfort+ Sneaker $108.49 at 26 $109.95 at 2 $240.00 at You Might Also Like Jennifer Garner Swears By This Retinol Eye Cream These New Kicks Will Help You Smash Your Cross-Training Goals Solve the daily Crossword
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
RFK Jr. to Oust Advisory Panel on Cancer Screenings, WSJ Reports
Health and Human Services Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. plans to oust members of the advisory board that decides which preventive health measures are covered by insurance, the Wall Street Journal reported Friday. Kennedy is expected to remove the 16 members of the US Preventive Services Task Force because he views them as 'woke,' the Journal reported, citing sources familiar with the matter.
