Parking panic: Woman charged R110k for 2-hour parking at shopping mall
But even our most expensive car parks can't compare to what happened to a woman in the UK, who was charged more than R110,000 for a two-hour stop at a shopping centre. Yes, you read that right - R110,000.
As a Capetonian living in Blouberg, I find it baffling that one of our nearby centres charges more than the V&A Waterfront. While I love its open design and spacious feel, the steep parking fees always leave a sour taste.
If you've ever grumbled about paying R20 for a quick visit to your local shopping mall, you're not alone.
The incident, reported by the BBC, has sparked global attention and has many of us side-eyeing those mall exit barriers even more.
Ms Kava had taken her two daughters shopping after work on a Friday evening and decided to have dinner before heading home. When they returned to the parking area, the payment machines inside the centre were closed, so she opted to pay at the exit gate.
In a rush and with tired children in tow, she tapped her card at the boom gate and was prompted to enter her PIN. She didn't think much of it as the large display read '4,5', which she assumed meant £4.50 (R108).
So, when Yaditi Kava thought she was paying £4.50 (R108) for parking, she was instead charged £4,586, which is around R110,000
The barrier lifted, but her phone buzzed almost instantly with a payment notification that made her heart stop.
The error, she later learned, was due to a faulty card machine. The centre's managing company, Savills, described the incident as 'an isolated anomaly' and assured her a refund was being processed. But getting that money back wasn't straightforward.
It took Ms Kava three full weeks to recover the funds. During that time, she was left without the savings she had put aside for legal fees amidst a divorce, and even considered cancelling her daughter's birthday celebration due to the stress and financial strain.
Feeling desperate and getting nowhere with mall management, she contacted a UK consumer rights programme. According to her, 'It was a godsend - one call from the programme's host and the next day the money was in my bank.'
Savills told the BBC they had remained in regular contact with Ms Kava throughout and were investigating the system to prevent future mishaps.
While the incident happened in the UK, it hits close to home for many South Africans frustrated with mall parking fees. Whether it's R20 for two hours or a five-figure blunder, it raises a broader question - why do we put up with such inflated costs just to do our shopping?
Parking should feel like a service, not a penalty. And while Ms Kava's case may be rare, it's a reminder of how quickly a simple errand can spiral when systems fail, and just how important it is to check that machine before you tap.
IOL Lifestyle
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
4 hours ago
- IOL News
Apex Court's surprise ruling extends Makate's Please Call Me Battle
Nqolokazi Nomvalo ss Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. Image: Supplied FOR nearly two decades, South Africans have watched the legal saga between Vodacom and its former employee, Nkosana Makate, unfold like a courtroom drama with no final act. The latest twist, a unanimous Constitutional Court judgment handed down on Thursday, has reignited public interest and legal debate. In a development that stunned many legal observers and defied predictions of finality, the apex court has remitted the case back to the Supreme Court of Appeal. It will now be reconsidered by a freshly constituted bench. This move injects fresh uncertainty into a saga long believed to be approaching its conclusion. But what does this mean, and why does it matter? It is important to clarify that Makate's original idea was a simple yet powerful proposition: a mobile user with no airtime should be able to 'buzz' another user, prompting them to call back. Vodacom, recognising the creativity, developed the concept into the now-famous "Please Call Me" free message. This version allowed for costless transmission and universal utility. That difference matters, especially when assessing the various compensation models, which have ranged from employee-equivalent remuneration to revenue-sharing frameworks. The Supreme Court of Appeal had previously affirmed the Gauteng High Court's decision in Makate's favour and went further, controversially substituting its own compensation formula and awarding Makate 5 to 7.5 percent of Please Call Me revenue. Vodacom challenged this ruling, arguing that the SCA overstepped its bounds as an appellate court, particularly because Makate had not lodged a cross-appeal. The Constitutional Court, being the highest court in the land, granted Vodacom leave to appeal and upheld its challenge. Justice Mbuyiseli Madlanga, writing for a unanimous bench in what is widely regarded as his swan judgment before retirement, agreed. The Constitutional Court held that the SCA had impermissibly ventured into terrain that required a cross-appeal and had disregarded the true issues before it. This resulted in a failure of justice, specifically a breach of Vodacom's right to a fair public hearing as guaranteed under section 34 of the Constitution. The Constitutional Court has directed that the case return to the SCA, where a different panel of judges will now consider it afresh. It marks a rare judicial reset in a case that has already passed through every major court in the country. The legal significance of this moment cannot be overstated. The Constitutional Court has reinforced the boundaries of appellate authority and revived critical scrutiny around the quantum of fair compensation. The referral order compels the SCA to take a fresh look, with a new bench and a sharper lens, at the determination originally made by Vodacom's CEO. That figure was R47 million, reached after extensive modelling and expert input. It followed a failed negotiation between Makate, who proposed R20.2 billion, and Vodacom, which offered R10 million. Makate has challenged the CEO's determination as woefully low, especially in light of the widespread success of the Please Call Me service. Beyond the courtroom, this case has come to represent the struggle for equitable recognition of intellectual contributions, especially by employees in corporate ecosystems. The 'Please Call Me' litigation has gripped the public imagination. It's not just because of the staggering figures involved. It speaks to something profoundly South African: the courage to claim one's voice and the power of innovation born in unlikely places. As the legal process restarts again, one hopes that the eventual outcome will honour not just the merits of law but the deeper values it serves—justice, fairness, and transformative equity. That would be a fitting tribute to Justice Madlanga's legacy of principled clarity and constitutional fidelity. (Nomvalo is Head of Legal: Operations at Life Healthcare Group. She began her career in corporate litigation and commercial law at Cliffe Dekker Hofmeyr Inc. Her expertise also encompasses traditional arts, heritage preservation, transformation, and the promotion of women's and children's rights. Her views don't necessarily reflect those of the Sunday Tribune or Independent Media) SUNDAY TRIBUNE
The Citizen
4 hours ago
- The Citizen
Union expects ‘mass exodus' of pilots as 12-day Flysafair strike ends
A four-year deal was signed between Flysafair and the unionised pilots. The 12-day strike by FlySafair pilots has officially ended after a settlement agreement was reached, though concerns remain over a potential mass exodus of pilots. FlySafair confirmed on Friday that its management had signed a formal agreement with the trade union Solidarity through the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA). The pilots initiated the strike on 21 July, demanding salary adjustments and changes to their roster system, including flexible leave days. The strike disrupted flight schedules and impacted thousands of customers. ALSO READ: Here's how much FlySafair pilots are earning as increase offer rejected FlySafair had initially offered a 5.7% wage increase, claiming that the pilots already earned between R1.8 million and R2.3 million annually. However, the unionised pilots rejected the offer, first demanding a 10.5% increase before lowering it to 7%. As part of the agreement, pilots will now receive salary increases of 6%, 6.5%, 6.8%, and 6.9% over the next four years. Flysafair pilots strike ends FlySafair's Chief Marketing Officer, Kirby Gordon, expressed satisfaction with the 'constructive resolution' reached, which will help the airline resume full-capacity operations. 'The return of our full schedule will help bring much-needed capacity back to the market, which is essential to restoring fare equilibrium and making travel more affordable again for South Africans. 'The agreement marks the conclusion of a challenging but ultimately productive negotiation process,' Gordon said in a statement on Friday. READ MORE: FlySafair accuses rivals of safety violations amid investigations into its own near-crash incident The airline said that with all planes back in service and schedules back to normal, airfares should stabilise 'in the coming weeks' as more seats become available. Solidarity spokesperson Helgard Cronjé bemoaned that the mediation process came at a high cost and could have been resolved earlier. He also claimed that the new shift roster system will now be governed by fixed rules instead of 'soft rules', which previously allowed management to make arbitrary adjustments. Solidarity believes Flysafair strike could have been avoided Moreover, Solidarity Secretary-General Gideon du Plessis criticised the airline, saying the pilots were forced to strike for what they rightfully deserved. 'It's really bittersweet because you know, the things that we've settled on after 12 days of strike is what we've been asking for since February this year. 'It's just gobsmacked that the pilots had to go out on a 12 day strike to get just what they asked for,' he told SABC in an interview on Friday. Du Plessis detailed the new work-life balance provisions for pilots, explaining that the emloyees will now receive at least one 60-hour weekend off every six weeks. 'They will also have 10 guaranteed days off per month because remember they work any of the seven days of the week. READ MORE: Rostering issue at heart of pilot strike, says Solidarity 'They can also swap the day with another pilot, say for instance, there's a family commitment, they may be able to swap with another pilot, but also if they have to go and work on a legal off day, then they can get that off day back the following month. 'It's so ridiculous that they had to go and strike to get this. The company must have lost hundreds of millions of rands, while the pilots have lost 12 days of remuneration to get what we ask for.' Due to the 'no work, no pay' principle, the affected pilots will receive a one-off payment equal to 15% of their monthly salary. They may also cash in five leave days to help ease the financial impact. 'It's a bittersweet deal, but in the end it was like a silent or a non-violent revolt of the pilots because the company said they didn't want to listen to them,' Du Plessis continued. Pilots mass exodus? He also warned of possible long-term consequences to the airline's workforce. 'They are very angry, they are very disappointed in the company, were bullied, they were intimidated during the strike so what we expect is a mass exodus of pilots.' Du Plessis pointed out that major international carriers like Emirates are currently hiring, presenting potential opportunities for disillusioned FlySafair pilots. 'The company has got a serious problem because they're going to lose many pilots who are just purely disappointed and disgruntled,' he said. 'It's just very concerning what will happen next but at least, we've managed to solve the big issue and is to bring the strike and the lockout to an end. 'The pilots can return to work on Sunday but there's a serious relationship building that needs to happen immediately,' Du Plessis added. NOW READ: FlySafair under fire for offshore payouts amid staff wage freezes
The Citizen
5 hours ago
- The Citizen
Haven't filed your tax return yet? Here's how to avoid mistakes
Tax season does not have to be a stressful time if you approach it the right way and ensure you do not make common mistakes. It is tax season, which means it is time for taxpayers to stress about getting their tax return right to ensure they do not pay too much tax or too little and maybe, just maybe, get a few rands back from Sars. This year, Sars' tax systems and officials are expected to be more efficient and focused on collecting revenue, which means you must be sure you included everything in your return, tax manager at Allan Gray, Meagan Fraser, says. 'For the majority of South Africans, the reversal of the proposed 0.5% VAT increase earlier this year provided a sense of relief in terms of their monthly budgets. However, the loss of the anticipated revenue from this proposed increase resulted in a R75 billion shortfall in the national budget.' This, she points out, resulted in a renewed drive on the part of Sars to ensure that outstanding taxes are accurately and efficiently collected. 'Its efforts during tax-filing season will therefore be focused on taxpayer compliance and collecting outstanding taxes.' ALSO READ: Common pitfalls to avoid this tax season However, she says, this does not necessarily mean you will pay more tax. 'Sars cannot collect more tax from you than you owe. As a taxpayer, you have the right to consistent and impartial application of the law, but you also have the obligation to submit your return with complete and accurate information to Sars on time.' How to make sure your auto-assessment is correct However, not everyone has to submit a tax return. If you earn below R500 000 a year and have no deductions and only one employer, you are exempt from filing a tax return. According to Sars, 5.8 million taxpayers are auto-assessed this year, which means they do not have to prepare their own returns. However, she warns that you must still carefully check the assessment. 'Sars uses the data they received from employers, financial institutions and medical aid schemes to pre-populate amounts on behalf of taxpayers. 'The intention is to improve the accuracy and verifiability of the amounts completed on returns and to assist Sars in issuing estimated assessments for taxpayers who have relatively simple tax affairs.' Fraser says if you were auto-assessed, Sars will notify you via SMS or email. 'It is up to you to ensure that the information Sars used in your return is accurate and complete by cross-checking it against the tax certificates your service providers issued. 'If you disagree with any amounts Sars used, you must query the amounts directly with the relevant third-party data providers and request that they resubmit the corrected information to Sars.' This would be amounts such as your salary and medical aid payments. ALSO READ: Beware of these scams during tax season If you have any additional income or deductions not included in your return, you will have to add the relevant information manually. If you accept your auto-assessment, Sars will pay you any money it owes you within 72 hours. Getting your tax documents ready If you are not auto-assessed, you have to complete your tax return. The first step is to get your tax documents ready. Fraser says this include an IRP5 from your employer, an IT3(b), IT3(c), IT3(s) and a retirement annuity fund contribution certificate from your investment manager, your medical scheme tax certificate and proof of qualifying medical expenses, as well as documents related to any rental properties. 'Remember, you are required to keep copies of all supporting documents for five years from the date of submitting your return, as Sars may request these documents to verify the information you declared.' ALSO READ: Tax season: Here is why you need to prioritise filing for returns With tax season in full swing, Fraser urges taxpayers not to wait until the last moment to submit their return to avoid incurring penalties. 'It is important to ensure you comply by filing your income tax return accurately and by the set deadline, as well as settling any outstanding taxes in full and on time.' Most frequent error taxpayers make Adriana Taljaard, an accountant from AT Accounting & Taxation Solutions, who works with Procompare, an online platform that connects South Africans with local professionals, says the most frequent error taxpayers make is forgetting to add their medical-aid deductions. Procompare's analysis of thousands of requests for accountants reveals a key taxpayer challenge: Sars auto-assessments shows these key insights:
