
Shop worker who claimed he was left out of birthday whip-rounds loses racism claim
A shop worker who claimed racial discrimination saw him excluded as a recipient of workplace whip-rounds organised for those celebrating birthdays has lost his case.
'I never saw a foreigner get flowers or presents,' the worker told a tribunal last month.
The Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) has rejected a complaint under the Employment Equality Act 1998 by the worker, Artur Czopek, against TJX Ireland Unlimited in a decision published today.
The company, which trades under the TK Maxx brand, had denied allegations of discrimination, harassment and victimisation brought by Mr Czopek, a Polish man working as a part-time sales assistant at one of the firm's shops in Newbridge, Co Kildare since 2017.
Presenting his own case at a hearing last month, Mr Czopek told the tribunal that an assistant manager was in the practice of arranging voluntary collections among staff to go towards gifts to colleagues for birthdays or significant events at the store.
Mr Czopek said he contributed to these collections, but was 'never selected' on his birthday.
Stock image
Today's News in 90 Seconds - July 1st
'She always selected Irish employees, and at no time was a non-Irish national the beneficiary of a collection,' Mr Czopek told the WRC.
A document presented to the WRC by the employer set out 17 collections done at the workplace from 2020 onward, marking 11 birthdays and six work anniversaries. Gifts were given for 18th, 30th, 40th, 50th and 65th birthdays, and to mark increments of 5, 10 and 15 years' service, the tribunal was told.
Mr Czopek told the WRC that after complaining to the store manager, Scott Cooper in July or August 2024 he was assured the practice would cease, but it didn't.
Cross-examining the complainant, counsel for the respondent Tiernan Lowey BL, appearing instructed by Hayes Solicitors LLP, put it to Mr Czopek that the collections were only done to mark 'milestone birthdays or events'.
Mr Czopek said: 'I turned 40 and nothing happened. No, only selected people were receiving presents.'
However, he agreed that the practice of doing the whip-rounds only started in 2020 and that he turned 40 in 2019.
Mr Lowey put three examples of other workers at the store who got presents funded by the collections practice to Mr Czopek. These including a Latvian woman, a Polish woman, and a Russian man, he said.
'I don't deny these,' Mr Czopek said.
After complaining, Mr Czopek said, he found that his usual Sunday shifts were cut, he was given 'unusual work' and that it took longer to get approval for bathroom breaks.
Mr Czopek further alleged he was being harassed on the basis of his nationality by Mr Cooper during a four-week medical absence from work, when he was expected to report in weekly.
Mr Czopek also claimed that there were 'no foreigners' being employed at the store since May 2024, but later qualified his position and said that since Mr Cooper took over, 'less non-nationals are employed'.
Mr Cooper said hiring across all nationalities 'continues as normal' and denied that there was 'any fall-off in the recruitment of non-Irish nationals' since he took charge of the store.
In her decision, adjudicator Bríd Deering wrote: 'The evidence shows that the occasions celebrated are objectively understood as milestone events and the beneficiaries of the collections were of various nationalities, not just Irish employees.'
She wrote that Mr Czopek had failed to establish facts that would back up an inference of racial discrimination in connection with the practice of gift collections.
Ms Deering, accepted the company's position that all of Mr Czopek's complaints were 'assertions unsupported by evidence' and rejected his case in its entirety.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


RTÉ News
2 hours ago
- RTÉ News
Trump claims victory on trade - but EU had little choice
In many respects US President Donald Trump achieved his aims by introducing a swath of tariffs with America's main trading partners around the world. The European Union has a population of 448 million compared to the US which has 340 million. However, the US economy is larger. Many have been surprised at the way Donald Trump has appeared to be able to dictate terms to Europe. His announcement yesterday that he would commence the new tariff arrangements from 7 August appeared to be his decision with little input from the EU. President of the European Commission Ursula Von Der Leyen has defended the deal, which will see tariffs of 15% imposed on EU goods. There are two reasons why the EU did not want a full blown trade war with Mr Trump. Firstly, European businesses were opposed to a prolonged period of tit-for-tat tariffs with enormously damaging consequences. Secondly, if relations with Mr Trump soured, he could threaten to row back on defence commitments. The EU is highly reliant on the US for arm supplies, funding for NATO and military support for Ukraine. But looking at scale of tariffs imposed on other countries the EU's 15% does not seem too damaging compared to India's 25%, Canada's 35% and Switzerland's 39%. Most of the US' main trading partners have rates of 15% or 20%. The exception is the UK's 10% tariff. However, this is not an all-inclusive rate. In other words, other rates can be added to it. Nor does Britain have a written agreement capping pharmaceutical tariffs unlike the EU. It is worth bearing in mind that while tariffs on European goods go up, Mr Trump stated the EU would be "opening up their countries at zero tariffs" for US exports. Unanswered questions From the Irish point of view there are still many unanswered questions. There is no agreement on alcohol exports to the US. That sector was expected to be covered by a zero-for-zero tariff arrangement but that has not yet been confirmed. This is critical for Ireland's whiskey industry and the EU's wine exports. It seems clear that pharmaceuticals and computer chips will face tariffs of up to 15%, but the timing is still uncertain. Both are subject of so-called Section 232 investigations because Mr Trump believes the US' use of imports is a national security issue. Tánaiste Simon Harris said the tariffs for sectors under investigation will not become clear until those processes are concluded. For pharmaceuticals that is expected to happen in two weeks. But the fact that the EU-US agreement won't exceed 15% does provide some clarity for the industry. Bank of Ireland pointed out that drugs are relatively inelastic, which means if prices go up people still buy them because they are prescribed by doctors. The new swath of tariffs come at a time when the dollar has been weakening and making EU exports to the US more expensive at the worst possible time. Then there is the question of what this all means for the Irish economy. In March, the Department of Finance and the Economic Social Research Institute published research on the impact of tariffs on the Irish economy. It looks at a range of scenarios from tariffs of 10% to 25%. Based on that analysis, officials at the Department of Finance told business leaders yesterday that the economy would continue to expand, but at a slower pace than previously expected. Employment will grow but at a slower rate. The Government will now have to decide how all this will impact the Budget in October. But while Mr Trump may believe he has achieved his aims on tariffs, in the long run his actions carry the risk of higher inflation in the US and undermining the American economy.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Irish influencer ‘unaware of Central Bank probe' into promotion of unregulated offshore trading platform T4Trade
Irish influencer Jonathan Finlay has said he is 'not aware of any ongoing investigation by the Central Bank into his affairs' or his promotion of an unregulated trading platform.


Irish Independent
4 hours ago
- Irish Independent
Labels on ready meals don't tell the full story – so where does our food really come from?
Irish consumers are increasingly buying ready-made meals that can range from premium produce to high-fat, high-sugar, nutritionally poor offerings.