
Mitchell Johnson slams Cricket Australia CEO's proposal to limit Test cricket to fewer teams: ‘Not the solution to save the format'
Speaking to the BBC, Greenberg recently stressed that the expansion of the number of Test-playing nations was not a feasible option; rather the impetus must be enforced on marquee five-match series like the Ashes.
'I don't think everyone in world cricket needs to aspire to play test cricket, and that might be Ok. We're literally trying to send countries bankrupt if we force them to try to play test cricket. Scarcity in Test cricket is our friend, not our foe,' Greenberg had said.
'We need to make sure we invest in the right spaces to play Test cricket where it means something and has jeopardy. That's why the Ashes will be as enormous and profitable as it is — because it means something,' he added.
Writing in his column for the West Australian, Johnson slammed Greenberg's comments as grossly missing the point of expanding the cricketing landscape.
'He's (Greenberg) not wrong when he says it's under threat. He's not wrong when he says we need to think smart.
'But there's a line in there that stuck with me: 'I don't think everyone in world cricket needs to aspire to play Test cricket, and that might be OK…literally we're trying to send countries bankrupt if we force them to try to play Test cricket',' wrote Johnson.
'Here's the thing — if that's the fear, then we've already missed the point. The solution to saving Test cricket isn't to scale it down to three or four rich countries. It's to lift the rest up. Help them. Grow the game. Back them.
'This is where real leadership starts — not by pulling up the ladder, but by building a stronger base.'
'Because let's be clear: these nations want to play Test cricket. The players want it. The fans want it. So why are we making it so hard?' Johnson added.
Johnson also highlighted the need for accountability from the Big Three powers, urging them to not merely blanket the cricket calendar.
'I don't have all the answers, that's not in my pay grade, but I can say from an ex-player's point of view that we need as many countries playing Test cricket as possible. If it wasn't for Test cricket and its initial financial support, we don't see Twenty20 cricket like it is today.
'The big three — India, England and Australia — have the money, the reach, the leverage. So don't just dominate the schedule — shape it.
'We talk about 'meaningful' Test matches. Well, meaning doesn't come from a marketing department — it comes from what it represents. A Sri Lanka v Pakistan series might not break streaming records, but to the players, the fans and the groundsmen who spend months preparing that pitch — it means everything,' the 2013 Ashes hero pleaded.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
17 minutes ago
- India Today
Stop hoarding privilege: Johnson slams Cricket Australia CEO's take on lesser Tests
Former Australian pacer Mitchell Johnson has criticised Cricket Australia CEO Todd Greenberg's remarks suggesting that the future of Test cricket lies in reducing the number of nations competing in the format. Greenberg recently argued that Test matches should be limited to the top teams to maintain financial stability and ensure 'quality' claimed that forcing smaller boards to play the five-day format could drive them towards bankruptcy, suggesting that 'scarcity in Test cricket is our friend, not our foe.' He pointed to the Ashes as an example of how meaningful rivalries between elite nations remain however, strongly disagreed, stating that cutting back opportunities for developing nations would damage the very fabric of the game. Writing in his column for the West Australian, he argued that leadership lies in lifting others up rather than shutting them out. 'The solution isn't to scale Test cricket down to three or four rich countries,' Johnson wrote. 'It's to help the rest grow. Players want it, fans want it — so why are we making it so hard? What these nations lack isn't passion, it's support. And if the ICC and the so-called big three want to protect the future, they need to stop hoarding the privilege and start sharing the responsibility.'He stressed that the meaning of Test cricket is not determined by broadcasting revenue but by national pride. 'A Sri Lanka v Pakistan series might not break streaming records, but to the players and fans it means everything. You don't protect that by cutting it off. You protect it by investing in it.'Johnson also highlighted the irony of Test cricket being labelled 'too expensive,' while money continues to pour into new T20 leagues worldwide. He pointed out that South Africa, the reigning World Test champions, do not have a single home Test scheduled this summer, calling it a sign of misplaced priorities.'The money is there — it's just being pointed the wrong way,' Johnson wrote. He suggested that a share of revenue from major Test series should be reinvested into grassroots cricket, coaching and infrastructure across call was clear: Test cricket's future will not be saved by restricting it to a few. Instead, it requires shared responsibility, fair investment and a commitment to ensuring that all cricketing nations have the opportunity to play the format that remains the ultimate test of skill and character.- EndsMust Watch


Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
Shoaib Bashir unfazed by Nathan Lyon's ‘just okay' comment: ‘I just stick to what I believe'
England off-spinner Shoaib Bashir shrugged off the comment made by Australian spinner Nathan Lyon on him and said he is unfazed by Lyon's assessment of him and still remains a big admirer of the Aussie veteran. Lyon stated that Jack Leach is still England's best spinner and took a jibe at Bashir, saying he just 'has been okay'. Bashir said he has enjoyed Lyon's bowling: 'I've never crossed paths with him but I have been watching him since I was young. I do enjoy the way he bowls, especially his overspin, it's a great asset he has, and the amount of revs he puts on the ball. He's someone I've been looking at for a while now.' With 562 wickets in 139 Tests, Lyon has been one of the finest spinners not only for Australia but for this generation. He will also lead the spin attack at the highly anticipated Ashes against England, set to happen later this year. Bashir is yet to play a Test in Australia but has experience of playing in Down Under as he played five matches for England Lions in 2024 where he managed just four wickets. However, having worked under Graeme Swann there, Bashir feels better prepared for the experience. 'I learned you do get bounce but you've got to find a way to use that,' Bashir said of his time in Australia. 'I've got height but there's more than just height to extract bounce from the wicket. Just small technical things. It's just (about) nailing what I do best. If you look at my attributes – I'm tall and try to put as many revs on the ball as I can, with that comes variations. I'm still learning, still quite young, I'm still trying develop my game and better myself day-by-day. That will never stop. I love talking about the game and I love learning,' he added.


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
'If we leave Tests to wealthy, it dies a slow death': Former Australia pacer Mitchell Johnson
Mitchell Johnson (Photo by) Former Australian fast bowler Mitchell Johnson has criticised Cricket Australia CEO Todd Greenberg's recent statements about Test cricket's future. Johnson disagrees with Greenberg's view that not all countries need to aspire to play Test cricket or bear its financial losses. Test cricket, the traditional five-day format of the sport, faces challenges due to its high costs. With declining attendance and shorter attention spans, cricket boards with limited resources are struggling to maintain the format. A proposed solution, supported by Johnson, suggests dividing Test cricket into two tiers. The top tier would include wealthy nations like India, England, and Australia, while other countries would compete in the second tier. This system would include promotion and relegation between tiers. Go Beyond The Boundary with our YouTube channel. SUBSCRIBE NOW! "Here's the thing — if that's the fear, then we've already missed the point. The solution to saving Test cricket isn't to scale it down to three or four rich countries. It's to lift the rest up. Help them. Grow the game. Back them," Johnson wrote in his column for The West Australian . "This is where real leadership starts — not by pulling up the ladder, but by building a stronger base. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Back Pain Treatments That Might Surprise You! Back Pain Treatment | Search Ads Undo Because let's be clear: these nations want to play Test cricket. The players want it. The fans want it. So why are we making it so hard? I've been to countries where cricket isn't backed by billion-dollar TV deals — but the passion is still there." Johnson suggests that instead of financial support alone, the Big Three nations should provide guidance and physical presence to smaller cricket boards. This assistance would help develop the game from grassroots level and engage audiences effectively. "Because here's the reality: if we only leave Test cricket to the wealthy, it dies a slow death. Fans see through that. Players lose hope. And one by one, countries quietly drift towards the formats that pay quicker and hurt less. West Indies cricket has been an example of this. But Test cricket is supposed to hurt. It's supposed to demand more. That's the beauty of it. You don't earn a baggy green or a Test cap because you've bowled four overs, including a couple in the powerplay. " "You earn it over years — through bruises, setbacks, second-innings spells in 40C heat when your body says no and your heart says yes. And that feeling isn't exclusive to Australia or India or England. It lives in the soul of every young cricketer from all parts of the world. The only difference is opportunity." Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!