
Water watchdog under fire: Just five inspections in North West for two trillion litres of allocations
A scathing report released on Wednesday by the Office of the Auditor General found the government agency in charge of monitoring licence holders was not doing 'anywhere near enough' to protect water resources across WA and could not be confident licence holders weren't taking water illegally.
The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (DWER) is tasked with monitoring more than 12,000 water licences across WA.
The licences are used for everyday life, industry, mining and agriculture, with 78 per cent of all water used across the State drawn from underground aquifers.
These free licences allow for the extraction of more than four trillion litres of water annually — enough water to fill more than 1.7 million Olympic swimming pools.
In the North West there are 907 licences for a combined water entitlement of 2045 gigalitres, or two trillion litres.
But only five on-ground inspections were held in the North West between 2021 and 2024.
In the Ord River Irrigation Area, DWER failed to follow the recommendations of its own specialists who determined that based on scientific evidence and research, 10 per cent of licensees should be inspected annually.
Auditor General Caroline Spencer found that while DWER carried out more than 2000 compliance activities a year, that number had decreased over the past three years and most activities were desktop reviews of unverified meter readings and information reported by licence holders.
On-ground inspections also decreased, dropping State-wide by 67 per cent between July 1, 2021, and June 30, 2024.
Ms Spencer said despite increasing demand for water and a drying climate, DWER couldn't be confident that licence holders were meeting their licence conditions and that water was being extracted appropriately.
'This audit shows that DWER is not doing anywhere near enough to adequately protect our water resources, with compliance activities in recent years reactive and ad hoc,' she said.
'Poor management, over-extraction and illegal taking of water all threaten the long-term sustainability of our groundwater supplies and creates an uneven playing field for operators who are doing the right thing.
'As regulator, DWER has a critical role to ensure those licensed to extract and use water comply with their licence conditions.'
Reports by the OAG in 2003 and 2009 also found the regulator's monitoring of water use in WA was not sufficient to ensure the resource was not being taken illegally.
The report noted DWER had few staff to carry out on-ground inspections and while some compliance activities were performed by licensing officers, there were only seven dedicated compliance officers.
In a response to the findings, DWER said it welcomed the report, would review its findings and implement improvements.
It said the audit was held during a transitional period for its water assurance activities and while improvements were under way.
'An increase in enforcement activity under the Rights in Water and Irrigation Act 1914, including the issuing of daily penalty notices, resulted in record fines for water assurance enforcement activities in 2024,' it said.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sydney Morning Herald
4 days ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Olympic organisers win 2032 trademark battle with local council
Brisbane's Olympic Games organising committee faced an unexpected challenge in their bid to protect Games branding when a local council beat them to the trademark for 'Logan 2032' by just 13 days, before ultimately pulling out of the race. The Brisbane 2032 Organising Committee and Logan City Council both applied to IP Australia to claim variations of 'Logan 2032' as a trademark earlier this year. Logan 2032 is one of 14 location-based trademarks the organising committee is trying to protect, along with others such as Cairns 2032, Toowoomba 2032 and Rockhampton 2032 – all locations where Olympic and Paralympic competition is to be held. Brisbane 2032 was granted protection in January 2023. The council, meanwhile, sought to trademark a nondescript 'LOGAN2032' logo, in the same font as its main corporate branding. The council's application was made on April 29, with the organising committee's application 13 days later on May 12 – an application IP Australia examiner Lucy Raftery cited in her initial rejection of the organising committee's request. 'I have considered the differences between the trade marks, this being the lack of space between Logan and 2032 in the earlier trade mark. These differences, however, in the context of the goods and services claimed, are not sufficient to prevent confusion in the marketplace,' Raftery wrote in IP Australia's June 17 letter to Allens Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys, who were representing Brisbane 2032. 'As such, consumers are likely to assume that the goods and services provided under your trade mark and the earlier trade marks come from the same, or related, trade source.' Losing that administrative race had the potential to derail the organising committee's plans, but a Logan City Council spokeswoman confirmed the municipality would withdraw its bid. 'Council initially lodged an application earlier this year to safeguard the term for potential future promotional use, and to help position the city's interests in the lead-up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games,' she said.

The Age
4 days ago
- The Age
Olympic organisers win 2032 trademark battle with local council
Brisbane's Olympic Games organising committee faced an unexpected challenge in their bid to protect Games branding when a local council beat them to the trademark for 'Logan 2032' by just 13 days, before ultimately pulling out of the race. The Brisbane 2032 Organising Committee and Logan City Council both applied to IP Australia to claim variations of 'Logan 2032' as a trademark earlier this year. Logan 2032 is one of 14 location-based trademarks the organising committee is trying to protect, along with others such as Cairns 2032, Toowoomba 2032 and Rockhampton 2032 – all locations where Olympic and Paralympic competition is to be held. Brisbane 2032 was granted protection in January 2023. The council, meanwhile, sought to trademark a nondescript 'LOGAN2032' logo, in the same font as its main corporate branding. The council's application was made on April 29, with the organising committee's application 13 days later on May 12 – an application IP Australia examiner Lucy Raftery cited in her initial rejection of the organising committee's request. 'I have considered the differences between the trade marks, this being the lack of space between Logan and 2032 in the earlier trade mark. These differences, however, in the context of the goods and services claimed, are not sufficient to prevent confusion in the marketplace,' Raftery wrote in IP Australia's June 17 letter to Allens Patent & Trade Mark Attorneys, who were representing Brisbane 2032. 'As such, consumers are likely to assume that the goods and services provided under your trade mark and the earlier trade marks come from the same, or related, trade source.' Losing that administrative race had the potential to derail the organising committee's plans, but a Logan City Council spokeswoman confirmed the municipality would withdraw its bid. 'Council initially lodged an application earlier this year to safeguard the term for potential future promotional use, and to help position the city's interests in the lead-up to the Brisbane 2032 Olympic and Paralympic Games,' she said.

Sydney Morning Herald
05-08-2025
- Sydney Morning Herald
‘Heavier and dark': Powerhouse Museum rebuild accused of trashing heritage significance
The National Trust has slammed last-minute changes to the $300 million Powerhouse redevelopment at Ultimo, saying they would effectively void a key part of the museum's heritage significance. The City of Sydney also objected to the planned 'total destruction and rebuilding' of the 1988-built Wran Building and bricking up of the museum's light-filled galleria. It warned the new museum would open with far less exhibition space – a loss of 1000sqm, about the equivalent of an Olympic sized swimming pool – and result in a 'heavier and darker' experience inside. 'The resulting building must now be considered – especially for the cost that will be outlaid – a compromised work of architecture, based as it is on recreating a series of shapes, rather than being based on museum functionality and display,' the National Trust's conservation director David Burdon said. 'It is not a good heritage outcome.' The state government appointed construction giant Richard Crookes in July to revamp the museum, which has been closed since February 2024. Loading Staircases, internal walls and mezzanines will be stripped out within the heritage-listed Boiler House, Engine House, Power House and Turbine Hall, new commercial creative studios built along Harris Street next to a 'cloister garden' on the bare forecourt, and a new entrance oriented to the Haymarket-facing Goods Line. On late advice from builders, and contrary to commitments Town Hall said it received, Infrastructure NSW now wants to replace the steel-ribbed structure forming the museum's specially built galleria that has long served as its entrance and display hall for the Locomotive No.1 and Boulton & Watt steam engine, priceless relics of the industrial age.