HC rejects plea on law colleges' irregularities
MUMBAI: The Bombay high court on Thursday dismissed a public interest litigation (PIL) seeking strict enforcement of the 75% attendance rule for law students in the colleges affiliated to the University of Mumbai (MU). The court refused to entertain the PIL, highlighting a lack of details to support the petitioner's claims.
The petition, filed by Sharmila Ghuge, an assistant professor at SVKM's Jitendra Chauhan College of Law, highlighted Ordinance 6086 of MU, which mandates a minimum attendance of 75% during lectures, practical sessions, and tutorials for all students. According to the rules, a student with attendance below 75% is not permitted to appear for examinations.
However, Ghuge's petition claimed that law colleges under MU aren't following this rule at present. She alleged that the attendance of most students is considerably lower, ranging between 0% to 30%. The primary reason behind this subpar attendance, according to Ghuge, is students securing internships and even employment while pursuing their law degrees. She claimed that colleges do not act against such students, which encourages them to further seek employment.
The petition, filed through advocate Shyam Devani, demanded that the Bar Council of India (BCI) and the University Grant Commission (UGC) take the appropriate disciplinary action against students and institutions found violating the attendance requirements in order to maintain the quality of legal education.
Ghuge also offered a few suggestions to the court, such as issuing a circular ordering colleges to comply with the attendance ordinance, having transparency in the defaulters list, and monitoring internship periods. She alleged that multiple students with 0% attendance are still allowed to appear for their semester examinations, against the rules.
'Such a system is in place for many years, which has decayed the teaching and learning process. It is totally against the high hopes of qualitative education and the future of the legal system of this country', she argued.
However, the division bench of chief justice Alok Aradhe and justice MS Karnik dismissed the petition, observing the lack of structured details in support of the allegations put forth.
'We find that the petitioner has not given any particulars of the colleges nor the students who are being allowed to appear in exams without following the mandatory attendance,' the bench stated. It highlighted that Ghuge, being an employee at a law college under MU, has failed to present data even about her own college and has not named any student who has attended exams without complying with the mandatory attendance rules.
Mandating the need to present concrete information backing the issue, the court granted Ghuge the liberty to file a fresh petition after gathering the relevant information to support her allegations.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
21 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Crorepati' husband must pay ₹1 cr to abused wife: Court
MUMBAI: The sessions court recently increased the compensation given to a woman in a domestic violence case from ₹5 lakh to ₹1 crore after noticing that her husband and in-laws were multimillionaires. Setting aside the order of a magistrate court, the additional sessions judge said that the compensation amount had to be substantially enhanced so as to compensate her for 20 years of torture and economic abuse. The woman had approached the court claiming she was subjected to years of domestic violence and torture by her husband and in-laws after getting married in December 1997. She said that her husband used to beat her and threaten her with dire consequences if she revealed it to anyone. The petitioner also claimed that she had suffered a miscarriage in the early years of their marriage due to pressure from her in-laws to conceive a son. After giving birth to a girl and two boys, she said her husband and in-laws only cared about her sons and used to mistreat her daughter. However, she continued with the marriage for the sake of her children, she added. The woman, a homemaker, also alleged that she was given a fixed amount to run the household, and her husband would beat her if she failed to account for the expenses. Further, she said that her husband sold a private company, in which she was also a director, without her knowledge and used the money to buy a flat. Despite having a share in the sale proceeds, her husband did not give her any money, she alleged. In November 2016, the woman's husband allegedly stopped giving her any money for household expenses and for the expenses of their daughter, prompting her to file a complaint under the Domestic Violence Act. An FIR was registered against her husband that same month. However, the magistrate court granted her a compensation of only ₹5 lakh, which she said was too meagre. She then approached the sessions court, arguing for higher compensation. Her petition said that her husband and his family own businesses and several flats in Mumbai, a bungalow in Kharghar, houses in Lonavala and a factory in Navi Mumbai. In response, her husband and in-laws alleged that the woman had the capacity to earn since she was a textile engineering graduate from the University of Mumbai. The sessions court ruled in favour of the woman, saying that 'having the capacity to earn by itself cannot result in the rejection of any claim of maintenance by a complainant who is subjected to domestic violence at the hands of her husband'. The court said it had been proven that the woman was subjected to economic abuse and domestic violence at the hands of the respondents. It added that her husband and his parents had the capacity to spend more than ₹1 crore to purchase land and a flat in Kharghar in 2012, and currently run an elevator company. This was 'a clear reflection of their sound financial status as also the fact of they belonging to the class commonly known as crorepatis,' the court said, adding that the woman and her daughter were also entitled to enjoy the same standard of living. The sessions court, thereby, set aside the magistrate court's order, observing that granting the woman a compensation of ₹5 lakh 'is too meagre an amount'. Observing that the woman's daughter is studying in an international school, the court said she was entitled to a maintenance of ₹1 lakh per month. It also restrained her husband and in-laws from evicting the woman and her daughter from the shared household.
Time of India
28-05-2025
- Time of India
Will ask UK for Savarkar's barrister degree: CM
Mumbai: The state govt will make efforts to get Savarkar's barrister degree from England, said CM Devendra Fadnavis on Tuesday. Fadnavis said due to his revolutionary work and actions against their rule, the British took away his barrister's degree. "The university should prepare a detailed proposal to get this degree back. The state govt will correspond with the relevant institutions in England in this regard and will make efforts to give him the barrister's degree posthumously," he said at the virtual inauguration of Swatantryaveer Vinayak Damodar Savarkar Study and Research Centre at Mumbai University (MU). Fadnavis said Savarkar completed his law education at Gray's Inn in London, but was denied the title of barrister as he refused to pledge allegiance to the British crown. "That was not just an injustice to his intellect but a testament to his unwavering patriotism." Criticising those who call Savarkar "maafi veer", the CM challenged his opponents to spend 11 hours in Savarkar's isolation cell. "I will give you a Padma Shri... Swatantryaveer Savarkar was a barrister, and when he filed an application, it would be written 'yours sincerely', which is written even today, and concluding he sought forgiveness is wrong." MU has proposed a grant of Rs 100 crore for developing the research centre at its Kalina campus. tnn
Hindustan Times
28-05-2025
- Hindustan Times
Maharashtra to seek restoration of Savarkar's barrister degree
MUMBAI: In a significant move to honour the legacy of Vinayak Damodar Savarkar, the state government has announced that it will initiate formal efforts to restore his barrister degree, which had been withheld by the British authorities due to his active participation in India's freedom struggle. Chief minister Devendra Fadnavis made this announcement on the eve of the virtual inauguration of the Swatantryaveer Savarkar Study and Research Centre at the University of Mumbai's Fort campus. The event was presided over by Governor C P Radhakrishnan. 'Savarkar completed his law education from Gray's Inn in London but was denied the title of Barrister since he refused to pledge allegiance to the British Crown,' said Fadnavis. 'This was not just an injustice to his intellect but a testament to his unwavering patriotism. The state government will now begin correspondence with the British government to reclaim his degree with due respect.' Fadnavis directed the university to prepare a detailed dossier to support this initiative. The varsity, in turn, has proposed a grant of ₹100 crore for developing the research centre on its Kalina campus. The centre will focus on academic research into Savarkar's writings, speeches and revolutionary contributions. The newly launched centre aims to become a national hub for scholarly dialogue on Savarkar's ideology, exploring his views on nationalism, scientific thought, social reform and literature. It will offer certificate, diploma, undergraduate, postgraduate, and doctoral programmes. The campus will also feature a statue, a dedicated museum housing rare photographs and handwritten documents, and a 500- to 1,000-seat auditorium for events. Speaking at the inauguration, vice-chancellor Ravindra Kulkarni announced another initiative inspired by Savarkar's linguistic passion. 'In the next two years, all science and technology textbooks will be translated into Marathi through this centre,' he said. 'Savarkar believed in linguistic pride, and this project will carry forward that vision.' Savarkar, known as a poet, historian and social reformer, opposed caste discrimination and religious orthodoxy. 'He considered untouchability a sin and a blot on humanity. He fought for temple entry rights for Dalits,' said Governor Radhakrishnan. He also noted that Dr B R Ambedkar had praised Savarkar's commitment to social equality. The event was attended by higher and technical education minister Chandrakant Patil, cultural affairs minister Ashish Shelar, MLAs Atul Bhatkhalkar and Parag Alvani, pro-vice chancellor Ajay Bhamre, registrar Prasad Karande and other dignitaries. Patil announced that Savarkar's statue would also be erected in the centre, and space had been made available for this.
