Air India crew surprises Shashi Tharoor with touching note on Kochi flight, earns Congress MP's 'Shabhash'
Tharoor took to X to give a shout out to his 'favourite' airline Air India, praising the company for its 'marvellous handling in monsoon weather,' and also appreciated the pilots for a 'smooth takeoff and landing.'
'What a joy it always is to fly Air India! The service is outstanding. And the team on my flight to Kochi today not only surprised me with this wonderful note but asked for a photo too! (Thanks, too, to the pilots for the smooth takeoff and landing, marvellous handling in monsoon weather and a ten-minutes early arrival on a wet runway… Shabash to my favourite airline!)" the Congress MP posted on X. Shashi Tharoor's post on X
He also posted a picture of the handwritten note he received from the airline's crew, along with a photo with them – taken in the flight. Air India crew's note to Shashi Tharoor
Shashi Tharoor's big shoutout for the Tata group airline comes amid US media reports on the ongoing investigations into the Air India plane crash in Ahmedabad that killed 241 people on board.
On Thursday, July 17, the Wall Street Journal revealed the final exchange between the two pilots – captain Sumeet Sabharwal and first officer Clive Kunder – pointing to possible pilot error as a key factor in the deadly crash.
The report also cited some persons familiar with the American probe.
Following the report, Federation of Indian Pilots (FIP) initiated a legal action through a formal notice to The Wall Street Journal and Reuters, and also sought an official apology.
Earlier, the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) had rubbished the Wall Street Journal report on the Blackbox recording of dialogue between the Air India flight 171's two pilot before the crash, terming it as 'selective and unverified' reporting.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
26 minutes ago
- The Hindu
When DMK opposed a Vice-President candidate from Tamil Nadu 41 years ago
Shortly after the BJP-led NDA fielded Maharashtra Governor and former Coimbatore MP C.P. Radhakrishnan as its candidate for the upcoming polls for the post of Vice-President, several political party leaders, including AIADMK leader Edappadi K. Palaniswami and TMC (Moopanar) leader G.K. Vasan, had appealed to parties in Tamil Nadu to sink differences and back his candidature. The last time a candidate hailing from Tamil Nadu was fielded for the post was 41 years ago – when R. Venkataraman entered the fray. However, now, the Opposition INDIA bloc, of which the ruling DMK in Tamil Nadu is a constituent, has announced former Supreme Court judge B. Sudarshan Reddy, who hails from Telangana, as their nominee to take on Mr Radhakrishnan. While Mr. Radhakrishnan's victory is likely guaranteed on account of the NDA's numbers in both Houses of Parliament, the DMK and its allies shall be opposing the 'son of the soil' for political reasons. However, such a stand is not new for the Dravidian party. On August 1, 1984, the Congress (I) Parliamentary board formally nominated R. Venkataraman, who was serving as the Defence Minister in Prime Minister Indira Gandhi's Cabinet, for the office of Vice-President of India. He had earlier served as a Minister holding various portfolios in Madras State, playing an instrumental role in the State's industrialisation. A report published in The Hindu on August 2, 1984, said that after nominating Venkataraman, also called R.V., Indira Gandhi apprised Satyasadan Chakraborty, the CPI(M) leader in the Lok Sabha, of the views of the Congress board members. The CPI(M) leader, in turn, informed his colleagues in the Opposition about the ruling party's decision, as the Prime Minister had sought their support to ensure Venkataraman's election by consensus, even though the Congress nominee could win comfortably on the party's own strength. Referring to the archival reports of Murasoli, the DMK's mouthpiece, R. Kannan, the author of The DMK Years and biographer of Dravidian stalwarts C.N. Annadurai and M.G. Ramachandran, noted that failing to achieve consensus, leaders of the Opposition parties, including Era. Mohan of the DMK, Atal Bihari Vajpayee of the BJP and Indrajit Gupta of the CPI convened a meeting on August 2, 1984, and decided to field B.C. Kamble, a former MP from the Republican Party, was their joint candidate, fully realising that the contest would only be token in nature. Mr. Chakraborty said the Opposition had nothing personal against R.V. but regretted that the Prime Minister had not followed the procedure of choosing a candidate on the basis of all-party consensus. The Opposition was keen that a member of the weaker sections be given an opportunity to occupy the post of Vice-President, The Hindu reported. Despite not being a part of the Congress-led alliance in the Parliamentary elections in 1980, the AIADMK, which eventually showed signs of moving closer towards the Congress in the early 1980s, supported R.V.'s candidature for the Vice-President post. The election held on August 22, 1984, ended as expected with R.V. defeating Kamble by a comfortable margin. In a statement, Chief Minister M.G. Ramachandran (MGR) thanked Indira Gandhi, saying, 'I am happy that Mr. R. Venkataraman has been elected Vice-President of the Indian Republic. You made it possible by enabling a Tamilian to contest the election and to win it. On behalf of the people and the Government of Tamil Nadu and on my own behalf, I express my sincere thanks to you for having fulfilled a long-cherished wish of the people of Tamil Nadu.' Three years later, when the Congress nominated R.V., the incumbent Vice-President, for the post of President, the AIADMK, by then in alliance with the Congress, backed him. The Opposition parties convened a meeting in New Delhi and unanimously decided to field eminent jurist V.R. Krishna Iyer for the top post. Even this time, the DMK opposed R.V.'s candidature and backed the Opposition as it was part of it. R.V. comfortably won the elections and went on to become the eighth President of India. Chief Minister MGR, in a statement, congratulated R.V. and said, 'Your election to the highest office of the Indian Republic is thus a natural culmination of your eventful public life and is a most fitting tribute to your selfless service. It is a matter of supreme pride for the people of Tamil Nadu, and I am profoundly happy in sharing this pride with them.' The DMK President M. Karunanidhi, in a telegram to R.V., said, 'Please accept my hearty congratulations on your election as the President of India.' AIADMK, DMK both backed Kalam In 2002, when the BJP-led NDA proposed the name of A.P.J. Abdul Kalam, an eminent scientist and native of Tamil Nadu, for the post of President of India, both the ruling AIADMK and the DMK rallied behind him. The DMK was then a key constituent of the NDA. Despite not being a part of the combine, AIADMK supremo and Chief Minister Jayalalithaa described Kalam as the ideal choice and said her party was happy to extend support. In a statement, she said Prime Minister Atal Bihari Vajpayee had spoken to her over the phone about Kalam's candidature. 'I told him that I was delighted with the choice…. Apart from the fact that Dr. Kalam is an eminent and internationally renowned scientist who is respected all over the world, it is a matter of great pride and happiness for the AIADMK that he belongs to Tamil Nadu,' The Hindu reported on June 12, 2002, quoting Jayalalithaa. A report published in this daily on June 16, 2002, noted how the DMK too welcomed Kalam's nomination. Reacting to the Left's contention that Kalam lacked political experience and knowledge of the Constitution, DMK president M. Karunanidhi said political experience was not listed as a necessary qualification for the post of the President of India. Comparing Kalam to former Presidents S. Radhakrishnan and Zakir Hussain, Karunanidhi said all three were eminent in their fields. 'In the current situation, a non-political, secular, non-partisan person like Dr. Kalam was best suited for the role,' he said. On July 18, 2002, the 71-year-old scientist was elected as the President of India. With the support of the NDA, the Congress, the Telugu Desam Party and the Samajwadi Party, Kalam secured nearly 90% of the valid votes against his sole rival Captain Lakshmi Sahgal. After his victory, Kalam addressed his critics who had doubted his suitability for the presidency because of his lack of political background. 'I have been working from 1982 onwards directly with the Government, whether it be related to research, launch vehicles or nuclear programmes. Unless political decisions are taken, satellites will not be in orbit. Political decisions are vital for the success of any programme. I have worked with six Prime Ministers, I know how to handle politics,' a report published in The Hindu on July 19, 2002, quoted Kalam.
Mint
26 minutes ago
- Mint
Trump slapped India with 50% tariff to put ‘secondary pressure' on Russia: White House
President Donald Trump's decision to raise tariffs on India was aimed at discouraging Russia from continuing its war in Ukraine, White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt said on Tuesday. The move was designed to put secondary pressure on Moscow, she explained during a press briefing Trump has effectively doubled India's tariff burden to 50 percent by adding an extra 25 percent on top of the earlier 25 percent levy. "Look, the president has put tremendous public pressure to bring this war to a close. He's taken actions, as you've seen, sanctions on India and other actions as well. He's made himself very clear that he wants to see this war end, and he has scoffed at the ideas of others that have been raised that we should wait another month before any meeting takes place," she said. Trump met Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky at the White House on Monday and last week he had also met with President Putin. Both have signalled that they are open to start direct talks. Leavitt further said that Trump wishes to bring peace as soon as possible. "The president wants to move and he wants to bring this war to an end as quickly as possible... With all of those European leaders leaving the White House, including the NATO Secretary General, they all agree that this is a great first step. And it's a good thing that these two leaders are going to be sitting down together, and the president expects that to happen," she said. Leavitt further said, "I can assure you that the United States government and the Trump administration are working with both Russia and Ukraine to make that bilateral happen as we speak." Leavitt said that Trump's relentless efforts at brokering peace led to the European leaders being present at the White House within 48 hours of his meeting with Putin. "The President met with all of these European leaders at the White House 48 hours after sitting down with President Putin on American soil. In fact, there was so much progress in the readout that was given to these European leaders immediately following his meeting with President Putin that every single one of them got on a plane 48 hours later and flew to the United States of America," she said. "So these leaders who this war is in their backyard are very grateful that the president took that call and that he was there to provide them with a readout of Russia's thinking on this, something that was not done by the previous administration at all," she added. In response to a reporter's question, Leavitt reiterated that the war would not have broken out had Trump been in office. "The president often says that this war would not have started if he were in office and and Putin confirmed that," the reporter asked. "True. Do you accept that as true? The European leaders do. Well, and President Putin himself said that, by the way," Leavitt said. Trump has repeatedly stated that the war wouldn't have started if he were in office, and surprisingly, Putin seems to agree. When asked about this, Leavitt confirmed that Putin did indeed say that.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
26 minutes ago
- First Post
Trump rules out deploying US troops in Ukraine under security guarantees
The US president, however, said that Washington is ready to provide air support to Kyiv in an attempt to play by the security guarantees deal. This would still be a major shift in his administration's policy on the conflict US President Donald Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy walk during a meeting, amid negotiations to end the Russian war in Ukraine, at the White House in Washington, D.C., US, on Monday. Reuters File US President Donald Trump has ruled out sending troops to Ukraine as part of security guarantees agreed upon in the White House, a move that was described as a significant breakthrough by European leaders. When asked during a phone interview with Fox News whether he could assure listeners, particularly his MAGA supporters who favour an isolationist, America-first foreign policy, that the US would not deploy troops to Ukraine, Trump responded: 'You have my assurance, and I'm president.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD He, however, said that Washington is ready to provide air support to Kyiv in an attempt to play by the security guarantees deal. This would still be a major shift in his administration's policy on the conflict. Meanwhile, Russia has warned that the deployment of Nato troops to Ukraine would be a red line in any negotiations. However, on Tuesday, Trump brushed off those concerns and expressed continued optimism about the possibility of reaching a deal with Putin. What do the security agreements entail? Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that he discussed Ukraine's plans to purchase $90 billion in American weapons through European funding during his meeting with Trump and European leaders at the White House. According to a report by the Financial Times, the security guarantees include a $50bn deal to produce drones with Ukrainian companies. A document of the guarantees does not mention which weapons Kyiv intends to procure; however, Ukraine has been clear about its intentions to purchase at least 10 US-made Patriot air defence systems. The document of the security guarantees, as seen by FT, also highlights 'lasting peace shall be based not on concessions and free gifts to Putin, but on [a] strong security framework that will prevent future aggression'. It adds that recent footage aired by Russian media suggests the Kremlin is not serious about pursuing a peace deal and holds a dim view of Trump's leadership, pointing to disparaging remarks about the US president made by prominent television host Vladimir Solovyov. UK offers air support to Ukraine The head of the British armed forces is set to inform his US counterparts that the UK is willing to deploy troops to help defend Ukraine's airspace and maritime borders, but not to engage on the front lines against Russia, as planning intensifies for a post-war security arrangement. Tony Radakin, the Chief of the Defence Staff, will attend meetings at the Pentagon on Wednesday aimed at finalising what 30 nations are prepared to contribute to Ukraine's long-term security. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies
