SpaceX delivers four astronauts to the International Space Station just 15 hours after launch
The four U.S., Russian and Japanese astronauts pulled up in their SpaceX capsule after launching from NASA's Kennedy Space Center. They will spend at least six months at the orbiting lab, swapping places with colleagues up there since March. SpaceX will bring those four back as early as Wednesday.
Moving in are NASA's Zena Cardman and Mike Fincke, Japan's Kimiya Yui and Russia's Oleg Platonov — each of whom had been originally assigned to other missions. "Hello, space station!" Fincke radioed as soon as the capsule docked high above the South Pacific.
Cardman and another astronaut were pulled from a SpaceX flight last year to make room for NASA's two stuck astronauts, Boeing Starliner test pilots Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams, whose space station stay went from one week to more than nine months. Fincke and Yui had been training for the next Starliner mission. But with Starliner grounded by thruster and other problems until 2026, the two switched to SpaceX.
Platonov was bumped from the Soyuz launch lineup a couple of years ago because of an undisclosed illness.
Their arrival temporarily puts the space station population at 11.
"It was such an unbelievably beautiful sight to see the space station come into our view for the first time," Cardman said once on board.
While their taxi flight was speedy by U.S. standards, the Russians hold the record for the fastest trip to the space station — a lightning-fast three hours.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Boston Globe
27 minutes ago
- Boston Globe
A Nuclear reactor on the moon? Come again?
In it, Duffy cites plans by China and Russia to put a reactor on the moon by the mid-2030s as part of a partnership to build a base there. If they were first, China and Russia 'could potentially declare a keep-out zone' that would inhibit what the United States could do there, Duffy said. Advertisement In an undated rendering from NASA, a concept image of a lunar surface nuclear reactor. NASA/NYT The directive calls for the appointment of a NASA official to oversee the effort within 30 days and for a request seeking proposals from commercial companies to be issued within 60 days. The reactor will be required to generate at least 100 kilowatts of electrical power — enough for about 80 households in the United States — and to be ready to launch in late 2029. Get Starting Point A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday. Enter Email Sign Up One lunar day lasts four weeks on Earth — two weeks of continual sunshine followed by two weeks of cold darkness. That harsh cycle makes it difficult for a spacecraft or a moon base to survive with just solar panels and batteries. Current exploration efforts, both by NASA and by the Chinese-Russian partnership, are focusing on the south polar region, where the sun is never high over the horizon and the bottoms of some craters lie in permanent shadows. Advertisement Over the years, NASA has financed nuclear reactor research, including the awarding of three $5 million contracts in 2022 to companies developing initial designs. Those designs were smaller, producing 40 kilowatts and weighing under 6 metric tons. The acceleration of nuclear development is part of the administration's efforts to focus NASA on human spaceflight, while seeking deep cuts to robotic space probes, climate science research and aviation technology development. It is, however, not clear what the nuclear reactor will power. The first moon landing under NASA's return-to-the-moon program, known as Artemis, is scheduled for 2027, but many experts find that timeline unlikely. Many of the needed components, including the Starship lunar lander under development by SpaceX, are still unproven. The Trump administration wants to pivot to using commercial rockets and spacecraft instead of the Space Launch System rocket and the Orion crew capsule that NASA has been working on for more than a decade. A reactor would be useful for long-term stays on the moon, especially during the two-week-long nights, but NASA's plans do not specify when a base might be built. Duffy issued a second directive, also Thursday, aimed at speeding up the development of commercial space stations to replace the International Space Station, which is scheduled to be retired in 2030. The directive changes how the agency will award contracts, allowing more flexibility. NASA will start seeking proposals within 60 days and will award at least two contracts. This article originally appeared in . Advertisement
E&E News
27 minutes ago
- E&E News
California Coastal Commission staff recommends rejecting increased SpaceX launches
California regulators are recommending that state officials reject a U.S. military plan to increase SpaceX launches from a Southern California base, setting up another fight with Elon Musk, who previously sued the agency for political bias. What happened: California Coastal Commission staff issued a recommendation Friday that the agency's 12 appointed commissioners vote next week to reject the U.S. Space Force's application to increase SpaceX launches from Vandenberg Space Force base from 50 to 95 annually on the grounds that some of the launches don't carry military equipment and shouldn't receive state permitting exemptions. Agency staff said the Space Force failed to provide information showing that all of the launches should be considered military activity, exempting them from commission oversight, even though most won't carry military payloads. Advertisement Why it matters: It's the third time SpaceX's rocket launches have come before the Coastal Commission, which has jurisdiction over development on California's vaunted 840-mile coastline, including Vandenberg Space Force Base. The agency does not have authority over military activity, however, meaning its votes are nonbinding.
CNN
29 minutes ago
- CNN
NASA wants US to be the first nation to put nuclear reactor on the moon
Acting NASA Administrator Sean Duffy has directed the agency to fast-track plans to put a nuclear reactor on the moon. Expediting work to place a reactor on the lunar surface to help power moon exploration efforts would keep the United States ahead of China and Russia, both of which have 'announced on at least three occasions' a joint effort to develop such a project by the mid-2030s, according to a directive dated July 31 and obtained by CNN. If another country were to achieve this feat first, it could declare a 'keep-out zone' that would effectively hold the US back from its goal of establishing a presence on the lunar surface through NASA's Artemis program. The agency's Artemis III mission, currently planned for 2027, is expected to return humans to the surface of the moon for the first time in more than five decades. But the program still has several milestones in order to reach that target. 'We're in a race to the moon, in a race with China to the moon,' Duffy told reporters at a news conference Tuesday on drones. 'And to have a base on the moon, we need energy.' Duffy's orders also call for an executive within 30 days to lead the program. Politico was the first to report the new directive. NASA has previously worked on similar projects in collaboration the Department of Energy and others, including a fission surface power project that would provide the moon with at least 40 kilowatts of power — enough to continuously run 30 households for 10 years, according to the NASA website. A nuclear reactor would assist with long stays on the moon, but the newly unveiled plans do not yet specify when a base could be built. Lunar surface power needs are at least 100kWe for long-term human operations, according to estimates cited by NASA. 'Energy is important, and if we're going to be able to sustain life on the moon, to then go to Mars, this technology is critically important,' Duffy said. The directive is Duffy's first big initiative since he was named NASA's acting administrator in July, an extra job he's been criticized for accepting alongside Secretary of Transportation, an agency that has had a tumultuous year navigating aviation safety incidents. He also issued a second directive last Thursday that could accelerate efforts to create a commercial space station to replace the International Space Station. NASA will seek more proposals within 60 days, and at least two companies will be awarded a contract within six months of the agency's request for proposals, according to the directive. The order changes the way the agency awards contracts by adding some flexibility. The aging International Space Station has experienced problems with leaks in recent years and is expected to be retired by 2030.
