logo
Survey: Retailers Face Consumer Backlash Over Tariff Price Hikes

Survey: Retailers Face Consumer Backlash Over Tariff Price Hikes

Forbes3 days ago

Shoppers are paying close attention to how retailers handle the import crisis, with most saying they would reward brands that absorb higher costs.
Three out of four consumers would be inclined to abandon their favorite retail brands over claims of price increases necessitated by new tariffs.
That's one of the top-line findings in a new survey by First Insight, suggesting that inflation-weary shoppers are annoyed and growing suspicious of major retailers' announcements about rising import costs. Among U.S. shoppers, only one in four said they are convinced that tariffs alone are responsible.
Inversely, 80% of the 1,120 American shoppers surveyed said they would reward brands that absorb those extra expenses with increased loyalty. Unlike during the pandemic, a cataclysm that played no favorites, the trade war is fast becoming a consumer marketing minefield.
In spite of persistent uncertainty and chaos surrounding the U.S. government's evolving tariff policies, most retailers have issued public statements about raising prices. Among 306 top retail and brand executives surveyed by First Insight, 77% reported they had preemptively announced price hikes even though the majority, 60%, concede they expect to lose market share to competitors that don't.
The survey reveals some strong undercurrents in the consumer economy that retailers ignore at their peril, and a clear opportunity to attract new customers.
For starters, price trumps brand loyalty more than ever.
Pandemic-driven inflation coupled with the surge in e-commerce gave consumers the motivation and the tools to aggressively shop for the lowest price for just about anything.
The 'value for money' calculation is increasingly top of mind among consumers.
Every major retailer of groceries and other comparable commodities and essentials is devoting more shelf space to lower-priced, higher-profit private label brands that shoppers deem equivalent to national brands. Brand loyalty is losing its grip on the many who are struggling to pay higher mortgage, rent, and insurance bills.
Shoppers are better informed than ever.
One can cruise the aisles of any store and price-check items using their cell phone before deciding whether to buy. That gives retailers who hold the line on prices a leg up on competitors that pass on higher tariff expenses. Hold the line might be a good slogan for an ad campaign.
As an industry, retail profits soared during the pandemic.
Walmart, for example, reported earnings per share that rose 70% over the past three fiscal years. The dichotomy between household budget pain and outsized retail profits was not lost on the public and suspicion lingers.
In 2022, for example, McDonald's said it was raising prices 10 percent at its U.S. restaurants while simultaneously reporting better-than-expected sales and profits. Its CEO explained at the time, 'consumers are willing to tolerate it.'
The dust has yet to settle on whether and by how much import tariffs might rise.
Either way, 'Any talk of pricing can not only shake the market, it can shake the consumer,' according to Sonia Lapinsky at Alix Partners, a retail advisory consultancy. Lapinsky recently told The Wall Street Journal, 'If they hear about price increases, it might just prevent them from going in the store at all.'
Consumers surveyed by First Insight said that the top two actions retailers and brands can take to offset price changes are: 1) clear communication–especially around if and why prices are rising. And 2) introduce new efforts to soften the blow, including offering loyalty points or discounts.
Good advice in any season.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Manhattan Renters Already Paying Record Prices Face More Hikes
Manhattan Renters Already Paying Record Prices Face More Hikes

Bloomberg

time36 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Manhattan Renters Already Paying Record Prices Face More Hikes

Manhattan apartment rents reached yet another all-time high last month and are expected to keep rising as the market's most competitive season collides with the city's new broker-fee law. The median rent on new leases signed in May was $4,571, according to appraiser Miller Samuel Inc. and brokerage Douglas Elliman. It was the third record price reached in the past four months and exceeded the previous peak by $71.

SpaceX Starlink rivalry grows as next Kuiper deployment nears
SpaceX Starlink rivalry grows as next Kuiper deployment nears

Digital Trends

time37 minutes ago

  • Digital Trends

SpaceX Starlink rivalry grows as next Kuiper deployment nears

Amazon is about to send another batch of Project Kuiper internet satellites to orbit as it seeks to take on SpaceX's Starlink service to provide broadband internet to customers around the world. The tech giant has a long way to go before it has any hope of effectively challenging Starlink, but with its second launch set for next week, progress is being made toward its goal. Recommended Videos Project Kuiper is currently targeting Monday, June 16, for the launch of 27 internet satellites aboard a United Launch Alliance (ULA) Atlas V rocket from Cape Canaveral in Florida. The KA-02 mission comes seven weeks after the first Project Kuiper launch, which also deployed 27 internet satellites. Commenting after the inaugural launch, Rajeev Badyal, vice president of Project Kuiper, said: 'We've designed some of the most advanced communications satellites ever built, and every launch is an opportunity to add more capacity and coverage to our network.' SpaceX began deploying its Starlink internet satellites six years ago and now has more than 7,000 of them in low-Earth orbit, bringing broadband connectivity to more than 5 million customers globally. Project Kuiper says its initial constellation will be made up of more than 3,200 satellites, with more than 80 missions needed to reach that goal. To that end, Amazon has put together a busy launch schedule, with six additional satellite deployments planned for ULA's Atlas V rocket, at least 38 on ULA's Vulcan Centaur rocket, and dozens more with Arianespace and Blue Origin. SpaceX's workhorse Falcon 9 rocket may even help out. Amazon is targeting as early as the end of this year for the launch of a high-speed, low-latency satellite-powered internet service, with as few as 1,000 satellites needed for global coverage. Building out the constellation to the targeted 3,200 satellites will help to boost network performance and reliability for paying customers.

House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs
House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs

Yahoo

time37 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

House Republicans draft competing budget as Senate nears deal with Hobbs

Photo by Jerod MacDonald-Evoy | Arizona Mirror Arizona lawmakers are at odds again, but this time it's the Republicans in the House of Representatives and Senate who can't agree on how to forge the state budget. Creating the state budget — deciding how much to allocate to departments, projects and initiatives or whether to fund them at all — is the most important job that legislators do each year, and the only thing they are constitutionally required to complete. Before the group of bills that will become the state budget becomes law, it must be approved by a majority in both the Arizona Senate and House — which are both controlled by Republicans — and garner a signature from Democratic Gov. Katie Hobbs. In recent history, budget negotiations in Arizona have occurred behind closed doors among the governor and legislative leaders in the House and Senate. But this year is different, with Hobbs and Republican leaders in the Senate nearing a deal after weeks of negotiations. GOP leaders in the House, who haven't been involved in those talks, have responded by drafting their own budget, which was introduced late Wednesday afternoon. SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX 'This is a sound, disciplined budget that delivers safe communities, strong families, and a government that lives within its means,' House Speaker Steve Montenegro said in a Wednesday evening statement. 'We're raising pay for our state law enforcement officers, reducing tuition at public universities, fully funding school choice, fixing critical infrastructure and roads, and protecting taxpayers. Our budget reins in government and puts it back to work for the people it serves.' But the spending package, which is chock-full of proposals that are unlikely to pass muster with Hobbs, will never become law. Instead, it is better viewed as a way for House Republicans to lay down a marker in order to force Hobbs and the Senate to move closer to the House's proposal. Republican political consultant Barrett Marson said House GOP leaders are hoping to demonstrate that the chamber can pass a spending plan in order to get leverage in the negotiations. 'Sometimes there's just gotta be movement to unstick a sticky situation,' he said. 'The House has an equal voice. And unlike previous years when one or both chambers had a go-it-alone ethos, the House isn't looking to be draconian or anything. They want something more responsible.' Marson said a major point of contention between the House and Senate is what to do with the budget surplus. While the Senate and Hobbs have settled on copying the novel process from 2023, in which each lawmaker was given a pot of money from the surplus that was used to fund whatever initiatives they wanted, the House wants to negotiate all of those details and not surrender control of that money to individual legislators. During a House Rules Committee meeting earlier Wednesday afternoon, House Minority Leader Oscar De Los Santos, of Laveen, said he was disappointed in the way the budgeting process was happening this year. 'We should not be moving forward with a House Republican-only budget that is destined to fail,' he said. 'This will not get signed by the governor. I don't even think it's going to pass out of the Senate.' De Los Santos even questioned whether the proposal would get enough votes to pass through the House, where Republicans hold 33 of the chamber's 60 seats. 'What we do know is that this is not a negotiated, bipartisan deal in good faith,' he said. 'House Democrats are at the table negotiating in a bipartisan way with the executive, with our (Senate) counterparts across the courtyard. That is the way to get things done in shared government.' But Republican Rep. Neal Carter, of San Tan Valley, replied that the work of governing should be done transparently, instead of in private — and that it should allow for input from the public. 'As a Republican, I stand for full transparency and not for back-room deals or negotiated budgets with parties that are somehow outside of this public process,' Carter said. The House Republican budget, introduced by House Appropriations Committee Chairman David Livingston, proposes significant changes in how federal money allocated to the state, but not restricted to specific uses, is controlled. The billions in unrestricted federal funds, currently controlled by the governor, would shift to legislative control and could only be spent on essential government services. The House GOP's budget proposal would also place new restrictions and monitoring requirements on entitlement programs, like the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System — the state's Medicaid program — and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, formerly called food stamps. Both programs would be monitored on at least a quarterly basis for participants who don't qualify, to be kicked off. And any participants who win $3,000 or more through gambling or playing the state lottery and don't report those winnings would become ineligible. It would also give the Arizona Department of Economic Security the authority to screen recipients of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families for illegal drug use and would ban anyone who tests positive for drugs not prescribed to them from the cash assistance program for a year. House Republicans also intend to increase the percentage of money spent in K-12 classrooms, as opposed to on administration; to decrease tuition for students attending the state's three public universities; and to ban those universities from using public or private money to give scholarships to students without legal immigration status. Hobbs introduced her budget proposal, which includes a much different list of priorities, back in January. Shortly after that, Livingston and Rep. Matt Gress, R-Phoenix, panned her proposal for leaving out projected cost increases for programs like AHCCCS. Hobbs spokesman Christian Slater told the Arizona Mirror on Wednesday that Livingston and Gress were to blame for the House's lack of collaboration on the budget. 'This is DDD all over again,' Slater said via email, referring to a fight earlier this year over funding for the Department of Developmental Disabilities. 'It's another circus led by the Speaker, David Livingston, and Matt Gress where they have refused to participate with any caucuses, including their Republican counterparts in the Senate, in a meaningful manner and are once again just trying to score some political points even though they know their plan is going absolutely nowhere.' Livingston and Gress, a former budget director for Republican Gov. Doug Ducey, were both key players in the fight over an extra $122 million in emergency funding for DDD that put vital services for the developmentally disabled in jeopardy. 'Rather than being productive, the House Republican leadership continues to show they are in over their head and unserious about governing,' Slater said. The House Appropriations Committee is set to discuss the proposal Thursday morning. The Senate Republicans have not introduced their budget proposal. SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store