More Republican governors send National Guard to Washington, backing Trump
The Republican governors of Mississippi, Louisiana, and Tennessee agreed to deploy troops to Washington, days after the Republican governors of West Virginia, South Carolina, and Ohio also did so at the Trump administration's request.
Trump has characterized Washington as overrun with violence and homelessness, a description local officials have rejected.
Federal and city statistics show violent crime rates have dropped sharply since a spike in 2023, though the city's murder rate remains higher than most other big US cities.
The Justice Department has opened an investigation into whether the city manipulated its statistics to make crime rates appear lower, the Washington Post reported, citing unnamed sources.
In a social media post on Monday, Trump wrote, "DC gave Fake Crime numbers in order to create a false illusion of safety," without providing evidence. He made similar assertions last week.
Trump announced on Aug. 11 he had ordered 800 Guard troops to the city and temporarily taken over the city's police department, a remarkable exercise of presidential power over the US capital. The federal government also dispatched agents from numerous agencies, including the FBI, to patrol the city's streets.
Following a legal challenge filed by the city's attorney general, the administration negotiated a deal with Mayor Muriel Bowser to keep Police Chief Pamela Smith in charge of the department's operations.
Trump has threatened similar operations in other Democratic-controlled cities such as Chicago, though he would likely face more legal obstacles than he does in Washington, where the federal government still has broad oversight under US law.
Critics have accused Trump of manufacturing an emergency to seize greater control of Washington and target Democratic cities.
Louisiana Gov. Jeff Landry said he had approved the deployment of about 135 Guard soldiers to Washington, while Mississippi Governor Tate Reeves said he had ordered 200 soldiers to the capital. Tennessee Governor Bill Lee has also deployed 160 Guard troops to the city, according to local media reports.
"Crime is out of control there, and it's clear something must be done to combat it," Reeves said in a statement.
In total, the six Republican states have announced deployments of more than 1,100 Guard troops to Washington.
"The numbers on the ground in the District don't support a thousand people from other states coming to Washington," the mayor told reporters on Monday, adding that the question was "why the military would be deployed in an American city to police Americans."
Guard soldiers, most of whom have civilian jobs and serve part-time, often respond to natural disasters and other emergencies. While the National Guard in Washington reports to the president, governors typically control the Guard in their own states.
Trump tested that authority in June, when he ordered thousands of National Guard troops and active-duty Marines into Los Angeles as protests over his administration's immigration raids flared up. The deployment came despite opposition from California's Democratic Gov. Gavin Newsom.
A federal judge in San Francisco is weighing whether Trump's actions in Los Angeles were illegal, after California sued the administration.
Federal law generally forbids the use of the military in law enforcement, but there are exceptions, including for National Guard troops that are under state command, such as California's.
In 2020, during Trump's first administration, the White House requested Guard troops from numerous states to help restore order in Washington in the wake of racial justice protests. Then-Attorney General Bill Barr said the National Guard remained under state command and was used to protect federal buildings and personnel.
Even so, Barr said their duties would include controlling crowds, temporarily detaining people, and conducting "cursory" searches, activities usually associated with police.
Critics said the 2020 experience in Washington potentially opened the way for the president to use armed troops against civilians.
A White House official said on Tuesday that Guard troops in Washington may carry arms but were not making arrests. Instead, the soldiers are protecting federal property and providing "a safe environment for law enforcement officers to make arrests."
Some 465 arrests have been made in the 12 days since the Trump administration's operations began, US Attorney General Pam Bondi wrote on X on Tuesday, an average of 39 arrests a day.
The city's Metropolitan Police Department arrested an average of 61 adults and juveniles per day in 2024, according to city statistics.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Westinghouse deal tensions loom over Korea-US summit
Controversial KHNP agreement faces backlash at home as leaders prepare to discuss nuclear energy cooperation Escalating tensions over a deal between South Korea's state-run energy firms and US company Westinghouse are complicating the agenda for the upcoming Korea-US summit, where nuclear energy cooperation is expected to take center stage. South Korean President Lee Jae Myung and US President Donald Trump are scheduled to meet in Washington next Monday for their summit, with officials saying nuclear partnership will be high on the agenda. According to a local media report on Wednesday, state-run Korea Hydro & Nuclear Power and Westinghouse, the two companies at the heart of the controversy, are preparing to form a joint venture to enter the US nuclear reactor market on the occasion of the upcoming summit. The report explained that since KHNP cannot independently access the US market, it plans to enter through a partnership with the American firm while handling most of the construction work. Nuclear energy's inclusion on the summit agenda was widely expected, given that the sector was part of South Korea's $200 billion investment pledge in the US under the tariff deal announced last month. President Trump has vowed to expand US nuclear energy capacity from 97 gigawatts to 400 gigawatts by 2050. Achieving this target would require constructing approximately 300 new 1,000-megawatt reactors. Industry observers view the US as eyeing Korean companies' technological expertise and construction capabilities to meet this goal. The plan comes amid controversy over a separate agreement that KHNP and Korea Electric Power Corp. struck with Westinghouse in January, sparking worries about potential summit implications. The settlement resolved Westinghouse's claims that KHNP had violated its intellectual property rights by using licensed Westinghouse technology in the development of its APR 1000 and 1400 nuclear reactor designs. The deal cleared the way for a KHNP-led consortium to sign an estimated 26 trillion won ($18.58 billion) contract in June to build two nuclear reactors in the Czech Republic. But after details of the settlement came to light on Monday following another local media report, the state-run company came under fire for agreeing to lopsided conditions to reach a swift deal, while burdening itself with hefty financial commitments. According to the agreement, KHNP agreed to sign contracts for goods and services worth $650 million with Westinghouse for each export of a single nuclear reactor, and to pay an additional $175 million per reactor in technology licensing fees. The 50-year deal also contains a provision requiring Westinghouse to verify the technical independence of Korean companies before they can bid on overseas nuclear reactor projects, including small modular reactors. It also restricted KHNP to pursuing nuclear projects in only 12 designated countries -- including the Philippines, Vietnam, Kazakhstan, Morocco, Egypt, Brazil, Argentina, Jordan, Turkey, UAE, Saudi Arabia and South Africa -- while barring it from new deals in North America, Britain, Japan, Ukraine and the EU, except for the Czech Republic. Lawmakers blamed KHNP for bowing to US pressure to secure the Czech deal. 'It has been confirmed that the Yoon Suk Yeol government signed an unfair contract with Westinghouse to break the deadlock in the Czech project,' said Rep. Han Jeong-ae of the ruling Democratic Party of Korea at the National Assembly on Tuesday. Amid the controversy, KHNP CEO Whang Joo-ho on Tuesday said the deal terms remain within acceptable limits, but he declined to provide detailed answers, citing confidentiality obligations. 'While I cannot say (Westinghouse's demands) are justified, they are something tolerable enough for us to endure and still generate profit,' Whang said at the National Assembly. Meanwhile, opposition People Power Party lawmakers also stressed that just before the Korea-US summit, it may not serve the national interest for the parliament to directly confront the Westinghouse issue. 'Westinghouse may hold the original technology, but it lacks the construction capacity to independently build reactors, which means Korean companies are likely to handle the construction,' said an industry insider on condition of anonymity. 'Even if the deal is viewed as unfavorable, I believe it was inevitable if Korean companies are going to expand their overseas nuclear businesses.' Amid growing backlash, South Korea's presidential office has ordered the Industry Ministry to investigate the deal to verify that the negotiations and contract process were carried out based on laws and regulations and in accordance with principles and procedures.
Korea Herald
3 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Samsung, TSMC face subsidy-for-shares dilemma under Trump plan
Critics argue Trump's equity demand is no subsidy but an attempt at ownership of private companies Washington is reviewing options to acquire equity stakes in foreign chipmakers such as Samsung Electronics and TSMC in return for the federal subsidies they are receiving to build factories in the US, industry sources said Wednesday. The idea has rattled the industry, with analysts dismissing it as 'unrealistic,' saying it reflects US President Donald Trump's intent to walk back on grants pledged under the former Biden administration. US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick on Tuesday openly floated the idea in reference to Intel, as the White House reportedly weighs options such as taking a 10 percent stake in the company. 'We should get an equity stake for our money,' Lutnick told CNBC, referring to Intel. 'So we'll deliver the money, which was already committed under the Biden administration, and we'll get equity in return.' Citing sources familiar with the matter, Reuters reported that Lutnick is exploring applying the same approach to other chipmakers, including Samsung. Lutnick argued that the Biden administration 'literally was giving Intel money for free, and giving TSMC money for free,' underscoring the Trump administration's critical stance on federal grants. The CHIPS and Science Act, legislated under the Biden administration, pledged subsidies to global chipmakers building plants in the US as part of a wider effort to reshore semiconductor manufacturing. 'Donald Trump turns that into saying, 'Hey, we want equity for the money. If we're going to give you the money, we want a piece of the action,'' Lutnick said, adding that any potential arrangement would not give the government governance rights in Intel. Intel has said it finalized a nearly $8 billion grant under the CHIPS and Science Act to build its factories, while TSMC was awarded $6.6 billion to expand chip production at its Arizona facilities. Samsung Electronics, which is building a $37 billion advanced chip plant in Taylor, Texas, secured a $4.75 billion subsidy package under the Biden administration last year. SK hynix is also set to begin construction of a $3.87 billion advanced packaging plant for AI memory in West Lafayette, Indiana, in the second half of this year. 'It's an unreasonable idea. The US government is effectively demanding equity in private companies — not state-run firms or startups, but already well-established foreign businesses like Samsung and TSMC. That is not a subsidy anymore, it is ownership,' said Kim Yang-paeng, a senior researcher at the Korea Institute for Industrial Economics and Trade. According to Kim, the plan reflects Trump's long-standing view that subsidies are a 'waste' and should not be handed out. 'What Washington is really saying is it wants equity equal to the subsidies, which means it's no longer a subsidy,' he said. 'US firms might accept that since it is their own government, but Samsung or TSMC will not.' In Intel's case, the Trump administration's plan to acquire a 10 percent stake is seen as roughly equivalent to the $7.86 billion in subsidies the company is set to receive, compared with its market capitalization of $110.8 billion. If applied to Samsung, the approach would translate into about a 1.6 percent stake, based on the $4.75 billion subsidy against its 414 trillion won market capitalization as of Wednesday. As the Korean chip giant is listed on the domestic stock market, Washington may instead target stakes in its US subsidiaries, such as Samsung Semiconductor and Samsung Austin Semiconductor, industry experts said.
Korea Herald
6 hours ago
- Korea Herald
Trump eyes air support for Ukraine, no US ground troops
WASHINGTON/LONDON/KYIV (Reuters) -- President Donald Trump said on Tuesday he has ruled out putting US troops on the ground in Ukraine, but said the United States might provide air support as part of a deal to end Russia's war in the country. A day after Trump pledged security guarantees to help end the war at an extraordinary White House summit, the path to peace remained uncertain as the US and allies prepared to work out what military support for Ukraine might include. "When it comes to security, (Europeans) are willing to put people on the ground. We're willing to help them with things, especially, probably ... by air," Trump said in an interview with the Fox News "Fox & Friends" program. Trump did not elaborate. Later, in an interview with radio host Mark Levin, Trump characterized his negotiating style in trying to end the war as "probably instinct more than process." Following Monday's meeting, Russia launched its biggest air assault in more than a month on Ukraine, with 270 drones and 10 missiles launched, the Ukrainian air force said. The energy ministry said the strikes caused big fires at energy facilities in the central Poltava region, home to Ukraine's only oil refinery. Trump conceded that Russian President Vladimir Putin might not want to make a deal after all, saying, "We're going to find out about President Putin in the next couple of weeks." The nature of US military aid for Ukraine under a peace deal was unclear. Air support could take many forms, such as missile defense systems or fighter jets enforcing a no-fly zone. White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt confirmed that US air support was "an option and a possibility," but, like Trump, she did not provide any details. "The president has definitively stated US boots will not be on the ground in Ukraine, but we can certainly help in the coordination and perhaps provide other means of security guarantees to our European allies," she said at a news briefing. Analysts say more than 1 million people have been killed or wounded in the conflict, which began with Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy hailed the White House talks as a "major step forward" toward ending Europe's deadliest conflict in 80 years and setting up a trilateral meeting with Putin and Trump. Zelenskyy's warm rapport with Trump contrasted sharply with their disastrous Oval Office meeting in February. Trump discussed Budapest as a venue for a summit involving Zelenskyy and Putin with Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban on Tuesday, a White House official said. Istanbul, where delegations for the two countries have met previously, has also been mentioned, a senior administration official said. Hungary is one of the few European places that Putin could visit without fear of arrest on International Criminal Court charges as Orban maintains close ties with the Russian leader. It was unclear whether Ukraine would accept Hungary as a venue. Neutral Switzerland also said it would be ready to host Putin for any peace talks. "They are in the process of setting it up," Trump told radio host Levin about a Putin/ Zelenskyy meeting. But Trump cast doubt on whether he would attend. "Now I think it would be better if they met without me. ... If necessary, I'll go," he said. Trump, asked by Levin how he balanced the interests of all the parties involved, said, "Well, it's probably instinct more than process. I have instincts." Ukraine's allies held talks in the so-called Coalition of the Willing format on Tuesday, discussing additional sanctions to crank up the pressure on Russia. The grouping has also agreed that planning teams will meet US counterparts in the coming days to develop security guarantees for Ukraine. NATO military leaders were expected to meet on Wednesday to discuss Ukraine, with US General Dan Caine, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, expected to attend virtually, officials told Reuters. Putin has said Russia will not tolerate troops from the NATO alliance in Ukraine. He has also shown no sign of backing down from demands for territory, including land not under Russia's military control, following his summit with Trump on Friday in Alaska. Neil Melvin, a director at the International Security at the Royal United Services Institute think-tank, said Russia could drag out the war while trying to deflect US pressure with a protracted peace negotiation. Melvin said both Ukraine and its European allies on one side and Russia on the other were striving "not to present themselves to Trump as the obstacle to his peace process." "They're all tiptoeing around Trump" to avoid any blame, he said, adding that Trump's statements on security guarantees were "so vague it's very hard to take it seriously."
