logo
ICJ climate ruling not binding — but a powerful ‘shield and sword' for global justice and climate-vulnerable nations

ICJ climate ruling not binding — but a powerful ‘shield and sword' for global justice and climate-vulnerable nations

Malay Mail4 days ago
PARIS, July 26 — The world's top court may not be able to compel polluting states to halt planet-warming emissions, but experts say its momentous climate decision gives potent legal and political firepower to countries and campaigners on the frontlines.
An advisory opinion like the one issued by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) this week is not binding and so is not directly enforceable, but that does not mean it has no weight.
By saying that all countries were firmly bound to a swathe of legal obligations under existing laws and treaties, experts say the ruling will influence courts, climate negotiations and policy decisions across the world.
The ICJ 'couldn't have been clearer' on the binding nature of a range of climate duties, said Cesar Rodriguez-Garavito, Professor of Law and Director of the Climate Law Accelerator at New York University.
He said the ruling, which was responding to questions on countries' climate responsibilities from the UN General Assembly, was 'as strong as we could have imagined'.
'The consensus among the judges is fully behind the conclusion that international law establishes clear and binding obligations for states not to cause massive harm to the environment in general and not to harm the climate system in particular,' he told AFP.
Schoolchildren from the Suango Mele primary and secondary school, located in the village of Mele, north of the Vanuatu capital of Port Vila, hold signs as they pose for a photograph on July 24, 2025. — AFP pic
These included ensuring national climate plans reflect the highest possible ambition to stay within the Paris agreement's safer global warming cap of 1.5C above pre-industrial times — a level that the world could reach this decade.
If those obligations are not met, the court said states may be obliged to repair damaged infrastructure or ecosystems — and if that is not possible, they could face compensation claims.
This will ripple into future litigation, said Markus Gehring, professor of European and international law at the University of Cambridge.
'We are a far cry from a contentious case between two countries, where someone is demanding liability for past and present climate change damage, but in theory, the court lays out an avenue towards such claims,' he said.
Climate activists and campaigners demonstrate outside the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ahead of the reading of an advisory opinion that is likely to determine the course of future climate action across the world, The Hague July 23, 2025. — Reuters pic
'Wrongful act'
Major petrostates like the United States may take little heed of the court's warning that expanding production of oil, gas and coal could constitute an 'internationally wrongful act'.
But Gehring said countries could choose to ignore ICJ advisory opinions 'at their peril'.
He cited the court's 2019 advice that the United Kingdom should end its occupation of the Chagos islands.
After Britain initially rejected the ruling, a UN General Assembly resolution demanded it cede the islands to Mauritius, which it eventually did in 2024.
Gehring said that while the court's climate decision is not directly binding on individual states, it would be indirectly binding through subsequent domestic or international court action and through UN institutions.
The move by US President Donald Trump to withdraw from the Paris deal also would be unlikely to absolve the country from its duties, Gehring added, because the obligation to address climate change is now 'crystal clear in international law'.
'So even leaving the Paris Agreement and the climate treaty regime does not eliminate those obligations,' he said.
ICJ judge Sarah Cleveland said countries' 'significant responsibilities' to protect the climate system may also affect interpretation of international investment law.
Schoolchildren from the Suango Mele primary and secondary school, located in the village of Mele, north of the Vanuatu capital of Port Vila, hold signs as they pose for a photograph on July 24, 2025. — AFP pic
'Shield and sword'
The ruling was 'a decisive legal vindication' for Vanuatu — which spearheaded the push for an ICJ opinion — the country said in a legal analysis of the decision.
The Pacific island nation, which is at risk from rising seas, said the court's conclusions would strengthen its hand in global climate negotiations, helping it demand greater climate ambition and attract financial support for countries suffering climate loss and damage.
It could also open the way for legal action against countries and possibly companies that have by their actions and omissions caused climate harm, the statement said.
'For Vanuatu, the opinion is both shield and sword: a shield affirming its right to survival and a sword compelling the world's major emitters to act in line with science and justice,' it added.
Manuel Pulgar-Vidal, former president of the UN COP20 climate conference in Peru and now WWF Global Climate and Energy lead, said he expects the ICJ ruling to 'move the needle strongly'.
'The timing is so fantastic because we are in difficult times in the climate debate, so to have that opinion in the current time, it is showing that we should never lose our hope,' he told AFP. — AFP
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Thailand and Cambodia exchange ceasefire violation claims amid border tensions
Thailand and Cambodia exchange ceasefire violation claims amid border tensions

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Thailand and Cambodia exchange ceasefire violation claims amid border tensions

BANGKOK: Thailand and Cambodia have accused each other of violating a ceasefire agreement meant to halt recent border clashes that left at least 43 dead. The truce, which took effect on Tuesday, followed five days of intense fighting over disputed temple territories along their 800-kilometre shared boundary. Thailand's foreign ministry reported that its troops in Sisaket province were attacked with small arms fire and grenades by Cambodian forces, calling it a 'flagrant violation of the ceasefire agreement.' Government spokesman Jirayu Huangsab confirmed overnight clashes but stated that Thai forces maintained control, with border conditions normalising by Wednesday morning. Cambodia, however, countered with its own accusations. A defence ministry official claimed Thailand twice breached the truce on Tuesday, undermining efforts to stabilise the region. Over 300,000 civilians have been evacuated from border areas since hostilities erupted last week. At a temple shelter in Thailand's Surin city, 50 kilometres from the frontier, volunteer Thanin Kittiworranun expressed scepticism. 'We don't believe Cambodia will hold the ceasefire,' the 65-year-old told AFP. Despite the allegations, an AFP correspondent on the Cambodian side reported no artillery fire since the truce began. China facilitated talks between the two nations, with deputy foreign minister Sun Weidong hosting a meeting in Shanghai where both sides reaffirmed their commitment to the ceasefire. The ceasefire remains fragile, with Thailand initially accusing Cambodia of continuing attacks to 'undermine mutual trust.' However, subsequent military discussions led to agreements on de-escalation, including halting troop reinforcements. The recent clashes have surpassed the death toll of previous border conflicts between 2008 and 2011, which claimed 28 lives. The current dispute stems from unclear colonial-era demarcations by French administrators in 1907. The peace deal was brokered in Malaysia with US President Donald Trump's intervention, as both nations seek to avoid potential trade tariffs. - AFP

Turkey to supply Azeri gas to Syria for electricity from Saturday
Turkey to supply Azeri gas to Syria for electricity from Saturday

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Turkey to supply Azeri gas to Syria for electricity from Saturday

ISTANBUL: Turkey will start exporting natural gas from Azerbaijan to Syria this Saturday, Energy Minister Alparslan Bayraktar announced. The move aims to support Syria's electricity production as the country recovers from years of civil war. Syria's new Islamist-led government, which overthrew Bashar al-Assad in December, is working to restore infrastructure after nearly 14 years of conflict. Severe damage to power plants has left many areas with daily blackouts exceeding 20 hours. 'We will start exporting natural gas from Azerbaijan to Aleppo via Kilis,' Bayraktar said, referring to a Turkish province bordering Syria. Syrian Energy Minister Mohammad al-Bashir confirmed the deal, stating that Damascus will receive 3.4 million cubic metres of Azerbaijani gas daily starting August 2. The supply is expected to generate around 900 megawatts of electricity, according to Syria's state news agency SANA. The agreement follows talks between Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Syria's new leader, Ahmed al-Sharaa. Azerbaijan, a key Turkish ally, has strengthened ties with Syria's transitional government. In May, Bashir revealed that Ankara and Damascus had finalized a deal for gas transfers through a northern pipeline. The arrangement highlights Turkey's growing role in regional energy distribution. - AFP

Gaza civil defence reports 14 killed by Israeli forces amid aid crisis
Gaza civil defence reports 14 killed by Israeli forces amid aid crisis

The Sun

time2 hours ago

  • The Sun

Gaza civil defence reports 14 killed by Israeli forces amid aid crisis

GAZA CITY: Gaza's civil defence agency reported 14 Palestinians killed by Israeli military actions on Wednesday, even as aid deliveries resumed in the war-torn territory. The conflict, now in its 22nd month, has left Gaza's two million residents facing severe famine, according to a UN-mandated report. Spokesman Mahmud Basal stated that six people died near an aid distribution centre northwest of Rafah. Two more were killed near the Netzarim junction, while another two died in an airstrike near Gaza City's Church of the Holy Family. Four others perished near the Wadi Gaza bridge. The Israeli military said it would review the reports. Media restrictions hinder independent verification of casualty figures. The war began after Hamas's October 7, 2023, attack on Israel, which killed 1,219 people, mostly civilians. Israel's retaliatory offensive has claimed at least 60,034 lives in Gaza, per Hamas-run health ministry data. Under international pressure, Israel announced daily pauses in fighting to allow aid distribution. Over 200 truckloads of food aid were delivered by UN agencies, with additional airdrops from Jordan and the UAE. Both sides accused armed groups of looting supplies, blaming each other for security failures. - AFP

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store