Google Maps causes 'chaos' in Germany by pretending motorways closed
Then Google Maps decided to redirect drivers away from Germany's famously fast "autobahn" motorways due to dozens of unexpected closures on crucial roads.
In a day of what German media called "autobahn chaos", the Ascension Day public holiday on Thursday was marred by lengthy detours for many after it turned out Google Maps was falsely reporting motorway closures across the country.
The online navigation service displayed red dots on road sections around Hamburg, Berlin, Frankfurt and other major German cities. However police in Hamburg, Frankfurt, Mainz and the highly populated state of North Rhine-Westphalia could not confirm the closures to dpa.
Parts of the Netherlands and Belgium also appeared to be affected by the error on Google Maps.
"They can't have closed ALL the motorways," tabloid Bild quoted one Facebook user as posting. "Especially because the traffic news isn't reporting anything."
Google told dpa the information was being reviewed and that it was removing closures that were incorrect. "We cannot comment on specific cases," a company spokesman said, noting that the information on Google Maps comes from a combination of third-party providers, public sources and user inputs.
"In general, these sources provide a strong basis for comprehensive and up-to-date map material," he said. Google Maps also allows users to report errors being displayed.
It's not the first time Google has invented a road closure in Germany, and at the beginning of May, the tech giant's service incorrectly displayed motorway tunnels in eastern Germany's Thuringia state as closed. Following a complaint from the police, the navigation instructions were corrected.
Germany's motorways are normally famed for their speed, having many stretches without a speed limit where drivers can go as fast as their Audis, BMWs or Porsches can carry them.
In the context of the climate crisis, lawmakers have long been debating efforts to stop drivers speeding on one of the world's few remaining motorways where you can legally - and considerably safely - reach speeds of over 300 km/h.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Miami Herald
an hour ago
- Miami Herald
Apple CEO drops bombshell about its future
Apple is notoriously tight-to-the-vest when it comes to making announcements, preferring to keep loyal fans and die-hard investors in the dark until the timing is right. The company's 'one more thing' mentality, reflected by founder Steve Jobs's surprising product reveals at Apple keynote conferences, appears shared by current CEO Tim Cook. In contrast to other big tech leaders, including Elon Musk, Cook often lets Apple's products do the talking. As a result, investors often look closely at Cook's comments during conference calls, looking for clues to what he may have planned for the company next. During Apple's second-quarter earnings conference call, Cook may have dropped his guard a little when he offered an interesting response about Apple's massive cash stockpile and artificial intelligence ambitions. Apple reported a solid June quarter that outpaced analysts' expectations. Revenue was a whopping $94 billion, up 10% year over year, and almost $5 billion better than Wall Street expected. Net income was over $23 billion, resulting in earnings per share, or EPS, of $1.57, up 12% from one year ago, and 14 cents ahead of estimates. Related: Veteran analyst spots unexpected star in Apple's earnings report The company's massive profit lifted its cash hoard to about $36 billion from roughly $30 billion last year, giving it plenty of financial firepower to invest in its products and software. And that's precisely what investors want to see happen. While competitors like Google have gone all in on artificial intelligence, developing the AI chatbot Gemini, Apple's AI strategy has been criticized as too little, too late. The company's arguably slow development of AI solutions relative to peers has left many investors wondering if Tim Cook's number-crunching mindset sets Apple on a course of missing out on the most significant opportunity since the dawn of the Internet. However, during Apple's earnings conference call, Cook acknowledged that he'd consider accelerating Apple's AI efforts by using its massive cash war chest. When Citi analyst Atif Malik asked about the prospects of "big M&A," Cook responded bluntly. "We've acquired around seven companies this year," said Cook on the call. "We're very open to M&A that accelerates our road map… We are not stuck on a certain size company." Cook said he didn't have anything to announce currently, but his willingness to consider a big deal could mean that reports of interest in Perplexity, a major AI player, may have merit. Cook aims to accelerate Apple's development timeline, ostensibly via internal research and development and smaller bolt-on deals. However, if he really wanted to, he could do a deal to acquire Perplexity that could, as he put it, "help us accelerate a road map." Related: Apple looks to ditch Goldman Sachs for big bank rival Perplexity provides an AI chatbot similar to Google and OpenAI's ChatGPT, but there are key differences. It has its own in-house model, Sonar, that's built on Meta Platforms' Llama open source code. It's also leaned on rival chatbots, including DeepSeek's R1. Subscribers to its Pro tier can also toggle between other large language models, including OpenAI, Gemini, Anthropic's Claude, and Elon Musk's Grok. Acquiring Perplexity would instantly give Apple an established model for monetizing AI. Perplexity operates on a freemium model, with a no-cost introductory subscription and paid service. Perplexity prioritizes real-time insight with direct responses-a design that arguably matches Apple's deep focus on user experience. In short, Perplexity's desire for a better chatbot user experience aligns nicely with Apple's approach, historically. Cook says Apple has acquired seven companies this year, about one "every several weeks." Those deals, however, are small and haven't cost the company much of its war chest. Buying Perplexity would be a different story. Perplexity, which launched in 2022 around the same time as ChatGPT, has over 22 million monthly active users. Its annualized revenue could hit $150 million this summer, according to About Chromebooks data, up from an ARR of $63 million exiting last year. The company's rapid user growth translated into Perplexity answering 780 million queries in May, according to which was up from 230 million in August 2024. Also in May, its website recorded 153 million visits, about triple the number from March. Perplexity isn't publicly traded, is currently reportedly valued at $18 billion, and its AI search market share is about 6%. Related: Apple announces major store closing and new opening The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Google AI summary feature deals blow to link clicks and website traffic
Google's algorithm changes last year led to a plummet in search engine traffic for news websites and publishers, and even resulted in the bankruptcy of some independent publishers, including Turkey's Gazete Duvar. The technology giant is now dealing another blow to online publishers through its artificial intelligence summaries. Google's Artificial Intelligence Overview feature is a service offered by the internet giant to compete with artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. The feature offers short summaries generated by Gemini that appear at the top of search results. Below the summary, there are details such as links to the source and a "Show more" option. In other words, when a user types a query into the Google search engine, they can get the answer in a summary without clicking on the links below. But this presents a serious risk, especially for websites that rely on Google Ads revenue and traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) efforts. Traffic of popular websites dropped The introduction of the AI Overview has particularly affected traffic to sites that feature content such as holiday guides, health tips and product reviews. According to Similarweb, search traffic to websites decreased by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. A report published by the Wall Street Journal indicates that traffic to many well-known news sites around the world is declining. Traffic from organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile sites has more than halved in the last three years, while the Washington Post has seen a nearly identical decline. Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng laid off about 21% of her staff in May, citing "extreme traffic declines beyond our control" as the reason for the layoffs. The share of traffic from organic search to the New York Times' desktop and mobile sites also fell to 36.5% in April 2025. Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, predicts that traffic from Google will drop towards zero and says the company needs to improve its business model. "Google is changing from a search engine to an answer engine," Thompson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. In an interview with the WSJ, Thompson and other industry leaders said they are trying to develop new strategies and are most concerned with building reader relationships. Users don't click on links Google executives argue that the company is committed to sending traffic to the web and that people who click on links after seeing the AI Overview tend to spend more time on these sites. However, survey studies show a different picture. According to a new study by the Pew Research Centre, only % of the 900 Google users in the US click on the source page specified as a result of a search that includes the Artificial Intelligence Overview summary. The rest are content with the short information provided by Google. Moreover, according to the study, the most frequently cited sources in both AI summaries and traditional search results are Wikipedia, YouTube (also a Google subsidiary) and Reddit. 15% of the sources in AI summaries come from these three sites. Referrals to government sites (e.g. with the 'gov' extension) are more common in AI summaries than in traditional search results. On the other hand, both AI summaries and traditional search results are equally likely to refer to news sites, at 5%. Worse still, 404 Media, a website known for specialised technology news, noticed that a story about AI-assisted music production was not showing up in Google searches. This was because Artificial Intelligence Overview summarised the content of the story, but did not link to the actual story. The site summarises the situation with the following statement: "The AI Overview ensures that information is presented in such a way that the source itself is never clicked on." SEO loses its impact The effects of the AI Overview on SEO (search engine optimisation) are also remarkable. According to the Register, the latest data showed that the click-through rate of the top-ranked site in searches with an AI summary fell by an average of 34.5%. Being on the first page is no longer as meaningful as it used to be. AI often provides false information Moreover, there is another risk: the reliability of artificial intelligence. 404 Media published a news article showing that one of the responses given by the feature in question was actually generated from another AI summary, which in turn was based on an AI source. The margin of error increases as the information moves away from the main source. This situation is described by experts as "the vicious circle of information that leads to the collapse of artificial intelligence models themselves". When there are not enough sources of quality information, users are left with inaccurate and superficial content produced by artificial intelligence. The advertising industry continues to work for Google The revenues of websites and Google are based on the following advertising cycle: Websites allow people who use search engines such as Google free access to their content. Google redirects users to websites where they see adverts as well as content. Most websites make money from these adverts. According to the BBC, an estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines, and around 90% of searches take place on Google. This means that websites rely heavily on Google to make money. It is stated that the Artificial Intelligence Overview mode could therefore destroy the business model that has existed for 23 years. However, Google experience no loss in this change, at least for now. Alphabet, the Google's parent company, increased its revenues to a record level in the last quarter of 2024. According to data released by the company, Google's total revenue increased by 14% compared to last year, reaching $96.4 billion. According to the Register, the bulk of the revenue still comes from advertising: exactly $54.2 billion. That's because Google now places adverts directly in or around AI Overview summaries. According to a study by SparkToro, by 2024, only 360 out of every 1,000 Google searches in the US led to sites that are not owned or advertised by Google. These rates are predicted to worsen with the rise of artificial intelligence summaries. 'Desperation not demand' While Google still dominates the market, rival AI-powered search engines such as Perplexity are slowly entering the competition. According to Bank of America executive Muhammad Rasulnejat, Google's spending of $14 billion on infrastructure investment in the last quarter alone points to "desperation in the face of competition", not growing demand. In addition to all this, the fact that the US Department of Justice still accuses Google of monopolisation creates a separate pressure. The Ministry is even demanding that Google divest its Chrome browser. The company's recent advertising and artificial intelligence moves may further inflame these debates.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Google AI summary feature deals blow to link clicks and website traffic
Google's algorithm changes last year led to a plummet in search engine traffic for news websites and publishers, and even resulted in the bankruptcy of some independent publishers, including Turkey's Gazete Duvar. The technology giant is now dealing another blow to online publishers through its artificial intelligence summaries. Google's Artificial Intelligence Overview feature is a service offered by the internet giant to compete with artificial intelligence tools such as ChatGPT. The feature offers short summaries generated by Gemini that appear at the top of search results. Below the summary, there are details such as links to the source and a "Show more" option. In other words, when a user types a query into the Google search engine, they can get the answer in a summary without clicking on the links below. But this presents a serious risk, especially for websites that rely on Google Ads revenue and traditional search engine optimisation (SEO) efforts. Traffic of popular websites dropped The introduction of the AI Overview has particularly affected traffic to sites that feature content such as holiday guides, health tips and product reviews. According to Similarweb, search traffic to websites decreased by 55% between April 2022 and April 2025. A report published by the Wall Street Journal indicates that traffic to many well-known news sites around the world is declining. Traffic from organic search to HuffPost's desktop and mobile sites has more than halved in the last three years, while the Washington Post has seen a nearly identical decline. Business Insider CEO Barbara Peng laid off about 21% of her staff in May, citing "extreme traffic declines beyond our control" as the reason for the layoffs. The share of traffic from organic search to the New York Times' desktop and mobile sites also fell to 36.5% in April 2025. Nicholas Thompson, CEO of The Atlantic, predicts that traffic from Google will drop towards zero and says the company needs to improve its business model. "Google is changing from a search engine to an answer engine," Thompson said in an interview with the Wall Street Journal. In an interview with the WSJ, Thompson and other industry leaders said they are trying to develop new strategies and are most concerned with building reader relationships. Users don't click on links Google executives argue that the company is committed to sending traffic to the web and that people who click on links after seeing the AI Overview tend to spend more time on these sites. However, survey studies show a different picture. According to a new study by the Pew Research Centre, only % of the 900 Google users in the US click on the source page specified as a result of a search that includes the Artificial Intelligence Overview summary. The rest are content with the short information provided by Google. Moreover, according to the study, the most frequently cited sources in both AI summaries and traditional search results are Wikipedia, YouTube (also a Google subsidiary) and Reddit. 15% of the sources in AI summaries come from these three sites. Referrals to government sites (e.g. with the 'gov' extension) are more common in AI summaries than in traditional search results. On the other hand, both AI summaries and traditional search results are equally likely to refer to news sites, at 5%. Worse still, 404 Media, a website known for specialised technology news, noticed that a story about AI-assisted music production was not showing up in Google searches. This was because Artificial Intelligence Overview summarised the content of the story, but did not link to the actual story. The site summarises the situation with the following statement: "The AI Overview ensures that information is presented in such a way that the source itself is never clicked on." SEO loses its impact The effects of the AI Overview on SEO (search engine optimisation) are also remarkable. According to the Register, the latest data showed that the click-through rate of the top-ranked site in searches with an AI summary fell by an average of 34.5%. Being on the first page is no longer as meaningful as it used to be. AI often provides false information Moreover, there is another risk: the reliability of artificial intelligence. 404 Media published a news article showing that one of the responses given by the feature in question was actually generated from another AI summary, which in turn was based on an AI source. The margin of error increases as the information moves away from the main source. This situation is described by experts as "the vicious circle of information that leads to the collapse of artificial intelligence models themselves". When there are not enough sources of quality information, users are left with inaccurate and superficial content produced by artificial intelligence. The advertising industry continues to work for Google The revenues of websites and Google are based on the following advertising cycle: Websites allow people who use search engines such as Google free access to their content. Google redirects users to websites where they see adverts as well as content. Most websites make money from these adverts. According to the BBC, an estimated 68% of internet activity starts on search engines, and around 90% of searches take place on Google. This means that websites rely heavily on Google to make money. It is stated that the Artificial Intelligence Overview mode could therefore destroy the business model that has existed for 23 years. However, Google experience no loss in this change, at least for now. Alphabet, the Google's parent company, increased its revenues to a record level in the last quarter of 2024. According to data released by the company, Google's total revenue increased by 14% compared to last year, reaching $96.4 billion. According to the Register, the bulk of the revenue still comes from advertising: exactly $54.2 billion. That's because Google now places adverts directly in or around AI Overview summaries. According to a study by SparkToro, by 2024, only 360 out of every 1,000 Google searches in the US led to sites that are not owned or advertised by Google. These rates are predicted to worsen with the rise of artificial intelligence summaries. 'Desperation not demand' While Google still dominates the market, rival AI-powered search engines such as Perplexity are slowly entering the competition. According to Bank of America executive Muhammad Rasulnejat, Google's spending of $14 billion on infrastructure investment in the last quarter alone points to "desperation in the face of competition", not growing demand. In addition to all this, the fact that the US Department of Justice still accuses Google of monopolisation creates a separate pressure. The Ministry is even demanding that Google divest its Chrome browser. The company's recent advertising and artificial intelligence moves may further inflame these debates.
