
A huge new metro station is being built beneath Sydney's CBD
In August of last year, the new stretch of the Sydney Metro City line opened, and Sydney went wild. The superfast driverless train system has transformed how Sydneysiders travel between the North Shore and the Inner West, but the Sydney Metro isn't stopping there. Once it's complete, the Sydney Metro network is due to comprise 46 stations – with the existing line extending all the way to Bankstown and a 23-kilometre line connecting to the new Western Sydney Airport. Alongside the new Western Sydney Airport metro line and the Sydney Metro City line extension, there's another major metro route currently under construction: Sydney Metro West. This 24-kilometre line – running from Sydney CBD to Westmead – is due to open in 2032, and construction has just reached a major milestone.
Deep beneath the CBD, the excavation for the huge Hunter Street Station – which will be the final station for the new line – is now complete. This station is due to be the busiest on the Western Sydney line, which is expected to double rail capacity between Greater Parramatta and the Sydney CBD. According to Transport for NSW, the Hunter Street Station will see 10,000 people per hour move through it during the morning peak by 2036.
As well as the subterranean metro station, the development of the Hunter Street precinct (in the heart of the CBD, with access points between O'Connell Street and Bligh Street and on the corner of George Street and Hunter Street) also involves the construction of Hunter Street Towers. The new world-class commercial and retail precinct will be formed by two towers, and will be directly connected to the station. Comprising a 58-storey building above Hunter Street Station East (between O'Connell Street and Bligh Street) and a 51-storey building above Hunter Street Station West (on the corner of George Street and Hunter Street), the development will support additional jobs and economic growth in Sydney CBD, with a direct link to the thousands of new homes set to be built along the Sydney Metro West line.
Currently, though, Hunter Street is home to an enormous, fully-excavated cavern which is ready to start welcoming construction. The cavern that now sits under Hunter Street is 20 metres high, 28 metres wide and 180 metres long – with 240,000 tonnes of material (enough to fill more than 290 Olympic size swimming pools) successfully removed from the site.
'This station is going to such an important gateway to Sydney's west, getting people to Parramatta in about 20 minutes, and linking precincts like Sydney Olympic Park, Burwood, the Bays and the health district of Westmead,' says Minister for Transport John Graham.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
21 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
Anyone going UK airports with hand luggage told one swap can save time
Making the one change not only saves you time and money but also helps the environment UK airports are keen to ditch the 100ml liquids rule for anyone carrying hand luggage through security this summer. However, until that happens, travellers must continue to limit and pack any liquids from their hand luggage in a clear bag for security reasons. This has led to a surge in the use of disposable clear plastic bags for toiletries and other liquids across the country. Some UK airports have relaxed the rules around liquids in hand luggage, reducing the need for these plastic bags. However, others still enforce the rule. The lack of consistency across the UK means many holiday -goers will continue to rely on putting their 100ml liquids in a disposable plastic bag. Even though the UK is eager to abolish the rules as soon as possible, thanks to advanced scanners, you may find that the airport you're returning from still insists on bagged 100ml liquids. Fresh data from plastic waste experts at suggests that a staggering 235 million single-use plastic bags could be used in 2025. The data also reveals that an astonishing 3.5 billion bags have been used since the rules were first introduced in 2006, reports the Liverpool Echo. The 100ml liquid regulation at airports, which mandates that liquids be stored in transparent, resealable plastic bags, was put in place in 2006 after a terror plot to blow up transatlantic flights was prevented. This plot involved the use of liquid explosives that were concealed as soft drinks in carry-on luggage. With an estimated 313 million passengers expected to pass through UK airports this year, the number of single-use plastic liquid bags used and discarded could hit 235 million. That's enough to fill two Olympic-sized swimming pools in just one year in the UK. Data projections indicate that a staggering 3.5 billion bags may have been used at UK airports over the last 19 years. When arranged end to end, this quantity of bags equates to 18 journeys around the Earth's equator or four times the height of Mount Everest when piled up. Why does it matter? These bags are crafted from soft plastics, which are rarely recyclable. They frequently end up in landfill sites, where they can take as long as 1,000 years to decompose. As these plastic items deteriorate, they can generate minuscule particles known as microplastics. Studies reveal that these pose a threat to both human and animal health. The energy and materials needed to manufacture these bags are depleting our planet's natural resources, with 98% of single-use plastic products made from fossil fuels or virgin feedstock. What steps can you take? Firstly, make sure you're familiar with the regulations of your departure airport. With many soon to adjust to new rules, there might be no need to bag liquids at all. If you're checking in luggage, avoid placing any liquids in your hand luggage. This eliminates the requirement for any small plastic bags and could also save you time at security checks. If reusable options aren't feasible, BusinessWaste is requesting travellers ditch single-use clear plastic bags in favour of reusable ones at UK airports this summer. The company recommends switching to reusable ones and says there is an array of reusable choices available online and in stores, like Boots and Superdrug. However, just make sure they measure 20cm x 20cm, are transparent, have a capacity no greater than one litre, comply with airport regulations, and can be securely sealed (by a zipper). Another tip is to use airside click-and-collect services for toiletries. This not only bypasses steep airport prices but also eliminates the need to carry liquids in hand luggage, saving space, money, and benefiting the environment. If you do take liquids in your hand luggage, at most airports: containers must hold no more than 100ml containers must be in a single, transparent, resealable plastic bag, which holds no more than a litre and measures approximately 20cm x 20cm contents must fit comfortably inside the bag so it can be sealed the bag must not be knotted or tied at the top you're limited to one plastic bag per person you must show the bag at the airport security point For those who do bring liquids in their carry-on, advises: "Liquids in containers larger than 100ml generally cannot go through security even if the container is only part full. There are some exemptions. Some airports may allow you to take containers of liquid up to 100ml through security in your hand luggage. Check with the airport before you travel. Also, check the rules at other airports you'll be travelling through - for example, on your return journey." Graham Matthews, a plastic waste expert at says making the swap from disposable plastic bags to reusable ones for 100ml hand luggage liquids should be done as soon as possible to avoid even more waste building up. He said: "The plastic bags we use to bring liquids through airports are a huge blight on the environment. "While you may only go on holiday once or twice a year, this quickly adds up as the UK now sees around 300 million air passengers a year. We're really happy to see the new scanners in place and hope that this reduces the reliance on single-use plastic bags. "However, old habits die hard, and many people will be nervous to change to the new system, or find that their return airport still requires liquids to be bagged. For anyone in this position, and until the new rules are firmly in place, we strongly encourage passengers to consider utilising hold luggage, switching to reusable options, or making use of airside click-and-collect."


Time Out
a day ago
- Time Out
The construction of Western Sydney Airport's spectacular airport terminal is officially complete
Back in January, we got an exclusive sneak peek at Sydney's brand new airport – an architecturally spectacular new complex that's coming to life 41 kilometres west of Sydney's CBD. Now, construction on Western Sydney Airport's (WSI) state-of-the-art terminal is officially complete, and the airport is on track to start welcoming passengers in late 2026. The initial design concepts by COX Architecture and Zaha Hadid Architects – awarded back in 2019 – have been brought to life through partnerships with Multiplex, Woods Bagot, Bechtel and WSI. Designed to honour its location on the land of the Darug, Dharawal and Gundungurra people, the new light-flooded terminal prioritises sustainable principles and new-age technology – and six years after the designs were confirmed, the terminal is officially complete. WSI (Nancy-Bird Walton) Airport is the first new greenfield international airport to be built in Australia in more than 50 years, and its 24-hour licence is going to change the game – it's predicted to eventually welcome 80 million passengers every year. At the unveiling of the new terminal, WSI CEO Simon Hickey cited the economic benefit that the airport has already brought – and will continue to bring – to Western Sydney, with almost half of the workforce that have brought the airport to life hailing from Western Sydney, and the more than $500 million spent by the airport with businesses based in Western Sydney. 'WSI has been the catalyst for billions in investment in the region and has helped create thousands of local jobs during construction and will bring even more opportunities across our precinct and the surrounding Bradfield City and Aerotropolis once the airport opens,' he said. 'Since the first sod was turned, nearly half our workforce has hailed from Western Sydney, with around a third learning on the job, so the region should be immensely proud of this new terminal as so many workers, businesses, manufacturers and suppliers have literally helped bring it to life. This is their legacy.'


Time Out
a day ago
- Time Out
Revealed: The shocking income you need to buy a house in Australia
Despite sky-high house prices, many Aussies can't let go of the dream of owning a home one day – even if it's just a shoebox with good natural light. The unfortunate news is that aspiring home buyers in almost every capital city now need to earn almost double what they did in pre-pandemic times to afford a house. In March this year, the ABS revealed that the average price of residential dwellings in Australia passed $1 million for the first time ever. Eeek! If you're still holding onto hope, a new Canstar analysis has unveiled the minimum annual salary you need to comfortably buy a median-priced house (defined as spending less than a third of your household income on mortgage repayments). As expected, Sydneysiders top the list when it comes to the income required to buy a home. With the city's median price jumping from $950,000 in 2020 to a whopping $1,460,000 in 2025, purchasing a house is now only realistic for those earning a gross household income of $272,737. That's $150,000 more pay than you would have needed five years ago (gulp). The Sunshine State follows close behind, with Queenslanders now needing to earn around $100,000 more a year than they did before the pandemic to afford a typical home. The study reveals that to buy a median-priced house ($920,000) in Brisbane, you'd need an annual income of $171,862 – a huge jump from $72,628 back in 2020. Like Queensland, Melbourne buyers now need to earn nearly $100,000 more per year – bringing the total to $160,000 – to comfortably afford the same home they could have snapped up in 2020. The median-priced house has climbed $61,000 in the past five years to $855,000. Sorry, South Australia – you'll need to have boosted your income by $90,000 over the past five years to comfortably afford loan repayments on a house. Even our two smallest states, Tasmania and the Northern Territory, aren't immune, with the income needed to buy almost doubling in both. Rather than buying property, how about taking a holiday instead (to cheer you up)? Here are our favourite places to go. The gross income needed to buy a house in Australia: RECOMMENDED FOR YOU: 👧🏻 🌳 The 10 Aussie regional hotspots everyone wants to move to in 2025