Incredible ancient lost city from 3,500-years-ago home to the Americas' oldest civilization uncovered in Peru
The ancient city of Peñico is thought to have been a vital link between early Pacific coast settlements and remote communities deep in the Andes and Amazon.
4
4
4
Located in the northern Barranca province - around 120 miles north of Lima - the site lies around 1,970 feet above sea level.
It is believed to date back to between 1,800 and 1,500 BC - around the period that early civilisations were flourishing in the Middle East and Asia.
Archaeologists say the discovery sheds light on what became of the Americas' oldest civilisation, the Caral.
Incredible drone footage shows a circular structure on a hillside terrace at the city's centre - surrounded by the remains of stone and mud buildings.
After eight years of research 18 structures were found including ceremonial temples and residential complexes.
Objects were also discovered in buildings at the site including ceremonial objects, clay sculptures of human and animal figures and necklaces made from beads and seashells.
Peñico is located close to where Caral was established 5,000 years ago in the Supe valley of Peru, around 3,000 BC.
Recognised as the oldest known civilisation in the Americas, Caral features 32 monuments.
This includes large pyramid structures, sophisticated irrigation agriculture and urban settlements.
It is believed to have developed in isolation to other comparative early civilisations in India, Egypt, Sumeria and China.
Ancient Pompeii home unseen for 2,000 YEARS finally unearthed
Dr Ruth Shady, the archaeologist who led the recent research into Peñico and the excavation of Caral in the 1990s, said the discovery is crucial in knowing what happened after the Caral civilisation was decimated by climate change.
She told the Reuters news agency that the Peñico community was "situated in a strategic location for trade, for exchange with societies from the coast, the highlands and the jungle."
Archaeologist Marco Machacuay, a researcher with the Ministry of Culture, unveiled the findings at news conference on Thursday.
He said that Peñico's importance lies in it being a continuation of the Caral society.
Many of the Americas' most significant archaeological discoveries have been found in Peru.
This includes the Inca citadel of Machu Picchu in the Andes and the mysterious Nazca lines etched into the desert in southern Peru.
4
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
2 hours ago
- BBC News
Inside the prehistoric 'fat factory'
New research shows Neanderthals may have been even more food savvy than we first thought. Archaeologists have already found out that they would break open animal bones to get out the fatty marrow which is packed full of calories. Now new research from MONREPOS in Germany and Leiden University in the Netherlands found Neanderthals not only broke open bones, but also constructed a prehistoric 'fat factory'. Researchers used to think this sort of behaviour started later in human ancestors, but the new findings suggest it could've been part of Neanderthal behaviour too. The evidence of the 'fat factory' was found at a site in Germany called Neumark-Nord which dates back to around 125,000 years ago when the temperatures were similar to what we experience today. It was here where researchers found evidence that large mammal bones had been crushed and heated in water to made a rich bone grease. Prof. Wil Roebroeks who worked on the study said: "What makes Neumark-Nord so exceptional is the preservation of an entire landscape, not just a single site." That gives archaeologists an even better insight into how Neanderthals used to live all those years ago. "We see Neanderthals hunting and minimally butchering deer in one area, processing elephants intensively in another, and—as this study shows—rendering fat from hundreds of mammal skeletons in a centralized location. "There's even some evidence of plant use, which is rarely preserved. This broad range of behaviours in the same landscape gives us a much richer picture of their culture," he added. Although you might hear people saying to avoid fat in our modern day diets, it's a nutritionally important food group. It's full of calories which give people energy and it helps absorption of important vitamins. In a time where food might be hard to come by, filling up on fat was especially important as a source of energy. Dr. Lutz Kindler, another researcher on the project said this new study shows Neanderthals "understood both the nutritional value of fat and how to access it efficiently."
Daily Mail
7 hours ago
- Daily Mail
Nessie hunters are telling the truth! Bombshell study says those who spot the monster really are seeing something in the loch
Nessie spotters are telling the truth and really do see something in the loch, a jaw-dropping new study has revealed. But those who describe a monster with a long body forming hoops above the water may be telling porkies, the paper suggests. Experts made their findings while examining whether Nessie sightings were influenced by popular depictions of the mythical monster. What they discovered was that the stereotypical Nessie – with her body looping above the loch – is only described in a small number of sightings. And that suggests that most witnesses are being truthful, according to Charles Paxton, a statistician at the University of St Andrews, and co-author of the study. Dr Paxton said: 'The wider conclusion is that it would be wrong for people to assume that people are just making up their experiences 'I'm sure there are liars and exaggerators and things like that, but I also think that most people are reporting their own experiences. 'That doesn't mean there actually is a Loch Ness Monster, but I think witnesses, broadly speaking, are telling the truth as they've experienced it.' The loch, in the Scottish Highlands, has become synonymous with the legendary creature. The modern fascination with Nessie began in April 1933, when Aldie Mackay reported seeing a whale-like creature in the loch To see how Nessie is portrayed in popular culture, the team examined postcards depicting the mythical monster. They found that roughly 30 per cent of the sample group depicted the creature with its body looping in and out of the water. Yet only 1.5 per cent of sightings described Nessie this way. Dr Paxton said: 'There is a mismatch there. 'And that kind of implies to me that the witnesses aren't necessarily being influenced by this imagery that they see in every souvenir shop around the loch.' Those few sightings which do describe a 'hooped' Nessie are false, the researchers believe. For one thing, such a creature is 'biologically impossible', Dr Paxton said. 'It's a really inefficient way to move through water,' he explained. Some people, such as Alan McKenna, founder of Loch Ness Exploration (LNE), believes elusive 'standing waves' might explain sightings of the mythical monster Nessie sightings might just be 'standing waves' Some experts say 'standing waves' might explain sightings of the mythical monster. Alan McKenna, founder of Loch Ness Exploration, said: 'A standing wave occurs when two boat wakes of the exact same frequency and amplitude are moving in opposite directions on the loch surface. When the two boat wakes finally meet and interfere with one another the results have the potential to create a standing wave.' The peaks of standing waves, rising above the calm waters, could be mistaken for 'humps' above the surface. 'And so if people report that, they're at best mistaken or they're telling untruths.' Dr Paxton's co-author, the naturalist Adrian Shine, added: 'Basically serpents undulate laterally – horizontally – as they move through the water. 'And of course they can derive some traction from that, but not if these loops are coming out of the water. 'As a means of progression in water, it's impossible. There's nothing to push against.' Mr Shine, a fellow of the Royal Geographical Society and founder of the Loch Ness Project, says he is a 'sympathetic sceptic' when it comes to the monster. But he says the study lends credibility to those who claim to have seen Nessie. He said: 'Since they are not reporting the loops, which are the stereotypical depiction, their testimony is more likely to be true, sincere and well-observed than not.' He added: 'Our findings lend credibility to the witnesses. The burden of the paper is that the witnesses are not being influenced by the popular stereotype.' The mythical creature has captured the attention of people around the world for decades (artist's impression) Yet he remains doubtful that any mythical monster is behind the sightings. The true cause could be a mixture of boat wakes and birds, among other things. Dr Paxton was more circumspect on the Nessie debate. 'I think the Loch Ness Monster exists as a reported phenomenon,' he said. The new study was published in the journal Endeavour. What IS the Loch Ness Monster? Rumours of a strange creature living in the waters of Loch Ness have abounded over the decades, yet scant evidence has been found to back up these claims. One of the first sightings, believed to have fuelled modern Nessie fever, came in May 2, 1933. On this date the Inverness Courier carried a story about a local couple who claim to have seen 'an enormous animal rolling and plunging on the surface'. Another famous claimed sighting is a photograph taken in 1934 by Colonel Robert Kenneth Wilson. It was later exposed as a hoax by one of the participants, Chris Spurling, who, on his deathbed, revealed that the pictures were staged. Other sightings James Gray's picture from 2001 when he and friend Peter Levings were out fishing on the Loch, while namesake Hugh Gray's blurred photo of what appears to be a large sea creature was published in the Daily Express in 1933. The first reported sighting of the monster is said to have been made in AD565 by the Irish missionary St Columba when he came across a giant beast in the River Ness. But no one has ever come up with a satisfactory explanation for the sightings - although in 2019, 'Nessie expert' Steve Feltham, who has spent 24 years watching the Loch, said he thought it was actually a giant Wels Catfish, native to waters near the Baltic and Caspian seas in Europe. An online register lists more than 1,000 total Nessie sightings, created by Mr Campbell, the man behind the Official Loch Ness Monster Fan Club and is available at So what could explain these mysterious sightings? Many Nessie witnesses have mentioned large, crocodile-like scutes sitting atop the spine of the creature, leading some to believe an escaped amphibian may be to blame. Native fish sturgeons can also weigh several hundred pounds and have ridged backs, which make them look almost reptilian. Some believe Nessie is a long-necked plesiosaur - like an elasmosaur - that survived somehow when all the other dinosaurs were wiped out. Others say the sightings are down to Scottish pines dying and flopping into the loch, before quickly becoming water-logged and sinking. While submerged, botanical chemicals start trapping tiny bubbles of air.
Daily Mail
8 hours ago
- Daily Mail
No more excuses! Men DON'T sleep through the sound of a baby crying, experts reveal
It's a well-worn trope that mothers will wake at the slightest stir from their baby while fathers peacefully doze on. But scientists now say that dads have no excuses for missing midnight nappy changes. Scientists from Aarhus University in Denmark found that men were just as likely to be woken by the sounds of crying as women. While women were slightly more likely to be woken by 'whisper level' sounds, computer modelling shows this cannot explain why they do so much more of the care. The researchers monitored 142 non-parents while they slept and recorded how often they woke up in response to the sound of a baby crying. Women were, on average, about 14 per cent more likely to wake up to sounds between 33 and 44 decibels - about as loud as birdsong or a library. However, men and women woke with the same frequency as soon as the volume started to approach that of a real baby's crying. Lead researcher Professor Christine Parsons told MailOnline: 'We had participants all waking up and we didn't have evidence that men were sleeping through.' Scientists have busted the myth that men are more likely to sleep through a baby's crying than women, finding only minor differences in how the sexes respond to nighttime noises Although the idea that men can sleep through their baby's crying is a myth, there are real reasons to think that women might wake up more frequently in the night. Studies have shown that women tend to report more disturbed sleep overall, regardless of sounds. Likewise, research suggests that women might be more sensitive to high-pitched sounds. However, Professor Parsons' research, published in the journal Emotion, shows that any differences only translate into small changes in waking patterns when the sounds are very quiet. More importantly, these small statistical differences cannot explain the large gap in care burdens. In a second trial, the researchers gave 117 first-time Danish parents an app to log their nighttime care over a week. Then, the researchers used simulations to predict what that distribution of nighttime care would look like if the only factor were those differences found by the first study. Professor Parsons says: 'What we found was that women did 75 per cent of the nighttime caregiving. 'If we estimate how much caregiving would emerge from that small difference [in sound responses], it would look much more equal between men and women.' What this shows is that inherent biological or psychological differences in how men and women respond to sounds in the night cannot explain why women do more of the care. These findings come in stark contrast to the extremely widespread myth that men aren't as easily woken by their children. In particular, Professor Parsons singled out an influential but unscientific survey funded by Lemsip, which claimed that the sound of the wind or the buzz of a fly were more likely to wake men than the sound of a child crying. While these findings weren't peer-reviewed and had no scientific merit whatsoever, these ideas have spread extremely far. Professor Parsons says: 'When I talk to scientists at conferences, they have actually heard of it and say, "Wasn't there that paper on waking behaviour?"' 'But these are phantom papers and phantom ideas, and if an idea confirms a suspicion or a belief that people have, then it is very difficult to change people's minds about it.' The study focused on adults without children in order to see whether pre-parenthood gender differences alone affected nighttime care patterns. However, pregnancy and childbirth cause massive hormonal changes that might affect waking times. There are also good reasons why new mothers might get up more in the night, especially if they are breastfeeding. Similarly, men in the OECD receive an average of 2.3 weeks of parental leave compared to 18.5 weeks for women. This means women get more practice caring for babies at night and don't have to wake up for work in the morning. All of these other factors, alongside societal expectations, are likely to be important in explaining why women do so much more of the nightly care. Professor Parsons says: 'I'm not excluding any of those things, but this is not really what our paper is about. 'What we were trying to test is a very specific question about how men and women can or cannot sleep through different types of sounds.' ABOUT CIRCIDIAN RHYTHMS Our internal circadian rhythms, or circadian clock, is responsible for waking our bodies up in the morning and ensuring they get a good night's rest. In a healthy person, cortisol levels peak at around 8am, which wakes us up (in theory), and drop to their lowest at 3am the next day, before rising back to its peak five hours later. Ideally, this 8am peak will be triggered by exposure to sunlight, if not an alarm. When it does, the adrenal glands and brain will start pumping adrenaline. By mid-morning, the cortisol levels start dropping, while the adrenaline (for energy) and serotonin (a mood stabilizer) keep pumping. At midday, metabolism and core body temperature ramp up, getting us hungry and ready to eat. After noon, cortisol levels start their steady decline. Metabolism slows down and tiredness sets in. Gradually the serotonin turns into melatonin, which induces sleepiness. Our blood sugar levels decrease, and at 3am, when we are in the middle of our sleep, cortisol levels hit a 24-hour low.
