External financing in FY2025-26
The Ministry of Economic Affairs has recently reported on the gross inflows up to the end of April 2025. They have aggregated to US$5.7 billion, equivalent to only 55 percent of the annual target. They should have reached 83 percent of the annual target by the end of April.
The biggest shortfall is in commercial loans. The target is US$3.8 billion, whereas the actual loans received aggregate to less than US$0.8 billion. Given the enhanced risk perceptions of lending to Pakistan, it is not surprising that private creditors have reduced their exposure to Pakistan.
The surprising outcome is the significant shortfall also in inflows from multilateral development agencies. The Asian Development Bank is, more or less, on target and has disbursed 76 percent of its annual commitment by April. However, the big shortfall is in the inflows from the World Bank. Only 51 percent of the annual target has been met up to April.
The IMF Staff Report of the 17th of May, following the first review of the IMF Programme, contains estimates of the likely inflow of external financing by the end of 2024-25.
These IMF estimates include the requirements of inflows to the private sector in Pakistan. The good news is that the expectation is of a gross inflow of US$18.9 billion, including rollovers, which will be $2.5 billion above the requirements of amortization of debt.
The expectation is that the foreign exchange reserves of the SBP will rise by $4.5 billion by the end of 2024-25. US$2 billion will be the inflow from the IMF, which has already taken place.
Consequently, the projection is that by end of June 2025, the level of foreign exchange reserves will reach US$14 billion. This will provide import cover of 2.8 months and put Pakistan in a somewhat more secure position.
There is need, however, to appreciate that total external inflows, of both foreign direct investment and loan financing, will be significantly smaller in 2024-25. Inclusive of inflows into the private sector, the IMF estimate of the actual external financing of Pakistan is US$20.9 billion. This is 23 percent less than the total inflow of US$26.3 billion in 2023-24.
We turn now to the outlook for 2025-26. The first part of the external financing requirement is the size of the current account surplus or deficit in the balance of payments. The IMF Staff report has projected a small deficit of US$1.5 billion.
Exports are expected to show a growth rate of 5.4 percent, while imports are projected to increase by 3.4 percent. The turmoil in the global trade after the US announcement of higher tariffs is likely to adversely impact on the volume of global trade. Further, the shortfall in major crop outputs like cotton and wheat will raise the volume of agricultural imports. Also, if a target GDP growth rate of 3.6 percent is to be achieved then this will imply larger imports of inputs and capital goods.
The IMF has been cautious about the level of remittances, which are likely to increase by 20 percent in 2024-25, and are the main reason for a near zero current account deficit. The expectation is that they will fall marginally in 2025-26. Also, only 3 percent growth is anticipated in interest payments and repatriation of profits. The latter may be significantly higher due to increase in risk perceptions about investment in Pakistan.
Overall, there is the risk that there may be a larger deficit in the current account in 2025-26, which could approach US$4 billion, equivalent to almost 1 percent of the GDP. The balance of payments projections of the IMF for 2025-26 are based on a double-digit depreciation of the rupee.
The projection of the level of amortization of external debt, both public and private, is of a significant increase of almost 18 percent. It is expected to rise from US$14.7 billion in 2024-25 to US$17.3 billion in 2025-26. Fortunately, repayment to the IMF will be less by almost $1 billion.
Turning to the available financing, the IMF has been cautious about the projection of foreign direct investment in 2025-26. The expectation is that it will remain at the same level as in 2024-25 of US$2.1 billion. However, the tense security situation may lead to some postponement of investments in South Asia.
Further, the IMF is also not expecting significant increase in the disbursement of loans in 2025-26. They are projected at $17 billion as compared to US$16.7 billion in 2024-25.
Overall, the lack of optimism in the IMF projections is clearly indicated by the expectation that the available financing will be virtually the same as the total external financing requirement of US$19.3 billion. This is in contrast to the expected surplus of US$2.5 billion from sources other than the IMF in 2024-25.
The assumption in the projections is that the IMF Programme will continue throughout 2025-26. Two reviews during the year will be successfully completed and Pakistan will meet the quantitative performance criteria and implement the agreed agenda of reforms.
Uninterrupted continuation of the IMF Programme in 2025-26 will lead to a loan disbursement of $2 billion from the IMF. In addition, there will be some inflows from the resilience facility, which has not yet been included in the IMF projections. Overall, Pakistan's reserves are projected to increase by $2 billion. In addition, there could be other prospective financing of US$1.4 billion.
Overall, the above IMF projections indicate a relatively high level of risk and uncertainty in the level of external financing in 2025-26. The requirement may be higher because of a larger current account deficit and the need for purchase of armaments. Foreign direct investment may be adversely affected by the security situation. On top of all this, Pakistan will have to continue performing well within the framework of the IMF Programme.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Is Gold Standard coming back?
Several countries have begun to trade in currencies other than the dollar as the US-led West continues to use punitive sanctions as a foreign policy tool — sanctions designed to throttle trade, strangle fund transfers through the Western controlled SWIFT payment system and freeze assets — physical and liquid assets. This trend has gathered considerable momentum after the US-led West imposed sanctions against powerful countries like Russia and China leading to their decision to strengthen an available forum, Brazil-Russia-India-China-South Africa (BRICS), with its expanding membership (including Iran) which President Trump has openly declared a war against. In recent months' Western attention has riveted on China procuring gold while reducing its investments in US treasuries/bonds by about 300 billion dollars - still a drop in the ocean as China's total holdings of US bonds are over USD 3 trillion, which have suffered a rate decline due to the tariffs announced by President Trump on Liberation Day. This has led to discussions on whether some countries intend to revert back to the gold standard, defined as fixing the price for gold in their local paper currency rather than pegging it to the dollar or the Euro. The gold standard reduced uncertainty in trade with price imbalances between trading countries offset by a balance of payment adjustment mechanism as gold, used to pay for imports, reduced the money supply of importing nations leading to deflation and thereby making them more competitive; while importation of gold by net exporters increased money supply causing inflation and making them less competitive. To put it from a historical perspective, the demise of the gold standard began soon after the end of World War II as the United States emerged as the largest creditor nation in the world. It was initially replaced by what was referred to as the gold exchange standard that allowed the dollar as a reserve currency but exchangeable for gold at the rate fixed by the US – an option that was available to central banks but not to firms or individual firms. Initially, this rate was set at 35 dollars per ounce. However, some countries at the time opted to impose trade restrictions to protect their reserves and exchange rates. French President Charles de Gaulle began reducing the dollar reserves held by the Banque de France (French central bank) and exchanging them for gold at the official rate, which led to a sustained balance of payments crisis in the US culminating in President Nixon's decision on 15 August 1971 to end US dollar convertibility to gold and replace it with a system which allowed for periodic devaluation of the dollar against gold. In December 1971 the US dollar was devalued to USD 38 per ounce, in October 1973 it was further devalued to USD 42.22 and as a measure of the failure of this measure the dollar was then floated. By 1976 October, the US officially changed the definition of the US dollar and references to gold were removed from the statutes. But countries have continued to cite gold as a component of their reserves to this day, including Pakistan. One advantage of the gold standard was that it took control of issuing paper money out of the hands of officials — officials who can be easily manipulated by economic team leaders guided less by economic and more by political considerations — as it allowed the quantity of gold held to act as a limit to further issuance of paper currency, thereby avoiding the threat of inflation. Pakistan as a case in point bears testimony to the misuse of discretionary powers by State Bank of Pakistan, which accounts for prohibitive conditions imposed by donor agencies on monetary policy (discount rate as well as the external value of the rupee). However, it is relevant to note that a 2012 study disabused those nostalgic about the good days of the gold standard after two-thirds of economic historians rejected the notion that the gold standard was 'effective in stabilising prices and moderating business-cycle fluctuations during the nineteenth century' and instead they maintained that the gold standard deepened the 1929 depression. Be that as it may, reserves cited by countries include not only US dollar/Euro reserves but also gold reserves. Today the largest gold reserves are held by the US (8133 tons), followed by Germany 3350 tons, Italy 2451.8 tons, France 2436 tons, Russia 2330 tons and China 2299 tons. On 31 July, perhaps as a countermeasure to reported China's gold purchases, the US imposed a 39 percent tariff on one kilogram and 100-ounce gold bars from Switzerland with immediate effect. The impact was very well argued in a tweet by endgame macro: 'a US Customs ruling reclassified these bars, the exact formats COMEX accepts for delivery, into a tariffed category. That's critical because Switzerland is the world's largest gold refining hub, and a substantial share of the physical gold that underpins COMEX futures flows from there. Within hours of the news, premiums for New York gold futures jumped above the spot price, signalling that deliverable supply into the US market had abruptly tightened. Swiss refiners have already slowed or halted shipments, further compounding the squeeze. At its core, this is about leverage and strategic positioning. The US is applying pressure on Switzerland while giving domestic refiners a direct pricing advantage in kilo and 100 ounce formats. That could lock in a higher New York futures premium, even if global spot prices hold steady. By effectively capping imports of these bar types, the move raises the stakes for COMEX short sellers, whose ability to source bars for delivery just got more complicated. Alternative routes such as shipping 400 ounce bars to London for recasting in the US, or rerouting through non-Swiss refineries will take time, limiting throughput in the interim. The longer game may be less about tariffs for revenue and more about weaponizing the gold market, creating a controlled squeeze in the very bar formats that drive global futures pricing.' Game perhaps was won by China; however, the set has been won by the US but the match is still to be played out between the two competitors focused on domination of the global economy. Pakistan as a case in point has dollar reserves of around 14 billion though rollovers alone are USD 16 billion and gold reserves of 64.75 tons against India's dollar reserves of over 700 billion and gold reserves of 880 tons. There is a long way to go for Pakistan to catch up and requires more than a decade of sustained growth backed by in-house out of the box policies that will reduce the country's indebtedness in the power sector (requiring comprehensive macro-policy decisions instead of micro decisions that are continuing) and a tax structure designed to be fair, equitable and non-anomalous rather than simply focused on raising total collections. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Circular debt: Govt moves to cut LNG import, reform gas sector
ISLAMABAD: The government is fine-tuning reforms in the gas sector, including the reduction of two LNG cargoes per month, along with other measures aimed at bringing the circular debt flow of the sector to zero, well-informed sources in Petroleum Division told Business Recorder. Currently, the gas sector's circular debt stands at around Rs 2.6 trillion, mainly due to lower RLNG consumption by the power sector. The International Monetary Fund (IMF) has directed the government to eliminate the gas sector's circular debt flow. The fourth meeting of the committee was held on August 8, 2025, under the chairmanship of the Minister for Petroleum at the Task Force Headquarters, Army Air Defence HQ, Westridge, Rawalpindi. The meeting was attended by Advisor to the Prime Minister on Privatization, Lt-General Zafar Iqbal, Secretary Petroleum, and representatives of OGRA. IMF delineates steps to address gas circular debt The Petroleum Minister briefed participants on his recent meeting with the Prime Minister, during which the Task Force on Power presented issues arising from reduced LNG off take by the power sector. He emphasized the need for a clear strategy ahead of the planned visit to Qatar. The Minister also updated the forum on the progress made in the previous three committee meetings, where the work of four sub-committees was reviewed: Sub-committee 1–led by the Secretary Power, tasked with making recommendations on LNG demand synchronisation for power plants. This includes improved forecasting and coordination, as well as addressing queries raised earlier regarding Energy Purchase Price (EPP) comparisons between imported coal and RLNG. Sub-committee -2 –progress on the Gas Circular Debt Management Plan (CDMP), to be presented by the Advisor to PM on Privatization. Sub-committee 3 led by the Secretary Petroleum Division, focusing on recommendations for the reduction/review of RLNG sale price components and add-ons. Sub-committee 4 headed by the Chairman OGRA, tasked with reviewing components of revenue requirements, particularly the return-on-asset formula for the Sui companies. The progress reported by the conveners of the sub-committees provided is as follows : Sub-Committee-1: LNG Demand Synchronization: Secretary Power noted that based on the discussions held in the third review meeting, options of comparing energy purchase price of imported coal versus RLNG have been prepared. He stated that 50 percent generation from imported coal-based plants is a must off-take, however, less generation is being taken from these plants. He further stated that RLNG based power plants cannot be declared as 'must-run' power plants as the same will have implications on overall power generation basket. He emphasized that a technical level coordination committee needs to be constituted between Power and Petroleum Division to address the issues of RLNG demand and off-take. Naveed Qaiser, a representative of Power Planning & Monitoring Company (PPMC) which has squeezed the roles of PPIB and CPPA-G presented the numbers of imported coal versus RLNG energy purchase price as was asked by the Committee in its 3rd meeting. He said that at current RLNG price power sector is consuming upto 340 mmcfd of RLNG which can have additional consumption of upto 174 mmcfd at RLNG tariff of Rs. 1,500/mmbtu and 127 mmcfd at RLNG tariff of Rs. 2,000/mmbtu respectively. He however, highlighted financial implications on power generation basket in both incremental RLNG usage options of Rs. 88 billion and Rs. 41 billion per annum. Lt-General Zafar Iqbal pointed out that Task Force team has worked out that RLNG at WACOG of Rs. 2,200/mmbtu will manifold increase its consumption in power sector. He emphasized that there is on-going study on conversion of imported coal power plants to local coal and consumption of additional RLNG would, at indicated tariff, be beneficial for both Petroleum and Power sectors. He further explained that country's average demand of power during winters is 12,500 MW whereas same is 25,500 MW in summer when all plants are up and running. He stressed that Power Division may review the numbers of the comparative tariff with imported coal where RLNG intake can increase i.e., replacing the imported coal-based generation. Advisor to PM on Privatisation, Muhammad Ali also emphasized reworking of fuel cost numbers of imported coal versus RLNG in respect of increased consumption of RLNG in power so that demand numbers for LNG cargoes could be firmed. He proposed 24 cargoes be taken into NPD for CY26; Secretary Petroleum proposed extension of contract beyond 2031 was better than NPD route to address the issue of surplus cargoes. =The Committee decided that Secretary Power and Secretary Petroleum will work towards institutionalizing a coordination mechanism on short-term and it would be shared in the next meeting for concurrence of the Committee. The demand goes upto 12,500 MW in winters, in summers when the production goes up to 25,500 MW, all thermal plants are operating. If power substitutes the imported coal, at the RLNG rate of Rs. 2,000/mmbtu price, the Power Division maintained that it could lift 127 mmcfd more and that this analysis may be conducted by Task Force and Power Division on price and additional lift-off. The chair decided that sub-committee-1 firms up its recommendations with task force and submit its final report. Sub-Committee-2: Circular Debt Mitigation: Advisor to PM Privatisation, Muhammad Ali informed that a meeting with KPMG, Task Force team and Petroleum Division has already been held wherein detailed data has been exchanged. He stated that Task Force team is closely working with KPMG to develop options on gas CDMP and same will be presented next week. On the request of Advisor, Asad Hussain of Task Force presented concept paper and basic premise for CDMP work. He highlighted that five cash inflow options for settlement of stock of gas CD which included: (i) savings from LNG cargoes diversion (ii) imposition of PL of Rs. 5/liter (iii) use of incremental dividends of SOEs (E&P companies) (iv) RLNG receivables from power sector and (v) 100 percent waiver of LPS/interest payable to gas producers. He highlighted that Task Force is closely working with KPMG to finalize the gas CDMP. Lt-General Zafar Iqbal observed that 24 surplus cargoes per annum should be taken for contract extension beyond year 2031 third-party sale/ Net Proceed Differential. Secretary Petroleum Division suggested that if power demand increases at reduced RLNG tariff then number of cargoes should be reviewed and confirmed before visit to Qatar. He also proposed IMF sensitivities, Reko Diq commitments and foreign listing (GDR requirement be kept in mind). Lt-General Zafar Iqbal suggested that all cash inflows/revenues especially PL should be ring-fenced for settlement of gas CD. Minister for Petroleum Division also supported the same, citing N-52 formula, however, he observed that utilisation of collections of levy previously granted to Power Division as allowed by Finance Division should be extended to Petroleum Division for settlement of circular debt (as tariff reduction delinked). Representative from KPMG highlighted that auditors of SOE's may also be taken on board with specific reference to IAS-39. On the apprehension of committee at projected cash flows of SOEs and dividends without hurting their future investments in important projects like Reko Diq, Advisor to PM suggested that KPMG and Asad Hussain develop the working in the CDMP. Minister for Petroleum Division recommended that Additional Secretary (Policy) and Asad Naqvi, KPMG and CEOs of the companies discuss the proposed scheme to be discussed in the next meeting. He emphasized that CEOs/CFOs of the SOEs must satisfy the committee on the above stated matters. Sub-Committee-3: LNG Tariff Rationalization : Secretary Petroleum Division highlighted that sub-committee is working on RLNG cost components which include the PQA charges and a meeting in this regard is scheduled with PQA. He stated that numbers are being firmed up and would be presented in next meeting of the committee. He highlighted that with respect to scope of the sub-committee regarding LNG demand increase, a case has been moved for relaxation of moratorium in respect of pending and new individual gas connection applications. Minister for Petroleum Division observed that since option of a reduction of LNG cargoes is on the cards, therefore, optimum utilization of terminals needs to be worked out for cost reduction. It was noted that the option of shelving of 2 LNG cargoes per month working done so far takes into account the optimal combination for terminal capacity utilization which comprises of regasification of 3 LNG cargoes at terminal-1 and 4 LNG cargoes at terminal -2. Minister for Petroleum advised that sub-committee holds meeting(s) and finalizes its recommendations early next week. Sub-Committee-4: Domestic Gas Tariff Efficiency and Transparency: Chairman OGRA, being lead of this sub-committee made a presentation on the work done by the committee so far. He highlighted that for the review of the key component of the revenue requirement i.e, Return on Asset (RoA), OGRA has issued Letter of Intent (LoI) to selected consultant who will submit study/report within 90 days. He stated although the cost of gas alone is 89% of the total revenue requirements and there is little room for squeezing the cost components, however, OGRA is objectively reviewing the other components like fixed/ variable costs, T&D costs especially HR benchmarking. He informed that Sui Companies demonstrated improvement in their UFG against OGRA approved benchmark. He informed that as per the UFG study done in year 2018 through KPMG, UFG benchmark of 7.6 percent was fixed for a period of 5 years which comprises of 5 percent technical allowance and 2.6 percent based on meeting 30 Key Monitoring Indicators. He stated that digitization of gas flow stations like Sale Meter Station, Town Border Station and Consumer Meter Station is giving real-time information to companies and helping isolate the loss-making areas. Minister for Petroleum Division observed that in-line with licence condition of the Sui companies, the UFG targets need to be reviewed periodically. He also enquired after the UFG study done in 2018 which was valid until 2023, on how OGRA is benchmarking UFG targets thereafter. OGRA Chairman responded that earlier OGRA used to apply benchmark on both T&D UFG, however, now that practice was discontinued in FY23 and UFG targets are set separately for transmission and distributions segments. It was noted that OGRA is considering to do a new study on UFG benchmarking which would take 6-8 months' time. Minister for Petroleum Division advised that new UFG study be completed by OGRA by November 30, 2025. He also stressed upon the need that sub-committee should make recommendations at review of revenue requirements on quantitative basis (instead of qualitative basis) keeping materiality of report before the next meeting of the committee. Insiders claim that the Power sector Task Force has done extensive work on the issue of excess gas in the country and how to resolve RLNG supply issue. The officials also confirmed that senior members of the Task Force made a detailed presentation to the Prime Minister and senior government ministers and officials on roadmap for RLNG cargoes and ways to reduce gas prices for industry and power sector. Sources say this was aimed at improving energy security by increasing use of domestic gas and increasing exports through reduction of gas price for industry and power. Among various measures proposed, the RLNG ring-fencing mechanism was suggested to be done away with and having one blended gas price for industry and power. The final report will be submitted to the Prime Minister's Office as per Notification of the Committee. It was advised that meeting of the main committee may be held at on August 18, 2025 (today) at Head Quarters of Task on Power, Rawalpindi. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Business Recorder
20 hours ago
- Business Recorder
US-India trade talks scheduled for August called off, source says
A planned visit by US trade negotiators to New Delhi from August 25-29 has been called off, a source said, delaying talks on a proposed trade agreement and dashing hopes of relief from additional US tariffs on Indian goods from August 27. The current round of negotiations for the proposed bilateral trade agreement is now likely to be deferred to another date that has yet to be decided, the source with direct knowledge of the matter said. The US embassy in New Delhi said it has no additional information on the trade and tariff talks, which are being handled by the United States Trade Representative (USTR). Missed signals, lost deal: How India-US trade talks collapsed India's trade ministry did not immediately reply to a Reuters email seeking comments. Earlier this month, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25% tariff on Indian goods, citing New Delhi's continued imports of Russian oil in a move that sharply escalated tensions between the two nations. The new import tax, which will come into effect from August 27, will raise duties on some Indian exports to as high as 50% - among the highest levied on any US trading partner. Trade talks between New Delhi and Washington collapsed after five rounds of negotiations over disagreement on opening India's vast farm and dairy sectors and stopping Russian oil purchases. In India, Trump's tariffs spark calls to boycott American goods India's Foreign Ministry has said the country is being unfairly singled out for buying Russian oil while the United States and European Union continue to purchase goods from Russia.
