logo
‘Devil Will Be In Detail': Luxon Reacts To Possible USA-China Trade Deal

‘Devil Will Be In Detail': Luxon Reacts To Possible USA-China Trade Deal

Scoop12-06-2025
Prime Minister Christopher Luxon says a possible USA-China trade deal is positive news, but time will tell what it means for New Zealand and the rest of the world.
US President Donald Trump said a deal with China is "done" after two days of high-level talks in London.
Luxon welcomed the news but wanted to see the finer details.
"What we want to see is more certainty in the global trading environment, and I've read the reports as well," he said.
"The devil will be in the detail, but that can only be a good thing."
Luxon said he expected to discuss the matter with China President Xi Jinping on his next trip the global giant.
"I'm sure that will be a topic of conversation about how we see the global trading environment and how we're observing in the region, but also around the world," he said.
Despite the trade uncertainty, Luxon said New Zealand exporters to the US had been making good progress.
"They'll still finding really great opportunities to grow their businesses, they're doing a great job of targeting the right channels and customers," he said.
"But yes, of course that will be a big top of conversation when I do catch up with both President Xi and Premier Li (Qiang) in due course."
Agriculture Minister Todd McClay also welcomed the news of a possible US-China trade deal.
The overnight announcement comes as the government welcomes the state of the country's agriculture sector.
The Ministry of Primary Industries' Situation and Outlook report is projecting a double digit increase in New Zealand export revenues this year - though it warns about global uncertainty.
It estimates New Zealand's agricultural export revenue could reach just under $60 billion by the end of June, up from a dip in 2023-4.
McClay told Morning Report if a US-China deal has been done it would be "good news".
At an OECD trade ministers meeting in Paris last week he had met with the trade ministers of both China and the US.
Both had then gone off for joint talks so some momentum had been building to try and find a solution to their tariffs impasse.
If things calmed down for international trade it would bring "welcome relief" for exporters and result in some "sensible decision-making".
Exporters 'go for value'
McClay said the remarkable growth in primary exports was very positive.
Dairy had enjoyed a solid season with a good supply of grass which had increased milk production.
The meat sector was performing well and for the first time $5 billion worth of kiwifruit had been exported.
Even the US market faced with tariff uncertainty was providing some opportunities for Kiwi exporters, citing the example of NZ King Salmon which has talked of increased sales at a higher price.
Kiwi exporters were working hard to add value to their products, McClay said. One example was selling ready to eat burger patties to China which resulted in greater returns for farmers.
"So we're seeing Kiwi exporters go for value, not competing on price anywhere as much as they used to."
Luxon said the government, particularly McClay and Finance Minister Nicola Willis could take a "tremendous credit" for the growth.
"We've created the conditions for growth; it's ultimately up to the businesses themselves to go out and seize on those opportunities," he said.
"But if I think about the work that Todd's undertaken to make sure we're opening new markets, whether it's the GCC, the UAE, a 21 percent growth in the UK just in the last 12 months, a 28 percent in the EU by virtue of Todd bringing that agreement into earlier acceptance.
"There's been tremendous progress made on the trade front, and I think Nicola's work to make sure that she's cleaning up the books, good financial management, good fiscal management to lower inflation, to lower interest rates to get the economy growing, to get people employed - that's the work we've been doing as a government."
Luxon reiterated the government's belief in the importance of growth and said it was the primary industry sector pulling New Zealand out of a recession.
"We've got a really exciting future to shape it despite all the volatility that's out there in the world.
"Really proud of the primary industry sector, but also proud of the work of both Nicola and Todd and all of our team to create the conditions for growth as well."
On building in sustainability
A government-backed grass certification standard for dairy and meat exports had been launched at Mystery Creek Fieldays yesterday, McClay said.
This would be highly desirable for markets in China, other parts of Asia and the Middle East, McClay said.
"Grass fed now is increasingly wanted by consumers and they're willing to pay more."
On sustainable products, Groundswell has been calling for New Zealand to exit the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.
McClay said that was not going to happen mainly because it would make exports to many markets untenable.
He believed Groundswell and others were worried about higher costs and lower production if they adopted sustainable measures.
"We've been really clear - we think through technology and other things we can meet these obligations without putting farmers out of business."
Alternatives to farmers going into the Emissions Trading Scheme were being worked on and would be announced soon.
McClay said the requirement of reducing methane by 10 percent by 2030 was on track to be met.
"So it shows farmers are willing to do it but we have to lean heavily into technology rather than just planting trees."
A number of products, known as methane inhibitors, have been developed already although they might have to overcome consumer resistance.
McClay said anything developed would have to go through rigorous scientific testing.
There would be a range of solutions developed and farmers would decide which ones they wanted to pick up.
"The overseas customers through the dairy company should be paying for this, not the New Zealand farmer."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith
Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith

RNZ News

timean hour ago

  • RNZ News

Watchdog agency launches probe into former Trump prosecutor Jack Smith

By Kaanita Iyer , CNN Special Counsel Jack Smith delivers remarks in Washington, DC, on 1 August, 2023. Photo: Getty via CNN Newsource The Office of Special Counsel has launched an investigation into former special counsel Jack Smith, who led criminal probes into President Donald Trump's handling of classified documents and alleged efforts to subvert the 2020 election. The investigation into potential Hatch Act violations comes as Trump and his allies have sought retribution against his political enemies and those who brought investigations against him. The Hatch Act limits certain political activities of government workers. It is supposed to stop the federal government from affecting elections or going about its activities in a partisan manner. According to the OSC's explanation of the rule, it applies to federal employees as well as state and local employees who work with federally funded programmes. While the Office of Special Counsel - which is distinct from the special counsels, like Smith, who are appointed to oversee politically sensitive Justice Department investigations - is an independent agency created by Congress. It is currently helmed by a Trump appointee in an acting capacity after the president fired the previous head of the office, who was appointed by President Joe Biden for a five year term. The office handles allegations of whistleblower retaliation and Hatch Act investigations, according to its website. CNN has reached out to a representative for Smith and to the White House for comment. The New York Post first reported the news. In 2021, a report found that 13 administration officials from Trump's first term violated the Hatch Act, including former adviser Kellyanne Conway, whom the Office of Special Counsel had previously recommended be removed from her job. Biden's press secretary Karine Jean-Pierre received a warning letter in 2023 for violating the Hatch Act by using the term "mega MAGA" from the briefing room podium. The rule is a workplace guideline, and violating it is not a crime. Responses can vary significantly after employees violate the rule, from a slap on the wrist to loss of a job. Smith no longer works for the federal government after he resigned from the Justice Department earlier this year - months after he formally dropped the classified documents and election subversion cases following Trump's victory in the 2024 election. Smith's two-year investigation into Trump was historic, marking the first time a former occupant of the White House faced federal criminal charges. Trump and his allies rallied against Smith, attacking his probes as a weaponization of the federal government. Trump had vowed to fire Smith once he retook the office, shattering previous norms around special counsel investigations. The Office of Special Counsel investigation comes after Trump ally Sen. Tom Cotton claimed earlier this week that "Smith used his DOJ role to influence the election" in favour of Biden's and Vice President Kamala Harris' campaigns, pointing to Smith filing a brief within 60 days of Election Day - which could violate a separate Justice Department rule that goes beyond the Hatch Act. Richard Painter, the top ethics lawyer in the George W Bush administration, told CNN he has "never seen a prosecutor found to violate the Hatch Act for pleading with a court". "If Jack Smith was making public announcements close to the election and putting up press releases, that is something he'd have to be extremely careful about," said Painter, now a law professor at the University of Minnesota. "But this was a case that'd been pending ever since the summer of 2023, and for him to continue the case with the filings with the courts that he filed, I don't think that is a violation of the Hatch Act." It is unclear what exactly the Office of Special Counsel is investigating as a possible violation of the Hatch Act. Painter also cast doubt on the independence of the agency under the Trump administration. Earlier this year, Trump fired Hampton Dellinger, a Biden appointee, and picked US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer to serve as interim head of the office. Trump's nominee for the position, Paul Ingrassia, awaits Senate confirmation. "A political appointee is going to do what the president wants. So, you know, it's not really functioning as an independent agency," Painter told CNN. CNN has reported that insiders and independent watchdogs are raising alarms over the historically a non-partisan agency, saying it has been "captured" by loyalists from the very administration it's supposed to police. "The office is a shell of its former self," a former federal ethics official previously told CNN in an interview. - CNN

India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say
India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say

RNZ News

time2 hours ago

  • RNZ News

India will continue to buy Russian oil, government sources say

By Shivam Patel and Chandni Shah US President Donald Trump and Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrive to hold a joint press conference in the East Room of the White House in Washington, DC, on 13 February, 2025. Photo: AFP India will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties , two Indian government sources said, not wishing to be identified due to the sensitivity of the matter. "These are long-term oil contracts," one of the sources said. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Trump last month indicated in a Truth Social post that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. On Friday, Trump told reporters that he had heard that India would no longer be buying oil from Russia. The New York Times on Saturday (local time) quoted two unnamed senior Indian officials as saying there had been no change in Indian government policy, with one official saying the government had "not given any direction to oil companies" to cut back imports from Russia. Reuters reported this week that Indian state refiners stopped buying Russian oil in the past week after discounts narrowed in July. "On our energy sourcing requirements ... we look at what is there available in the markets, what is there on offer, and also what is the prevailing global situation or circumstances," India's foreign ministry spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal told reporters during a regular briefing on Friday. Jaiswal added that India has a "steady and time-tested partnership" with Russia, and that New Delhi's relations with various countries stand on their own merit and should not be seen from the prism of a third country. The White House in Washington did not immediately respond to requests for comment. Indian refiners are pulling back from Russian crude as discounts shrink to their lowest since 2022, when Western sanctions were first imposed on Moscow, due to lower Russian exports and steady demand, sources said earlier this week. The country's state refiners - Indian Oil Corp, Hindustan Petroleum Corp, Bharat Petroleum Corp and Mangalore Refinery Petrochemical Ltd - have not sought Russian crude in the past week or so, four sources familiar with the refiners' purchase plans told Reuters. On 14 July, Trump threatened 100 percent tariffs on countries that buy Russian oil unless Moscow reaches a major peace deal with Ukraine. Russia is the top supplier to India, responsible for about 35 percent of India's overall supplies. Russia continued to be the top oil supplier to India during the first six months of 2025, accounting for about 35 percent of India's overall supplies, followed by Iraq, Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, received about 1.75 million barrels per day of Russian oil in January-June this year, up 1 percent from a year ago, according to data provided to Reuters by sources. Nayara Energy, a major buyer of Russian oil, was recently sanctioned by the European Union as the refinery is majority-owned by Russian entities, including oil major Rosneft. Last month, Reuters reported that Nayara's chief executive had resigned after the imposition of EU sanctions and company veteran Sergey Denisov had been appointed as CEO. Three vessels laden with oil products from Nayara Energy have yet to discharge their cargoes, hindered by the new EU sanctions on the Russia-backed refiner, Reuters reported late last month. - Reuters

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?
Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

NZ Herald

time5 hours ago

  • NZ Herald

Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited?

Listening to articles is free for open-access content—explore other articles or learn more about text-to-speech. Why are we more likely to buy when our options are limited? Good business sense using consumer psychology. Photo / Getty Images Every city has its signatures. In Ho Chi Minh City it was someone pointing at my sneakers and offering to clean them. In Da Nang it was, 'Taxi, sir?' and in Hội An it's been, 'Want a boat ride?' We have resolutely fought off all efforts to part us from our money. Well, most efforts. It was our first afternoon in Hội An, a historical port city in central Vietnam, home to a Unesco world-heritage ancient town. We'd gone in search of a particular tailor, recommended to us by our hotel and breathless English tourists on TikTok. At the first street corner, I got out my phone to check directions, and 15 minutes later we were at a completely different tailor, having been expertly waylaid by one of their 'scouts', who'd seen us and asked if she could offer directions … The next day we did a lantern-making class at our hotel, led by the ever-patient tutor, Moon. Moon asked us what we had planned and made a few recommendations, including one for dinner at the Citadel restaurant at which a friend of hers worked. That evening, we followed her advice and had a frankly delightful evening marked by fantastic food, an absolutely lovely waitress, Anna, and regular check-ins from Gray, the manager (who also happens to be a Kiwi). As with every restaurant we visited, we had to force ourselves to sit back and enjoy the experience; at no point did we ever feel like we had to rush to finish, pay, and give up our table to the next customer. Not like, ahem, at home in Wellington. What do these latter examples have in common? Bloody good business sense based on friendliness and strategic use of consumer psychology. Having recently hosted friends visiting Wellington from overseas, my heart was warmed by hearing them say how friendly New Zealanders are, but it's a step change to Vietnamese hospitality. For example, first and last impressions count or, in technical terms, primacy and recency. We make impressions incredibly quickly and largely unconsciously, and research shows that, while we care deeply about how good the chef is, we have to be drawn in first to find out. That can hang entirely on the rapport we sense from our first encounter. When we left the restaurant, Anna farewelled us by our names (which she remembered several days later when we happened to pass by). That's a personal touch that leaves a positive impression. Ever started to feel tense because wait staff check in on you a little too frequently? Or neglected because they don't check in at all? That's another tricky balance, and one that requires a bit of intuition about the best time to stop by. Another thing Citadel did well, but almost every other restaurant we ate at didn't, was a sensibly curated set of options. Ever eaten at the American restaurant chain The Cheesecake Factory? The menu runs to more than 200 items and around 20 pages. It is frankly exhausting. You get to a point where you no longer care what you order, you just want to make it stop. Psychology researchers Sheena Iyengar and Mark Lepper are probably best associated with the notion of this 'paradox of choice'. In a particularly well-known experiment they showed that people may be more likely to head over to a counter offering 24 types of jam than a counter with only six, but people were 10 times more likely to buy jam when the number of types available was reduced from 24 to six. Why? Because what if you make the wrong choice? The more choices, the harder the decision, and the greater the likelihood of buyer's remorse. So in keeping with this research, we broke our holiday rule and went back to the Citadel and its more limited number of choices a second time.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store