
Underage driver crashes into Repentigny, Que., home after police pursuit
Quebec provincial police (SQ) are investigating after a minor crashed a vehicle into a home in Repentigny, Que., early Thursday morning.
According to the SQ, around 2:30 a.m., officers from the Mascouche station tried to intercept the vehicle on Highway 40 after it failed to stop, triggering a police chase.
Shortly before 3 a.m., the vehicle collided with a residence in the Boulevard L'Assomption area of the off-island Montreal suburb.
An SQ spokesperson said officers were no longer in pursuit when the collision occurred.
'The officers arrested the underage driver. They could face charges such as reckless driving and dangerous driving,' the spokesperson said.
The minor was released pending an investigation.
No injuries were reported.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Suspects wanted in south Windsor break-in
The Windsor Police Service is looking for suspects wanted in a break-and-enter in south Windsor. The incident took place on Aug. 4 at a home in the 3800 block of Devonwood Avenue. Several items were stolen, according to the WPS. Police believe the suspect(s) used yards of neighbouring houses to get access to the home. If you live in the area, you are asked to check your dashcam and security camera footage for any suspicious activity between 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. on Aug. 11. Anyone with information is asked to call the WPS Target Base Unit at 519-255-6700 extension 4350. Crime Stoppers also accepts anonymous tips at 519-258-8477 or online.


National Post
19 minutes ago
- National Post
Colby Cosh: It's cute to think Parliament has any say over Criminal Code
Article content This seems like an open invitation to Parliament to make its will known when it comes to principles of criminal sentencing, not to mention the higher-level political question of what distinctions the law is permitted to make between citizens and non-citizens. There is also the even-higher-level question whether Parliament has any remaining practical control of criminal sentencing at all. After all, the accepted sentencing ranges which loom so large in the Pham reasoning are themselves established by judges through an opaque oracular process of vibe-consultation, and they sometimes lead to controversial outcomes. Article content The Liberals will probably kill Rempel Garner's bill with as little fuss as they can manage. But the more interesting outcome will arise if they co-opt it, allowing the Criminal Code to be amended. (Whatever your own views on immigration, you cannot reasonably deny that public sentiment has undergone a nightmarishly fast and well-documented change of attitude toward it.) Would the appellate courts then find a way to reject the new directive despite their endless fine talk of deference to legislatures? Article content Article content I'm afraid the only real question is 'How would they go about it?' Think about this month's Ontario Superior Court decision establishing that a few Toronto bike lanes were protected by the Charter. (You've seen various nincompoops complaining in other newspapers that, no, this ruling 'didn't create a right to bike lanes': readers may enjoy perusing the uncategorical view offered by the professionals at McCarthy Tetrault, and in particular the 'key takeaways'.) Article content That bike-lane decision may not survive in the appellate courts, but the judicial procedure that led to it will certainly be available in a context of criminal sentencing. A trial judge confronted with the Conservative-initiated changes to the Criminal Code would almost be bound to accept that Charter rights were implicated, and he could thereby, like enterprising Superior Court Judge Schabas, conduct his own personal re-analysis of Parliament's decision, deciding whether the people's representatives had behaved rationally and non-arbitrarily. Thus is the character of our government now: any thought of statutory measures being 'passed into law' by 'legislators' is itself increasingly obsolete and misleading. Article content


CTV News
19 minutes ago
- CTV News
Sudbury senior charged with indecent act at a beach area
A 73-year-old man from Sudbury has been charged with committing an indecent act near a park and beach area in Sables-Spanish Rivers Township. (File) A 73-year-old man from Sudbury has been charged with committing an indecent act near a park and beach area in Sables-Spanish Rivers Township. Manitoulin Ontario Provincial Police said the incident took place Aug. 9 around 4 p.m. Officers 'responded to a report of a person committing an indecent act at a park and beach area in the Sables-Spanish Rivers Township, where children and families were present,' an OPP news release said Thursday. 'Police initiated an investigation and subsequently arrested the individual.' The suspect was charged with committing an indecent act in a public place and is now scheduled to appear before the Ontario Court of Justice in Espanola on Sept. 8.