Opposition, unions back up 63% of Albertans against provincial pension
Aerial shot of the Alberta legislature on Monday, May 26, 2025. (Cam Wiebe/CTV News Edmonton)
Survey results on a provincial pension plan show many Albertans are dead-set against what Premier Danielle Smith has been pushing since stepping into office.
On Wednesday, the province quietly released raw data from a survey done nearly two years ago showing only 10 per cent of respondents were for an Alberta Pension Plan (APP).
But Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL) president Gil McGowan said the results of the survey aren't what's surprising.
'What's really significant is that the UCP government seems determined to proceed with this crazy notion to pull Alberta out of the Canada Pension Plan (CPP), despite clear opposition to this idea,' said McGowan. 'This poll is just the latest evidence that Albertans are dead-set against this idea.
'Albertans should be outraged by our premier's continued refusal to take no for an answer.'
Premier Smith has touted an APP will be of benefit to Albertans, who she says are disproportionately represented in the CPP.
A LifeWorks report from 2023 calculated that Alberta would be entitled to 53 per cent of the CPP — about $334 billion — if it leaves.
Other economists, however, have estimated Alberta's share to be closer to 15 to 20 per cent.
'The CPP isn't perfect, but it is one of the best and most secure and stable pension systems in the entire world,' said McGowan, adding that he's spoken to thousands of AFL members who want the province to keep their hands off their pensions.
'It's not Danielle Smith's money. These are the retirement savings of literally millions of Albertans. People are relying on them and they don't want our provincial government to be playing political games with their retirement security.'
The CPP is currently working on an enhancement that will increase the maximum pension by more than 50 per cent for those who make enhanced contributions for 40 years.
The maximum level of earnings protected by the CPP was also increased by 14 per cent over 2024 and 2025.
NPD leader Naheed Nenshi also wasn't taken aback by the results or the way they were released.
'This government held these results from Albertans for nearly two years … and this is just very typical of this government.' said Nenshi. 'They lie, they cheat, they hide information from the public to get their ideological work done.'
Naheed Nenshi
Leader of the Alberta NDP Naheed Nenshi speaks to media about the Alberta 2025 budget in Edmonton, on Thursday February 27, 2025.THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson
(JASON FRANSON/THE CANADIAN PRESS)
Nenshi said the UCP government spent some $9 million on advertising to convince Albertans the APP was the right thing to do, but when they were asked to release the results, they consistently refused.
'The Information Privacy Commissioner forced them to release the results, and this is what came out: everyone hates it,' said Nenshi. 'And that's obviously why the government didn't want to release this information, but taxpayers paid for it — they have the right to see it.
The opposition leader said the real reason Smith wants an APP is to control investments and use pension funds to invest in things that align with her interests, not the interests of Albertans.
'I think the government needs to take the loss and move forward,' said Nenshi.
CUPE Alberta President Raj Uppal said an Alberta plan would cost more and deliver weaker investment returns and smaller pensions.
'I know Smith likes to flirt with separatists, but the CPP is one of the strongest reasons for Alberta to remain in Canada,' said Uppal. 'The premier needs to abandon this idea and stop threatening the retirement security of Albertans.'
Moshe Lander, a senior lecturer at Concordia University in Montreal, told CTV News Edmonton the issue of an APP is likely very low on the federal finance minister's to-do list.
'I don't think it's a priority at all until there's a clear sign that Alberta has voted for independence,' said Lander. 'They have so many other things to worry about that are now and that are legitimate. This is not one of them.'
A statement from the federal department of finance said a separate provincial pension plan would mean Albertans would no longer enjoy the same economies of scale, pooling of risk and investment advantage that is currently available through the CPP.
SUB: 10 per cent of Albertans are still on board with an APP
One Alberta senior said she'd much rather go with Alberta than the federal government on a pension plan.
'You look at Quebec and the power they have and they have their own pension plan,' said Irene Moyer. 'I think Alberta would be way better off.'
Moyer is skeptical of the federal government's spending and said Ottawa holds Alberta hostage.
'I'm going to be fine because of my age, but I look at people coming up and I wonder if there will even be a pension for them.'
A respondent to the survey said Alberta deserves a better deal than what it's been given by the federal government.
'Alberta has always overcontributed to CPP … with no thanks from Canadians,' said another comment from a survey respondent. 'Enough. Leave CPP.'
Results from the survey show 63 per cent of respondents were against the APP while 12 per cent were unsure. Fifteen per cent of the responses were incomplete.
The province said it will continue to engage with Albertans on an APP through the Alberta Next panel despite the survey results.
Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith speaks to media prior to the First Minister's Meeting in Saskatoon on Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards
Premier of Alberta Danielle Smith speaks to media prior to the First Minister's Meeting in Saskatoon on Monday, June 2, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Liam Richards
The Ministry of Treasury Board and Finance did not provide a new statement to CTV News Edmonton and reiterated comments made Wednesday.
The Alberta Pension Protection Act guarantees the CPP won't be replaced with an APP unless Albertans approve it in a referendum.
With files from CTV News Edmonton's Amanda Anderson and Nicole Lampa
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
National Post
44 minutes ago
- National Post
Canada won't pause digital services tax despite pressure from U.S., finance minister says
OTTAWA — Canada won't put a hold on the digital services tax on big tech companies set to take effect on June 30, the finance minister said Thursday. Article content Article content Finance Minister Francois-Philippe Champagne said Thursday the legislation was passed by Parliament and Canada is 'going ahead' with the tax. Article content Article content 'The (digital services tax) is in force and it's going to be applied,' he told reporters before a cabinet meeting on Parliament Hill. Article content Article content It will apply retroactively, leaving U.S. companies with a $2 billion US bill due at the end of the month. A June 11 letter signed by 21 members of Congress said U.S. companies will pay 90 per cent of the revenue Canada will collect from the tax. Article content Canadian and U.S. business groups, organizations representing U.S. tech giants and American members of Congress have all signed letters in recent weeks calling for the tax to be eliminated or paused. Article content It's set to take effect just weeks before a deadline Canada and the U.S. have set for coming up with a new trade deal, following months of trade conflict between the two countries. Article content Rick Tachuk, president of the American Chamber of Commerce in Canada, said the plan to go ahead with the tax 'undercuts those talks and risks derailing the agreement.' Article content Article content 'A retroactive tax like the DST, weeks before a new deal is supposed to be done, isn't a bargaining chip. It would likely be viewed as a provocation,' he said in an emailed statement. Article content Article content The Canadian Chamber of Commerce and other organizations have warned retaliatory measures in a U.S. spending and tax bill could hit Canadians' pension funds and investments. Article content Champagne said Canada isn't the only country that could be affected by those retaliatory measures. Article content David Pierce, the Canadian Chamber of Commerce's vice-president of government relations, said in an earlier interview his organization fears Canada could 'aggravate an already very tricky trade discussion with the Americans' if it goes ahead with the tax and the retroactive payment requirement. Article content Matthew Holmes, the chamber's executive vice-president and chief of public policy, said in a statement that a Liberal government announcement on counter-tariffs to protect the steel and aluminum industries Thursday was 'geared toward the 30-day deadline, so we see no reason why DST's timeline shouldn't be as well.'
Globe and Mail
an hour ago
- Globe and Mail
Judge points to ‘tainted' process in Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital bidding process at Bondfield trial
The judge presiding over the trial of two men facing criminal fraud charges stemming from the $300-million redevelopment of Toronto's St. Michael's Hospital says the bidding process was 'tainted.' Vas Georgiou, former chief administrative officer of St. Michael's, and John Aquino, the former president of Bondfield Construction Co. Ltd., are each charged with two counts of fraud over $5,000. Both men have pleaded not guilty. 'What the public have lost is the belief that this very expensive procurement would be fair without interference by anybody, and what they have is something that stinks,' Justice Peter Bawden told an Ontario court on Thursday. The Superior Court of Justice case resumed this week after 24 days of testimony last November and December. Since then, Crown prosecutors and defence lawyers submitted written closing arguments amounting to 345 pages, and the hearing on Thursday was designed to allow the judge to address them. Justice Bawden described this week's hearing as 'a bit unorthodox,' but he said it would allow him to tell the court what he thinks about the voluminous written submissions while providing the lawyers with the opportunity to say if he is wrong. The judge is scheduled to deliver his verdict on Oct. 7. Justice Bawden said the public was counting on a fair competition for the hospital redevelopment. Instead, he said, 'the procurement is tainted because of the conduct of the two accused.' Bondfield president given 'insider information,' prosecution alleges in St. Michael's Hospital case The Crown's case against Mr. Georgiou and Mr. Aquino focuses on their alleged undisclosed business connections, as well as their alleged secret communications throughout the bidding process for the lucrative hospital project, which Bondfield won in 2015. These alleged communications took place over a e-mail address and a BlackBerry that Mr. Aquino gave to Mr. Georgiou. The Crown has alleged that Mr. Georgiou used the BlackBerry to leak confidential information about the procurement to Mr. Aquino. Prosecutors allege in their written submissions that the discovery of the electronic devices, set up for the purpose of communicating in secret about the hospital procurement, provide the 'most egregious examples of criminality.' Defence lawyers counter in their submissions that the Crown is overstating the secret nature of the BlackBerry, adding that breaking the rules is not always a criminal act. Justice Bawden said most of his big issues involve Mr. Georgiou, whose defence lawyer, Peter Brauti, fielded a number of questions from the judge. 'I fear that I could see a conviction of your client even if I largely accept his evidence,' Justice Bawden said. 'That makes me very nervous.' Former St. Michael's CEO testifies he was unaware of alleged secret messages between men accused of hospital-bid fraud Mr. Georgiou testified in his own defence last December. The judge noted that Mr. Georgiou's testimony revealed he was strongly motivated to further establish his reputation in the hospital procurement sector and get the St. Michael's expansion and renovation done. Justice Bawden told court that it was almost as though Mr. Georgiou had a conflict from the start: He wanted the procurement to succeed, but he was also a member of a hospital committee set up to impartially evaluate bids from construction companies competing for the project. But, the judge said, the existence of the BlackBerry and e-mail address causes him to see the conflicts in a different light. Had Mr. Aquino not been 'coached' by Mr. Georgiou, he speculated that perhaps the procurement should have failed or proceeded at a higher price. The only surviving content on Mr. Georgiou's e-mail account was communication between him and Mr. Aquino on the May, 2014, long weekend – three days before the deadline for hospital bids. On May 18, Mr. Georgiou advised Mr. Aquino to keep certain costs out of Bondfield's proposed price, explaining that he could 'always fight later when we are No. 1,' says one e-mail. Former St. Michael's Hospital executive promoted co-accused's company before it won project bid, court hears In their submission, Crown prosecutors note that Mr. Georgiou, a busy executive away with his wife for a personal trip in England during the long weekend, answered Mr. Aquino's questions. The fact that Mr. Georgiou brought the BlackBerry with him on a weekend away underscores the intensity of his ties to Mr. Aquino, prosecutors allege in their submission: 'He was ready and expecting to assist.' Alan Gold, Mr. Aquino's lawyer, told the court on Thursday that Bondfield's bid was done by the May long weekend and had nothing to do with anything Mr. Georgiou said in the e-mails. 'Whatever taint your honour sees is totally harmless,' he said. Mr. Brauti told the court Bondfield was the uncrowned winner of the procurement by May, 2014, because the other two rival companies had submitted bids well in excess of the budget. Any rule-breaking, he said, did not result in an unfair outcome. And if the outcome was fair, he said, there was no fraud. At the end of Thursday's hearing, Mr. Gold said the May, 2014 e-mail exchange between Mr. Aquino and Mr. Georgiou did not 'cost victims any money' and, therefore, did not constitute fraud. Special to The Globe and Mail
CTV News
an hour ago
- CTV News
Vancouver Police Board learned about ‘Task Force Barrage' through mayor's announcement, chair says
The oversight body was unaware of a $5 million crime crackdown on the Downtown Eastside before it was announced at a press conference, the chair confirmed. An oversight body whose role it is to develop the Vancouver Police Department's budget, wasn't part of the approval process for a multi-million dollar initiative aimed at targeting crime on the Downtown Eastside. Frank Chong, the chair of the Vancouver Police Board, said the board learned about the $5 million dollar plan, named 'Task Force Barrage,' through Mayor Ken Sim's press conference with then-chief Adam Palmer in February. 'That was a notification that we found out at during the media announcement,' Chong said. 'And I think that what transpired was that there was a miscommunication and perhaps, some missteps with regards to process.' Chong said the board is working on rectifying what transpired. 'That was determined by the finance committee that there is a need for sharpening of that particular process, which will be discussed at our governance committee,' he added. Police Act The mayor's announcement, came after the city's budget was finalized. As outlined in the B.C. Police Act, the Vancouver Police Board is required to prepare and approve the provisional budget for the following year on an annual basis. Any changes to this budget, per the act, must be submitted to council on or before March 1 of the year to which the provisional budget relates. Chong believes the board did not breach the legislation. Mayor's response Typically, the approval process for an initiative such as Task Force Barrage involves city council sending a request to the police board, which would then discuss the financial implications. From there, if board members agreed they were wiling to adjust the budget, they would then give approval to the Vancouver Police Department. CTV News asked Sim in May, why a funding request or proposal was not sent to the police board for approval before the task force was launched. At the time, Sim said he didn't know. 'Look, I can't comment on what people know and didn't know,' he said. 'You're asking me to comment on what six other individuals knew. I'm not in their mind.' Critics such as Green Coun. Pete Fry and former board vice-chair Faye Wightman have questioned how Task Force Barrage was approved. Both have pointed to the lack of a paper trail and called it a backroom deal.
