
EU asks 44 oil and gas producers to provide new CO2 storage solutions
BRUSSELS, May 22 (Reuters) - The European Commission said on Thursday it had asked 44 oil and gas companies to contribute to the EU's collective target of storing at least 50 million tonnes of CO2 per year by 2030, as part of the bloc's aim to achieve climate neutrality.
The companies are required to participate to the EU target in proportion to their share of the Union's crude oil and natural gas production from 2020 and 2023, the Commission said in a statement.
"Having extracted hydrocarbons and contributing to greenhouse gas emissions, (the European oil and gas industry) will now contribute to storing CO2 and help mitigate climate change," said Kurt Vandenberghe, head of the Commission's directorate general for climate action.
"By combining their industrial know-how with faster permitting processes and robust financial support - including from the ETS-resourced Innovation Fund - we can make substantial progress in advancing industrial decarbonisation and modernisation in Europe," he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
11 hours ago
- The Guardian
Trump tariffs could ‘wipe out' European steel sector, senior industry figure says
Europe's steel industry faces being 'wiped out' in the face of Donald Trump's prohibitive 50% tariffs, high energy costs and a mountain of cheaper Chinese steel, one of Germany's biggest industrial groups has warned. Ilse Henne, a board member at the steel, engineering and chemicals group ThyssenKrupp, said the industry faced an existential crisis after the US president's decision last week to double tariffs on steel and aluminium imports from 25% to 50%. Asked at the European Policy Centre conference on security in Brussels if she 'feared a wipeout', she replied: 'Of course.' Henne, who is chief executive of ThyssenKrupp Materials Services, told the Guardian: 'Steel is at the beginning of the value chain, so you create a lot of instability for all these supply chains that get disrupted that now all of a sudden have to deal with much more expensive steel.' Steel and aluminium are foundational industries, central to everything from submarines, aircraft and cars to everyday products such as stainless steel cutlery, food mixers and joists in housing. 'If the European steel industry disappears, we will have a lot of collateral damage,' said Henne. 'A weak European steel industry is not only a weak European steel industry. It also puts all the other steps in the industry and the value chain in danger.' She said Europe must step in to save the sector because it was fundamental for military security and was a large employer, and if it failed, the continent would be left reliant on the US and China for a key manufacturing material. There is also the growing problem of cheap Chinese steel imports, something the European Commission has in its sights in current talks with Beijing over its dumping of goods in the EU, which are also covering the oversupply of cars and fast fashion. Chinese steel imports soared by 36% in the first quarter of 2025, according to Eurostat. According to Henne, Russian steel is still appearing on the market, at a level of 3m-4m tonnes a year, just short of the 3.8m tonnes the EU as a whole exports to the US. The US doubling of the tariff on steel and aluminum imports does not apply to the UK, which will continue to pay 25% until 9 July and is racing to implement the terms of a bilateral deal struck last month that would take the rate down to zero. Ministers are working to ensure the UK's biggest player in the sector, Tata Steel, is not excluded from the deal because it has begun importing semi-finished products from India and Europe since closing its blast furnace in south Wales last year. This could breach US rules that require all steel to be 'melted and poured' in the country from which it is imported. US representatives also have concerns that British Steel, which is owned by China's Jingye group, could be used as a 'back door' to bring in Chinese products. The UK government used emergency legislation to take control of the company's plant in Scunthorpe, and according to the Sunday Times, ministers now face a standoff with Jingye over a £1bn-plus compensation claim to get it to relinquish its interest. Sign up to Business Today Get set for the working day – we'll point you to all the business news and analysis you need every morning after newsletter promotion Henne said Trump's tariffs strategy could backfire and kill US heavy industries rather than deliver the revival he has promised. 'Following the 50% tariff increase, all US steel producers have immediately bumped up their prices. So the cost of manufacturing has gone up,' she said. The impact 'is a lesson that the US has to learn, unfortunately, I believe, the hard way,' she said. 'What they are doing is actually limiting their own growth potential.' In its second quarter outlook report issued last Thursday, Eurofer, the EU steel trade association, said the US tariffs had dealt 'a severe blow' to recovery expectations. It has called on the EU to bring in 'emergency' measures to help save the industry. 'There is a lot that we can do to save the steel industry,' said Henne, calling on the European Commission to do more to ensure hydrogen came on stream at a competitive price to reduce the reliance on oil- and gas-fuelled furnaces. 'Reducing the tariffs would be a good thing, but equally important for us is competitive energy pricing,' she said.


The Guardian
12 hours ago
- The Guardian
Brussels celebrates art deco's mass-produced objects for the middle class
The glazed porcelain vases with bold colours and geometric shapes of the 1920s and 30s are immediately recognisable to many people, says the art historian Cécile Dubois. Often given as a wedding present, these vases were usually passed down as family heirlooms, revealing the accessibility of art deco works, she says, gesturing to the glass cabinet beside her. 'If you were a collector, you could find works that cost a fortune, but these pieces were destined for people of more modest means for very reasonable prices.' Art deco was the first artistic movement that sought to appeal to a wider public beyond the elites, say the organisers of a new exhibition dedicated to the artistic movement of the interwar years, co-curated by Dubois, the president of the Brussels Art Deco Society. The exhibition, which opened this month at the BELvue museum in Brussels, brings together for the first time works owned by the King Baudouin Foundation, which was founded through a donation from the late Belgian monarch in 1976. It is part of the Belgian capital's year-long celebration of art deco – events and exhibitions to recognise and market Brussels as a centre for the artistic movement known for its geometric designs, exotic motifs and opulent materials. Through this modest exhibition of sculptures, vases, furniture and everyday artworks, the museum aims to chart the evolution of art deco: from luxurious hand-crafted goods for the few, to mass-produced objects aimed at middle-class consumers around the world. 'It's the first style that spread in all layers of society, from the richest to the poor people,' says Werner Adriaenssens, another co-curator and an art history professor at the Free University of Brussels. During the interwar years, brightly coloured geometric-patterned ceramic tiles were exported from Belgium's industrial heartlands all around the world. Ships left the port of Antwerp laden with tiles destined for kitchens, bathrooms and shops. Art deco was the first global style. From Paris, often credited as the birthplace of the movement, it spread to New York, Soviet Moscow, Shanghai, Beirut and Brussels. Many of the 'wedding gift' vases were designed in the southern Belgium town of La Louvière by the Franco-Belgian artist Charles Catteau, who oversaw production of decorative ceramics at Boch Frères during the interwar years. The company was a Belgian offshoot of the Franco-Luxembourgish ceramics dynasty, founded 14 years after the Belgian revolution of 1830. By 1935 it employed 1,350 people. Catteau did not design all the pieces but supervised the models, colours and finish of the glazes. His signature was stamped on every piece, a kind of trademark. As art met commerce, governments realised the creative sector had economic weight. Economic considerations led Belgium's government to participate in the International Exhibition of Modern Decorative and Industrial Arts in Paris in 1925, a show seen as the founding moment of the art deco movement, although almost no one used that term until decades later. 'The only reason to participate for Belgium in 25 was that the government was convinced that the decorative hearts had an economic impact,' Adriaenssens said. That Paris exhibition in 1925 heralded a shift from art nouveau of the prewar years, especially in the depiction of women. No longer the dreamy feminine ideal of art nouveau, women in art deco were often elegant, stylised and powerful. Emblematic of the shift is a 1925 sculpture by the Flemish artist Oscar Jespers: influenced by cubism, the work Fine Pearl shows a female face that is abstract, modern, ghost-like. Catteau's vases reflect cubist influences, as well as a fascination with exotic birds and animals, probably inspired by the Belgian Congo. According to Adriaenssens, art deco artists were the first to do market research. 'They were really searching, what does the middle class want?' So they did not shy away from older themes, such as ancient Greek-inspired pottery, but with modern geometric shapes and glazes. Art nouveau, as the name implies, wanted to be new, Adriaenssens observed. 'Art deco has not that aspiration to be completely new, but to be modern.'


Daily Record
16 hours ago
- Daily Record
New Ryanair, easyJet and Wizz Air bag rules coming for Spain and Greece
The EU rule, which will apply to UK holidaymakers, will change the law on what you take onto a plane - and how much you pay The European Union is planning a change in the rules on carry-on bags on flights, which would cover planes flying between the UK and countries including Spain, Portugal, Greece, France and Italy. At the minute, some airlines charge passengers for each item they want to take aboard. Different airlines have different rules - meaning the size of the bag you can take aboard and how much it will cost you - is different each time. The new EU rule would set a specific size of bag you would be allowed to take on flights operated by companies like easyJet, Ryanair and Wizz Air. And the rule would stipulate that the take-on bag would be free, the airline would not be able to charge you extra to take a bag aboard the plane. The rule would change the confusion that see people being charged extra when they get to the airport for bags deemed too big, or too heavy. And people being charged for a bag by one airline but allowed to take it without additional fees by another. EU transport ministers this week proposed standardised sizing for free underseat baggage on EU airlines. It will become law if it is accepted by the European Parliament. The new rule would mean passengers are guaranteed one free personal item, measuring up to 40x30x15cm (including wheels and handles) - or which could reasonably fit under a plane seat. The rules would apply to EU-based airlines, including when they are carrying passengers from a non-EU country like the UK to an EU country and vice-versa. 11 years ago, an EU court ruled that hand baggage should not be subject to an additional fee so long as it is a reasonable size. But the ruling did not define 'reasonable'. Currently, Ryanair allows a free carry-on bag of 40x20x25cm, while easyJet's rules for a free bag are 45x36x20 cm, including wheels and handles. The new rule would cover under-seat bags, but does not currently mention bags you put in overhead lockers. In November, five airlines in Spain were fined £150million for 'abusive practices', including charging for hand luggage. Spain's Consumer Rights Ministry said it planned to ban charging extra for carry-on luggage. Ryanair told the BBC it fully complied with EU law. A spokesman said: "If airlines were forced to include additional carry-on bags as part of the basic fare, it would reduce choice and drive up air fares for all passengers, which would harm consumers." Industry group Airlines For Europe said charging different amounts depending on baggage "allows passengers to choose the exact services that best suits their needs". Travel consumer expert Jane Hawkes, told the BBC: "A one-size-fits-all kind of approach would make it a lot simpler for passengers."