
The one-second habit that could save you £60 on your power bill
While many instinctively cut back on discretionary spending like new clothes, daily coffees, or dining out, and even cancelling memberships, simpler ways to reduce expenditure often exist.
One such overlooked method, potentially right under our noses, is unplugging household appliances.
Lisa Stanley, chief sustainability officer at Zero and co-founder of Good With Money, asserts that unplugging appliances from the wall '100 per cent saves money'. She highlights studies from consumer champion Which? which indicate this simple habit could lead to annual savings of up to £60.
'The reason why it saves money is because if you leave sockets turned on, or plugs turned on at the socket, it has this thing called vampire power,' Stanley explains.
'It actually continues to suck the power once you turn off the socket but when you unplug the appliance, it breaks the circuit and can no longer continue to take that flow of electricity.'
Although appliances can eat up energy a lot, Stanley says it's 'simple, small lifestyle changes that can make a difference and they don't need to impact your quality of life at all'.
What appliances take up most energy?
'When it comes to your fridge and freezer for example, they are quite energy-hungry but of course you've got to keep them turned on all the time,' Stanley says. 'Other appliances, like your set-top box, actually use quite a lot of energy too but you may find that if you turn that off then it messes with your settings, so you may not want to do that frequently.
'However, you can also look at your laptops and TVs because you can turn your TV off without it impacting your set-top box. All of your tech actually uses around 6% of your entire home's energy and that isn't including someone who is working at home daily or a heavy gamer.
'Unfortunately, other kitchen appliances, such as a dishwasher, can use up to 4% of your home's energy in a year but you can start looking at using the eco-settings.'
What changes can people make when thinking about appliances?
'The first thing you can do is make sure you're not falling victim to vampire power and you're turning off all your sockets as much as possible,' Stanley says. 'Really think about it. For example, when I'm working at home I will plug my laptop in, go downstairs to get lunch and I leave it plugged in, even if my laptop is fully charged – so be aware of these things.'
'Secondly, you can switch to LED light bulbs which are also much kinder to the planet and are longer lasting. The manufacturing impact of them is also better because you're not having to replace them all the time.
' Thirdly, if you're boiling the kettle – which is really energy hungry – make sure if you're only making a cup of tea for one person, pour it into a mug before you pour it into the kettle. That way, you're only boiling as much water as you need and it's also saving water – which at the moment is really important that we try and do.
'You can also wash your dishes by hand, run all your appliances on the eco-setting or when washing your clothes, turn down the temperature to 20 or 30 degrees or even cold if you can, as that can make a massive difference to both the amount of energy used and the cost.
'At this time of the year as it is hot, fans are another thing to think about when it comes to energy. If it's a standard desk fan, you can get it from somewhere like John Lewis and costs 1p an hour to run, versus if you've got one of the Dyson fans that are also air purifiers, they can cost up to 66p an hour to run.
'There are also massive differences with the type of smart speakers too. Be aware that keeping music playing when you're not in the room is essentially sucking power when it's not needed.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Finextra
10 minutes ago
- Finextra
NS&I to replace legacy core banking system with SBS
NS&I (National Savings and Investments), the U.K.'s government-owned savings bank, and global financial technology company SBS today announced their work together to digitise NS&I's core banking and payments services. 0 The initiative is part of NS&I's Transformation Programme and its contract with Atos, a European digital transformation company, to modernise its banking engine. SBS's digital, cloud-native core banking platform will lay a foundation for new business efficiencies, product and service delivery, and customer experiences for NS&I. Organisations now realise the need to move faster than legacy on-premise infrastructure allows. European retail banks are accelerating their cloud investments, with spending projected to rise by 57.5% from 2025 to 30, reaching $12.6 billion according to a recent Celent report. Through its ongoing transformation programme, NS&I is proving how financial institutions can move beyond just aspirations to make fully digital, cloud-based services a reality organisation-wide. Working with Atos, IBM and Sopra Steria, NS&I is transforming and digitising its retail operations. Powering this digitisation on the back-end will be SBS's next-gen SBP Digital Core platform, which will replace NS&I's existing core system with a cloud-native infrastructure for all of its Retail banking and payments services. 'NS&I's transformation program will help to deliver the digital experiences that our customers expect, while still ensuring there is help and support for those who need it,' said Matt Smith, Chief Operating Officer at NS&I. 'Replacing our core system is a critical step in this evolution, and we look forward to continuing our work with SBS and Atos to bring it to fruition.' As one of the U.K.'s largest savings organisations, NS&I's internal infrastructure is responsible for not only upholding its 24+ million customer base, but also implementing savings rate changes and servicing the resulting interactions with customers. With on-premise and even hybrid cloud systems, this means maintaining the highest level of data storage at all times—even when it's not being used. By transitioning to SBP Digital Core, NS&I will benefit from the complete flexibility and scalability of AWS's cloud environment, enabling it to make data storage and other infrastructural adjustments as often as it needs to. Compared to legacy core systems that are not easily updated or modified, SBS's cloud and Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)-based alternative enables it to provide regular, automatic system updates, so there are no disruptions to banks' day-to-day operations. 'Cloud and SaaS transformation in the financial industry is not a matter of when, but how,' said Eric Bierry, CEO, SBS. 'NS&I's transformation program is evidence that it is possible for banks to execute this transformation—and doing so sets them up to drive otherwise unattainable efficiencies and experiences. We're thrilled to partner with NS&I on this journey.' SBP Digital Core is a cloud-native, composable core banking solution that leverages latest technology and data to allow banks to offer personalised and relevant banking experiences to their clients while complying with regulatory requirements. It is a part of SBS's larger retail banking offerings used by more than 1,500 banks across Europe, the Middle East and Africa. In addition to core banking, these offerings include deposits, payments, lending, reporting, open banking and more.


The Independent
10 minutes ago
- The Independent
Do home security systems require a subscription? Plans, costs and features explained
Monthly or annual subscriptions are an increasingly common part of owning a home security system. At their simplest, these fees cover the cost of cloud storage, since some security cameras and video doorbells don't save their recordings locally. Some security products also bundle extra features with the cloud storage fee, such as AI tools for identifying people, vehicles, animals, and other types of movement. Lastly, — and arguably most importantly — is the subscription tier that unlocks professional monitoring. This is where a specially trained call centre agent is alerted when your alarm is triggered and can check in on the situation and even call the emergency services on your behalf if it's clear that something is wrong. Brands like Eufy and Arlo produce security cameras, video doorbells and alarm systems with no subscription fee, as their footage is saved locally and they don't offer professional monitoring services. Alarm systems from Ring, Arlo and Nest charge a monthly fee for cloud video storage, while professionally monitored systems from the likes of SimpliSafe and Verisure charge for both video storage and their all-important connection to the call centre and emergency services. Before buying a system – or deciding whether a home security system subscription is worth it – it's important to know what you want, and to understand how the system works without a subscription. For example, cameras from Ring and Simplisafe don't save video unless you're subscribed, although you'll still be notified via their respective apps if the intruder alarm is triggered. Which brands offer home security subscriptions? Practically all home security companies offer a subscription. Ring is probably the most well-known, thanks to its ownership by Amazon and the popularity of its video doorbells. The company also sells a wide range of indoor and outdoor security cameras, a home alarm system, and accessories such as door/window sensors and solar panels to keep camera batteries charged. Its subscription service is called Ring Protect. Prices start at £4.99 a month for the Basic tier, rising to £7.99 for Standard and £15.99 for Premium. Ring offers a discount for annual subscriptions, with the same three tiers priced at £49.99, £79.99 and £159.99, respectively. Arlo is another security company that operates on a subscription model. Prices for Arlo Secure start at £5.49 a month or £54.90 a year for the Single Cam tier, rising to £11.99 a month or £119.90 a year for Secure Multi-Cam, and £16.99 or £169.90 for the range-topping Secure Plus plan. Separately, Arlo offers its CVR (continuous video recording) plan, which records 24/7 like a traditional CCTV camera, rather than only when motion is detected. This costs from £10.99 per month, per camera, and can get expensive for larger properties. Eufy's cloud storage starts £3.99 a month for one camera or video doorbell, or £12.99 for multiple devices. Unlike many others, this is purely optional, since Eufy's are among the few security cameras that have local storage. Moving up the scale, Simplisafe offers two subscription packages, priced at £19.99 and £27.99 a month. Verisure offers a similar level of protection, complete with professional monitoring, but starts from around £30 per month. What's included in a home security system subscription? The simplest security system subscriptions unlock cloud storage for video recordings. For Ring and Arlo customers, this is a crucial addition, since those cameras and video doorbells do not store footage any other way. Paid-for cloud storage is less of a necessity for Eufy owners since those cameras save video to a microSD card in the device itself, or to an optional base station elsewhere in your home. By paying for a cloud storage subscription, owners of the Ring Alarm system also unlock Alarm Calls – where your pre-defined list of emergency contacts will receive an automated call when your home alarm is triggered. The subscription also includes cellular backup where the alarm system automatically connects to the mobile phone network to maintain functionality if your home broadband goes offline. The first of Simplisafe's two subscription tiers is similar to what Ring offers, providing cloud video storage for all camera and doorbell recordings for £19.99 a month. The higher tier is when Simplisafe's professional monitoring comes into play where an agent can check what's going on (by viewing live camera feeds, with your prior consent) and call the emergency services on your behalf. If what's caused the alarm isn't clear, Simplisafe will dispatch an agent from Securitas to visit your home and assess the situation. This tier costs £27.99 a month, close to the £30 a month Verisure charges for a similar level of protection and professional monitoring. The pros and cons of home security subscriptions Pros Cons Some cameras don't function fully without a subscription Monthly costs can add up, especially for multiple devices Single-camera users may find local storage options better value Limited functionality if you stop paying the fee Buyers of a single security camera, or a video doorbell, might be frustrated by the need to pay every month for cloud storage. If you only want a single camera, you're best picking one that stores footage locally and requires no ongoing fee, like those from Eufy. However, if you plan to install a larger security system – complete with motion sensors, a siren, a keypad, door/window sensors, multiple security cameras and more – then paying a subscription feels much more reasonable. Ensuring your alarm system stays active and connected to the internet during a power cut or a broadband blackout is a clear positive, and some customers will like the reassurance of Ring's automated calling system, which can let neighbours or family members know when the alarm is triggered. At the top end of the market, paying a higher fee for professional monitoring makes lots of sense for customers who want an alarm system that's connected to the emergency services. Since many neighbours are unlikely to respond to the blaring of an alarm, knowing Simplisafe and Verisure proactively investigate every incident can bring huge peace of mind. Ultimately, choosing a subscription comes down to comparing the features you want with your budget. It's also worth remembering that some home security systems, like cameras from Arlo and entire product packages from Simplisafe, work in a very restricted way, or even not at all, if you stop paying the subscription. With these systems, it's best to look at the ongoing fee like an extension of other household bills, like home insurance, rather than an optional extra.


Telegraph
11 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Ed Miliband's ‘eye-watering' wind subsidy increase to hit energy bills
Ed Miliband will ramp up 'eye-watering' subsidies for offshore wind farms to tempt developers to build in UK waters – adding costs to household bills. Under the revised scheme, Mr Miliband will offer international developers up to £116 per megawatt hour for the power they generate from the farms – far above the wholesale price of power, which last year averaged around £72. The extra money will be added to power bills via a levy, inflating costs for households, industry and businesses. The levy adds an estimated £24 a year to the average domestic power bill via a system known as contracts for difference. The sum was already expected to rise as the number of offshore and onshore wind farms expands and more solar plants are built. The higher prices will accelerate that increase. The subsidies will also inflate costs for UK industry and business, which already face some of the world's highest energy costs. The move comes as Mr Miliband faces a growing struggle to fulfil his pledge to decarbonise the UK power grid by 2030. He is also facing increasing political challenges, with Nigel Farage's Reform UK warning it would scrap new offshore wind contracts if it wins power. A report published by the Department for Energy Security and Net Zero (DESNZ) said the sharply increased prices were essential to overcome rising costs faced by offshore developers. 'Renewable technologies continue to face macroeconomic uncertainty and supply chain constraints – this is particularly true for wind technologies. 'The Government is continuing with the strategy of setting strike prices meaningfully above expected [electricity market] clearing prices.' Claire Coutinho, the shadow energy secretary, said: 'These are eye-watering prices – the highest in a decade and way above the average cost of electricity last year. 'And this is before the hidden extra costs of grid, storage and wasted wind – all of which end up on our energy bills. 'Ed Miliband can't cut bills by £300 like he promised because he will always put his net zero zealotry above the economy and the cost of living. Cheap energy must come first.' The price rise for wind developers follows the disastrous cancellation of key wind farm projects seen as essential for the UK to meet its renewables and decarbonisation targets. The massive Hornsea 4 wind farm was cancelled by Ørsted earlier this year, arguing it could never be profitable. Hornsea had a capacity of 2.4 gigawatts (GW) – one of the largest yet planned but the company said the £85 per megawatt hour subsidy on offer from the Government was too low. Another project, Norfolk Boreas, was also cancelled by developers Vattenfall due to low prices. 'Definition of insanity' If Mr Miliband wants to meet his targets he must triple offshore wind to about 50GW by 2030, double onshore wind to 30GW and nearly triple solar power to 47GW. But the rising cost of borrowing for renewable developments plus inflation across the industry is putting all such targets in jeopardy. Ashley Kelty, from Panmure Liberum, said the cancellation of such major projects had spooked Mr Miliband into offering ever higher prices – but he predicted it would not work. 'It's lunacy to think it could meet his targets. Supply chain constraints and rising costs means the build-out will be even slower. 'These high prices will also drive up bills. Renewables are not cheap by any metric. The gas needed to supply stable baseload will have to be imported at high cost – which is also passed through to consumers. This is the clear definition of insanity.' A DESNZ spokesman said the newly published 'strike prices' were the maximum that might be paid and the auction – when developers offered their own prices – could see lower final prices. 'Our recent reforms will ... secure the best possible price for consumers while securing the clean energy we need to get us off the fossil fuel roller-coaster,' he said. Richard Tice, Reform's energy spokesman, said: 'With inflation these offshore wind prices mean a 15pc increase on last year. 'They are also well over double the forecast six months ago by the climate change committee. The cost of getting to net zero will be much higher than even my worst fears. Reform will stop this negligent madness by scrapping net stupid zero.' Kathryn Porter, an energy analyst, said: '[Mr Miliband] keeps insisting that renewables are cheap. After 35 years of subsidies, offshore wind is now massively more expensive than using gas to generate electricity. 'This is definitive proof that renewables are not cheap, and will not lower bills. If the auction clears anywhere near these maximum levels consumers will be facing 20 years of huge additional levies loaded onto their bills.'