Elon Musk's Stunning U-Turn After Explosive Spat Reveals Something Telling... About Trump
Musk addressed his public falling-out with Trump in a post on Monday, writing on his platform X, formerly Twitter: 'I regret some of my posts about President @realDonaldTrump last week. They went too far.'
The Tesla CEO has evidently cooled down quite a bit since he leveled a series of fiery attacks at the president just days prior. The relationship between two of the most powerful men in the world began to unravel early last week, when Musk publicly criticized Trump's so-called Big Beautiful Bill.
Things then escalated quickly on social media last Thursday. During the real-time public spat, Trump wrote on his Truth Social platform that Musk 'went Crazy' after he left his position leading the so-called Department of Government Efficiency. He also threatened to cancel Musk's government contracts.
Musk, for his part, charged on X that the reason the Jeffrey Epstein files haven't been released is that Trump is mentioned in the documents about the disgraced financier and sex offender. The billionaire also suggested that he supported the idea of Trump getting impeached.
Trump later warned in a phone interview with NBC on Saturday that Musk would face 'serious consequences' if he backed Democrats in opposing his signature legislation.
Musk has since deleted some of his inflammatory tweets about Trump, but it's unclear where his relationship with the president will go next. Trump indicated last week that he had no intention of speaking with the billionaire, who reportedly spent hundreds of millions of dollars to back his presidential campaign.
Todd Belt, professor and political management program director at The Graduate School of Political Management at The George Washington University, said that the falling-out between Trump and Musk, and Musk's quick reversal, proves that Musk 'failed to understand' one thing about Trump that continues to need everyone's attention: 'Trump's power is the lock he has on Republicans in office.'
'Republican voters are almost exclusively Trump voters now. There are no more never-Trumper Republican members of Congress — they have been voted out of office,' Belt said. 'I think that Musk egotistically thought that his wealth would buy him power and influence, but he failed to realize that what power he had was mediated by Trump, and Trump could take it away.'
'Trump has loyalists in Congress and has filled the executive branch with loyalists, so Musk has no real political power,' he continued. 'He may still have the adoration of some tech-bros, but that's not real political power.'
GOP lawmakers have long faced criticism for showing unwavering loyalty to Trump, even when the president's policies are at odds withtheir pastpositions.
Belt was surprised that Musk's reversal came so quickly after the explosive blow-up last week. 'With the enormous egos of the world's richest man and the world's most powerful man, I thought that it would be a more gradual reconciliation,' he said.
But nonetheless, while the spat may have played out like a 'silly soap opera' on social media, Belt cautions that there are some reasons for the public to care about the Trump-Musk feud.
Belt said that Musk's SpaceX and Starlink — the world's largest satellite constellation — have 'a tremendous impact on the nation's national security.'
NASA relies on SpaceX to launch science missions and transport crews and cargo to and from the International Space Station with the company's Dragon space capsules. During the back-and-forth between Trump and Musk on Thursday, Musk said at one point that he would 'begin decommissioning' the SpaceX Dragon spacecraft 'immediately.' He later appeared to walk back that statement in another post on X.
Overall, Belt thinks that Musk's 'significant pendulum swing in tone' combined with allegations surrounding his drug use may cause many in the public, including his investors, to question his 'competency to run his businesses.'
'Musk entered government service thinking he would be lauded for his ability to cut government spending, but he ran into the reality that what the government spends money on impacts people's lives both through services and employment,' he said.
Was Musk's reversal 'just about saving his businesses, which are heavily reliant on government contracts and subject to administrative regulation?' Belt considered.
'If that were the case, at least the reversal would be rational,' he said.
Musk Turned Meek After Phone Call With JD Vance, Susie Wiles: Reports
'Coward' Elon Musk Mocked On His Own Platform After Bending The Knee To Trump
'They Went Too Far': Elon Musk Just Walked Back Some Of His Explosive Criticism Of Trump
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
a few seconds ago
Texas House votes in favor of redistricting plan after Democrats' attempts to stall
The vote comes more than two weeks after dozens of Democrats left Texas, stalling a vote on new congressional maps favoring Republicans.
CNBC
a few seconds ago
- CNBC
Red carpet for Putin, trade relief for China, penalties on India: Inside Trump's peculiar policy playbook
President Donald Trump is pursuing an unusual strategy — courting Russian President Vladimir Putin, holding fire on Beijing, all the while turning the screws on a close ally: India. Despite India being one of the earliest nations to engage in negotiations with the Trump administration, there is still no sign of it sealing a deal with the U.S. New Delhi is now also staring at a secondary tariff of 25% or a "penalty" for its purchases of Russian oil that is set to come into effect later this month. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent on Tuesday escalated criticism against India, accusing it of profiteering from cheap Russian oil imports and threatening to further raise tariffs on Indian goods. "We have planned to up the tariffs on India — these are secondary tariffs for buying the sanctioned Russian oil," Bessent told CNBC on Tuesday. Earlier this week, White House trade advisor Peter Navarro condemned the Asian giant's dependence on Russian oil as "opportunistic" and undermined international efforts to isolate Russia's war economy. "India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro said in an op-ed for the Financial Times . By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda. Professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore Bert Hofman The sharp rhetoric threatens to unravel years of improving ties between Washington and New Delhi — with India saying the U.S. was targeting it unfairly over its Russian oil purchases. "By now the world is getting used to the ad-hoc and sometimes contradictory ways in which the Trump administration is pursuing its agenda," said Bert Hofman, professor at the East Asian Institute at the National University of Singapore. India has emerged as a leading buyer of Russian oil, which has been sold at a discount since some Western nations shunned purchases and imposed restrictions on Russian exports over Moscow's invasion of Ukraine in 2022. It was the second-largest purchaser of Russian oil, importing 1.6 million barrels per day in the first half of this year, up from 50,000 bpd in 2020, though still trailing China's 2 million bpd imports, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Washington has not placed secondary tariffs on China for its Russian oil purchases. India has reiterated that it was the U.S. administration that had asked it to purchase Russian oil to keep the markets calm, while pointing to the European Union and even the U.S.' existing trade with Moscow. The country has taken aim at Washington, saying U.S. continues to import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for the electric-vehicle industry, as well as fertilizers and chemicals from Russia. U.S. bilateral trade with Russia in 2024 stood at $5.2 billion, down from nearly $36 billion in 2021, government data showed. Bilateral trade between New Delhi and Moscow reached a record $68.7 billion for the year ended March 2025. In comparison, the European Union's trade with Russia stood at 67.5 billion euros ($78.1 billion) in 2024, while its services trade in 2023 was at 17.2 billion euros, according to European Commission data . "India has been victimized by these pressure tactics that that the Trump administration is trying to carry out. Trump is clearly using tariffs as a pressure tactic against Russia," Michael Kugelman, director of the South Asia Institute at Washington-based think tank Wilson Center, told CNBC's " Squawk Box Asia ." Another factor determining the U.S. approach to India is that Trump feels "aggrieved," over how Modi undercut his bid to claim credit for playing a role in the India-Pakistan ceasefire, Kugelman emphasized. Adding to Trump's grievances is India's "unwillingness to lower barriers" to exports of American agricultural products such as soybeans and corn, Kevin Chen Xian An, associate research fellow at S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies pointed out. Oil trade for ceasefire Trump's true agenda has little to do with Washington's stated goal of curbing Moscow's oil revenues, but extracting leverages from the trading partners, according to several geopolitics experts. "The overarching objective for the Trump administration is to extract concessions from countries to figure out some justification for levying taxes on trade so that the government can fund its tax reductions on American citizens' income," said Drew Thompson, senior fellow at the think-tank RSIS. "It's not based on foreign policy principles [but] on power politics and gaining leverage," Thompson added. Last week, Trump rolled out a red carpet to greet Putin on his first visit to the U.S. in about a decade, sharing a ride with him in the presidential limousine to the venue. While the meeting did not appear to have produced meaningful steps toward a ceasefire in Ukraine — a goal Trump had set ahead of the summit — both leaders described the meeting as "productive." Speaking at the joint news briefing following the talks , Putin reiterated that "for the conflict resolution in Ukraine to be long-term and lasting, all the root causes of the crisis ... must be eliminated; all of Russia's legitimate concerns must be taken into account." Kirill Dmitriev, one of Putin's top negotiators, hailed Monday's talks in Washington as an "important day of diplomacy," emphasizing Moscow's opposition to any short-term ceasefire deal with Ukraine. Trump is trying to "maximize his leverage ... pressuring India, and Russia via India," to get a trade deal with the former and a ceasefire pact with the latter, said Matt Gertken, chief geopolitical and U.S. strategist at BCA Research. These will eventually help boost Republicans' prospects in the upcoming midterm election, Gertken added. Not provoking China While India faces steep tariffs for its purchases of Russian crude, China, which has remained the largest importer of Russian crude, has been spared such levies. Trump said last Friday he was not considering retaliatory tariffs on China for buying Russian oil, but might consider it in two or three weeks. China's purchases of Russian oil have risen to 46% of overall exports from Russia in the first half of this year, from 34% in 2022, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, followed by India which imported around 36% of Russia's supplies. When asked about China's role in Russian oil purchases, Bessent suggested that Beijing's imports were less egregious in the eyes of the Trump administration because it had already been a big buyer even before Russia invaded Ukraine. Going soft on China may also reflect Trump's desire not to scuttle a potential high-profile summit with Chinese President Xi Jinping in the coming months and the conclusion of a lasting trade deal, said Stephen Olson, a senior visiting fellow at ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute. The secondary tariffs on India may be intended as "a shot across Russia's bow" to show that the U.S. could turn up the pressure by extending similar tariffs to China, if Russia is not more compliant, Olson added. Following weeks of escalating tensions, Beijing and Washington agreed in May to suspend the hefty duties and loosen several punitive measures imposed in April, as both sides continued to work on hammering out a durable deal. Beijing has leveraged its sheer dominance of rare-earth minerals crucial for military and industrial use in its negotiations with Washington, maintaining a tight control on exports of the critical minerals. The relationship with China is complicated, and the Trump administration has not yet come out with "a clear, coherent policy toward China. Sometimes it seems like it wants to compete with China economically. Other times it seems like it wants to reach some type of understanding or a or a detente," Kugelman said.
NBC News
a few seconds ago
- NBC News
Trump administration's newest allegation against political foes: Mortgage fraud
In recent weeks, President Donald Trump's administration has targeted Democratic officials over allegations of mortgage fraud, a new front in an effort to undermine critics. The latest one came Wednesday, when Trump, who has been sharply critical of the Federal Reserve's interest rate policies, posted to his Truth Social platform that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook 'must resign, now!!!' His post came after William Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, alleged in a letter to Attorney General Pam Bondi that Cook, who was nominated by President Joe Biden, 'falsified bank documents and property records to acquire more favorable loan terms, potentially committing mortgage fraud.' Pulte's letter claimed that Cook falsified her residence statuses for her properties in Ann Arbor, Michigan, and Atlanta. The move followed recent efforts targeting Sen. Adam Schiff, D-Calif., who was a leading figure in Trump's impeachments, and New York Attorney General Letitia James, who successfully sued Trump and his company over what her office said were fraudulent misrepresentations of his wealth and financial statements that he used to get favorable rates on bank loans and insurance policies that he otherwise would not have been able to obtain. (A judge awarded James' office over $300 million in the case, an amount that has since ballooned to over $500 million with interest. Trump has called the case 'a fraud on me' and is appealing the judgment.) This month, NBC News reported that Bondi appointed Ed Martin, a conservative activist and former interim U.S. attorney for Washington, D.C., as a 'special attorney' to probe mortgage fraud allegations against Schiff and James. At the time, a senior law enforcement official told NBC News that a grand jury in Virginia will investigate the allegations against James, while a grand jury in Maryland will take up the Schiff allegations. Trump had called for both officials to be prosecuted over the allegations. Schiff, James and now Cook have all denied any wrongdoing. The White House referred questions to the Federal Housing Finance Agency, which declined to comment. Making an allegation of mortgage fraud has long been a common tactic in opposition research on political campaigns. A Republican campaign veteran told NBC News that searching for inconsistencies in where candidates declare their 'primary' residences is among the first tasks for opposition researchers. It is an issue relevant to elected officials who split their time between their home states and Washington. This person said it is a frequent issue in campaigns on both sides, and the penalty tends to be a fine, not jail time. Last year, Sen. Angela Alsobrooks, D-Md., then a candidate for office, faced a $47,000 bill in Washington, D.C., after it was discovered she wrongly received property tax credits she improperly claimed on a home she had rented out. 'It looks sloppy,' this person said. 'But I don't think we've ever had anyone screw up their life on this. It just looked bad.' Now, the Trump administration is giving such allegations against Democrats special attention. At the same time, The Associated Press reported that Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton, a Trump ally who is running for the Senate, and his wife, Angela, made inaccurate statements on mortgage applications claiming that three separate properties were each their primary residence. The Trump administration has not said whether Paxton is under similar investigation. In a letter to Martin on Monday, James' lawyer, Abbe Lowell, pointed out the potential inconsistency in enforcement actions. 'Notably, absent from your mandate is Kenneth Paxton (Republican Attorney General of Texas). Given that the same news reports raising questions about Ms. James and Mr. Schiff have reported that, somehow, Mr. Paxton has three different properties that he claims to be his 'primary residence,' it seems to indicate your title ought really be, 'Special Assistant for Mortgage Fraud [Alleged Against Democrats Adverse to President Trump],'' he wrote. Pulte said in an interview with CNBC on Wednesday that the administration's probes of the allegations of mortgage fraud were free from political considerations. 'We will look at any allegation of mortgage fraud,' he said. 'And we do not care whether you're a Republican, a Democrat. We do not care whether you're wealthy. We don't care whether you're a prosecutor. We don't care whether you're a Fed governor, if you commit mortgage fraud and you present an existential threat to the Federal Home Loan Banks, Fannie or Freddie, we are going to prosecute it, period.' Cook, the first Black woman to serve on the Fed's Board of Governors, said in a statement Wednesday that she learned from news reports that Pulte had made a criminal referral against her 'based on a mortgage application from four years ago, before I joined the Federal Reserve.' 'I have no intention of being bullied to step down from my position because of some questions raised in a tweet,' she said. 'I do intend to take any questions about my financial history seriously as a member of the Federal Reserve and so I am gathering the accurate information to answer any legitimate questions and provide the facts.' Later Wednesday, Sen. Elizabeth Warren, D-Mass., said the episode amounted to the latest example of the Trump administration's trying to pressure the Federal Reserve. 'I've long been an advocate for holding Fed officials accountable,' Warren, the ranking member of the Senate Banking Committee, said in a statement. 'But anyone can see that for months now, President Trump has been scrambling for a pretext to intimidate or fire Chair Powell and Members of the Federal Reserve Board while blaming anyone but himself for how his failed economic policies are hurting Americans. The President and his Administration should not weaponize the Federal government to illegally fire independent Fed Board members.'
