Senate Democrats launch investigation into RFK Jr. firing of CDC vaccine panel
Led by ranking member Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.), who caucuses with Democrats, the lawmakers asked for detailed information about why Kennedy dismissed members of the CDC's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP), who else was involved in the process, and how the new members were identified and vetted.
'By removing all 17 of ACIP's members and replacing them with eight individuals handpicked to advance your anti-vaccine agenda, you have put decades of non-partisan, science-backed work— and, as a result, Americans' lives—at risk,' the lawmakers wrote.
In June, Kennedy fired all members of the panel in an unprecedented escalation of his quest to reshape federal health agencies and vaccine policy. He then handpicked eight replacements, many of whom are vaccine critics.
He accused the panelists of being beholden to corporate interests and said the panel was rife with conflicts, but did not provide any evidence.
The panelists are not political appointees. ACIP members meet and discuss data to determine which vaccines are recommended and for whom. If the CDC director signs off on the panel's recommendations, ACIP-recommended vaccines must be covered by health insurance. Under many state laws, ACIP-recommended vaccines are mandated for schoolchildren.
The lawmakers on Tuesday called on Kennedy to provide information on the firings by Aug. 12, including details of the alleged conflict of interest for each fired member and how their conflicts differ from ones they previously disclosed.
Kennedy has promised transparency and department officials pledged to release ethics forms on the new panelists prior to their meeting last month, but that never happened. A searchable database of ACIP members lists conflicts of interest for just two of Kennedy's picks, though it's much more detailed for the dismissed members.
The senators also asked if Kennedy plans to appoint any additional members to the panel. Only seven members participated in last month's meeting. Kennedy claimed in a Fox News interview in June that he would allow Health Committee chairman Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) to place one of his own candidates on the panel.
In addition to Sanders, the letter was signed by Democratic Sens. Tim Kaine (Va.), Maggie Hassan (N.H.), John Hickenlooper (Colo.), Ed Markey (Mass.), Andy Kim (N.J.), Lisa Blunt Rochester (Del.) and Angela Alsobrooks (Md.).
The lawmakers said they launched a partisan investigation because a Sanders request for a bipartisan inquiry in June went unheeded.
Cassidy on Tuesday said he doesn't see the point in an investigation, because Democrats will be able to question Kennedy directly the next time he testifies.
'The Secretary will be back before us. He's been before us once. He's going to be back before us again,' Cassidy told reporters.
'I'm not sure what an investigation is going to accomplish, more than the guy who apparently made the decision, sitting there before us, taking questions from everybody on the panel,' he continued.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
14 minutes ago
- Fox News
The media reacted with fake articles about backlash: Gutfeld
Fox News hosts Greg Gutfeld and 'Gutfeld!' guests discuss the Democrats meltdown over Greg's appearance on 'The Tonight Show' with Jimmy Fallon.
Indianapolis Star
an hour ago
- Indianapolis Star
Why 17-year-olds are exempt from new Indy youth curfew passed after mass shooting
Indianapolis officials have made the youth curfew two hours earlier for all children younger than 17 for at least the rest of this year. About a month after a July 5 mass shooting left two teenagers dead, the Indianapolis City-County Council voted Aug. 11 to make the youth curfew stricter effective immediately. An initial proposal that included 17-year-olds was amended at the last minute by Democratic councilors who felt that older teens should be granted more independence. The new rules mean that children ages 15 and 16 won't be allowed in public unsupervised past 11 p.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and past 9 p.m. Sundays through Thursdays. Children under 15 will face a 9 p.m. curfew every day. The city's emergency curfew will remain in place for 120 days, which means the council must decide in early December whether to extend or relax the policy. Teens who are 17 will still be subject to the state curfew of 1 a.m. on Fridays and Saturdays and 11 p.m. on Sundays through Thursdays. The 25-person council's Democratic majority passed the amendment that excluded 17-year-olds from the new curfew despite the opposition of all six Republican councilors. "The sun doesn't even go down in the summer until near 10 p.m., and I don't think we're putting ourselves in a good position pushing 17-year-olds to break curfew at 10-10:30 p.m.," said Councilor Jared Evans, who introduced the amendment at Monday's council meeting. Republicans like Councilor Joshua Bain said that excluding 17-year-olds from the new policy weakens the Indianapolis Metropolitan Police Department's efforts to keep people safe. "It is not the goal of IMPD to go around arresting every 17-year-old that's out at night," Bain said. "This is a targeted way for them to get in between a 17-year-old that's about to make a really bad decision and possibly ruin the rest of their life." The ordinance doesn't create a criminal offense for children who break curfew, but it does grant police the authority to detain them. The policy carves out several exceptions for kids who are returning home from work, a school activity, a religious event or activities protected by the First Amendment such as political protests, among others. IMPD Chief Christopher Bailey said he was unbothered by the change exempting 17-year-olds from a stricter curfew. (He mentioned in jest that his daughter, who is nearly 17 and has been criticizing her father at home over the new curfew, would be "very pleased.") "My direction to the officers is not some sweep of everyone that's out," Bailey said. "It's really behavioral-based." Democratic Councilor Dan Boots spoke bluntly in support of more leniency for 17-year-olds. "Seventeen-year-olds are rising seniors in high school, a step away from being able to vote and be drafted and killed for our country," Boots said. "I think they have a right to stay out past 9 to go to a movie and come back." Republican Councilor Michael-Paul Hart, who also voted against the last-minute change, introduced a new proposal Monday night that would fine parents whose children violate curfew. State law allows the city to impose thousands of dollars in fines, according to city attorney Brandon Beeler, but it's unclear how harshly violators would be prosecuted. Hart's proposal would give parents one written warning for a first violation, followed by a $500 fine for a second time and a $1,500 fine for each subsequent occurrence. Councilors will consider the proposal in committee later this month before a likely vote in September. The harsher curfew change comes after hundreds of unsupervised teens lingered downtown in the hours following the Fourth of July fireworks show, culminating in a mass shooting after midnight that killed Xavion Jackson, 16, and Azareaon S. Cole, 15. Two other teens and three adults were also injured. Four teenagers ranging from 13 to 17 years old have been charged in connection with the shooting for illegally carrying guns.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Newsom Warns Trump California Can 'Neutralize' His Texas Redistricting Efforts
California Gov. Gavin Newsom, a committed thorn in Donald Trump's side, told the president Monday that he's prepared to redraw California's districts in Democrats' favor if he doesn't call on Texas and other red states to halt their own GOP-friendly redistricting plans. Newsom made the threat in a letter to Trump, who's backing a GOP-led effort to redraw five Texas districts in Republicans' favor ― something the president has said his party is 'entitled' to ahead of the 2026 midterms. 'If you will not stand down, I will be forced to lead an effort to redraw the maps in California to offset the rigging of maps in red states,' Newsom vowed. 'But if the other states call off their redistricting efforts, we will happily do the same. And American democracy will be better for it.' It's not a step he takes lightly, continued Newsom, who said he believes legislative district maps should be drawn through 'independent, citizen-led efforts,' not via political maneuvering. 'You are playing with fire, risking the destabilization of our democracy, while knowing that California can neutralize any gains you hope to make,' he continued. 'This attempt to rig congressional maps to hold onto power before a single vote is cast in the 2026 election is an affront to American democracy.' The White House did not immediately return a request for comment on Newsom's threat. The letter comes after Democratic members of the Texas state House left the state to deny Republicans a quorum on the redistricting vote, outraging Gov. Greg Abbott (R), who sought to arrest them and remove at least one of them from office. Republicans are also leading redistricting efforts in multiple other states, including in Indiana, Missouri, Ohio and South Carolina. In a Fox News appearance Monday, Abbott claimed California and New York were both already gerrymandered and vowed to pursue even more GOP-friendly districts in Texas if Newsom proceeds with the plan he outlined to Trump. 'If California thinks they're going to move their needle to the extreme and eliminate five Republican numbers of the United States Congress there, Texas is not going to do five ― we will add 10 more Republican seats using the same procedure they're using in California,' he said. Related... Beto O'Rourke Trashes Texas Republicans: 'These Motherf**kers Are Panicking' Texas State Rep. Isn't Backing Down From Fighting 'Overtly Racist' Redistricting Map Greg Abbott Lobs New Threat At Democrats Who Fled Texas To Stop Gerrymandering
