Drag Performers Crash Trump's Date Night at the Kennedy Center to Protest His Anti-'Woke' Agenda
While the president, first lady and other MAGA A-listers received a mixed reception, drag performers Tara Hoot, Mari Con Carne, Ricky Rosé and Vagenesis entered to applause and cheers from the crowd.
The subtle protest came after Trump seized control of the Kennedy Center's board and named himself chairman in February, insisting that he would specifically ban drag shows from the venue.President Donald Trump and first lady Melania Trump received a mixed reception of cheers and boos when they attended the Kennedy Center's opening night performance of Les Misérables on Wednesday, June 11.
However, a group of drag performers who arrived ahead of the first couple received applause and admiration from the crowd. Videos captured by fellow attendees showed Tara Hoot, Mari Con Carne, Ricky Rosé and Vagenesis — all in full drag — smiling and waving as they took their seats ahead of the performance.
An Instagram post by Qommittee, a "national network of drag performers fighting hate and censorship," confirmed that the performers' attendance was a "protest of Trump's presence at the show, following his ban of drag at the center."
"FREE EXPRESSION MEANS EVERYONE. NO EXCEPTIONS," the post added.
Tara Hoot reflected on the experience in a video following the show, saying, "The staff at the Kennedy Center, they were just delighted to see us walk in."
"Kudos to all of you bringing art to the world," the self-proclaimed "campy and kind" queen continued. "Unfortunately, there were some other people there, but I think we brought the audience as much as we possibly could."
The subtle demonstration comes after Trump seized control of the Kennedy Center board — naming himself chairman and installing special envoy Richard Grenell as the president and interim director — in February, shortly after taking office for his second term.
'I want to make sure it runs properly,' Trump said of his motives at the time. 'We don't need woke at the Kennedy Center, and we don't need — some of the shows were terrible. They were a disgrace that they were even put on.'
When a reporter asked a follow-up question about whether he had 'seen any shows there,' the president admitted, 'No.'
'I get reports they were so bad… I didn't want to go,' he explained. 'There was nothing I wanted to see.'
On Monday, Feb. 10, Trump announced Grenell's appointment on Truth Social, specifically calling out his belief that the Kennedy Center had featured drag performances.
"NO MORE DRAG SHOWS, OR OTHER ANTI-AMERICAN PROPAGANDA — ONLY THE BEST. RIC, WELCOME TO SHOW BUSINESS!" Trump wrote.
In another post, Trump again claimed that the performing arts theater had put on 'Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth."
"THIS WILL STOP," he continued. "The Kennedy Center is an American Jewel, and must reflect the brightest STARS on its stage from all across our Nation. For the Kennedy Center, THE BEST IS YET TO COME!'
Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer.
Wednesday's Les Mis performance — which was also attended by Vice President J.D. Vance and his wife, Usha Chilukuri Vance — was always expected to feature a slightly different cast than most Kennedy Center attendees will see during the show's month-long run.
On May 7, CNN reported that at least 10 of the 12 actors in the musical were not planning to perform on the night the Trumps attended. According to sources who spoke to the outlet, the cast was given the option to not perform, and several ensemble members and starring cast members opted out.
Somewhat ironically, Les Mis is a personal favorite of President Trump. In February, the U.S. Army Chorus performed the musical's protest anthem, "Do You Hear the People Sing?," at the 2025 White House Governors Ball.
He also incorporated the song into his 2016 and 2024 presidential campaigns, with The Guardian reporting in 2022 that the politician "bizarrely" blasted the song ahead of announcing his 2024 candidacy. Many see the president's admiration for the song as an odd choice, given that the lyrics are sung from the point of view of French revolutionaries standing up against a powerful and corrupt ruling class.
The lyrics include, "Do you hear the people sing? / Singing the song of angry men?/ It is the music of the people / Who will not be slaves again!"
Read the original article on People
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Times
a few seconds ago
- New York Times
Trump Demands a Fed Governor Resign, Escalating Campaign to Remake Central Bank
President Trump demanded on Wednesday that Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook 'resign, now!!!,' citing unconfirmed allegations that she may have engaged in mortgage fraud, as the administration ramped up its campaign to try to remake the central bank. Mr. Trump unleashed his latest attack shortly after Bill Pulte, the director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency, said on social media that his office had investigated Ms. Cook and found that she appeared to have falsified bank documents to obtain favorable loan terms. Mr. Pulte said the FHFA had referred the matter to the Justice Department for a criminal inquiry. In attacking Ms. Cook, the first Black woman to ever serve as a Fed governor, both Mr. Trump and Mr. Pulte signaled anew their willingness to weaponize the instruments of government to influence monetary policy, even though economists long have warned that interfering with the Fed and its independence could carry catastrophic results. Mr. Trump has been pressuring the central bank and its chair, Jerome H. Powell, to slash interest rates. Mr. Trump has consistently attacked Mr. Powell, suggesting at times that he could take the unprecedented and legally dubious step of trying to fire him before his term as chair expires next year. The Fed has instead kept interest rates steady this year in part because officials are concerned that Mr. Trump's tariffs will spark a new round of price increases. Ms. Cook has consistently voted with Mr. Powell and is generally seen as aligned with him on policy decisions. Ousting Ms. Cook, whose term as governor runs through 2038, would give Mr. Trump another seat on the seven-member board that he could fill with someone more likely to support cutting rates. Mr. Trump already has one unexpected seat to fill. Adriana Kugler, another Fed governor, resigned unexpectedly this month, several months before her term was set to expire in January. Mr. Trump has nominated Stephen Miran, currently the chair of the Council of Economic Advisers, to fill out Ms. Kugler's term. He must still be confirmed by the Senate. The White House has also started weighing potential replacements for Mr. Powell, whose term as chair ends in May. A spokeswoman for the Fed did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Ms. Cook also did not immediately respond.
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
Musk Backs Off ‘America Party' Plans, Report Says
Elon Musk is reversing course on his plans to form a third political party and is telling associates to instead focus on his companies, according to a new report citing sources who said Musk is considering financially backing Vice President JD Vance if he decides to run for president in 2028. Vice President JD Vance exits the Oval Office in the opposite direction as US President Donald Trump and Elon Musk (R) walk away before departing the White House on his way to his South Florida home in Mar-a-Lago in Florida on March 14, 2025. (Photo by ROBERTO SCHMIDT/AFP via Getty Images) AFP via Getty Images Musk has expressed concerns about angering Republicans if he followed through with his plans for a new 'America Party,' the Wall Street Journal reported Tuesday, citing unnamed sources with knowledge of his plans who said Musk hasn't ruled out the possibility of forming a third party. Musk announced last month—at the height of his feud with President Donald Trump—he informally launched the party, which he has said he would use to target Senate and House races, though he hasn't registered the America Party with the Federal Election Commission. Despite cutting ties with Trump, the Tesla CEO has reportedly stayed close to Vance and has floated the possibility of contributing to his 2028 presidential campaign, if he decides to run. Musk forged a close relationship with Trump after contributing to his 2024 presidential campaign then went on to work in the White House, heading up the Department of Government Efficiency. Musk left his government role in May and a feud with Trump quickly ensued when Musk blasted Trump's signature policy bill for being too expensive and adding to government debt. Trump subsequently threatened to revoke Musk's government contracts, though their public spat appears to have cooled after Trump said in late July on Truth Social he wants Musk's companies to 'THRIVE LIKE NEVER BEFORE' and denied he was considering revoking Musk's government subsidies. Forbes Valuation We estimate Musk is worth $413 billion. Elon Musk Suggests His New 'America Party' Will Target Senate And House Seats (Forbes) Elon Musk Announces New 'America Party' In Split With Democrats And Republicans (Forbes) Trump-Musk Feud: Musk Says Trump's Comments About Him Are 'Just Plain Wrong' (Forbes)
UPI
a few seconds ago
- UPI
Tell me how this ends, Ukraine
President Donald Trump meets in the Oval Office with with U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, German Chancellor Friedrich Merz, French President Emmanuel Macron, Finnish President Alexander Stubb, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy and NATO Secretary General Mark Rutte after his call with Russian President Vladimir Putin on Monday. Photo by Daniel Torok/White House/UPI | License Photo Aug. 20 (UPI) -- The theatrics of Monday's White House confab are over. As badly as the Disasta in Alaska went last Friday, President Donald Trump did a first-rate job of presiding over this conclave of key leaders from six major European states, as well as the European Commission and NATO. Expressions of solidarity were clear and apparent. And the Oval Office meeting between Trump and Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was a complete reversal of last February's debacle when the Big Z was escorted out of the White House in semi-disgrace. But the looming question is the one Gen. David Petraeus posed about the second Iraq War to journalists: "Tell me how this ends?" And, indeed, how will the 3 1/2-year war in Ukraine end any time soon -- or will it? To Donald Rumsfeld's useful list of "knowns and unknowns," history should be added in considering how this may end. The combination does not project optimism, although hope can never be abandoned. The crucial issues are security guarantees and land swaps. Whether the West can achieve a NATO-like pact with Ukraine or not, the Russian Foreign Ministry has issued a firm "nyet" to any outside forces being stationed in Ukraine as peacekeepers from NATO or from NATO members -- a seeming reversal of what Trump believed President Vladimir Putin had accepted in Alaska. Nor has the size, composition and states of origin been even roughly defined. Rules of engagement and other sticking points will arise. Of course, Russia's repeated and predictable failure to abide by agreements, especially the Budapest Memorandum of 1994 and the two Minsk Agreements of 2014/15, is too well-known to be ignored. And if this guarantee could not be maintained, would that automatically lead to war with Russia? About land swaps, Putin has made the case "what is mine is mine and what is yours is mine," referring to three major Ukrainian cities in the Donbas that are crucial in Kyiv's defense network and are not occupied by Russian forces. Zelensky is bound by his constitution and public opinion that at least 80% of Ukrainians are opposed to territorial concessions. His certain response, unless a deal is offered, that he cannot refuse is also "nyet," but on steroids. About the unknowns, Putin is on top of that list. From what Trump and his envoy, Steve Witkoff, said right after Alaska and what Trump has said since is that Putin wants to end the war as much as others do. But on what terms? Putin had been unswerving in his intentions to return Ukraine to the Russian motherland whether through occupation or perhaps a puppet government subservient to Moscow. Students of Putin will say there is no unknown here. Putin's response will be unchanged. Yet, because Trump and Witkoff believe differently, there is at least some plausible doubt about how Putin will react. Interestingly, the comment was made that Putin will have to gain support from his cabinet, or what passes for it. But, does anyone believe that Trump will ask advice or concurrence from his advisers? Of course not. Both leaders are in charge. Most depressing is history. In Vietnam, Afghanistan and Iraq 2, the answer to Petraeus' question was crystal clear. We lost. In the case of Vietnam, the North's will to win won. When Congress cut off aid by 1975, Saigon would become Ho Chi Minh City. As Trump should realize, after he and the Taliban made the Doha Accords in 2020 without the presence of the Kabul government, it was do svidaniya, Afghanistan. And with the dissolution of the Iraqi army and dismissal of competent bureaucrats who were part of the Baathist Party, the fate was sealed. Assuming if they meet, and that is by no means a done deal, suppose Putin and Zelensky cannot agree on the land swaps. Or suppose sufficient security guarantees cannot be put in place. From Trump's position, he has done all he can to end the killings and the war. He, too, is likely to say that he tried and now it is up to the warring parties to make a deal. Trump would also argue that as Europe has agreed to shoulder the burden to rearm and supply Ukraine -- that while the United States is happy to sell weapons to Europe, we have done our duty. And make no mistake. Given Russia's overwhelming advantages in size and numbers, we know how this will end. Harlan Ullman is UPI's Arnaud de Borchgrave Distinguished Columnist, senior adviser at Washington's Atlantic Council, chairman of a private company and principal author of the doctrine of shock and awe. His next book, co-written with Field Marshal The Lord David Richards, former U.K. chief of defense and due out next year, is Who Thinks Best Wins: Preventing Strategic Catastrophe. The writer can be reached on X @harlankullman.
