
$19.5 million allotted for Brownsville ISD teacher incentives
Feb. 7—Brownsville ISD announced receiving a new round of Teacher Incentive Allotments through the Texas Education Agency that bring the district's total to more than $19.5 million annually for the next five years.
The designations include 738 new designations and 232 higher designations, bringing the district's total number of TIA-designated teachers to 1,475, BISD said in a news release
The Teacher Incentive Allotment was established by the Texas Legislature as part of House Bill 3 to provide funding for school districts that reward and retain their top-performing teachers.
TIA designations include three levels — Recognized, Exemplary and Master — with qualifying teachers earning between $3,000 and $32,000 annually for the next five years. This milestone highlights a significant transformation for Brownsville ISD.
Starting in 2019 with an inaugural group of 41 teachers in two schools, the program has expanded to include teachers across all campuses. Brownsville ISD continues to lead the area with an all-inclusive designation process that allows all teachers an equal opportunity to earn a designation, regardless of grade level or teaching assignment.
This sets Brownsville ISD apart from other Teacher Incentive Allotment districts across the state, BISD said in the release. Under the district's spending plan, all teachers working at campuses with TIA-designated colleagues will receive a share of the allotment.
These new designations ensure that all teachers in Brownsville ISD benefit. This collaborative model celebrates the district-wide effort to achieve excellence.
Chief Human Resources Officer Linda Gallegos, leader of the TIA initiative, acknowledged the efforts of both teachers and campus administrators.
"Our campus administrators have shown incredible diligence in conducting effective evaluations and refining the Student Learning Objective (SLO) process. Their ongoing commitment to continuous improvement ensures that our educators receive the recognition they deserve. We also acknowledge the incredible work our teachers do on a daily basis to provide high-quality instruction to ensure student success," she said.
Featured Local Savings
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
3 days ago
- Yahoo
NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc. Appoints Dr. Josh Neman as Chief Clinical Officer to Advance Clinical Strategy and Translational Oncology Programs
USC brain tumor authority to accelerate four clinical trials including lead asset NEO100 nearing Phase 2a completion ahead of schedule Appointment bolsters FDA approval path while company explores AI and quantum computing to enhance drug delivery platform CALABASAS, Calif., June 06, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTHI), a clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company focused on innovative treatments for central nervous system (CNS) cancers and disorders, today announced the appointment of Josh Neman, PhD as its new Chief Clinical Officer (CCO). Dr. Neman brings with him a distinguished career at the intersection of cancer neuroscience, translational research, and academic medicine. Dr. Neman joins NeOnc Technologies Holdings Inc. (NeOnc) from the Keck School of Medicine at the University of Southern California (USC), where he serves as Associate Professor of Neurological Surgery and Physiology & Neuroscience, and Scientific Director of the USC Brain Tumor Center. At USC, he also leads the Cancer Biology and Genomics PhD Program and serves as Director of Cancer Research Training and Education Coordination at the USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center- a leading National Cancer Institute-designated cancer research hospital. A nationally recognized leader in neurooncological sciences and cancer neuroscience, Dr. Neman's research has advanced the understanding of how brain microenvironments influence the progression of brain tumors and metastases. His pioneering studies on tumor-neuron interactions, GABAergic signaling in cancer, and mechanisms of leptomeningeal dissemination have helped shape new therapeutic paradigms for both adult and pediatric brain tumors. 'I am deeply honored to join NeOnc at this exciting time,' said Dr. Neman. 'NeOnc's commitment to developing innovative therapeutics, including Blood Brain Barrier-penetrant compounds like NEO212 and NEO100, aligns perfectly with my lifelong passion to improve outcomes for patients with brain tumors. I look forward to helping lead the translation of promising discoveries from the lab into meaningful clinical impact.' In his role as Chief Clinical Officer, Dr. Neman will lead NeOnc's clinical development strategy, including investigator-initiated trials and precision oncology partnerships. He will also play a key role in expanding NeOnc's research collaborations with academic institutions, regulatory agencies, and patient advocacy groups. 'Dr. Neman's appointment signals a major step forward in NeOnc's mission to transform the treatment landscape for patients with life-threatening cancers with poor outcomes,' said Amir Heshmatpour, Executive Chairman and President of NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc. 'His academic and clinical leadership, coupled with his deep expertise in brain tumor biology, will be instrumental in accelerating all four of our clinical trials—especially our lead asset, NEO100, which is approaching the completion of its Phase 2a trial with full enrollment achieved ahead of schedule. As we look to add AI and quantum computing into our expanding platform in drug delivery and bio-conjugation, Dr. Neman's appointment further strengthens our commitment to advancing precision therapies and driving toward FDA approval.' About NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc. (NASDAQ: NTHI): NeOnc Technologies is a publicly traded, clinical-stage biopharmaceutical company developing innovative therapies for brain and central nervous system cancers. Its lead programs—NEO100-01, NEO100-02, NEO100-03, and NEO212—utilize proprietary formulations to bypass the blood-brain barrier and target malignancies with precision. The company's IP portfolio includes 176 patents worldwide, reflecting a broad platform with strong commercialization potential. For more about NeOnc and its pioneering technology, visit Important Cautions Regarding Forward-Looking Statements All statements other than statements of historical facts included in this press release are "forward-looking statements" (as defined in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995). Generally, such forward-looking statements include statements regarding expectations, possible or assumed future actions, business strategies, events or results of operations, including statements regarding expectations or predictions or future financial or business performance or conditions and those statements that use forward-looking words such as "projected," "expect," "possibility" and "anticipate," or similar expressions. The achievement or success of the matters covered by such forward-looking statements involve significant risks, uncertainties, and assumptions. Actual results could differ materially from current projections or implied results. The Company cautions that statements and assumptions made in this news release constitute forward-looking statements and make no guarantee of future performance. Forward-looking statements are based on estimates and opinions of management at the time statements are made. The information set forth herein speaks only as of the date hereof. The Company and its management are under no obligation, and expressly disclaim any obligation, to update, alter or otherwise revise any forward-looking statements following the date of this news release, whether because of new information, future events or otherwise, except as required by law. 'NEO100' is a registered trademark of NeOnc Technologies Holdings, Inc. Company Contact:23975 Sorrento Park Suite 205, Calabasas, CA, 91302info@ Investor Relations:James CarbonaraHayden IR369 Lexington AvenueSecond FloorNew York, NY 10017Office: (646)-755-7412James@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Opinion: How Some Texas Teachers Are Earning Six Figures — Without Leaving the Classroom
Ask teachers how much their pay matters, and they often shy away from a direct answer, feeling ashamed to admit they do their job for anything beyond a sheer love of helping students. District leaders more openly acknowledge the importance of compensation, especially for teachers who must work a second job to make ends meet, and in regions that struggle to hire and retain educators. But they can do more than just help their educators escape a two-job grind. In Texas, one district has made it possible for teachers to earn six-figure salaries without leaving the classroom — and without having to wait for decades. Every state and district should make this their teachers' reality. How is it happening? Take a look at Midland Independent School District, in the Permian Basin. First, the district created teams headed by teacher-leaders, following the Opportunity Culture Multi-Classroom Leader model provided by my employer, Public Impact. Participating districts around the country offer educators with records of strong student learning growth and the ability to lead adults the chance to fill these roles, reaching more students as they continue to teach while guiding small groups of colleagues to attain similar results. Each team typically has four or five classroom teachers and a specially trained paraprofessional who supports them, especially by focusing on small-group tutoring. The leaders have dedicated time each week for observing and coaching the team, co-teaching, modeling instruction, and leading planning and data analysis. They are accountable for the results of all students taught by members of the team. For all this, they receive a pay supplement that in 2023-24 averaged $13,500 nationally and reached as high as $25,000. The supplements are funded by reallocations of regular budgets, making them sustainable. Related Team leaders repeatedly call this combination of teaching plus leadership the best of both worlds, seeing an immediate impact from providing targeted, on-the-job support and feedback to a manageable number of people. In Midland, the district goes a step further by adding state incentive funding to the mix. Texas districts can receive annual state Teacher Incentive Allotments, based on how many of their educators the state designates as outstanding. Districts distribute those dollars, using locally designed criteria, to high-performing teachers — from $3,000 to $32,000 apiece. With Midland educators a dozen or so years into their career already earning well above $60,000 a year, 37 team leaders reached the six-figure mark in 2024-25 after adding in stipends of $17,000 or more and state incentive allotments. And in February, the district received notification of 77 more teachers designated as outstanding, many of them already on multi-classroom teams. The combination of a leadership role and higher pay can be disruptive — in a good way. Since the Opportunity Culture initiative began over a decade ago, principals have repeatedly told me that if the program had existed when they were teaching, they would never have left the classroom. One even confessed to planning to step back from the principalship and become a team leader, returning to direct work with students — the reason most educators choose their career in the first place. In fact, Midland officials now have to consider how teacher-leader pay is affecting the ranks of assistant principals, as becoming an AP can mean a pay cut. But that is by design, and more of the district's teachers are staying in the classroom rather than moving up the administrative ranks. At the same time, the district is seeing improved recruitment and retention, because educators earning higher pay feel valued. The program could well create an opportunity to attract people to teaching who might not have otherwise thought about a career in education. And unlike typical grant-funded supplements or bonuses, teachers can trust that this higher pay has been designed to last. In the end, the math adds up to a sweet sum: Great educators + higher pay = supported and satisfied teachers + strong learning results. It's something all teachers and students deserve, and that all states and districts should provide.


New York Times
29-05-2025
- New York Times
Damian Lillard salary exception, re-signing two bigs and building depth: Bucks mailbag
One month has passed since the Milwaukee Bucks were eliminated in the first round of the 2025 NBA Playoffs by the Indiana Pacers, who look poised to represent the Eastern Conference in the NBA Finals. While Giannis Antetokounmpo and the Bucks have been one of the league's most popular topics of late, nothing has changed about their situation. Advertisement The Bucks are waiting for the 2024-25 season to end so that the offseason moves can begin in earnest. While waiting for that moment, we asked our readers to submit questions about Milwaukee's offseason for senior NBA writer Eric Nehm to answer. This is the first installment of that mailbag, which we will continue to work through over the next few weeks. Note: Questions have been lightly edited for clarity. What is the cap exception if Damian Lillard is out for the entire year? And based on that exception amount, who are free agents they could sign? — Brad G. I addressed this in my offseason overview a few weeks ago (and in response to Marques Johnson on his podcast), but I get it often enough and see Bucks fans discussing it enough that I wanted to address this at the start of this mailbag. The exception referenced here is the disabled player exception, which is in line with the non-taxpayer midlevel exception of $14.1 million. However, barring something unforeseen and terrible, it will not be something the Bucks can use on Lillard next season. To be granted a disabled player exception, a team needs to apply for the exception with the league, and then an NBA-designated physician (or a Fitness-to-Play panel) would need to determine that the player in question is 'substantially more likely than not' to be unable to play through the following June 15. On May 2, the team announced that Lillard underwent successful surgery to repair his torn left Achilles tendon. Even on an incredibly conservative timeline of 13 months, Lillard would be expected to return to play before the June 15, 2026 deadline. Hey, Eric, the 'gap year' idea seems more like a 'gap years' pitch to free up most salaries heading into Giannis's player option year, so do you mind sharing more details on what you had in mind? Is it as simple as: We want to build a two-year roster that can make the playoffs, get that notorious 'bite of the apple' and enter a full salary cap reset heading into the 2027-28 year? Or, what did you have in mind? — Jason V. As I laid out in the gap year story, I think the most important thing for the Bucks to accomplish next season is giving young(ish) players the opportunity to develop and grow into real contributors with plenty of minutes and game reps. Turning players such as Gary Trent Jr., Kevin Porter Jr., AJ Green and Ryan Rollins (or other free agents in that same age range of 23-28) into real contributors creates a core that can either serve as the role players needed to contend moving forward or useful pieces for a trade next offseason (the summer of 2026). Advertisement If the Bucks can successfully build that core next season, they have the pieces in place to be a much better and more complete team when Lillard returns to action. That return could happen at the end of next season or maybe it takes until the start of the 2026-27 season for Lillard to look like himself. Building out the depth of the roster and then adding a superstar talent on top with Lillard would be the simplest path, but not the only gap year path. Lillard has a player option worth more than $58.4 million for the 2026-27 season. If he accepts that option and Kyle Kuzma is still on the roster ($20.4 million contract), the Bucks would have nearly $80 million of contracts with which to go out to make a trade. If the Bucks do not touch any of their first-round picks over the next year, general manager Jon Horst would have the ability to move three first-round picks next offseason: a 2026 first-round pick that is tied up in a swap with the New Orleans Pelicans, the team's 2031 first-round pick and its 2033 first-round pick. It would require Horst to leverage a few more years of the team's future, but that collection of picks and players on expiring contracts could allow Horst to put together trade packages for the type of talent that could pair with Antetokounmpo to put the Bucks into contention. I think that path would allow the Bucks to get back into the title conversation quicker. I will always be skeptical of any plan that requires opening up salary-cap space and asking big-time free agents to sign to play in Milwaukee. Getting to play with Antetokounmpo is a great opportunity, but Milwaukee is still a smaller, cold-weather Midwestern city and creating actual cap space to sign players is always easier said than done. So I think trading for top-end talent is the more logical path to ensuring just a single gap year. If Brook Lopez isn't re-signed and Bobby Portis opts out, will that free up more cap space or will we still somehow be limited by the CBA? — Arthur H. What is Brook's value in free agency, and is a return for him more likely than a free-agent signing? — Wfthiel What is a realistic plan for center next year? If they get Brook back on a cheaper contract, will they start him regularly and leave it at that, or look toward young/Giannis as the primary center? — Cory R. I'll start with Arthur's question because I think that sets the scene best. With four players — Antetokounmpo, Lillard, Kuzma and Tyler Smith — already on guaranteed contracts for next season, the Bucks will have used up roughly 86 percent of the projected salary cap of $154.6 million. Add in Pat Connaughton's player option for $9.4 million, which seems like a no-brainer for Connaughton to accept, and the Bucks would be roughly $12.6 million under the salary cap. Advertisement So, realistically, there won't be a way to create cap space to sign an outside free agent, but there would still be avenues for the Bucks to sign both Portis and Lopez or use cap exceptions to sign a new group of centers. Because Lopez and Portis have been with the Bucks for at least three seasons, Milwaukee has full Bird rights on both players, which means it can sign them to contracts that exceed the salary cap. So, even if Portis decides to opt out of the last year of his contract, the Bucks still will be in a position to bring both back, but they will have to decide if they want to be a luxury tax team or stay below the luxury tax line of $187.9 million. That is where things will get interesting for the Bucks with Portis and Lopez. If the Bucks want to bring back Portis and Lopez while remaining under the luxury tax line, it may be difficult. Hypothetically, if they would bring their roster to 14 players by splitting the nontaxpayer midlevel exception on Trent Jr. and Porter Jr., signing Rollins and Jericho Sims to minimum contracts, guaranteeing the contracts of Green and Andre Jackson Jr., and signing the No. 47 pick to a minimum, they'd have roughly $21 million to split between the contracts of Portis and Lopez. The Bucks would be allowed to pass the luxury tax line, but using an exception would hard cap them at the first apron (roughly $195.9 million). (Disclaimer: Different cap mechanics or signing players for cheaper contracts than suggested above would allow the Bucks to create more space. This was just an exercise to show how much space the team might have available to sign both players if they want to stay below the luxury tax line.) Also, while I don't see Lopez commanding the same market he did two offseasons ago when the Bucks brought him back on a two-year, $48 million contract, it is incredible how rare his skill set remains throughout the NBA. Last season, Lopez averaged 13.0 points, 5.0 rebounds and 1.9 blocks per game while knocking down 37.3 percent from 3 in 80 games for the Bucks. The 37-year-old big man was one of six players to record at least 82 blocks and 82 3s in the 2024-25 season. Even if you change the filters to per-game averages to account for injuries, Lopez was one of only 17 players leaguewide to average at least one 3 and one blocked shot per game last season. There are simply not many players who can both knock down 3s and block shots, so there will be teams that are interested in adding Lopez to their roster. Also, as I'll note most summers, an underrated part of the value for a team re-signing its free agents is maintaining salary slots larger than minimum contracts on their cap sheet. If the Bucks attempt to turn over their roster during next offseason to get back into more serious contention, they will need contracts to include in trades. By signing both Portis and Lopez to contracts, the Bucks would not only keep two talented players, but they would also have contracts that they may be able to use in future trades. Advertisement As far as playing Antetokounmpo at center, per Cory's suggestion, the easiest place to start is Antetokounmpo's thoughts on playing center. During the last five seasons, every time he has been asked to play center for a long time, he has described how much greater the physical toll ends up being when asked to take on the responsibility of defending and boxing out centers. Antetokounmpo is a consummate pro, so he will always do what is asked of him, but he has also made it clear he finds playing center far more taxing. His final evolution as a player may require a position change, but I don't think we've reached that point yet. If the Bucks are going to ask him to take on an even larger offensive responsibility next season, the last thing they need to do is make his defensive work more difficult as well. If the NBA has shifted from the 'three stars to win' model to the 'depth is king' model, how do the Bucks adapt and compete with two $50 million-plus players on the roster? — Mike M. A colleague at another Milwaukee outlet recently wrote that, given the parity in the league now, the Bucks may not be that far from returning to title contention. I thought it was an interesting idea, but I'm wondering what you think of it. — Jeffrey M. Commissioner Adam Silver has made greater parity one of his goals, and it appears as though the league is trending in that direction. No matter who comes out on top among the remaining conference finalists, the league will crown its seventh different champion in the last seven seasons. Homecourt advantage has started to matter less than it did previously and there have been plenty of recent examples of deep runs from teams closer to the middle of the pack than the top of the conference. That setting does make me believe that we are looking at a different version of the NBA. Three-star teams are getting more difficult to build and manage and some analysts have started to call this the 'weak-link era' because there is some belief that it is now more important for teams to make sure they don't have the weakest link on the floor more than having the best player on the floor. While I think having top-end talent will always matter, I think there may be some credence to that idea as coaches have become skilled at picking on their opponent's weakest player on each end of the floor. Ultimately, though, while I think that means the Bucks are closer to getting themselves back into title contention, they still have a lot of work to do with respect to Mike's question. If they are going to compete for championships again with Antetokounmpo, they need to build depth, which is why a gap year could end up being important. No one can deny that Antetokounmpo was the best player on the floor in the first-round series against the Pacers, but there were large stretches of that series where the Pacers might have had the five next-best players on the floor. The Bucks need to get to a place where that is no longer the case in the playoffs. Even if the Bucks can't boast the best roster in the Eastern Conference next season — and they certainly can't with $54 million tied up in Lillard recovering on the sideline — getting reps and building the confidence of the players further down the roster could give the Bucks a far more versatile group when Lillard returns, and they can start thinking about contending again. (Photo of Damian Lillard, Giannis Antetokounmpo and Brook Lopez: Todd Kirkland / Getty Images)