
'The system is broken': Report recommends outing specialists with excessive fees
Nearly 1.9 million Australians are delaying or skipping critical care due to high specialist fees.
Some specialists charge two to three times the Medicare rate, with annual costs topping $670 for some services.
Grattan Institute urges reforms, including naming overcharging doctors and expanding access in underserved areas. The report recommended naming specialists who charge excessive fees and scrapping medicare subsidies for them. Some private specialist doctors charge patients two to three times more than the rate Medicare sets for those services, the report found. It said patients of one specialist forked out an average of $300 per year in 2023 - up 73 per cent since 2010.
Average out-of-pocket costs for extreme-fee-charging specialists in 2023 reached $671 for psychiatry services and more than $350 for endocrinology, cardiology, paediatrics, immunology and neurology services. The high costs leave critical health care out of reach for millions, causing patients in poorer pockets of Australia to wait months or years for urgent appointments, and leading to missed diagnoses, avoidable pain and added pressure on hospitals. About four in 10 Australians visited a specialist in 2023/24.
About two-thirds across all specialities are private appointments, with patients receiving a Medicare rebate and paying a gap fee. Grattan's Health Program director Peter Breadon said the system was broken from start to end. "Everywhere, from how the system is planned and how training is funded through to how we target public investment and integrate the system between primary care and specialist care, it all really needs a lot of change," he told AAP.
Federal Health Minister Mark Butler said private health insurers and specialists needed to do more to protect patients from exorbitant bills. He said the Albanese government would upgrade the Medical Costs Finder, which helps patients find the best value for specialist medical advice, and was committed to working with stakeholders to improve cost transparency. "Hopefully it would discourage those specialists who are charging really unreasonable fees, but this is a problem that needs many solutions," Breadon said. The report also recommends governments provide one million extra specialist appointment services every year in areas that receive the least care, a system in which GPs can get written advice from other specialists, modernise public specialist clinics, and allocate $160 million to expand specialist training for under-supplied specialities and rural training. Australian Medical Association President Dr Danielle McMullen said public hospital underinvestment and lagging Medicare rebates made it harder for patients. "The risks of delaying medical care are that the health problem gets worse," she said, adding it also puts pressure on GPs and hospitals in public and private clinics.
The doctors' association supports most of Grattan's recommendations, but said removing Medicare funding from specialists who charged excessive fees was not practical. As governments negotiate the National Health Reform agreement, McMullen urged leaders to sort out longer-term funding for public hospitals and develop a health workforce data tracker to show where investment was needed.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
an hour ago
- SBS Australia
Report finds excessive medical fees prohibit patients accessing specialist care
Report finds excessive medical fees prohibit patients accessing specialist care Published 16 June 2025, 8:21 am Cost barriers are preventing millions of Australians from receiving specialist care. That is based on a Grattan institute report shining a light-on the extreme fees being charged. While the public system provides the majority of care in some specialties, it accounts for only a fraction in others.

News.com.au
3 hours ago
- News.com.au
Health watchdog warns public warned about suspended dentist Peter Terzi
The public have been warned about a dentist who was suspended by the health watchdog but may still be operating on patients. Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency (AHPRA) released its first public statement under new laws to warn consumers about Peter Terzi, also known as Peter Taylor, who held a dual dentist and nurse registration. Mr Terzi is under investigation and was suspended from practising both professions in February this year. AHPRA allege the suspended Western Australian practitioner poses a serious risk to people because of his conduct. 'He remains under investigation and AHPRA believes he may be continuing to present himself as a registered dentist or nurse while he is suspended and unregistered,' the statement read. Mr Terzi is facing criminal charges for recklessly holding himself as a registered dentist and carrying out a restricted dental act and is before the court. He pleaded not guilty to the charges. AHPRA chief executive officer Justin Untersteiner said the power to issue a warning to the general public came into force two years ago, but Monday's public statement is the first time these powers have been used. 'We take the matter of issuing public statements very seriously and will only ever issue such statements in exceptional circumstances where the public needs to be informed from a safety perspective,' he said. 'The threshold for issuing a public statement is set at a high level. The decision to issue a public statement may only be made when AHPRA or a National Board form a reasonable belief that a practitioner or person poses a serious risk to the public. 'Issuing this statement today means we can warn the public while we continue to take steps to assess and investigate matters that could raise a serious risk to the public.' Anyone who suspects they may have received treatment from or employed Peter Terzi/Taylor, or who has information that he has claimed to be a dentist or a nurse since February 26, is urged to contact AHPRA's Criminal Offences Unit.

The Age
3 hours ago
- The Age
Soaring doctor fees are a pain, but medics have another problem
If you have a history of medical mayhem in your family, specialists are part of your life from early on. Sure, you might feel fine. But my darling GPs have a different vibe. Feeling fine means nothing to them. So it is, with still a good six months to go in 2025, that I've nearly reached my safety net. Probably by this weekend, I'll be there. The Medicare safety nets come in when you incur a certain amount of out-of-pocket costs for out-of-pocket medical services. There's a scheduled fee. Then there is what we're really charged. This week, the Grattan Institute released a report which revealed, kind of, the true cost of visiting a specialist in this country. It says 40 per cent of Australians saw a specialist in 2023-2024, and, with government, we spent nearly $9 billion in 2021-2022. More than one in five Australians who saw a specialist in 2023 was charged an extreme fee at least once. Grattan tells us one in 10 Australians who saw a psychiatrist ended up paying $400 in out-of-pocket costs for their initial consultation alone. Grattan has a bunch of excellent recommendations. My favourite would be to strip Medicare rebates from specialists charging excessive fees. And then set the competition watchdog on specialist costs. Perfect. But money is not the only problem. It's the emotional cost, the cognitive load. Decades back, we spent time concentrating on the way doctors dealt with patients. Universities started to interview students based on their interpersonal skills – and choosing them on that basis, as well as stuff they could study for. The Australian Health Practitioner Regulation Agency received more than 11,000 complaints about medical practitioners last year – well up from the year before. About one in six of those complaints is about communication. Whatever universities and specialist colleges are teaching their students about communication, it is not enough. Five out of six in the list of top earners from the Australian Taxation Office are doctors of one kind or another. I'm sure they're happy. I wouldn't mind paying their gaps if I also thought I was getting good service. Clear, open communication. Warm hearts, warm hands. Medical receptionists who are not so overloaded they can't do their jobs properly. (A special shout-out to Anna. You are a gem and so is your boss.) A quick but seriously anecdotal and eavesdroppy survey of the people who shared a waiting room with me last week – people going to the medical receptionist every 20 minutes or so to ask how much longer they would have to wait. My own experience at this practice? Five hours of delay. 'Sorry, the doctor is very busy.' So are the rest of us.