Would YOU use a robot surrogate? China develops the world's first 'pregnancy humanoid' that's capable of giving birth to a live baby
But scientists in China are developing the world's first 'pregnancy robot' capable of carrying a baby to term and giving birth.
The humanoid will be equipped with an artificial womb that receives nutrients through a hose, experts said.
A prototype is expected to be released next year, with a selling price of around 100,000 yuan (£10,000).
Dr Zhang Qifeng, who founded the company Kaiwa Technology, is developing the machine.
The device he envisions is not simply an incubator but a humanoid that can replicate the entire process from conception to delivery, Asian media outlets report.
He said the artificial womb technology is already in a 'mature stage' and now needs to be implanted in the robot's abdomen, 'so that a real person and the robot can interact to achieve pregnancy'.
With regards to ethical and legal issues, he said: 'We have held discussion forums with authorities in Guangdong Province and submitted related proposals while discussing policy and legislation.'
Experts have not yet provided any specifics on how the egg and sperm are fertilised and implanted in the artificial womb.
Dr Zhang's revelations were made during an interview shared on Duoyin, the Chinese version of TikTok.
News of the development sparked intense discussion across Chinese social media, with critics condemning the technology as ethically problematic and unnatural.
Many argued that depriving a foetus of maternal connection was cruel, while questions were raised about how eggs would be sourced for the process.
However, many showed support for the innovation, viewing it as a means to spare women from pregnancy–related suffering.
One wrote: 'Many families pay significant expenses for artificial insemination only to fail, so the development of the pregnancy robot contributes to society.'
Previously, scientists have successfully kept premature lambs alive for weeks using an artificial womb that looks like a plastic bag.
The 'biobag' provided everything the foetus needed to continue growing and maturing, including a nutrient–rich blood supply and a protective sac of amniotic fluid.
After 28 days of being in the bag, the lambs – which otherwise would likely have died – had put on weight and grown wool.
While the biobag acts like an incubator, allowing premature individuals to grow in an environment similar to the womb, scientists hope the pregnancy robot will be able to support the foetus from conception to delivery.
Since the 1970s, feminist activists such as Andrea Dworkin have been strongly opposed to the use of artificial wombs on the grounds that it could lead to the 'end of women'.
In 2012, Ms Dworkin wrote: 'Women already have the power to eliminate men and in their collective wisdom have decided to keep them.
'The real question now is, will men, once the artificial womb is perfected, want to keep women around?'
In 2022 a group of researchers from The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia – who have been developing artificial wombs – published an article on the ethical considerations of technology.
The researchers wrote: 'A concern is that it could lead to the devaluation or even pathologizing of pregnancy, and may diminish women's experience of deriving meaning, empowerment, and self–fulfillment from this unique aspect of female biology.'
Earlier this year, however, a survey showed that 42 per cent of people aged 18–24 said they would support 'growing a foetus entirely out of woman's body'.
The development is reminiscent of the 2023 film The Pod Generation, where a tech giant offers couples the option of using detachable artificial wombs or 'pods' to share pregnancy.
If it comes to fruition, the humanoid pregnancy could be seen as a tool to help tackle rising rates of infertility in China.
Reports suggest the rates of infertility in China rose from 11.9 per cent in 2007 to 18 per cent in 2020.
In response, local governments in China are including artificial insemination and in vitro fertilization treatments in medical insurance coverage to support childbirth for infertile couples.
EXPLAINED: PREMATURE BIRTH AND ITS RISKS TO BABIES
Around 10 per cent of all pregnancies worldwide result in premature labour - defined as a delivery before 37 weeks.
When this happens, not all of the baby's organs, including the heart and lungs, will have developed. They can also be underweight and smaller.
Tommy's, a charity in the UK, says this can mean so-called preemies 'are not ready for life outside the womb'.
Premature birth is the largest cause of neonatal mortality in the US and the UK, according to figures.
Babies born early account for around 1,500 deaths each year in the UK. In the US, premature birth and its complications account for 17 per cent of infant deaths.
Babies born prematurely are often whisked away to neonatal intensive care units, where they are looked after around the clock.
What are the chances of survival?
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Geeky Gadgets
2 hours ago
- Geeky Gadgets
GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Comparison Guide : The Key Differences You Need to Know
Is newer always better? When GPT-5 was announced, many expected it to be a new leap forward, a model that would leave its predecessor, GPT-4o, in the dust. Yet, early adopters have been met with a surprising reality: while GPT-5 features impressive advancements in reasoning, coding, and visual generation, GPT-4o continues to hold its ground with unmatched speed, simplicity, and reliability. This unexpected dynamic has sparked a heated debate among users, could the latest iteration of OpenAI's technology actually fall short in certain areas? The answer, as it turns out, is far more nuanced than a simple yes or no. The strengths and weaknesses of these models reveal a fascinating trade-off between innovation and practicality. In this comparison, Skill Leap AI unpack the key differences between GPT-5 and GPT-4o, exploring how their distinct capabilities shape their real-world applications. From GPT-5's advanced problem-solving and creative ideation to GPT-4o's efficiency in document creation and everyday tasks, each model offers unique advantages that cater to specific needs. But which one truly delivers the best value? Whether you're a developer seeking innovative tools or a professional craving speed and simplicity, understanding these trade-offs will help you make an informed choice. The answer isn't just about which model is 'better'—it's about which one is better for you. GPT-5 vs GPT-4o Distinct Strengths and Weaknesses Both GPT-5 and GPT-4o bring unique capabilities to the table, making them suitable for different types of tasks. Understanding their core strengths and limitations is essential for making an informed choice. GPT-5: Known for its advanced reasoning and ability to tackle complex problem-solving tasks, GPT-5 is particularly effective in generating detailed visual outputs. It is a strong choice for users seeking innovation in coding, creative ideation, and tasks requiring higher cognitive processing. Known for its advanced reasoning and ability to tackle complex problem-solving tasks, GPT-5 is particularly effective in generating detailed visual outputs. It is a strong choice for users seeking innovation in coding, creative ideation, and tasks requiring higher cognitive processing. GPT-4o: Designed with speed and simplicity in mind, GPT-4o is ideal for straightforward tasks such as document creation and rapid content generation. Its reliability and ease of use make it a preferred option for everyday applications. Performance in Key Functional Areas The differences between GPT-5 and GPT-4o become more evident when evaluating their performance across specific tasks. Each model demonstrates distinct advantages depending on the nature of the task. Coding: GPT-5 outperforms GPT-4o in handling intricate programming challenges. Its ability to generate detailed, executable code makes it a valuable tool for developers working on complex projects. GPT-5 outperforms GPT-4o in handling intricate programming challenges. Its ability to generate detailed, executable code makes it a valuable tool for developers working on complex projects. Data Visualization: GPT-5 offers significant advantages in creating interactive and visually rich dashboards, making it a strong choice for data analysts and visualization tasks. GPT-5 offers significant advantages in creating interactive and visually rich dashboards, making it a strong choice for data analysts and visualization tasks. Document Creation: GPT-4o excels in producing cleaner, more organized documents with fewer formatting errors. This makes it the preferred model for professional writing and administrative tasks. GPT-4o excels in producing cleaner, more organized documents with fewer formatting errors. This makes it the preferred model for professional writing and administrative tasks. Processing Speed: GPT-4o consistently outpaces GPT-5 in terms of speed, particularly for tasks that do not require deep reasoning or complex problem-solving. GPT-4o consistently outpaces GPT-5 in terms of speed, particularly for tasks that do not require deep reasoning or complex problem-solving. Accuracy: GPT-5 shows slight improvements in reducing hallucinated outputs, such as inaccurate citations, but both models continue to face challenges in this area, highlighting the need for further refinement. Is GPT-5 Better Than GPT-4o? Watch this video on YouTube. Take a look at other insightful guides from our broad collection that might capture your interest in ChatGPT 5 comparison. Creative Applications and Ideation For creative tasks such as storytelling, brainstorming, or email drafting, GPT-5 demonstrates clear advantages. Its outputs are more structured, detailed, and contextually relevant, making it a powerful tool for ideation and creative writing. However, the improvements over GPT-4o, while noticeable, may not be substantial enough to warrant a switch for all users. Those who prioritize creativity and innovation may find GPT-5 more appealing, but for simpler creative tasks, GPT-4o remains a reliable option. Automation and Workflow Optimization GPT-5 introduces enhanced capabilities for automating complex workflows. Its advanced reasoning skills enable it to independently break down multi-step tasks and execute them with minimal user input. This makes it particularly valuable for professionals looking to streamline agentic tasks such as project management, workflow optimization, or multi-layered decision-making processes. By contrast, GPT-4o, while efficient, lacks the same level of sophistication in handling intricate automation tasks. User Experience and Practical Usability The user experience offered by GPT-5 and GPT-4o varies significantly, depending on the complexity of the task. GPT-5 includes a streamlined 'auto' mode designed to assess task complexity and adjust its approach accordingly. However, this feature occasionally misinterprets user intent, leading to less satisfactory outputs. On the other hand, GPT-4o provides a more predictable and user-friendly experience, particularly for everyday tasks. For users who prioritize consistency, simplicity, and intuitive interaction, GPT-4o may be the better choice. Challenges and Limitations Despite their advancements, neither GPT-5 nor GPT-4o is without flaws. GPT-5's improvements, while meaningful, do not represent a dramatic leap forward akin to the transition from GPT-3 to GPT-4. Both models continue to struggle with certain tasks, such as generating accurate YouTube thumbnails or avoiding hallucinated citations. These limitations underscore the ongoing challenges in AI development and the need for further refinement to address these persistent issues. Making the Right Choice The decision between GPT-5 and GPT-4o ultimately depends on your specific needs and priorities. Each model offers distinct advantages that cater to different use cases: Choose GPT-5: If your work involves advanced reasoning, complex coding, creative ideation, or tasks requiring detailed visual outputs, GPT-5's capabilities make it the better option. If your work involves advanced reasoning, complex coding, creative ideation, or tasks requiring detailed visual outputs, GPT-5's capabilities make it the better option. Choose GPT-4o: For tasks that prioritize speed, simplicity, and reliability, such as document creation or rapid content generation, GPT-4o remains a strong contender. While GPT-5 introduces notable advancements, it does not deliver a new upgrade over GPT-4o. Instead, the choice comes down to weighing the trade-offs and selecting the model that best aligns with your goals and workflow requirements. Media Credit: Skill Leap AI Filed Under: AI, Top News Latest Geeky Gadgets Deals Disclosure: Some of our articles include affiliate links. If you buy something through one of these links, Geeky Gadgets may earn an affiliate commission. Learn about our Disclosure Policy.
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Microplastics found in highest amounts in these popular drinks
Microplastics are all around us – in the air we breathe, in seas and rivers, they're found in the guts of sharks, and inside growing plants. They're also inside humans, too: in our blood, accumulating in our brains, and even in our testicles. So it is perhaps unsurprising to learn that one of the key means of entering the body is through the fluids we drink. Previous studies have established that microplastics are present in both tap water and bottled water, but new research has revealed that hot drinks may be an even bigger source of microplastics than was previously realised. A research team at the University of Birmingham tested 155 common soft drinks, including hot and cold drinks, for microplastics to get a picture of average human exposure through a realistic spectrum of daily drinks available in one country. The study, believed to be the first of its kind, found the highest concentrations of microplastics were in hot tea and hot coffee. The study also tested iced tea and coffee for microplastics, but found significantly less, suggesting the high temperatures and processes used for making hot drinks contribute to the levels of microplastics which end up in the product. The team assessed 31 different types of drinks in total from popular UK brands, all bought from supermarkets and coffee shops in 2024. These included hot and iced coffee, hot and iced tea, juices, energy drinks, and soft drinks. The samples were filtered, and then microplastic counts were determined through microscope imaging. Cold drinks were filtered immediately, while hot drinks were allowed to cool for 30 minutes before analysis. Hot tea in disposable cups contained the highest level of microplastics (MPs), averaging 22MPs per cup, compared to 14MPs per cup for glass cups. More expensive teabags leached the greatest amount of plastic, the study found, averaging 24 to 30MPs per cup. Similarly, the research team said that for hot coffee, their findings "strongly suggest that the disposable cup material is a primary source of [microplastics] in our hot coffee samples'. As not all samples were cup-sized, the team expressed their overall findings in microplastics per litre. The authors said their study "proves for the first time that assessment of exposure via drinking water only may substantially underestimate the risk" posed to humans by higher microplastics prevalence in other drinks. The same team published research in 2024, revealing the average microplastics concentration in tap water (24 to 56 MP per litre) was 'statistically indistinguishable" from that in bottled water (26 to 48 MP per litre). Professor Mohamed Abdallah from the University of Birmingham, who was one of the lead authors of the new research, told The Independent: "We noted that a lot of research in the microplastics sphere is focusing on drinking water – tap water, bottled water – and we've also released a paper from the UK on water. But we realised that people don't only drink water during their day. You drink tea, coffee, juices... "We found a ubiquitous presence of microplastics in all the cold and hot drinks we looked at. Which is pretty alarming, and from a scientific point of view suggests we should not only be looking at water, we should be more comprehensive in our research because other sources are substantial." He added: "We're consuming millions of teas and coffees every morning so it's something to definitely look at. There should definitely be legislative action from the government and also from international organisations to limit human exposure to microplastics … they're everywhere." The authors said the new research "serves as a critical step towards better understanding of the extent of MPs exposure under real-life scenarios, and advocates for more comprehensive studies for accurate risk assessment of MPs intake via dietary sources, to enable broader environmental and public health interventions".
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Meet the Afghan girls building robots at home after the Taliban stopped their education
In the sweltering heat of Kabul, a group of young women, who have been barred from higher education for the past three years, gather in one of their homes to work on a new project. Calling themselves 'Voices of Hope,' the group's members are former computer science students who refuse to abandon their pursuit of knowledge, despite the Taliban's sweeping ban on female education. They are using the internet and artificial intelligence to reconnect with the subject they once studied at university. In a country where even a walk in the park is off-limits for them, they have created their own community of learners behind closed doors. Their education was interrupted in December 2022, when a Taliban ban forced them to abandon their studies. The young women were all in their second semester of computer science studies at a private Afghan university. Initially, they clung to the hope that public outrage and international pressure might prompt the regime to reverse its decision. Instead, the Taliban, who had seized power in 2021, issued even harsher decrees, further tightening restrictions on women and making their lives even more difficult. Asrar Parsa, the 25-year-old leader of Voices of Hope, told Independent Persian that the university ban caused a wave of despair. But she and 20 of her classmates decided to keep going, turning to online educational resources to continue studying at home. Since then, the team has taken on several projects in their desire to learn, grow and keep their dreams alive. Among their achievements are building two robots from scratch. They cost about 30,000 Afghanis (roughly $430 or £330) to build, paid for by the group members themselves. Under Taliban rule, women are not allowed to go outside without a male guardian. The team has one male member: Asrar's 28-year-old brother, Navid Parsa, a computer science graduate who is their link to the outside world. He runs errands for the group and brings in supplies from the city. The group started off with 20 members. But over time, 14 dropped out due to economic hardship and a growing sense of hopelessness. Asrar explains: 'Our goal was to keep the light of hope alive in our hearts, to stay motivated, and to learn about AI. But most of the team became disheartened and gave up.' However, some chose to stay. 19-year-old Hadiya Ahmadi, says she suffered from depression and anxiety after universities shut down. But working on small projects and learning how to use AI with the support of the group helped her feel better. Over the past two years, the team has used what they learned in their first year of university and supplemented it with online tutorials. They've built two robots and several other devices. One robot can recognise 20 different objects, including humans, and is controlled remotely. The team tested its movement on a kitchen table. It's powered via radio frequency and bluetooth and can be operated through four different apps. Asrar says if developed further, it could be used in search and rescue operations after earthquakes or explosions. The team is also working on building a drone. If successful, they hope it could be used for tasks like collecting rubbish, delivering emergency medicine, or transporting small items across Kabul. For Asrar, Hadiya, and the rest of the group, tinkering with wires and batteries and listening to online lessons is about more than just robotics or AI. In a time when, under Taliban laws, even a woman's voice and face are deemed awrah (something to be hidden), these sessions are a way to cope with the mental and emotional toll of their isolation. Asrar says these gatherings are a way to escape 'the pain and grief brought about by their current situation'. The meetings offer hope, she explains:'When we're together, it feels like not everything is lost. We still have the power to learn and grow.' Hadiya adds that meeting the group two to three times a week has had a positive impact on her mental well-being. They study AI, build robots, and talk about their hopes for the future. She says she feels better now than she did when her university first closed down: 'Seeing the results of our work makes us happy. It makes us feel that our education isn't over yet and we can still try to reach our goals.' They draw inspiration from another Afghan robotics team, known as 'The Afghan Dreamers', which was founded in 2017 and gained widespread attention both at home and abroad. Focused on technology, engineering, and robotics, the team became a symbol of talent and hope in the face of social and political restrictions. After the Taliban returned to power and banned education and employment for women and girls, team members left the country and now continue their work in exile. For Voices of Hope, the Afghan Dreamers serve as an inspiration. But unlike them, Asrar's team has not yet received any support from external organisations. Despite all the obstacles, they hope to one day showcase their work in international exhibitions, and find opportunities to keep chasing their dreams. The Taliban have strictly enforced their ban on education for girls over the age of 12, claiming that they are adhering to 'Sharia law'. These decrees, especially those denying women access to education and jobs, have drawn widespread international condemnation. But Taliban leader Mullah Hibatullah Akhundzada has dismissed international pressure as 'pointless.' Over the past four years, Mullah Hibatullah has repeatedly emphasised the importance of 'education within the framework of Sharia and Islamic principles'. However, not once has he addressed the topic of education or employment for women and girls in Afghanistan.
