Cash-strapped Woking Borough Council ‘moving the right way
A cash-strapped council in Surrey "moving the right way," its leader has said.Woking Borough Council (WBC), which declared itself effectively bankrupt in June 2023, approved a 2.99% increase to its share of the council tax bill in the county at a meeting on Monday.The budget for 2025-2026 was passed after ministers agreed to financial support of £171m.Last year, residents saw a 10% increase in council tax, as well as cuts to services because of borrowing and investment decisions which led to debts of more than £2bn.
A band D household will be charged £298.11, alongside the amounts paid to Surrey County Council and the police.Liberal Democrat leader Ann-Marie Barker told BBC Radio Surrey: "We've done all we can as a council to put our house in order."We've balanced the budget. We've made some more savings, and the council as a whole is moving the right way."She added that the government Exceptional Financial Support included £74.6m to cover the costs of paying the interest on the council's historic borrowing."We are actually adding to our debt with that," she added. "But that's the only deal on the table, it's the way we need to go."It's our second year of doing that. We can't keep doing it forever, so we are still looking for government to work with us and come up with a longer term solution."We realise that is clearly a challenge."She added: "The remaining amount of money is not making us make payments, called Minimum Revenue Provisions (MRP), that should have been put aside to repay the borrowing."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
16 minutes ago
- BBC News
East Sussex County Council considering specialist accountants
East Sussex County Council is considering hiring specialist accountants to help it deal with financial difficulties and potentially apply for government Nick Bennett, lead member for resources and climate change, will decide on Tuesday whether to commission a £40,000 review by the Chartered Institute of Public Finance and Accountancy (CIPFA). The council faces a potential deficit of more than £37m in the 2026/27 financial a report, officers said a CIPFA review would likely be required should the council approach the Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government (MHCLG) to explore options for Exceptional Financial Support (EFS). The council has not yet formally agreed to seek EFS, reports the Local Democracy Reporting Service. A council spokesperson said: "CIPFA have been approached to undertake their assurance review early, to provide the council with a report that will support the work that the council may need to undertake with MHCLG."If EFS proves not to be required, or an option, the CIPFA review will provide external assurance as to the actions the council is taking to address the financial challenges the council faces."A CIPFA document says the team would work with the council to draw up an improvement plan after say the review's findings would also be used to inform the county council's annual budget-setting proposal comes amid some significant financial uncertainty for the report said the upcoming comprehensive spending review and potential changes to grant funding could impact the authority's could help by allowing the council to borrow money to fund everyday services - something councils are not usually allowed to councils can only borrow money for long-term investments, like building schools or buying equipment, not to cover day-to-day costs like wages or energy bills.
Belfast Telegraph
13 hours ago
- Belfast Telegraph
California governor to sue Trump over deployment of National Guard to protests
'Commandeering a state's National Guard without consulting the governor of that state is illegal and immoral,' Mr Newsom, a Democrat, told MSNBC on Sunday. The streets of the sprawling city of four million people were quiet on Monday morning, but the smell of smoke hung in the air downtown, one day after crowds blocked off a major freeway and set self-driving cars on fire as police responded with tear gas, rubber bullets and flash-bang grenades. The law enforcement presence was heavy, with police cars blocking the street in front of the federal detention facility that was a focus of the protests. While much of the city was spared from any violence, clashes swept through several downtown blocks and a handful of other places. It could take days to clear the debris from burned cars and to paint over the graffiti. Mr Newsom called on Mr Trump to rescind the Guard deployment in a letter Sunday afternoon, calling it a 'serious breach of state sovereignty'. The governor, who was was in Los Angeles meeting with local law enforcement and officials, also told protesters that they were playing into Mr Trump's plans and would face arrest for violence or property destruction. 'Trump wants chaos and he's instigated violence,' he said. 'Stay peaceful. Stay focused. Don't give him the excuse he's looking for.' The deployment appeared to be the first time in decades that a state's National Guard was activated without a request from its governor, a significant escalation against those who have sought to hinder the administration's mass deportation efforts. Los Angeles Police chief Jim McDonnell pushed back against claims by the Trump administration that the LAPD had failed to help federal authorities when protests broke out on Friday after a series of immigration raids. He said his department responded as quickly as it could and had not been notified in advance of the raids. Mr Newsom, meanwhile, has repeatedly said that California authorities had the situation under control. He mocked Mr Trump for posting a congratulatory message to the Guard on social media before troops had even arrived in Los Angeles, and he told MSNBC that Mr Trump never floated deploying the Guard during a Friday phone call. He called Mr Trump a 'stone cold liar'. The admonishments did not deter the administration. 'It's a bald-faced lie for Newsom to claim there was no problem in Los Angeles before President Trump got involved,' White House spokeswoman Abigail Jackson said in a statement. National Guard troops stood shoulder to shoulder on Sunday morning in LA, carrying long guns and riot shields as protesters shouted 'shame' and 'go home'. After some demonstrators closely approached the Guard members, another set of uniformed officers advanced on the group, shooting smoke-filled canisters into the street. Minutes later, the LAPD fired rounds of crowd-control munitions to disperse the protesters, who they said were assembled unlawfully. Much of the group then moved to block traffic on the 101 freeway until state patrol officers cleared them. Nearby, at least four self-driving Waymo cars were set on fire, sending large plumes of black smoke into the sky and exploding intermittently. By evening, police had shut down several blocks of downtown Los Angeles. Flash-bang grenades echoed out every few seconds into the evening. The arrival of the National Guard followed two days of protests that began Friday in downtown Los Angeles before spreading on Saturday to Paramount, a heavily Latino city south of the city, and neighbouring Compton. Federal agents arrested immigrants in LA's fashion district, in a Home Depot parking lot and at several other locations on Friday. The next day, they were staging at a Department of Homeland Security office near another Home Depot in Paramount, which drew out protesters who suspected another raid. Federal authorities later said there was no enforcement activity at that Home Depot. The weeklong tally of immigrant arrests in the LA area climbed above 100, federal authorities said. Many more were arrested while protesting, including a prominent union leader who was accused of impeding law enforcement. The last time the National Guard was activated without a governor's permission was in 1965, when former president Lyndon B Johnson sent troops to protect a civil rights march in Alabama, according to the Brennan Centre for Justice. In a directive on Saturday, Mr Trump invoked a legal provision allowing him to deploy federal service members when there is 'a rebellion or danger of a rebellion against the authority of the Government of the United States'. He said he had authorised the deployment of 2,000 members of the National Guard. Mr Trump told reporters on Sunday as he prepared to board Air Force One in Morristown, New Jersey, that there were 'violent people' in Los Angeles 'and they're not going to get away with it'.
NBC News
13 hours ago
- NBC News
Oklahoma inmate Richard Glossip to face new murder trial but without death penalty
Oklahoma's top prosecutor said Monday the state intends to pursue a new murder trial against inmate Richard Glossip but without the death penalty after the U.S. Supreme Court vacated his capital conviction in a rare victory for a death row prisoner. State Attorney General Gentner Drummond's decision to retry Glossip, 62, on a first-degree murder charge came out of a status conference hearing. In a news release, Drummond said, the evidence still implicates him in the 1997 murder of Oklahoma City motel owner Barry Van Treese. Glossip, a motel manager working for Van Treese, has maintained his innocence while he was on death row for almost three decades. While Drummond, a Republican, has not agreed with Glossip's innocence claims, he was supportive of the Supreme Court's ruling in February, when the majority of justices, he said, agreed "it is now an undeniable fact that he did not receive a fair trial." He said in a statement Monday that he would ensure Glossip receives an impartial one now. "While it was clear to me and to the U.S. Supreme Court that Mr. Glossip did not receive a fair trial, I have never proclaimed his innocence," Drummond said. "After the high court remanded the matter back to district court, my office thoroughly reviewed the merits of the case against Richard Glossip and concluded that sufficient evidence exists to secure a murder conviction." Oklahoma County District Attorney Vicki Behenna, a Democrat, had previously indicated that Glossip would not be eligible for the death penalty now if he were to be retried. Drummond said he would seek a life sentence for Glossip at his next trial. "While I cannot go back 25 years and handle the case in the proper way that would have ensured true justice, I still have a duty to seek the justice that is available today," he added. The continuation of the state's prosecution against Glossip resumes a twisting case that saw him dodge death several times with nine separate execution dates that had to be postponed. Various courts had delayed the executions as he appealed, while state corrections officials also came under scrutiny a decade ago for botched execution attempts. But Glossip's case had been championed in recent years by a bipartisan group of Oklahoma legislators after an indepe n dent report they commissioned in 2022 found that "no reasonable jury hearing the complete record would convict Glossip of first-degree murder." The report centered on the state's primary witness, Justin Sneed, who had confirmed to the report's investigators that he had discussions with multiple family members about "recanting" his testimony over an 11-year period. Investigators also said the district attorney's case file included documentation describing how the state provided Sneed information "so he could conform his testimony to match the evidence" from other witnesses. Glossip's original 1998 conviction was overturned in 2001, when a state appeals court found that the evidence against him was weak. But the state took him to trial again, and a second jury found him guilty in 2004. At Glossip's trial, Sneed, a motel handyman, admitted that he killed Van Treese, but said that it was at Glossip's direction and that he had been promised $10,000. In exchange for testifying against Glossip, Sneed received a life sentence while Glossip was given the death penalty. Prosecutors said Glossip orchestrated the plot because he was embezzling from the motel and feared being fired. The Supreme Court tossed out Glossip's capital conviction in a 5-3 ruling. Justice Neil Gorsuch did not participate, presumably because he was involved in the case when he was on a federal appeals court that includes Oklahoma. Justice Sonia Sotomayor wrote in the majority's ruling that prosecutors "knew Sneed's statements were false" and that "because Sneed's testimony was the only direct evidence of Glossip's guilt of capital murder, the jury's assessment of Sneed's credibility was necessarily determinative here." "Hence, there is a reasonable likelihood that correcting Sneed's testimony would have affected the judgment of the jury," she added. After the Supreme Court's decision, Glossip was moved off death row, but was held without bail in the Oklahoma County Detention Center on a first-degree murder charge. A next court date in Glossip's case is scheduled for June 17. Glossip's attorney, Don Knight, did not immediately comment about the prosecutors' decision, but had welcomed the Supreme Court's ruling in February that spared his longtime client from the death chamber. "He had nine execution dates, three last meals, and obviously, to finally get relief has been huge for him," Knight said, "and he's thrilled beyond words."
