
‘He Knows I Can Weather It': The GOP Rebel Trump Can't Crush
'Yes, we're conservatives, but we also have independent thinking,' said Republican state Rep. TJ Roberts, a protege of Massie's in Frankfort. 'We have a consistent track record of having a very different taste, especially when we talk about foreign affairs.'
That taste has set Massie on a collision course with Trump, whom Massie has defied at key moments of his second presidency. In March, Massie ignored Trump's wishes and voted 'No' on the current continuing resolution to keep the government funded. Then, in May, Massie opposed Trump's 'big, beautiful bill,' which is to say, most of the president's domestic agenda. Just a few weeks later, he took a swing at Trump's foreign policy. 'This is not Constitutional,' Massie said on X, embedding a screenshot of Trump's blustery announcement that U.S. forces had struck Iran. Massie quickly threatened a war powers resolution, cosigned by Democrats, to rein Trump in.
'I am consequential here in Washington, D.C. In between launching B-2 bombers to the other side of the planet, the president spends some portion of his attention worried about what I'm going to do next,' said Massie, a 54-year-old, MIT-educated entrepreneur who founded a haptics company before moving back to his family home of Lewis County in the early 2000s.
Massie's rebelliousness was hardly the type of behavior you'd expect from a rock-ribbed conservative representing a state that delivered Trump a 30-point margin. Or was it? Kentucky Republicans have been needling Trump like it's a part-time job ever since his return to the White House — from Sen. Mitch McConnell's long feud with Trump, to Sen. Rand Paul's vote against the 'big, beautiful bill' and support for a Democrat-led measure to end Trump's tariffs on Canada.
Still, it's one thing for a senator to put pressure on his party's president. It's riskier for a Republican House member to invite a Trump-backed primary challenge, as Massie has. He has drawn so much ire that Trump's political machine dispatched MAGA campaign stars Chris LaCivita and Tony Fabrizio to find a suitable candidate to take him down.
'Thomas Massie's constituents want a representative from KY-4 that will support lower taxes, protect the border and support the policies of President Trump that they all voted for,' said LaCivita, 'instead of a grandstander who has never accomplished a thing for his constituents.' Trump, taking to his favorite platform of Truth Social, called Massie a 'LOSER' who is just 'Rand Paul Jr.,' and who needs to be replaced by an 'American patriot.'
But Massie shrugged off the invective, convinced that he has a far better feel for his district than the president. After all, Trump failed to oust him in 2020.
'I don't really think he has a vendetta against me,' Massie said. 'He's trying to keep the other people in lockstep with him by attacking me. He knows I can weather it.'
His confidence is based on the particular contours of the electorate in his district, which is focused around Cincinnati's Northern Kentucky suburbs with a healthy bite of Appalachia and exurban Louisville. Local political professionals know Massie's fief to be a quizzical mixture of many right-leaning factions that don't always get along: suburbanites who identify with Ohio; Appalachians who are deeply skeptical about all forms of federal control; and a strong Catholic tradition that contrasts with the state's Bible-thumping stereotype.
In the Northern Kentucky region alone, Massie says there are 'a dozen different cities,' 'about 20 mayors,' all of whom relish their independence.
While these voters welcomed Trump's vitriolic attacks on Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, trans athletes and student-loan giveaways, they notably did not sign up for ballooning the deficit, expanding presidential power and engaging in another Middle Eastern conflict. Now, in the ramp-up to a possible primary, something strange is happening. Whether Massie means to or not, his defiant stand for libertarian principles is offering a roadmap for other critics of the president to do something many believe is impossible: turn some of his most ardent voters against his policies.
Thousands of voters in Kentucky take their libertarianism seriously enough that they've given their candidates a name: Liberty Republicans. They're an emerging anti-establishment group in a party whose establishment is now represented by a certain New York real estate developer.
'I was the first. I was the spearhead,' state Rep. Savannah Maddox said about the clique of local GOP leaders who emulate Massie and Paul's style. Their admiration for Massie may have something to do with the manner in which he lives his principles — namely, on his farm, off the grid in Appalachia, where self-sufficiency means building a robot chicken pen to care for his birds while he's in D.C. Like Massie, the Liberty Republicans are a thorn in the state party's side that neither outside money nor heavy-handed leadership can bring to heel.
Massie, who is famously not a team player in D.C., is happy to take credit for developing this bench of libertarian-leaning candidates in his district. In Massie's telling, he's fond of showing up at fundraisers for 'state senators, state reps — even magistrates and county judge executives' to help them expand his revolution. He has deliberately focused on nurturing elected officials rather than seizing control of the party infrastructure.
'I have actually distributed about a quarter million dollars directly to local candidates,' Massie said. He boasted that his Liberty acolytes 'were all challenged significantly in their last election, and they all survived.' Like him, the enmity they create in the capital seems only to amplify their appeal to voters back home.
Trey Grayson, a mainstream Republican and McConnell ally who served as Kentucky secretary of state and director of the Harvard Institute of Politics, and is a longtime Northern Kentucky resident, thinks that Massie's ties with the Liberty group gives him 'protection' and 'reinforcement.'
Those benefits extend beyond state lines. In the age of the Internet and social media, such boosters as Elon Musk frequently amplify Massie's libertarian message on X, which has helped him connect to a large pool of online donors. It's this point that gives Massie his sense of confidence facing down the president and any of his surrogates.
In his view, Trump's real weapon against Republicans who defy him is his ability to scare off donors.
'I have a fundraising model that is impervious to that,' he said, as he elaborated on all the money that he's been able to source from fans online. According to Massie, he raised approximately $370,000; $50,000; and more than $180,000 in three separate weeks when he was in Trump's crosshairs.
Those donors, he says, are pro-Trump. But they 'want to see me here delivering their view.'
One person who seems to agree with that is Musk, who recently posted on X that he'd be supporting Massie's campaign.
Massie said he hasn't met Musk in real life, but that he's 'definitely a fan,' adding that he owns a Tesla and uses Starlink. When asked if Musk might intervene on his behalf with a super PAC, Massie said he didn't know.
'I haven't heard that he is, but I can tell you there will be a super PAC that will be helping me,' he teased.
Still, money isn't everything, and while Massie has a large network of loyalists, they aren't close to an organized machine: The very nature of libertarians makes them harder to corral.
Tres Watson, a consultant with ties to the GOP establishment, believes that some of Massie's proteges are 'sharp,' but 'others are complete and absolute morons' whom party leaders have easily played off against one another. In other words, not the troops to go into battle with Trump.
Liberty Republicans themselves are quick to concede that they aren't very organized. But their ability to hand out pamphlets at the county fair seems secondary to the larger point: Their existence proves that Massie's message works in Kentucky. Trump's team may have arrived at the same conclusion. On June 29, POLITICO reported that White House officials had contacted state Sen. Aaron Reed as a possible primary opponent. Reed, it turns out, has also been associated with the Liberty movement.
But Reed or any other candidate faces a tough task. Because finding a good lane to run in versus Massie won't be easy. It's one thing for Trump to force out an opponent like Sen. Thom Tillis, who attacks him from a centrist position, but entirely another to get rid of someone who frequently stands to the right of MAGA.
Massie's critics and boosters both acknowledge that when he does cross the president, he usually does so in the name of guiding him back to their shared conservative principles. It's a wise tactic to please voters who both love the president but also have a soft spot for anti-establishment figures. They are, after all, used to such leaders as his two GOP predecessors, the congressman-turned-Senator Jim Bunning, an irascible conservative who rarely shied away from conflict; and Rep. Geoff Davis, who came to politics as an outsider. Not to mention his across-the-river neighbors in the Cincinnati media market, Rep. Warren Davidson and Vice President JD Vance.
State Rep. Maddox put her finger on where she thinks the district's pulse is today:
'President Trump is responding to an electorate of folks who asked for change,' she said. 'But the way he is trying to evoke it is causing friction with the People's branch of government, where our laws are made.'
In other words, her constituents love Trump's agenda. But they're more loyal to Massie's principles of limited government.
Grayson thinks this district's contrarianism is part of a much longer story.
'Kentucky has a very rural population compared to the nation. Those rural voters traditionally were pretty Democratic,' Grayson said. 'The Fourth [district] was an exception. Where Thomas Massie lives was always Republican. It was a pro-union enclave during the Civil War.'
The Fourth district, that is to say, has historically been different. That history might be forgotten by the distillers on the Bourbon Trail or the businessmen sipping juleps at Churchill Downs. But those same Kentuckians are well acquainted with the vibeshift they feel whenever they cross into Boone, Kenton and Campbell counties, the longtime core of Massie's district in Northern Kentucky. Though its population is on comparable footing with Louisville and Lexington — the state's two largest cities, where establishment Republicans live — almost no one in either of those cities would ever think of Northern Kentucky as a peer. To them, Massie's constituents live in suburban spillover from Cincinnati that does not belong in their blessed Bluegrass.
Snide regionalism aside, they might be half-right.
'A lot of people have moved over from Ohio for jobs, cheap land. They're not as connected to the state,' Grayson said.
That much could be said about much of the Ohio River Valley, where communities often have little in common with the states they're drawn into. Independence is part of life here, and in Massie's district, it's also baked into the politics.
'I'm just going to keep supporting Donald Trump and Thomas Massie, and hope they can come to a resolution, because I think we need the two working together very badly,' said Rep. Roberts. 'Both have a constituency that represents the future of the GOP in America.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
The Post's Eric Adams support: Letters to the Editor — Aug. 13, 2025
The Issue: The Post's editorial urging President Trump to endorse Mayor Adams for re-election. Wasn't it the New York Post that featured photos of Mayor Adams greeting busloads of illegal immigrants at Port Authority ('The Post says: Endorse Adams Apple,' Editorial, Aug. 8)? Have you already forgotten about the billions of dollars that taxpayers shelled out to house, feed and educate illegals? Advertisement Have you forgotten about all the corrupt politicians Adams surrounded himself with in his administration? One would think The Post would do the right thing for New Yorkers and instead ask President Trump to endorse Curtis Sliwa. Ruth Adler The Bronx Advertisement The Post's support for Eric Adams illustrates a lack of innovation. New York City is primed for a change, which requires the insights of Sliwa. Any other candidate inhabits a 'business as usual' mentality. Advertisement God willing, enough people will stop the madness and give Sliwa his due. Jonathan Kiddrane Queens I urge all New Yorkers to get behind Adams. Advertisement I believe that he cares about New York City and is well aware of the mistakes he has made in his first term. Above all else, he cares about the quality-of-life issues in all five boroughs. He does not want to brainwash us, seize property, close family businesses or make our neighborhoods less safe. Whether you live in Chinatown, Little Italy, Forest Hills, Harlem or elsewhere, Adams will advocate for you. Ken Karcinell Hewlett Adams is the greatest sleazeball since Jimmy Walker during the Roaring '20s. Yes, Andrew Cuomo is distasteful and Zohran Mamdani is over the moon, but going to bat for Adams indicates rabid insanity. Advertisement Doug Brin Brooklyn Has the New York Post lost its mind? How, for the love of God, could you ask President Trump to endorse Adams for re-election? Advertisement Adams has been a complete disaster since his first day in office. Cuomo and Mamdani — the despicable communist — are even worse. Sliwa is the only viable candidate with a chance to bring some semblance of sanity back to our once-great city. John Lucadamo Advertisement Westchester County While The Post raises legitimate questions about Cuomo's record, endorsing Adams overlooks how many of his policies resemble those of Mamdani and Cuomo. Trump would be wise to refrain from any endorsements to avoid involvement in the federal scrutiny the next mayor will likely face over a range of ludicrous campaign proposals. Michael Mulhall Advertisement Moseley, Va. The Issue: The possible cancellation of 'The Howard Stern Show' following a dropoff in listeners. Howard Stern lost his edge years ago when he suddenly went woke ('Bye bye booey: Staff coasting,' Aug. 10). For most of his career, he eschewed good taste and battled critics, going out of his way to be politically incorrect. The more outrageous he was, the funnier he got, and that earned him a tremendous following. But, as Howard's longtime fans know, he is driven by money. When Stern realized his brand of humor could get him canceled, he became a soft liberal. Bill Calvo Brooklyn This is not the old Howard Stern; he is kissing up to the targets, like the woke people he once hated. I have a better opinion of Stern staffers Gary Dell'Abate and Fred Norris than I do of Stern. He shouldn't be offered any extension of his show. The time to pull the plug is now. Sheldon Fosburg Staten Island Want to weigh in on today's stories? Send your thoughts (along with your full name and city of residence) to letters@ Letters are subject to editing for clarity, length, accuracy, and style.


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
Mamdani's ‘war' against Trump spells bad news for NYC
Zohran Mamdani's 'Five Boroughs Against Trump' tour makes oodles of sense for him — but only at the expense of the rest of the city. Not just because the last thing New Yorkers need is a mayor seeking a war with the White House, since they'd inevitably be the cannon fodder. More: Centering the mayoral debate on countering President Donald Trump encourages everyone to ignore all the issues Mamdani doesn't want voters thinking about, like how to make the streets and subways safe, the public schools functional and the local economy growing. It also prevents any focus on his privilege and inexperience, his cop-hatred, his obsessive loathing of Israel and the unworkability of pretty much his entire 'positive' agenda. Truth is, it mainly appeals to the vanity of his Democratic Socialists and their cheerleaders: Already imagining that their guy's surprise victory (in a Democratic primary) puts America on the brink of a new socialist era, they now get to also dream of Mamdani somehow turning the tide against Bad Orange Man. Except that he can't 'stand up' to Trump (beyond boring bits like the legal efforts to claw back improperly canceled grants that Mayor Eric Adams already has under way). Indeed, no mere mayor of any city can. Check the US Constitution: You'll find no mention of a mayoral power to check the president, Congress or for that matter the Supreme Court. And in the real world, a Mayor Mamdani declaring war on Trump would entail setting City Hall on fire and expecting the White House to burn down. New York City has zero leverage over the federal government, except perhaps 1) Wall Street's money — which socialists can't direct except via their trust funds — and 2) whatever power the national media has left — when the media's already done its damnedest to stop Trump. The feds, meanwhile, can screw New York eight ways to Sunday, starting with cutting back on the hundreds of billions it sends our way. Nor can local government 'withhold' New Yorkers' taxes, as some whiz kids in the Legislature suggest. State Attorney General Tish James, Manhattan DA Alvin Bragg and a few complacent judges have already waged their worst lawfare against Trump, while then-Mayor Bill de Blasio did what he could against the Trump businesses that remain here. 'Trump-proofing' the city — the new tough talk from progressives around the country — is an empty threat, too: Federal law almost always trumps state and local ordinances. Playing tough guy and talking big is sure to give Mamdani lots of outraged outtakes for his social media. But he is writing checks that the people of NYC will have to pay.


New York Post
25 minutes ago
- New York Post
New York state's headed deep into the red — but Albany will ‘rely' on denial
State Comptroller Tom DiNapoli just sounded a blaring alarm about the state's cash shortfall — but the rest of the state's leadership wants the fiscal crisis kept quiet. They all knew trouble was coming, but the Legislature left Albany for the year having given Gov. Kathy Hochul the power to cut as needed. That keeps the cutting out of the headlines, and (lawmakers hope) hangs any blame on the gov. She's asked state agencies to find $750 million in savings in the current-year budget. But next year, the nut jumps to $3 billion. Longer-term, per DiNapoli, the picture grows even more distressing: Albany is facing its worst cash shortfall, as a share of spending, since the Great Recession — with $34.3 billion in red ink through 2029. New York's 'softening economy' and preprogrammed 'spending growth' already guarantee a growing gap, he warns, and future 'drastic reductions in federal aid' may make the shortfall even worse than the comptroller now projects. So he urges 'policymakers' to 'put the fiscal health of the State on a more sustainable, structurally balanced path.' If only. For years, Hochul & Co. have OK'd billions in future spending, with nary a care about available cash: As DiNapoli reports, state-funded disbursements through 2029 are on course to soar 13.9% over current levels, while revenue ticks up just 4.6%. Nor will it be possible to jack up taxes to plug the hole, not without fueling a mad rush by high-earners and job-creators out of state: Hochul (and Gov. Andrew Cuomo before her) already goosed taxes to the hilt, making New York's tax burden the nation's highest. That's why the gov is on record opposing tax hikes — though that hasn't always stopped her from giving way to the Legislature's demands for 'revenue enhancements.' Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters These gaps are no real surprise: Hochul, Assembly Speaker Carl Heastie and Senate Majority Leader Andrea Stewart-Cousins all knew months ago what was in store, as billions in federal pandemic-relief funds were set to run out and the Trump team made no secret of its intent to rein in aid to states. Their response: Who cares? We'll worry about it later. Bet on the denialism to keep on dominating Albany: Hochul is running for re-election next year, with strong incentive to depend on gimmickry to paper over the state's deficit until after November — and so make the longer-term problem even worse. This warning may be the loudest DiNapoli offers for the next 16 months, as his fellow Democrats push him to collude with Hochul in denying that New York is staring at its worst budget crisis in years.