India to review tariff surcharges on luxury cars, solar cells, may spur US imports
India plans to review import tariffs on over 30 items, including luxury cars, solar cells and chemicals, a senior finance ministry official said, potentially leading to increased imports from the United States as global trade tensions grow.
The move, aimed at reducing average tariffs, comes ahead of Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to the U.S. next week.
In a bid to avoid President Donald Trump's growing tariff actions, India has already reduced average import tariff rates to 11% from 13% on several items in the latest budget.
The finance ministry official did not give the time period for the completion of the consultation process, but industry analysts say the process could take months.
Various Indian government departments, including those overseeing heavy industries and renewable energy, will soon consult local industry on reducing the Agriculture Infrastructure Development Cess (AIDC), Sanjay Agarwal, chairman of Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs, told Reuters in an interview on Tuesday.
The AIDC is an alternative import tariff, collected by the Indian federal government for raising funds in a separate pool, and funds collected are used for building farm infrastructure.
Agarwal said the ministries would select items from this list for possible tariff reduction after industry consultations.
India has protected domestic industries such as autos, pharmaceuticals and farm sectors through state subsidies and high import tariffs, amid growing pressure to improve ties with the Trump administration.
The list includes 32 items such as luxury cars, solar cells, yachts, sports vessels, devices used in building semiconductors, and other machinery, all of which have seen the government impose AIDC tariff of between 6.5% and 70% on imports, after reducing the basic customs duties.
India's average import tariffs, including AIDC, are much higher than those of major trading partners including the United States, China and Japan, the official acknowledged.
"We can't take a giant step. We have to take baby steps," Agarwal said, referencing India's strategy of gradually reducing tariffs to temporarily protect domestic industries and boost their competitiveness.
TRADE BALANCE WITH THE U.S.
Referring to Trump's concerns about the high U.S. trade imbalance with India, Agarwal said average tariffs on goods imported from the United States, are relatively low, and imports, especially of crude oil and liquefied natural gas, could increase this year.
"Duty is not an issue in the oil sector. One (Indian) rupee per metric ton is the rate of duty on import of crude," he said, suggesting that U.S. crude could become more attractive for India as supplies from Russia face increased sanctions.
India's trade surplus with the U.S., estimated at $35 billion in 2023/24, has been a highly contentious point following Trump's earlier threat of imposing tariffs over India's high levies.
India's crude oil and LNG imports from the U.S., estimated at about $6.5 billion in 2023/24 fiscal year ending March, out of a total $42 billion imports, could increase after the U.S. sanctions on Russia's oil companies and China's retaliatory tariffs on energy imports from the U.S., analysts said.
"We got better prices from Russia. But the situation may change," Agarwal said adding the trade imbalance could be "corrected." India's top 30 import items from the U.S., such as oil products and diamonds, all fall within low tariff category, with rates ranging from 3% on airplanes to 7.5% on petrochemicals, he said, indicating items where imports could potentially increase.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Gulf Today
an hour ago
- Gulf Today
Nato defence spending hike to deter Russia, Trump tells Zelensky
President Donald Trump met with Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky on the sidelines of the Nato summit on Wednesday and suggested that increased spending by the trans-Atlantic alliance could help prevent future Russian aggression against its neighbors. Nato members agreed to raise their spending targets by 2035 to 5% of gross domestic product annually on core defence requirements as well as defense-and security-related spending. That target had been 2% of GDP. 'Europe stepping up to take more responsibility for security will help prevent future disasters like the horrible situation with Russia and Ukraine,' Trump said at the summit-ending news conference shortly after seeing Zelensky. 'And hopefully we're going to get that solved.' Trump also reiterated his belief that Russian President Vladimir Putin wants to end the war in Ukraine that began with Moscow's invasion in February 2022. 'He'd like to get out of this thing. It's a mess for him,' Trump said. 'He called the other day, and he said, 'Can I help you with Iran?' I said, 'No, you can help me with Russia.'' Trump's meeting with Zelensky was their first face-to-face session since April when they met at St. Peter's Basilica during Pope Francis' funeral. Trump also had a major confrontation with Zelensky earlier this year at the White House. Zelensky, in a social media post, said The Hague talks were substantive and he thanked Trump for the US assistance. 'We discussed how to achieve a ceasefire and a real peace. We spoke about how to protect our people. We appreciate the attention and the readiness to help bring peace closer,' Zelensky added. Trump left open the possibility of sending Kyiv more U.S.-made Patriot air defense missile systems. Asked by a Ukrainian reporter, who said that her husband was a Ukrainian soldier, Trump acknowledged that sending more Patriots would help the Ukrainian cause. 'They do want to have the antimissile missiles, OK, as they call them, the Patriots,' Trump said. 'And we're going to see if we can make some available. We need them, too. We're supplying them to Israel, and, they're very effective, 100% effective. Hard to believe how effective. They do want that more than any other thing.' Over the course of the war, the US has routinely pressed for allies to provide air defense systems to Ukraine. But many are reluctant to give up the high-tech systems, particularly countries in Eastern Europe that also feel threatened by Russia. Trump laid into the US media throughout his news conference but showed unusual warmth toward the Ukrainian reporter. 'That's a very good question,' Trump said about the query about Patriots. 'And I wish you a lot of luck. I mean, I can see it's very upsetting to you. So say hello to your husband.' Ukraine has been front and center at recent Nato summits. But as the alliance's latest annual meeting of leaders opened in the Netherlands, Zelensky was not in the room. The Trump administration has blocked Ukraine's bid to join Nato. The conflict with Russia has laid waste to Ukrainian towns and killed thousands of civilians. Just last week, Russia launched one of the biggest drone attacks of the war. During Trump's 2024 campaign for the White House, the Republican pledged a quick end to the war. He saw it as a costly boondoggle that, he claimed, would not have happened had he won reelection in 2020. Since taking office in January, he has struggled to find a resolution to the conflict and has shown frustration with both Putin and Zelensky. Zelensky spent Tuesday in The Hague shuttling from meeting to meeting. He got a pledge from summit host the Netherlands for military aid, including new drones and radars to help knock out Russian drones. British Prime Minister Keir Starmer announced that the United Kingdom will provide 350 air defense missiles to Ukraine, funded by 70 million pounds ($95 million) raised from the interest on seized Russian assets. Associated Press


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
More than 20 Palestinians killed in Israeli attacks on Gaza
Israeli strikes and gunfire kill more than 20 Palestinians in Gaza Trump says US will hold talks with Iran next week Iran's death toll from war exceeds 600 Children killed in 'more than half of fatal attacks' at Gaza aid sites Israeli troops kill three Palestinians after settlers attack West Bank town Israel says strikes on Iran set its nuclear programme back 'many years'


Middle East Eye
3 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
Israel-Iran ceasefire: Tehran's resistance sends a message to the world
On Monday night, US President Donald Trump announced a ceasefire between Israel and Iran that took effect within hours. Of course, as with any of Trump's schemes, this has to be taken with a sizeable grain of caution. But for now at least, this development appears to have ended two hectic weeks that started with Israel attacking Iran. We then saw Tehran retaliating, the US jumping into the fray by striking Iranian nuclear facilities, and Iran's largely symbolic response against US military bases in the region. Israel had already signalled its wish for de-escalation last weekend. Perhaps Israeli planners had not anticipated the harsh Iranian response, or had put excessive confidence in the damage inflicted upon the Islamic Republic's s military capabilities. It also emerged that US envoy Steve Witkoff had been maintaining direct contact with the Iranian side the entire time. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters What has occurred in the last few days between the US and Iran looks more like theatrics than war, similar to the choreographed clash that played out five years ago after General Qassem Soleimani's assassination. US political leaders made bombastic claims about delivering a devastating blow to Iran's nuclear facilities at Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan. Military assessments, however, appeared more cautious about the damage inflicted, especially in the case of the Fordow enrichment site, which is buried under a mountain. Time will tell, but the general sentiment does not seem optimistic. Beyond western media spin Fordow is the core of Iran's nuclear enrichment programme, with advanced centrifuges that could enrich uranium up to the military threshold of 90 percent. Iran is already estimated to own 400 kilogrammes of uranium enriched to 60 percent. To increase it to 90 percent seems eminently feasible, but this does not imply that Iran will soon own a nuclear bomb; rather, it has enough material to potentially assemble a few, but according to some estimates, that process could take a couple of years. This past March, the vast US intelligence community, through director Tulsi Gabbard, assured Congress that Iran was not in the process of building nuclear weapons - a conclusion also reached, amid other clumsy moves, by the International Atomic Energy Agency. Israel's failure to subdue Iran shows it can no longer dictate the regional order Read More » Last weekend, by ordering strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, Trump ignored this assessment. When challenged by journalists, his secretary of state, Marco Rubio, remarked that the intelligence assessment was irrelevant. Tens of billions of dollars spent annually by US taxpayers for the biggest intelligence apparatus on earth, just to see top officials dismiss their findings as irrelevant. Hours after Iran carried out its largely symbolic retaliation on Monday, a deal was announced. If the ceasefire stands, and if from here it paves the way for a new nuclear deal, Trump will bombastically portray himself as the winner, the dealmaker, the man of peace - while also recovering some credibility among his disappointed Maga base. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu may emerge as the biggest loser. He apparently did not achieve the destruction of Iran's nuclear programme, nor was he able to drag the US into a prolonged military confrontation with Iran - and it is highly likely that his decades-long dream of regime change in Tehran will remain just that: a dream. Beyond all the western media spinning, however, the real winner - unrecognised of course - could be Iranian Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei. Iran ultimately resisted the joint military pressure of Israel and the US, displaying a remarkable capacity to retaliate by severely depleting Israel's missile-defence system. This will be the key takeaway for the region, and for those around the world - especially in the Global South - who grasp its significance. As for Europe, the dystopian statements of its top leaders issued after the Israeli-US strikes on Iran will go into history's dustbin for their sheer hypocrisy. The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.