Racing calls one-day strike over proposed betting tax rise
The BHA set up the 'Axe the Racing Tax' campaign in response to proposals to replace the existing three-tax structure of online gambling duties with a single tax, with fears the current 15 per cent duty on racing could be increased to the 21 per cent levied on games of chance.
Brant Dunshea, chief executive at the British Horseracing Authority, said: 'We have decided to take the unprecedented decision to cancel our planned racing fixtures on September 10 to highlight to Government the serious consequences of the Treasury's tax proposals which threaten the very future of our sport.
'British racing is already in a precarious financial position and research has shown that a tax rise on racing could be catastrophic for the sport and the thousands of jobs that rely on it in towns and communities across the country.
'This is the first time that British racing has chosen not to race due to Government proposals. We haven't taken this decision lightly but in doing so we are urging the Government to rethink this tax proposal to protect the future of our sport which is a cherished part of Britain's heritage and culture.
'Our message to Government is clear: axe the racing tax and back British racing.'
The four tracks involved are operated by the Jockey Club and the Arena Racing Company, with both backing the move.
Jim Mullen, CEO at the Jockey Club, said: 'We hope this pause for reflection will enable the Government to truly understand the economic impact of horseracing and its cultural significance to communities across the UK, as well as the world-class racing festivals we host.
'After this period of reflection, we hope the full implications will be understood, and we can prevent the irreparable damage that threatens a sport the nation is, and should be, proud of.'
Martin Cruddace, CEO at ARC, added: 'We have always been taxed and regulated differently, and it is imperative for our future that we continue to be so.
'If the Government wants Britain to be a world leader in online casino and a world pauper in a sport at the heart of its culture, then tax harmonisation will achieve that aim.'
While the four meetings will be rescheduled, Paul Johnson, chief executive of the National Trainers Federation, underlined the 'sacrifice' in calling a halt to the sport for a day.
He said: 'Cancelling fixtures is a huge sacrifice by racing and should serve as a stark reminder to the Government of the impact its tax raid will have on our sport.
'Thousands of jobs are at stake alongside the loss of millions of pounds to the British economy.'
A Treasury spokesperson said: 'We are consulting on bringing the treatment of online betting in line with other forms of online gambling to cut down bureaucracy – it is not about increasing or decreasing rates, and we welcome views from all stakeholders including businesses, trade bodies, the third sector and individuals.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
an hour ago
- The National
Edinburgh failing to honour childcare commitments
FAMILIES have been left paying thousands of pounds a year for childcare because Edinburgh City Council has reneged on a flagship Scottish Government policy that promises all children more than 1000 hours of free care at a nursery of their choice, it has been claimed. Under the policy, children aged three to five years old are entitled either to 30 free hours per week during term time or 22.8 hours per week for 50 weeks per year – a total of 1140 hours a year. These state-funded hours can be either a council-run nursery or a council-approved private one or with a registered childminder, according to the Government's Funding Follows The Child approach. Many working families say they choose privately run nurseries because they typically have longer opening hours and operate during school holidays, while some council nurseries are only open during school hours or term time, which don't fit with most work schedules. READ MORE: Fix visa problems to allow Gaza students to study in Scotland, Keir Starmer told However, in 2024, problems arose for families who were using private nurseries in Edinburgh but living in a bordering local authority area, when City of Edinburgh Council decided it would no longer fund free childcare in these circumstances. These cross-border families, who use Edinburgh nurseries either because they work in the city or because it is closest to their home, were told they could either find a new nursery in their own local authority or a council-run one in the city. But a group of impacted parents, many of whom were unable to find anything that met their childcare needs and working hours, are now claiming the move breaches both governmental policy and child rights, while discriminating against working parents. City of Edinburgh Council insists it is meeting statutory guidelines and claims its cross-border policy will lead to savings of £1 million. But the parents' group disputes this claim. It has shared freedom of information requests with The Ferret which the parents claim show savings are as little as £36,650 because almost as many children living in Edinburgh claim free places from nurseries in other local authorities. Several parents also shared emails from other councils willing to reimburse Edinburgh if cross-border private nursery places there could be granted. 'It had a real impact on his confidence' The Ferret spoke to families impacted – some living just metres outside the City of Edinburgh Council border – who were facing annual fees of more than £7000 if they did not remove their child from their private nursery. But some say they have been unable to find a nursery outside of Edinburgh that is open before they have to leave for work, or closes before they can return for pick-up. Others have been offered insufficient hours at council nurseries in Edinburgh, given work commitments, or have only been offered available hours at nurseries further away that would add hours on to already long commutes. Some had to cut working hours or ship in grandparents from other parts of the country. In one case, a mother was forced to give up her lunch break so she could pick her three-year-old up from a council nursery, where he had a free place for five mornings, and take him to a private nursery for the afternoon, as it was the only way she could find additional hours. Some parents have considered legal action and, backed by a leading professor in child law, they are calling for the Scottish Government to intervene. Private and third-sector nurseries – such as those run by charities and community groups – said they were also impacted. Claylands Nursery, in the western outskirts of Edinburgh, closed last July, after Edinburgh council decided that children attending from West Lothian, just a few miles away, would not receive funded places. It had asked the council for an exemption from the ruling, claiming the number of cross-border families that would be forced to leave would make their business unsustainable. Kirsten, a mother who has asked us not to use her surname, said her child was attending Claylands three days a week when she received an email giving five days' notice of its closure. She lives 'minutes' from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. 'It was a really stressful time as more than 50 people were looking for last-minute places all at once,' she said. 'We looked at one nursery in West Lothian, but because of our working patterns, it would have added about an hour to our commute, and we would have to pay for a second car to make pick-ups and drop-offs possible due to our hours, so we went with an Edinburgh nursery which was much closer.' Though Kirstin felt 'lucky' to find a nursery she is happy with, the sudden move had a big impact on her then almost two-year-old, who went from being content at drop-offs to 'screaming and crying and clinging to us'. 'It was horrible,' she said. 'It had a real impact on his confidence.' The family got through a difficult transition with the help of additional leave from work. Now almost three, her son has settled and 'loves the nursery and the staff', but his place will not be funded by Edinburgh Council. Kirstin has decided not to move him again this year. Instead, the family will make 'sacrifices' to afford £10,000 worth of fees over the next two years, though they will reassess in her son's preschool year. 'It's hugely frustrating,' she added. 'The council took this decision [about cross-boundary funding] without assessing the impact on children, and it's been left to parents to sort it out. I feel it should be up to the council and the Scottish Government should recognise that its policy is not being upheld.' Father Sam Illingworth lives in West Lothian, just metres from the City of Edinburgh Council boundary. His youngest daughter was settled in a private nursery just over the Edinburgh boundary. But since she has turned three, they have been unable to secure funding for her place there. They found a council nursery nearby, but as it doesn't have enough hours available, they had to 'top-up' their hours by continuing to use the private one. He has gathered testimonies from other parents whose work patterns rule out available council nurseries and others unable to find funded places that work with their commute. Earlier this month, he set up a petition calling on Edinburgh City Council to reversve its decision on funding. 'The frustration is that West Lothian was willing to reimburse Edinburgh in terms of the funding,' he said. 'We understand that council budgets are stretched – of course we do – but we dispute that they can make the savings they claim. It feels like this decision is ideological.' Sharon Fairley, chief executive of the Scottish Private Nurseries Association and owner of the Little Flyers chain, claimed the problems stemmed from the decision to move away from the centralisation of funding in 2020. 'It means that councils are nursery providers but are also making decisions on who gets funding,' she said. 'This is a conflict of interest. This can be solved by moving back to a centralised payment system.' She claimed there had also been widespread issues in other council areas, with 'unfair' payment funding distribution. In recent years, hundreds of third sector and private nurseries have closed, with many blaming problems on a lack of 'fair funding'. Bruce Adamson, a professor in child law at the University of Glasgow, said the issue was about 'children's rights and fairness'. 'The high cost of living in Edinburgh means that many parents and carers who work in Edinburgh live in neighbouring local authorities, but need childcare close to their work,' he added. 'The City of Edinburgh Council's decision to block funded nursery places for children living outside the city risks breaching children's rights. 'We should be making it easier – not harder – for children to get high-quality early learning and childcare. The Scottish Government needs to step in to protect families and uphold children's rights.' Women, he claimed, were more likely to 'bear the brunt of childcare gaps'. A study by the Fawcett Society from November 2023 found that almost a quarter of a million women had left their jobs due to the difficulty of balancing work and childcare. Anna Ritchie Allan, executive director of charity Close the Gap, which campaigns on gender-based inequality in work, said: 'It's clear the childcare system isn't working for women and their families, especially those on low incomes. Local variation in how funded hours are delivered further penalises many women.' READ MORE: Protesters go on strike in Israel demanding ceasefire and hostage releases However, councillor James Dalgleish, the education, children and families convener at Edinburgh City Council, insisted it 'follows national guidance in offering funded early learning and childcare (ELC) for children in Edinburgh and work in partnership with a range of providers to ensure that all parents and carers in Edinburgh are able to access quality funded early learning and childcare'. City of Edinburgh Council does offer its own local authority nursery provision to families living in neighbouring local authorities, he added, though it is currently not accepting new private or third sector providers as partner nurseries. A Scottish Government spokesperson said: 'Local Authorities have a statutory duty to make available funded early learning and childcare to the children residing within their own area and are also responsible for meeting the statutory guidance requirements in relation to cross-boundary placements. 'We encourage local authorities to work with neighbouring areas to ensure publicly funded services meet the needs of families and prioritise children's wellbeing, including those who need cross-boundary placements.'
Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Inside UK's first TGI Friday's - now abandoned and graffiti-covered
As TGI Friday's looks to make a comeback in the UK, pictures from inside the derelict and destroyed first restaurant in Edgbaston, Birmingham, show a grim state A derelict TGI Fridays has been left in ruins, with graffiti daubed across its boarded-up front and shards of broken glass scattered across the floor. The once-bustling Edgbaston restaurant, on Hagley Road, Birmingham, made history as the very first TGI Fridays in the UK before shutting its doors last October. But now, the famous site has been reduced to a vandal's playground. Spray paint covers much of the exterior, while one window appears to have been smashed, leaving glass littering the ground. The place is now surrounded by boards to keep intruders out. It comes after a Brit abroad slams all-inclusive hotel food asking 'what on earth is this?' It's not the first time an abandoned TGI has been targeted this year. In March, the Sutton Coldfield branch, which also lay empty, was broken into, with vandals leaving a gaping hole in one of its windows. The closures come after the US diner chain axed 35 of its restaurants in a shock move last year. But 51 sites were saved in a dramatic rescue deal by Breal Capital and Calveton UK, including the popular Birmingham NEC and Walsall Waterfront locations. Since lighting up British high streets back in 1986 with its neon-gilded entrance in Birmingham, TGI Fridays has been a beloved hangout, but the past year has seen its fortunes nosedive. In September 2024, Hostmore, which is the UK operator of the chain, pulled the plug on a fabled £177million buyout of the American parent and entered administration, triggering a wave of panic. Suddenly, 87 UK restaurants hung in limbo, and 4,500 jobs trembled on the brink. A rescue deal in October by private equity titans Breal Capital and Calveton UK swooped in to save the day. They bought 51 restaurants, preserving around 2,000 jobs, but left 35 sites to shut their doors with immediate effect, etching more than 1,000 redundancies into the record. The shuttered list reads like a UK road trip: Birmingham's historic Hagley Road, Leicester Square's flagship, Brighton Marina, Sutton Coldfield, Swansea, all which are boarded up amid growing despair. In January 2025, the cherished Leicester Square branch, once deemed safe, quietly closed too—a poignant sign of how perilous the chain's path remains. Now, behind the scenes, the brand is trying to stage a comeback. With an Americana-infused 'brand reset' in the works, which involves revamping 70% of its menu and leaning into its old-school charm,TGI Fridays hopes to re-ignite the spark that once made it a Friday-night staple. Birmingham City Council has been asked for comment.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Serbia hit by anti-government riots after railway collapse
The offices of Serbia 's ruling party have been set on fire during a fifth night of unrest between anti-government protesters and riot police. More than 130 police officers have been injured and 18 people arrested as authorities struggle to regain control, with incidents in Belgrade, Valjevo and Novi Sad. Police in the city of Valjevo, western Serbia, were accused of using stun grenades and tear gas after a small group of masked protesters attacked the empty offices of the Serbian Progressive Party (SNS). Serbia's interior ministry denied allegations of violence and police brutality in Belgrade, the country's capital, and Novi Sad, which lies to the north east. The unrest was caused by the collapse of a railway station in Novi Sad in November, which killed 16 people. Protesters claimed the station's renovators had been allowed to cut corners. The investigation into the collapse is still ongoing, but a dozen officials, including a government minister, are facing charges. The student-led anti-corruption demonstrations had been largely peaceful until Wednesday, when pro-government supporters launched counter-protests. On Saturday, riot police were deployed across a number of cities, including Belgrade. Russia, a key Serbia ally, has expressed its support for Aleksandar Vucic, the country's pro-Kremlin president who leads the SNS. Mr Vucic on Sunday vowed a 'strong' response to the anti-government protesters, who he compared to 'terrorists'. 'You will see the full determination of the Serbian state. We will use everything at our disposal to restore law, peace and order,' he said. As well as attacking the offices of the SNS, protesters smashed the windows of the Serbian Radical Party, a coalition partner. Footage showed fireworks being launched at the front of the offices, causing fires. Injuries have been reported at protests across the country, with online footage purporting to show one man being beaten by police in Valjevo. Ivica Dacic, Serbia's interior minister, said: 'There will be more detentions. All those who have broken the law will be arrested.' Mr Vucic's government, despite courting EU membership and receiving billions of euros in aid from Brussels, has remained close with Moscow, backing its war in Ukraine. The Serbian president is also on good terms with Donald Trump, whose son-in-law Jared Kushner is planning to build a hotel in Belgrade. He said the protest movement had been infiltrated by foreign agents to 'destroy Serbia' and vowed to crack down on demonstrations. Russia 's foreign ministry on Friday said it may offer further support to Mr Vucic, describing the protests as 'violent riots'. 'Russia cannot remain unresponsive to what is happening in brotherly Serbia,' it said. Alain Berset, the secretary general of the council of Europe, has called for 'calm and respect for the right to peaceful assembly'. He said: 'Serbian authorities must uphold Council of Europe standards.'
