Will there be a deal with Iran?
All the signals point to a desperate Iran wanting a ceasefire and restart of negotiations with the United States. The Wall Street Journal and others report that the Iranians have signaled Israel asking for a deescalation of the attacks.
President Trump may like this because he sees himself as a great negotiator. But he had better be careful here, because his original proposed deal is too vague and doesn't cut it as a solution to Iran's nuclear program and overall regional threat to Israel and its Arab neighbors.
While the diplomatic feelers are filling the air, there are other reports that regime muckety mucks are leaving Iran on a secret airlift, maybe heading to Moscow but no one really knows.
There is, as yet, no sign that Israel intends to slow its attacks which are, in part, now focusing on government institutions and regime leaders (other than Ayatollah Khameini who is, allegedly, off limits).
Washington is building up its forces in the Middle East and is now sending the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier task force from the South China Sea heading 'in the direction' of the Middle East, where it would join the USS Carl Vinson carrier task force already on station.
Other reports say that the US has sent a large number of aerial refueling tankers across the Atlantic, but without an as yet known destination. US warships have helped Israel shoot down Iranian missiles and drones. The UK also announced it is deploying Royal Air Force jet fighters to the Middle East.
It is not clear whether negotiations with Iran will restart. Should that happen, the original US parameters for a deal would not solve the bigger problem that must be resolved if the war is going to end.
Obviously the first priority is to end Iran's nuclear program. But what does that mean? Israel is unlikely to agree to inspection of Iranian nuclear sites as an adequate or reliable way to assure Iran does not resume its nuclear weapons programs.
The Trump administration set down a red line saying 'no more uranium enrichment,' but has not clarified how that can be achieved.
Relying on IAEA inspections is a formula that has proven a leaky vessel not only in Iran, but elsewhere. IAEA never saw the North Korean-Iranian-Syrian attempt to build a secret nuclear fuel reactor modeled on the North Korean Yongbyon reactor. Israel wiped it off the map. Nor did the IAEA ever grasp Iraq's nuclear bomb effort under Saddam Hussein.
The IAEA so-called inspections in Iran don't include the massive Fordow complex, where Iran was readying enrichment to bomb-grade uranium, or other 'secret' facilities, such as the recently discovered tritium 'rainbow' facility, part of the effort to build either boosted nuclear bombs or hydrogen weapons.
The only reliable way to end Iran's nuclear program is to destroy all the nuclear facilities in the country, while putting Iran's nuclear reactors under strict international control, not inspection.
In addition to the nuclear issue, the US needs to demand limits on Iran's ballistic missile program. Just before the outbreak of hostilities, Iran tested an as yet unnamed intermediate-range ballistic missile that can carry a two ton warhead. This missile obviously is designed to deliver a nuclear warhead. It could be that when Israel saw this test it realized it had no choice but to act against Iran.
Part of any deal must include scrapping heavy missiles and an agreement never to manufacture them again.
Israel also will demand, and rightly so, the immediate release of all the hostages held by Hamas in Gaza and a guarantee that no weapons of any kind can be transferred to Hamas, Islamic Jihad or others who intend to attack Israel. Israel knows that if it smashes Iran, Hamas is finished because it utterly relies on weapons supplied by Iran.
Finally, Iran has to agree to no transfers of weapons of any kind to the Houthis in Yemen. Israel will not tolerate missile attacks from the Houthis any more than it will tolerate Iranian attacks against Israel.
If the Trump administration wants to negotiate a deal, either the deal has to address the nuclear issue and the hostages, and Yemen, or it isn't worth anything.
Stephen Bryen is a special correspondent to Asia Times and former US deputy undersecretary of defense for policy.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
39 minutes ago
- RTHK
No plan for new nuclear talks with US, says Iran
No plan for new nuclear talks with US, says Iran Abbas Araghchi dismissed claims by Donald Trump that Iran was set to return to nuclear negotiations with the United States. File photo: Reuters Iran has denied it is set to resume nuclear talks with the United States after the end of a 12-day war with Israel, and accused Washington of exaggerating the impact of US strikes. The most serious conflict yet between Israel and Iran derailed nuclear talks between Iran and the United States, yet President Donald Trump said Washington would hold discussions with Tehran next week, with his special envoy Steve Witkoff expressing hope "for a comprehensive peace agreement". But Iran's Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi shut down what he said was "speculation" that Tehran would come to the table and said it "should not be taken seriously". "I would like to state clearly that no agreement, arrangement or conversation has been made to start new negotiations," he said on state television. "No plan has been set yet to start negotiations." Araghchi's denial came as Iranian lawmakers passed a "binding" bill suspending cooperation with the UN nuclear watchdog and after supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused Trump of exaggerating the impact of US strikes on Iranian nuclear sites. In a televised speech – his first appearance since a ceasefire in the war with Israel – Khamenei hailed what he described as Iran's "victory" over Israel, vowed never to yield to US pressure and insisted Washington had been dealt a humiliating "slap". "The American president exaggerated events in unusual ways, and it turned out that he needed this exaggeration," Khamenei said, rejecting US claims Iran's nuclear programme had been set back by decades. The strikes, he insisted, had done "nothing significant" to Iran's nuclear infrastructure. Araghchi, for his part, called the damage "serious" and said a detailed assessment was under way. Trump said key facilities, including the underground Fordo uranium enrichment site, had been "obliterated" by American B-2 bombers. Posting on his Truth Social platform, he dismissed speculation Iran might have removed enriched uranium prior to the raid, saying: "Nothing was taken out... too dangerous, and very heavy and hard to move!" He added that satellite images showed trucks at the site only because Iranian crews were attempting to shield the facility with concrete. Khamenei dismissed such claims, saying "the Islamic republic won, and in retaliation dealt a severe slap to the face of America". Both sides have claimed victory: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu called it a "historic win", while Khamenei said Iran's missile retaliation had brought Israel to the brink of collapse. (AFP)
RTHK
39 minutes ago
- RTHK
Dollar slides as Trump eyes new Fed boss
Dollar slides as Trump eyes new Fed boss The US dollar hit its lowest level since March 2022. File photo: Reuters The US dollar hit a three-year low on Thursday as US President Donald Trump eyed candidates to succeed Federal Reserve boss Jerome Powell, fueling bets of cuts to US interest rates. But Wall Street rose handsomely, lifting the S&P 500 to near a closing record, following solid earnings from chip company Micron and a signal that the White House could extend an upcoming tariff deadline on trading partners. Trump had suggested Wednesday that he was lining up Powell's replacement ahead of an expected departure next year. "No decisions are imminent, although the president has the right to change his mind," a White House official told AFP. The Dollar Index, which compares the greenback to a basket of major currencies, hit its lowest level since March 2022 at 96,997 points. The pound meanwhile reached its highest level against the dollar since October 2021. "Concerns over the Federal Reserve's independence and growing expectations for monetary easing weighed on the currency," said George Pavel, general manager at Middle East, a trading platform. "The move, if confirmed, would raise serious questions about the central bank's autonomy at a time of heightened policy uncertainty, painting a bearish scenario for the greenback," Pavel said. Since returning to the White House, Trump has constantly hit out at Powell for not cutting US interest rates and questioned his intelligence, stoking worries about the bank's independence. "I know within three or four people who I'm going to pick," Trump told reporters after a NATO summit. The Wall Street Journal reported that Trump could announce a replacement as early as September, with Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, economic adviser Kevin Hassett and former Fed governor Kevin Warsh among the contenders. Earlier this week, Powell told lawmakers the bank would assess the impact of Trump's tariffs on the economy before making any rate move. (AFP)
South China Morning Post
2 hours ago
- South China Morning Post
US bombing of Iran risks a breakdown of nuclear governance
The United States' attacks on Iran's nuclear sites on June 22 have been described as a ' spectacular military success ' by US President Donald Trump. Some have concluded that Israel has emerged as the definitive winner in a long-festering regional rivalry. The political objective of this dramatic American intervention in the Israel-Iran conflict was a simple Trump goal: 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon.' Advertisement With a fragile ceasefire in place between Israel and Iran, an objective assessment of US and Israeli policy would suggest that the actions of the two countries were unlawful and will ultimately weaken an already dented and weakened global nuclear non-proliferation regime. The trigger for Israel's attack was the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) finding on June 12 that censured Iran for violation of enrichment commitments and site inspections. Any such breach by a state without nuclear weapons – such as Iran, a party to the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons – should have been taken to the UN Security Council to decide how to hold that state accountable. It is telling that the UN Security Council's five permanent members are also the first five nuclear-armed states – the US, Russia, the United Kingdom, France and China – which acquired this capability between 1945 and 1964 and subsequently helped forge the NPT in 1968 to manage the global nuclear domain In essence, these five nations named themselves the guardians of global nuclear governance. However imperfect, the NPT regime ensured that most nations – with notable exceptions such as India, Pakistan, North Korea and Israel – agreed not to acquire nuclear weapons from others. The global majority accepted the status of permanent non-nuclear weapon states with the caveat that they could pursue peaceful nuclear programmes, subject to compliance with IAEA safeguards and inspections. Advertisement Under a separate UN Security Council resolution, states without nuclear weapons are entitled to security guarantees from nuclear weapon states. The US nuclear umbrella for its allies might be seen as an example.
