Telangana Ex-CM KCR, Two Cabinet Colleagues Summoned by Commission Examining Kaleswaram Irregularities
Menu
हिंदी తెలుగు اردو
Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion
Support independent journalism. Donate Now
government
Telangana Ex-CM KCR, Two Cabinet Colleagues Summoned by Commission Examining Kaleswaram Irregularities
N. Rahul
47 minutes ago
T. Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender were summoned on June 6 and 9 respectively.
K Chandrashekar Rao. Photo: X/@BRSparty.
Real journalism holds power accountable
Since 2015, The Wire has done just that.
But we can continue only with your support.
Contribute now
Hyderabad: Former Telangana chief minister K. Chandrasekhar Rao has been summoned to face an inquiry by a one-man commission headed by former Supreme Court judge and the first Lokpal of the country, Justice Pinaki Chandra Ghose, into alleged irregularities in construction of Kaleswaram lift irrigation project in the state.
He was served notice to appear before the commission at its office at BRK Bhavan here on June 5 while two of his former cabinet colleagues T. Harish Rao and Eatala Rajender were summoned on June 6 and 9 respectively.
While Harish Rao was irrigation minister in the cabinet of Chandrasekhar Rao during his first term as chief minister from June 2014 to December 2018, Rajender was finance minister for the same period. Harish Rao later became finance minister in the second term, from September 2019 to November 2023. Chandrasekhar Rao also held the portfolio of irrigation throughout the second term when the project was dedicated to the nation by then governor E.S.L. Narasimhan.
The role of the finance ministers had come under the scanner as they were held responsible for all the expenditure met under the project and borrowing of loans through an exclusive corporation.
The notices to the three leaders sprang a surprise in official and political circles since it was widely believed that the commission was set to submit a 400-page report at the end of this month without giving them a hearing. Reports speculated that the commission felt that there was no need to hear them because the proceedings were mostly evidence-based and dependent on documents. Several argued that, if summoned, the leaders would deny many of the contentions which would require further cross-examination of witnesses and delay the submission of the report.
The state government has also extended the term of the commission by two months up to July 31. This is the eighth extension given to the commission since it was constituted in March last year, three months after the Congress assumed power in the state. Initially, the commission was set a deadline of three months to complete its work but it was given seven extensions with the last one expiring on May 31, 2025, as the volume of work involved was significant.
Several engineers, contracting firms, executing agencies and officials right up to then chief secretary of the government Somesh Kumar were looked at. Even the present chief secretary K. Ramakrishna Rao who was principal finance secretary and a senior official in the Chief Minister's Office Smita Sabharwal deposed before the commission. Many stakeholders and public representatives presented their version in the form of sworn affidavits.
Make a contribution to Independent Journalism
Related News
'BRS Fought 3 Elections Alone, Will Continue the Trend': K.T. Rama Rao on Scope of Ties With BJP
CPI (Maoist) General Secretary Nambala Keshava Rao Killed In Encounter in Chhattisgarh
Karnataka Temple Trust Issues Apology to Muslims After BJP MLA's Inflammatory Speech
Secularism, Federalism and Social Justice Have Always Been at the Heart of the Constitution
'Ceasefire Must Be the First Step': Over 1,000 Feminists from India and Pakistan Call for Dialogue
'Anti-India', Terror and Air Guns: How the Grounds for a Kerala Journalist's Detention Have Shifted Rapidly
Invoking Rahul and State Survey, Telangana Congress Takes Credit For Union's Caste Census U-Turn
Central Hall | Pakistan, Terrorism and the Role of Diplomacy
Caught Between Borders and Broken Promises, Pakistani Woman's Journey Through J&K's Militant Rehab Policy
About Us
Contact Us
Support Us
© Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Wire
2 hours ago
- The Wire
From Custodianship to Control: The Conflict Around Sacred Sites in the Eastern Mediterranean
Menu हिंदी తెలుగు اردو Home Politics Economy World Security Law Science Society Culture Editor's Pick Opinion Support independent journalism. Donate Now Politics From Custodianship to Control: The Conflict Around Sacred Sites in the Eastern Mediterranean K.M. Seethi 34 minutes ago The very concept of religious endowments, spiritual heritage, and independent worship is jeopardised when sacred spaces are subordinated to administrative decisions and development agendas. St. Catherine's Monastery in the Sinai Peninsula, Egypt. Photo: Joonas Plaan via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY 2.0) Real journalism holds power accountable Since 2015, The Wire has done just that. But we can continue only with your support. Contribute now In recent years, sacred sites across the Eastern Mediterranean have become flashpoints in a broader conflict between religious heritage and state power. When Turkey's highest court ruled in 2020 to reconvert the Hagia Sophia from a museum into a mosque, global reactions were swift – critiquing what many viewed as a retreat from secularism and an assertion of majoritarian identity over pluralist heritage. Now, a similar controversy gets underway in Egypt, where a court ruling on May 28, 2025, declared that the 1,500-year-old St. Catherine's Monastery and its surrounding lands are 'public property' of the state, purportedly ending its historical autonomy. This ruling has triggered a rift between Cairo and Athens and provoked deep concern among the global Orthodox Christian community. Despite Egypt's formal assurances that the monastery's religious character will be preserved, the court's assertion of state ownership indicates a shift with far-reaching implications, not only for the monks who inhabit the site, but for the principle of religious custodianship itself. Much like the Hagia Sophia decision, Egypt's move is not merely administrative. It rather reflects a wider recast in how sacred spaces are governed, framed, and politicised in the name of national identity, development, and control. The court ruling has resulted in strong resistance from the monastery's monks, who have now closed the sacred site in protest and visitors are not allowed to enter the place. Historical continuity and legal precedent St. Catherine's Monastery, established in 548 AD by order of Byzantine Emperor Justinian I, is not merely an architectural relic. It is one of the oldest continuously inhabited Christian monasteries in the world, and a symbol of religious coexistence in the region. Placed at the foot of Mount Sinai, where tradition holds that Moses received the Ten Commandments, the monastery occupies sacred terrain central to Abrahamic religious memory. Its legal and moral foundation, however, extends beyond its Christian origins. Following the Arab conquest of Egypt in the 7th century, the monastery was granted a written covenant of protection (ʿ ahd) reportedly issued by Prophet Muhammad himself, and transcribed by Caliph Ali ibn Abi Talib. Though the original manuscript was later taken to Istanbul by Sultan Selim I during the Ottoman conquest, a copy remains housed in the monastery's archive. This covenant, promising the security of the monks, their property, and their freedom of worship, became a touchstone for interfaith legal protection under Islamic governance, an example of how early Islamic legal thought could accommodate pluralism. This protective tradition was reaffirmed over centuries by successive Islamic dynasties, including the Umayyads, Abbasids, Fatimids, Ayyubids, Mamluks, and Ottomans. These regimes issued firmans (royal decrees) upholding the Prophet's covenant, thereby creating an enduring chain of recognition that spanned religious, linguistic, and political divides. Also Read: Has India's Suspension of Indus Waters Treaty Caused a New Faultline in South Asia? Even under postcolonial Egypt, no previous regime – not even during the nationalist wave following the 1952 revolution – sought to unilaterally redefine the monastery's legal status or revoke its historically acknowledged autonomy. A key feature of the monastery's operational continuity was its network of waqf properties – endowments legally donated under Islamic law from both Christian-majority and Muslim-majority territories, including Cyprus, Crete, Cairo, Gaza, and Syria. These waqfs were not informal gifts but were formally registered, validated by Islamic qadis (judges) and court notaries, and formed part of the economic bedrock supporting the monastery's religious and charitable activities. The Islamic legal framework thus became a custodian of Christian monasticism, demonstrating a rare case of juridical pluralism, in which Islamic courts institutionalised the preservation of a non-Islamic religious community. Thousands of historical manuscripts, written in Arabic, Greek, Syriac, Coptic, and Georgian, remain preserved within the monastery's library, some dating back to the 4th and 5th centuries, including the famed Codex Sinaiticus, one of the earliest complete copies of the Christian Bible. These texts reflect a shared intellectual heritage, with scholars from both Christian and Muslim worlds contributing to the preservation and study of sacred knowledge. The library is considered second in global significance only to the Vatican Library. Against this deeply interlocked legal and religious history, the 2025 Egyptian court ruling that classifies the monastery and its lands as 'public state property' appears legally ahistorical and morally discontinuous. The claim disregards not only centuries of uninterrupted monastic use but also binding legal customs rooted in Islamic jurisprudence. Furthermore, the idea that the monastery's inhabitants are merely beneficiaries rather than legal custodians – after over 1,450 years of unbroken presence – undermines both Islamic norms of protected dhimmi status and international principles on the rights of religious minorities and cultural property. In essence, the monastery stands at the crossroads of sacred continuity and statist disruption. Any attempt to recast its status as a purely administrative or developmental concern must reckon with a multifaith legal ecosystem, one that long upheld coexistence and recognised historical possession, religious function, and communal stewardship as grounds for legal legitimacy. The 'great transfiguration project' and tourism-driven development Launched in 2020, Egypt's ' Great Transfiguration Project ' aims to transform the Saint Catherine area in South Sinai into a premier destination for religious, environmental, and medical tourism. The initiative includes the development of infrastructure such as hotels, bazaars, heritage centres, and even an airport, all designed to attract a global audience of pilgrims and tourists. The project is promoted by the Egyptian government as a means to showcase the spiritual and historical significance of the region, particularly Mount Sinai, revered in Judaism, Christianity, and Islam. While officials assert that the monastery's sanctity will remain untouched, critics express concern that the project's true intent is to appropriate sacred land and reframe the space as a state-controlled tourism hub. This could potentially compromise the spiritual character of the area and the autonomy of the monastery. The ruling, which declares the monastery and surrounding sites as state property, goes in line with a broader pattern of the Egyptian state centralising control over religious and heritage sites – a policy trend that some describe as 'Neo-Ikhwanism' in practice, despite the regime's avowed opposition to the Muslim Brotherhood. The judiciary's role in this case, appearing to follow executive instructions, has raised further questions about the independence of Egypt's legal system in matters involving religious minorities and cultural heritage. The Greek Orthodox Church has denounced the ruling as an attempt to alter a system that has been in place for 15 centuries. Hagia Sophia and comparative reflections Both St. Catherine's Monastery in Egypt and Hagia Sophia in Turkey are symbolic of ancient Christian heritage, shaped by centuries of religious coexistence and later, politicised reinterpretation. Founded under Emperor Justinian I in the 6th century, St. Catherine's Monastery has continuously functioned as a Greek Orthodox monastic site at the foot of Mount Sinai. It gained protection under Islamic rule due to a covenant (achtiname) reportedly issued by the Prophet Muhammad himself, guaranteeing the safety and autonomy of the monastery and its monks. Similarly, Hagia Sophia, built in 537 CE by the same emperor, served as the seat of Eastern Orthodoxy for nearly a millennium before its conversion into a mosque after the Ottoman conquest of Constantinople in 1453. It was later secularised into a museum by Kemal Atatürk in 1935 – symbolising modern Turkey's secular turn – until its controversial reconversion into a mosque in 2020 by President Erdoğan. Both sites are UNESCO World Heritage Sites and represent a shared history of interfaith reverence and cultural diplomacy. However, their status in the 21st century reveals a troubling pattern – religious heritage sites are increasingly reinterpreted through state-centred narratives. While Hagia Sophia remains open to visitors with Christian mosaics veiled during Islamic prayers, the recent court ruling in Egypt effectively transfers ownership of St. Catherine's to the state, rendering the monks 'beneficiaries' rather than rightful custodians. This redefinition of sacred space – whether as a mosque-turned-museum or monastery-turned-tourist site—points to a clearer erosion of religious pluralism. Both cases raise urgent questions about the future of minority heritage in the face of state appropriation, and about the fragility of interfaith pacts that once upheld mutual respect and autonomy. While Hagia Sophia's reconversion caters to nationalist-religious sentiment, the expropriation of St. Catherine's reflects a more bureaucratic assertion of sovereignty over religious minorities. In both cases, long-standing interfaith understandings – whether Ottoman-era endowments in Istanbul or early Islamic covenants in Sinai – are being reinterpreted or sidelined by modern states seeking to consolidate control over religious heritage. Implications and the erosion of religious pluralism The legal redefinition of ownership and use of Saint Catherine's Monastery brings significant implications for religious pluralism, minority rights, and cultural preservation in Egypt. The very concept of religious endowments, spiritual heritage, and independent worship is jeopardised when sacred spaces are subordinated to administrative decisions and development agendas. The Egyptian state's position also raises questions about its international credibility, particularly in light of UNESCO conventions. Saint Catherine's Monastery has been designated a World Heritage Site since 2002, recognised for its cultural and historical significance. The move risks diplomatic fallout with Greece and broader Orthodox Christian communities, as well as undermining Egypt's image as a promoter of religious coexistence. The case of Saint Catherine's Monastery is not an isolated legal matter – it serves as a serious test case for how modern states treat ancient religious traditions and the communities that uphold them. It is also a barometer of Egypt's commitment to historical continuity, interfaith pacts, and pluralist governance. The encroachment – whether direct or administrative – on such a profound spiritual site calls for urgent international dialogue and domestic introspection. If the Egyptian government continues to advance its tourism ambitions at the expense of sacred heritage, it risks transforming a sanctuary of prayer into a showcase of expropriated piety – a place where ancient holiness is preserved not for spiritual veneration but for curated spectacle. The author is Director, Inter University Centre for Social Science Research and Extension (IUCSSRE), Mahatma Gandhi University (MGU), Kerala. He also served as ICSSR Senior Fellow, Senior Professor of International Relations and Dean of Social Sciences at MGU. The Wire is now on WhatsApp. Follow our channel for sharp analysis and opinions on the latest developments. Make a contribution to Independent Journalism Related News 7 Indians Injured in Deadly German Car Attack; Saudi Ex-Muslim Suspect with Far-Right Views Arrested Who Gets to Think in India? Renaming the Pataudi Trophy: Understanding Why the Decision Matters Arrest of Ashoka University Professor: NHRC Says Haryana Police Yet to Respond to Its Notice Is Ashoka University the Next Target After Professor Ali Khan? The Liberal Arts University in the Age of AI and 'Activism' Ashoka University Can't Call Its Refusal to Stand Up to BJP's Bullying 'Institutional Neutrality' Perhaps, This is Why The Innocent Men-Tourists Died in Pahalgam Founders of Ashoka Should Know that a University Can't be Equated With Hierarchies of a Corporate Office View in Desktop Mode About Us Contact Us Support Us © Copyright. All Rights Reserved.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kaleshwaram project probe: KCR points fingers at KLIS engineers
HYDERABAD: Former chief minister K Chandrasekhar Rao on Wednesday made it clear that all technical decisions related to the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme were taken by engineers and had nothing to do with politicians. He stated that all approvals for the project were granted by the state Cabinet. Deposing before the Commission of Inquiry on Kaleshwaram, headed by former Supreme Court judge PC Ghose, at BRKR Bhavan here, KCR explained the genesis of the project and the subsequent decisions taken. KCR, the first chief minister of Telangana, appeared before the Commission as witness number 115. Before the commencement of the cross-examination, which began at 12.02 pm, KCR held a meeting with the Commission chairman. Stating that he was unwell, he requested a one-on-one cross-examination, which the Commission allowed by passing an order. Though this raised many eyebrows, sources in the Commission said that as KCR was 'unwell', the order was passed. 'That liberty has to be given to him,' a source in the Commission stated. In his 50-minute deposition before the Commission, the former chief minister answered 18 questions.
New Indian Express
4 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Kaleshwaram project row: If found guilty, no one will be spared, warns Revenue Min Ponguleti
MULUGU: Dismissing the claims of political vendetta behind the ongoing investigation into alleged irregularities in the execution of the Kaleshwaram project, Revenue Minister Ponguleti Srinivasa Reddy on Wednesday said that once the PC Ghose Commission submits its report, those involved will have to 'face the consequences for their misdeeds.' Speaking to the media in Mulugu, the minister said: 'There is no question of any political revenge in this issue. The Central commission is conducting the inquiry. After the Commission submits its report, the culprits will have to face the consequences. No matter who they are and what their status is, they will not be spared.' 'The previous BRS regime had projected the Kaleshwaram Lift Irrigation Scheme as the eighth wonder of the world. The Kalvakuntla family looted the state while pillars of the project caved in during the BRS regime itself,' he added. 'KCR, the self-declared 'father of Telangana', deposed before the PC Ghose Commission. None of the people who were involved in this scam will be excluded from this inquiry,' he further said. Stating that Chief Minister A Revanth Reddy and Irrigation Minister N Uttam Kumar Reddy protected the Kaleshwaram project by taking up temporary repair works, he said: 'The flaws in the project design, defects in its execution and damage caused to its various components will be revealed once the Commission of Inquiry submits its report. Then the courts will deal with it as per law.' 'The Congress government will neither spare those responsible for Kaleshwaram scam nor those involved in phone-tapping, land-grabbing, and Mission Bhagiratha scams,' he added. Earlier, Srinivas Reddy, along with Panchayati Raj & Rural Development Minister Danasari Anasuya alias Seethakka and MP P Balaram Naik, distributed sanction letters for Indiramma Housing Scheme beneficiaries at Incherla village in Mulugu district. They also laid the foundation stone for the construction of houses in the Indiramma Colony of the village. Stating that the government had sanctioned 4.5 lakh Indiramma houses in the first phase across the state, he said that the highest allocation of 5,000 houses was made in the Mulugu Assembly constituency. Later in the day, Srinivasa Reddy and Seethakka took part in the Bhu Bharathi Revenue Sadassulu programme at Govindaraopet village and interacted with the applicants.
