‘Indian Constitution a symbol of justice, equality & nat'l pride'
Indian Constitution
is not just a legal document but a living entity that embodies the ideals of
justice
,
equality
, and liberty, shaping the identity of every Indian. It serves as a reminder that the Constitution is a cornerstone of India's democracy and the source of its
national pride
.
This view was expressed by professor Mukul Sharad Sutaone, director, Indian Institute of Information and Technology (IIIT), Allahabad, while speaking at a programme titled '
Hamara Samvidhan
, Hamara Swabhiman' organised on Monday. He said that this phrase emphasises the deep connection between India's Constitution and the nation's pride and identity. The Constitution of India is the supreme law of the land and represents the principles and values upon which India stands: democracy, equality, justice, secularism, and the rule of law.
The director said, "When we say 'Hamara Samvidhan,' we refer to the foundational document that not only guides the governance of the country but also ensures the protection of the rights and freedoms of every citizen. 'Hamara Swabhiman' (Our Pride) reflects the respect and dignity that every citizen of India feels towards the Constitution, recognising it as a symbol of unity, diversity, and strength."
Prof Pawan Chakarborty, dean, said the Constitution is derived from a combination of multiple sources, both domestic and international, that helped shape its structure, provisions, and functioning.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
If you have a mouse, play this game for 1 minute
Navy Quest
Undo
Prof O P Vyas, dean infrastructure, said that the Constitution is a product of historical circumstances, philosophical thought, and global influences. It was designed to be a flexible, progressive document that would reflect India's diverse social, cultural, and political landscape.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Scrutiny of documents necessary': HC denies bail to alleged Bangladeshi national arrested for 'illegal' entry in India
Rejecting the bail plea of a Thane resident, an alleged Bangladeshi national who police claimed illegally entered India, the Bombay High Court on Tuesday observed that his claim of being Indian citizen and identity documents be strictly examined under Citizenship Act. 'The applicant has failed to produce any document duly verified or authenticated by the concerned government authorities that could conclusively establish his Indian citizenship,' a single-judge bench of Justice Amit Borkar observed in an order on bail application of Babu Abdul Ruf Sardar, who claimed that he had valid Indian identity proofs including Adhaar card, Voter ID, PAN Card, and Passport. 'Merely relying on the existence of certain identity documents such as Aadhaar, PAN, or Voter ID, without verification of the process through which these were obtained, cannot be treated as sufficient proof of lawful citizenship at this stage, particularly when the very authenticity of such documents is under investigation,' the HC noted. 'In such circumstances,' the Justice Borkar added, 'where the investigation is at a crucial stage, and where serious allegations involving national security, illegal entry, and use of forged government documents are involved, the Court finds it neither proper nor prudent to enlarge the applicant on bail at this juncture.' Wagle Estate Police station in Thane had last year arrested Sardar under provisions of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), Passport (Entry into India) Act, and Foreigners Order for entering India without valid passport or travel documents, deliberately suppressing foreign nationality by creating and using forged Indian identity documents such as Aadhar, PAN and falsely showing himself as Indian citizen. The Police claimed that he not only misrepresented his status before the authorities but also obtained an Aadhaar Card by submitting fabricated documents. Moreover, as per police, the mobile phone found in possession of the application contained digital copies of his and his mother's birth certificates allegedly issued by Bangladesh authorities which raised suspicion that he was a Bangladeshi national who illegally entered India. The probe also revealed frequent communication with several numbers linked to Bangladesh. The prosecution said that official verification regarding the genuineness of the Aadhar card was awaited from the authority. Advocate Jyotiram S Yadav for the applicant denied prosecution's claims and argued that his client was a bona fide citizen of India and there was no reliable or conclusive evidence produced by the prosecution to prove that he was Bangladeshi national. He also argued that his applicant had no connection with alleged Bangladeshi birth certificates. Additional Public Prosecutor Megha S Bajoria for Thane Police, while opposing the bail plea, claimed the possibility of the applicant being part of 'larger organised network involving illegal immigration and identity fraud,' and his release would have implications for national security. The court said that whether the documents were true or false will be decided in the trial, documents such as Bangladeshi birth certificates found on the applicant's own phone were 'important and cannot be ignored,' and if found genuine, it would impact the question of his citizenship. Observing the allegations were 'not small,' the judge said 'the fact that he was allegedly able to get official documents through fraud shows that he has the ability to misuse the system and create a false identity again if given the chance.' Rejecting the bail plea, the HC noted that fear expressed by prosecution of applicant destroying evidence in case released on bail was 'not empty' or 'imaginary' and the 'danger of applicant running away from the law or interfering with investigation was real.'
Indian Express
10 minutes ago
- Indian Express
J&K nominated MLAs: Centre says ‘no bearing or co-relation with formation of govt'
THE Centre has described the power vested in the Jammu and Kashmir Lt Governor to nominate five members to its Legislative Assembly as 'discretionary', and exercisable by him without the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers in the Union Territory. In an affidavit in the Jammu & Kashmir and Ladakh High Court, the Union Home Ministry has also said that this nomination has 'no bearing or co-relation with the formation of the government'. The affidavit was in response to a question framed by the court as to whether Sections 15, 15-A and 15-B of the Jammu & Kashmir Reorganization Act, 2019, providing for nomination of members to the UT's Legislative Assembly over and above its sanctioned strength – which could potentially convert a minority government into a majority government, and vice-a-versa – were in violation of basic structure of the Constitution. Senior Congress leader and its chief spokesperson Ravinder Kumar Sharma had filed a PIL in the High Court, challenging the provisions. Just before results were declared for the first elections held to the J&K Assembly following the abrogation of Article 370, in October 2024, non-BJP parties had expressed apprehension over the L-G's powers to nominate members. This fear was accentuated by claims of a BJP leader that all five would be BJP leaders, and that L-G Manoj Sinha would name them in consultation with the Centre. Opposition parties had demanded that the nominations be made only on 'the aid and advice' of the government that was due to take over, and not precede it. With five nominated members, the strength of the J&K Assembly would be 95, making the majority mark 48. It was feared that the Opposition would not reach this mark, and the BJP would tilt the scales in its favour with the nominated MLAs. Eventually, however, the L-G did not make any nominations before the results, and the National Conference-Congress combine won with 47 MLAs (NC 41 and Congress 6), apart from enjoying the support of four Independents and a CPI(M) MLA. In its affidavit in the High Court, the Union Home Ministry has noted that while Section 15 was part of the original 2019 Reorganization Act, Sections 15A and 15B were added through an amendment in 2023. Section 15A empowers the Lt Governor to nominate two members, one of whom shall be a woman, from the Kashmiri migrant community, while Section 15B provides for nomination of one member from persons displaced from Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). Speaking about Section 15, the Centre's affidavit says that the provision in it for nomination of two women MLAs was similar to an Article in the Constitution of the erstwhile J&K state, before its special status was scrapped. Then the Governor had the power to nominate up to two women members if women were not adequately represented in the Assembly. '(It) is an act of affirmative action, in support of promoting and ensuring female representation.' A 'plain reading' of the statute shows that 'it is a nomination which is to take place at any juncture post-elections, and has no bearing or co-relation with the formation of the government, inasmuch as the standard in the section is representation of women in the Assembly, and not in the government', says the affidavit. On Section 15A, the affidavit refers to the Supreme Court's verdict upholding the abrogation of Article 370 in which Justice Sanjay Kishan Kaul wrote an epilogue on the migration of Kashmiri Pandits. 'In order to move forward, the wounds need healing… The first step towards this is to achieve a collective understanding of the human rights violations perpetrated both by State and non-State actors, against peoples of the region,' Justice Kaul wrote. The Centre's affidavit says that it is a matter of record that multiple regions of Kashmir have remained disturbed for decades, leading to extensive displacement of civilians. 'Accordingly, the nomination of two members from the Kashmiri Migrant community under Section 15A serves the objective of providing them with adequate representation, ensuring their voice is heard in the legislative process, and safeguarding their rights and interests,'' it says. Similarly, the affidavit talks of Section 15B providing representation to those displaced from PoJK, in 1947 and during the India-Pakistan wars of 1965 and 1971. 'It is evident that displacement of these communities prevents them from their democratic participation… thereby necessitating the appointment of a nominated representative to ensure that their interests are not entirely excluded from governance.' Therefore, the affidavit says, the legislative intent behind these provisions is 'well-founded in law and equity', ensuring that voices of the displaced are neither ignored nor marginalised. On whether the J&K Lt Governor has to act on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers or has discretionary powers to nominate the five members, the affidavit says that this stands conclusively settled with respect to the Assemblies of both Puducherry and the Municipal Corporation in NCT of Delhi – the other two UTs with Assemblies. Sections 15, 15A and 15B specifically recognise the authority of the Lt Governor to nominate Assembly members, the affidavit says, adding that there can be no doubt that he has to exercise this duty in his discretion as a statutory functionary and not as an extension of the government – and thus, act without aid and advice of the Council of Ministers.
News18
10 minutes ago
- News18
Washington Mayor SLAMS Trump: ‘Illegal to Use Military on Americans'
Washington Mayor SLAMS Trump: 'Illegal to Use Military on Americans' | Bowser's Bold Rebuttal | N18G Last Updated: August 12, 2025, 20:00 IST Videos Tensions escalate in Washington D.C. as Mayor Muriel Bowser openly rejects former President Donald Trump's controversial move to deploy police and military forces against American citizens. Bowser calls it 'illegal to use the military on Americans' and warns that such actions threaten democracy and civil rights. The clash comes amid growing concerns over the militarization of domestic law enforcement, raising questions about constitutional rights, federal authority, and the limits of presidential this video, we break down Bowser's fiery statement, the legal implications of Trump's plan, and what this political showdown means for the future of civil liberties in the United States. From the streets of Washington to the halls of power, this is a battle over law, order, and the Constitution. News18 Mobile App - homevideos Washington Mayor SLAMS Trump: 'Illegal to Use Military on Americans' | Bowser's Bold Rebuttal | N18G CNN name, logo and all associated elements ® and © 2024 Cable News Network LP, LLLP. A Time Warner Company. All rights reserved. CNN and the CNN logo are registered marks of Cable News Network, LP LLLP, displayed with permission. Use of the CNN name and/or logo on or as part of does not derogate from the intellectual property rights of Cable News Network in respect of them. © Copyright Network18 Media and Investments Ltd 2024. All rights reserved.
