Mexico Discounts Risk Of 'Invasion' After Trump Order To Target Cartels
"There will be no invasion of Mexico," Sheinbaum said after The New York Times reported that Trump had secretly signed a directive to use military force against cartels that his administration has declared terrorist organizations.
"We were informed that this executive order was coming and that it had nothing to do with the participation of any military personnel or any institution in our territory," Sheinbaum told her regular morning conference.
The Mexican foreign ministry said later that Mexico "would not accept the participation of US military forces on our territory."
The remarks followed a statement released by the US embassy in Mexico, which said both countries would use "every tool at our disposal to protect our peoples" from drug trafficking groups.
US ambassador to Mexico Ronald Johnson said on X that the countries "face a common enemy: the violent criminal cartels."
The Pentagon referred questions on the issue to the White House, which did not immediately confirm the order.
The Times said Trump's order provided an official basis for military operations at sea or on foreign soil against the cartels.
In February, his administration designated eight drug trafficking groups as terrorist organizations. Six are Mexican, one is Venezuelan and the eighth originates in El Salvador.
Two weeks ago, his administration added another Venezuelan gang, the Cartel of the Suns, which has shipped hundreds of tons of narcotics into the United States over two decades.
On Thursday, the US Justice Department doubled to $50 million its bounty on Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro, whom it accuses of leading the Cartel of the Suns.
Venezuela has dismissed the allegations, with Foreign Minister Yvan Gil calling it "the most ridiculous smokescreen we have ever seen."
Sheinbaum has made strenuous efforts to show Trump she is acting against her country's cartels, whom he accuses of flooding the United States with drugs, particularly fentanyl.
"We are cooperating, we are collaborating, but there will be no invasion. That is absolutely ruled out," she said.
She said that in "every call" with US officials, Mexico insisted that this "is not permitted."
The 63-year-old has been dubbed the "Trump whisperer" for repeatedly securing reprieves from his threats of stiff tariffs over the smuggling of drugs and migrants across their shared border.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Int'l Business Times
an hour ago
- Int'l Business Times
Ukraine Says Fighting 'Difficult' After Reports Of Russia's Rapid Gains
Ukraine said Tuesday it was engaged in "difficult" battles with Russian forces after Moscow had made rapid advances in a narrow but important section of the front line in the country's east. The gains came just days before US President Donald Trump was to meet Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin in Alaska for talks on the war, the first meeting between a sitting US and Russian leader since 2021. The Ukrainian army said it was engaged in "heavy" battles with Russian forces attempting to penetrate its defences. "The situation is difficult and dynamic," it said in a statement. A map published by Ukrainian battlefield monitor DeepState, which has close ties with Ukraine's military, showed Russia had advanced around 10 kilometres (six miles) over around two days, deep into a narrow section of the eastern front line. The corridor -- now apparently under Russian control -- threatens the town of Dobropillia, a mining hub that civilians are fleeing and that has come under Russian drone attacks. It also further isolates the destroyed town of Kostiantynivka, one of the last large urban areas in the Donetsk region still held by Ukraine. The Institute for the Study of War, a US-based observatory, said Russia was sending small sabotage groups forwards. It said it was "premature" to call the Russian advances in around Dobropillia "an operational-level breakthrough". The military's Operational-Tactical Group Donetsk, which oversees parts of the front in the industrial region, also said Russia was probing Ukrainian lines with small sabotage groups, describing battles as "complex, unpleasant and dynamic". Trump has described his summit with Putin on Friday as a chance to check the Russian leader's ideas for ending the war. Ukrainian leader Volodymyr Zelensky warned ahead of the talks that Moscow was laying the groundwork for further attacks, after Trump said on Monday that both sides would have to swap territory for peace. European leaders have meanwhile sought to ensure respect for Kyiv's interests. "We see that the Russian army is not preparing to end the war. On the contrary, they are making movements that indicate preparations for new offensive operations," Zelensky said in a statement on social media. Russia, which invaded Ukraine in 2022, has made costly but incremental gains across the sprawling front in recent months and claims to have annexed four Ukrainian regions while still fighting to control them. Ukrainian police meanwhile said that Russian attacks in the past hours had killed three people and wounded 12 others, including a child.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
US designates BLA separatists in Pakistan a terror group – DW – 08/12/2025
The Balochistan Liberation Army and its Majeed Brigade have carried out several separatist attacks. The US designations follow a recent trade agreement between the US and Pakistan. The United States on Tuesday has officially designated Pakistan's Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and its armed wing, the Majeed Brigade, as Foreign Terrorist Organizations (FTO). Washington says the group is responsible for deadly attacks in Balochistan, including a train hijacking in March that killed 31 people. "Today's action taken by the Department of State demonstrates the Trump administration's commitment to countering terrorism," Secretary of State Marco Rubio said in a statement. Pakistan welcomed the designation on Tuesday. Balochistan is Pakistan's largest but least populated province, home to the Sunni Muslim ethnic minority known as the Baloch. Separatists have fought since the early 2000s for autonomy and a greater share of the region's rich natural resources. The Baloch Liberation Army (BLA) is the largest militant group operating in the province. In March, the BLA claimed responsibility for an attack on a train traveling from Quetta to Peshawar, killing 31 civilians and security personnel and holding more than 300 passengers hostage. Pakistan says it has quelled the insurgency, but violence continues in Balochistan. Troops killed 50 militants in the Zhob district over the past week, according to the military. On Monday, at least nine Pakistani soldiers were killed when dozens of militants attacked a police station and border force compound in southwestern Balochistan. "Pakistan remains a steadfast bulwark against terrorism. Our sacrifices have secured critical counterterrorism successes, not only for the country, but for regional stability and global security," Pakistan's Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. The US first labeled the BLA a terrorist group in 2019. Now, it has formally designated the group as a Foreign Terrorist Organization — a move analysts say will tighten scrutiny of its supporters in the US and Europe. The designation coincides with a visit to Washington by Pakistan's army chief, Field Marshal Asim Munir. It also comes less than two weeks after the US and Pakistan signed a trade agreement expected to allow American firms to help develop Pakistan's largely untapped oil reserves in resource-rich Balochistan. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Separatists in Balochistan have opposed the extraction of resources by Pakistani and foreign firms and have targeted Pakistani security forces and Chinese nationals working on multibillion-dollar projects.
DW
4 hours ago
- DW
Why is Trump being so generous to China? – DW – 08/12/2025
Donald Trump slashed tariffs and softened his stance on China, while imposing steep duties on India and Brazil. What leverage does Beijing hold that others don't? After months as a trade pariah, China is now at the heart of US President Donald Trump's efforts to reset relations and avoid another tariff spiral. Back in April, Trump labeled China "the greatest threat to America," saying it had "cheated" the world's largest economy for decades. He then slapped massive tariffs of 145% on Chinese goods. Just months later, the tone has shifted. Trump has extended the tariff pause on China, praised President Xi Jinping as "a strong leader," and floated the idea of a US-China summit this fall. Meanwhile, countries like India and Brazil now face the steepest penalties — up to 50% tariffs — while China's rate is capped at a more manageable 30%. Trump has several reasons for giving China an easier ride. He wants to avoid a tariff spike just as US retailers stock up on Chinese imports for the crucial holiday season. Trump is also buying time to allow negotiations on a broader trade deal that could include technology, energy and rare earth minerals. As China is the only country to firmly confront Washington's aggressive policy stance, Antonio Fatas, economics professor at INSEAD Business School, thinks Beijing's strategy may have left Trump scrambling for leverage. "From the beginning, it was clear that China was more willing than the US to have a full-blown trade war," Fatas told DW, which would bring "economic consequences that the Trump administration cannot afford." To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video China's dominance in rare earths — needed to produce everything from electric vehicles to missile guidance systems — is arguably Beijing's strongest card. With US industries heavily reliant on Chinese supply, these minerals have become a decisive factor in the trade standoff. After Trump announced sky-high tariffs in April, China, which controls about 60% of global rare earth production and nearly 90% of refining, imposed export controls on seven rare earth elements and permanent magnets, hitting US industries hard, including carmakers. Washington is also pushing for tighter restrictions on China's access to advanced artificial intelligence (AI) chips, while pressuring Beijing to cut imports of Russian oil, warning of secondary sanctions — including steep tariffs — if volumes continue to rise. Further down the list of priorities, Trump is urging China to quadruple its purchases of US soybeans — a boost to American farmers and last year's $295.5 billion (€254.5 billion) trade deficit between the world powers. China is by far the world's largest soybean importer, accounting for over 60% of global demand, mostly for livestock feed and cooking oil. China, on the other hand, is seeking a lasting rollback in US tariffs, especially around technology and manufacturing. Beijing also wants safeguards for Chinese firms from US sanctions and assurances over access to cutting-edge US chips. At the same time, the Chinese government is now actively discouraging the use of Nvidia's H20 processor, the most advanced US chip currently allowed for export to China. Analysts say this move is a public show that the country is becoming less reliant on the US for high-end technology. Economist Alicia Garcia-Herrero, a senior fellow at the Brussels-based think tank Bruegel, noted Trump's many trade, domestic and geopolitical challenges — like Friday's peace talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska — as other reasons he's giving China more leeway. "Trump has enough on his plate ... and has no choice but to offer China more [time] than other countries," she told DW. Now that the tariff truce has been extended until early November, negotiators can zero in on the most contentious issues. Chief among them is avoiding a return to triple-digit tariffs — 145% on Chinese goods and 125% on US exports. Both sides agree such a move would be economically damaging. China's current 30% average tariff rate remains significantly above most other countries. Chinese copper and steel exports to the US are subject to a 50% levy. While China enjoys extra time, India's fall from favored partner at the start of Trump's second term to trade villain has been swift. The country now faces a punishing tariff of up to 50% — 25% on general goods and an additional 25% on Russian oil purchases that's expected to kick in on August 27. INSEAD's Fatas noted that "India has neither the economic size of China, exports crucial for US industry, nor the power to inflict damage on the US economy," calling on New Delhi to work with allies to show collective strength and secure a better tariff. While China may appear to have the upper hand in negotiations, Han Shen Lin, China Managing Director of strategic advisory firm The Asia Group, warned against complacency from the Chinese side. After all, Trump's flair for chaos leaves room for unexpected moves. "We can't underestimate the US's ability to add more shock value [to negotiations]," Han told Reuters news agency. "I suspect the type of leverage the US has, as the largest consumer market in the world, will be a factor that will cause other countries to think cautiously." Despite softening his tone, Trump is keeping up the pressure on China in other ways. Chinese exporters have been rerouting goods meant for the US through Southeast Asian countries, especially Vietnam, Malaysia, and Thailand. The objective is to obscure their origin and avoid direct US tariffs. In response, Trump has imposed a sweeping 40% transshipment tariff on all nations suspected of facilitating Chinese rerouting, which took effect last week. With US-China negotiations expected to stretch until the deadline, Garcia-Herrero, who is also chief economist for Asia-Pacific at French investment bank Natixis, foresees a partial trade thaw that benefits US firms while sidelining key allies. "We'll likely get movement on both export controls on high-end chips from the US side and rare-earth from Beijing," Garcia-Herrero told DW. " China will likely see a slightly lower [base] tariff and US companies will get better access to the Chinese market, to the detriment of the European Union, South Korea and Japan."
