Uganda: Activists call for enforcement of plastic use regulations
The petitioners who met the committee on Wednesday, 12 February 2025 asked MPs to address Uganda's escalating plastic pollution crisis. They presented to the MPs a brief highlighting the dangers of unregulated plastic use in Uganda.
The Managing Director of Plawaste, Kenneth Tumusiime stressed the need for intentional awareness campaigns.
He expressed concern over the widespread practice of burning plastics in residential areas, warning of severe health consequences. 'How can we make plastic burning stop in Uganda? We are seeing numerous health issues emerge because of such practices,' he said.
Tumusiime, a waste management consultant urged the government to improve waste management through subsidies for recycling and to implement the National Strategy for the Management of Plastic Pollution (2023-2028).
Committee Chairperson, Hon. Joseph Ruyonga commended the activists and called for research on alternative packaging, such as glass bottles instead of plastic. He suggested engaging water bottling companies to include cautionary labels warning consumers about the dangers of prolonged plastic exposure to sunlight. 'When you look at water bottles, there is no caution yet some of these bottles are exposed for too long in the sun without knowledge of the effects on the water,' he said.
Hon. Samuel Acuti Opio (Indep., Kole North) proposed bylaws to penalise littering, reinforcing the need for public education on responsible waste disposal.
Hon. Victor Nekesa (UPDF) raised concerns about plastic contamination in soils which has led to the rejection of exports to the European markets. She urged Plawaste to research the impact of plastics on soil health. 'This is a wake-up call for Ugandans. Our products once tested fail to meet international market standards because they find microplastics in them. Can we do more research on the matter,' she said.
Distributed by APO Group on behalf of Parliament of the Republic of Uganda.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Al Etihad
8 hours ago
- Al Etihad
International warning of famine in Gaza amidst calls for urgent action
12 Aug 2025 20:40 BRUSSELS (WAM)The European Union, the United Kingdom, and Japan, along with 21 other countries including Canada and Australia, expressed deep concern over the famine striking the Gaza Strip, calling for urgent action to halt the humanitarian a joint statement issued on Tuesday — signed by Kaja Kallas, the EU's foreign policy chief, and the foreign ministers of 17 European countries — the countries stressed that the humanitarian suffering in Gaza has reached an unimaginable level, with famine unfolding before the world's eyes. The statement urged Israel to allow the passage of all international humanitarian aid convoys and remove obstacles hindering the work of relief organisations.
Middle East Eye
13 hours ago
- Middle East Eye
How Syria became the battleground for Israeli and Turkish influence
Watching the geopolitical landscape in the Middle East in recent months, it would be tempting to conclude that Israel's strategic position has improved. The same could be said for Turkey. Could this situation constitute a recipe for stability, or presage further troubles ahead? Although engaged in conflict on multiple fronts - Gaza, the occupied West Bank, Lebanon, Syria, Yemen, and Iran - Israel appears to have prevailed for the time being, while the Tehran-led 'axis of resistance' seems in disarray. Iran's military leadership and infrastructure were severely hit during the June war, which also damaged the state's nuclear programme, although how much it has been set back remains unclear. The Iranian response was muted after the US bombed the Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites on 22 June. Syria, meanwhile, is now ruled by a former al-Qaeda militant whose reputation was laundered at record speed by western democracies. Decades of American and European mobilisation against extremist groups such as the Islamic State and Hayat Tahrir al-Sham were tossed into the garbage within days, further confirming western double standards. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters Iran's main logistical route to support Hezbollah in Lebanon has thus been severed. As for the Lebanese movement itself, it has been severely weakened with the loss of leader Hassan Nasrallah and other top figures. It is now under strong pressure, both internal and international, to give up its military arsenal. At the same time, Israel's ruthlessness in Gaza, which has been turned into a massive killing field as starving civilians queue to receive limited humanitarian aid, has degraded much of its international support. But Israel's extremist government does not really care about the world's opinion, as long as western nations continue to provide support (and others, such as Russia and China, remain inexplicably neutral). Unprovoked strikes As for Turkey, President Recep Tayyip Erdogan recently succeeded in neutralising the main security threat along its southeastern border, the Kurdistan Workers' Party. It also prevailed in its long-sought objective to remove Bashar al-Assad from power in Syria, replacing him with Ahmed al-Sharaa. And last but not least, Ankara has bolstered its global reputation as the go-to mediator in the Russia-Ukraine war. Alongside Israel, Turkey has become a top regional actor. In this context, any path towards stability in such a volatile setting must now inevitably involve both Israel and Turkey - and both are prepared to rebuff US pressure, in ways few other American allies could dream of doing. Unsurprisingly, suspicions about Washington's real intentions run deep in Turkey. Ankara believes that ultimately, the US will always prioritise Israel Syria could become one of the most important stress tests for this dynamic. Last month, Israel carried out air strikes against Syrian regime positions amid clashes between Druze and Bedouin communities in southern Syria. While Israel said its goal was to protect the Druze, its actual policy seems to be focused on disarming the area south of Damascus to expand its own 'buffer zone'. This is not even to mention how, in the immediate aftermath of Assad's collapse, Israel launched a series of unprovoked air strikes on Syria, levelling the state's military infrastructure - to the usual deafening silence of western democracies. Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Turkey and other regional states have expressed their support for Syria's unity, while Turkish Foreign Minister Hakan Fidan has warned that Turkey could intervene if separatist groups - such as the Druze, viewed by Ankara as an agent of Israel - attempt to divide and destabilise Syria. There has also been speculation that Israel may try to void its 1974 ceasefire deal with Syria, in search of a new security arrangement that would give Israel a presence beyond the Golan Heights for a five-year transitional period, according to a regional security source. Considering how easily Israel turns transitional periods into permanent ones, it would be normal to expect such a move to ignite serious concerns in Damascus, and possibly also Ankara. Suspicions run deep At the same time, the Syrian government's recent attempt to subdue Druze areas has caused concerns among the Kurdish-led Syrian Democratic Forces (SDF), who fear that in such a scenario, they could become the next target - although so far, they have benefitted from US protection. In this context, Turkey does not appear ready to come to Sharaa's defence, and it is unclear as to whether it would be able to compromise with Israel on agreed spheres of influence. In a hypothetical division, the southern part of Syria up to the outskirts of Damascus could fall under Israeli influence, and the rest - except for the SDF heartland east of the Euphrates - under Turkish influence. In such a configuration, the SDF would count on American support as a bulwark against Turkish attacks. How this would work in practice would be an open question. Syria after Assad: How Israel and the US are accelerating plans to partition the country Read More » Another significant stress test may soon come into play with regard to US diplomacy in the area. The US ambassador to Turkey, Tom Barrack, an American of Lebanese origin, has a significant advantage in Washington: a direct line to President Donald Trump. He is also the special envoy for Syria, with a mandate to stabilise the political situation in Lebanon. This is quite an extensive mandate for a single figure in a highly volatile region - a clear signal that Washington might be aiming for a comprehensive approach. Unsurprisingly, suspicions about Washington's real intentions run deep in Turkey. Ankara believes that ultimately, the US will always prioritise Israel. But the future remains uncertain. Can Washington rein in two of its major regional allies to avoid a scenario in which a deeply divided Syria, pulled in different directions by competing spheres of influence, could be the spark that ignites another major conflict? The views expressed in this article belong to the author and do not necessarily reflect the editorial policy of Middle East Eye.
Zawya
15 hours ago
- Zawya
Are African countries aware of their own mineral wealth?
Imagine running a business for over a century without knowing what's in your warehouse. That's essentially what many African countries are doing with their mineral wealth. Governments across the continent still have very little knowledge of what lies beneath their soil. Between the 18th and 20th centuries, European colonial powers exploited African mineral wealth for their industrialisation. Post-independence, many African nations nationalised their mining sectors. International pressure led to privatisation in the 1980s. This weakened the motivation and capacity of governments to develop long-term strategies. They have more incentive to export minerals for foreign exchange in the short term. As political economists, we have been researching the governance of Ghana's and Rwanda's minerals sectors for over a decade. We conducted research into why some African nations are investing more than others in geological investigations. These are studies that examine where minerals can be found and what their economic potential is. We focused on Ghana and Rwanda because of their different levels of commitment to investing in geological investigations. We found that intense political competition forces Ghanaian governments to have short-term priorities. This makes geological investigations (a long-term, risky venture) unappealing to ruling elites. In contrast, the Rwandan Patriotic Front government has invested in geological surveys over the last decade. Beyond economic and technical costs, context-specific political dynamics – interests, ideas and power relations – shape the decision to invest in geological mapping. A mixed searchGhana is rich in several minerals and is Africa's largest producer of gold, which is its highest export earner. Minerals generated US$11 billion in revenue in 2024. The country is also rich in diamonds, manganese and bauxite. It recently discovered lithium in commercial quantities. Lithium is a 'critical mineral' for the energy transition and this discovery will be of interest to investors. Rwanda is a producer of tin, tantalum and tungsten. It also has commercial deposits of gemstones, silica sands, kaolin, vermiculite, diatomite, clays, limestone and gold. Policy experts and international organisations often encourage governments to invest in geological mapping of their minerals. This is to enhance greater investment in the sector and boost the country's gains from its resources. But these investigations are costly and lucrative findings aren't guaranteed. Some African governments have limited commitment to investing in geological mapping. Others, such as Uganda, Morocco, Botswana and South Africa, have put resources into it. For example, the Ugandan government announced its intention to expand national geological mapping coverage from 50 to 100 percent. Ghana's lack of geological knowledgeThe roots of the knowledge gap stretch back to colonialism. European powers meticulously mapped African minerals, but kept the data for themselves. Today, the British Geological Survey holds over 300,000 geological reports and maps from other countries. Much of it is gathering dust in archives rather than helping African governments understand their own resources. Even basic geological knowledge often sits in London, Paris or Brussels rather than in Accra, Kigali or Nairobi. Take Ghana, which has been mining gold for over a century yet still lacks comprehensive geological surveys. We found that the country's competitive political system, where power alternates between two main parties almost every eight years, stands in the way of long-term planning. Successive Ghanaian governments have relied on private mining companies to conduct geological investigations. There is limited monitoring of whether investigations are carried out before extracting minerals. This approach has obvious flaws. Firstly, companies may not share all their findings. Secondly, the government doesn't have control over information about its own resources. We also found evidence of a darker political calculation. Through licensing, political elites are able to maintain lucrative relationships with mining companies. Comprehensive geological mapping might force more transparent, competitive bidding processes that could disrupt these arrangements. This includes vested political interests extending into the small scale and artisanal mining space. Rwanda's different pathRwanda tells a different story. Since 1994, the governing Rwandan Patriotic Front has increasingly taken control of all aspects of the society. As part of this drive it has developed longer-term ambitions in relation to its development strategies. The country has chosen to know more about what lies beneath its land and has taken steps to improve its capabilities. Firstly, it revised its mining law. The Rwandan government had initially invited foreign mining companies to obtain permits on a first come, first served basis. Though permit holders were required to invest in geological investigations before extraction, there was limited monitoring of what firms were doing. This is similar to what was taking place in Ghana. Secondly, the Rwandan government even established its own mining company, Ngali Mining, to invest directly in exploration. Thirdly, it has attracted investment in geological surveys, with some support from donors. In this way, it directly employs geological investigation firms rather than relying on mining firms to invest in investigations themselves. The results are impressive: between 2012 and 2016, the government attracted four different sets of North American and European firms to conduct extensive mapping studies. Fourth, as a result of these surveys, the government re-categorised existing mining areas into 52 separate areas for mineral exploration. As a result, the Rwandan government now attracts investment to these areas because there is more understanding of which minerals exist there. It's important to note that Rwanda imports many of its minerals from neighbouring Democratic Republic of Congo and then re-exports them. Importing and re-exporting DRC minerals earns Rwanda immediate foreign exchange earnings. This is particularly evident in rising Rwandan gold exports in recent years. Thus, even where governments may be keen to invest in geological investigations, when other short-term priorities exist it is less easy to sustain long-horizon goals in domestic mining sectors. Breaking the knowledge barrierThe global demand for minerals is soaring. This has made developing comprehensive knowledge of underground resources more urgent for African countries. However, our research suggests that simply throwing more money at geological surveys won't reorganise domestic minerals sectors if political incentives favour short-term interests. Understanding the political dynamics is the first step towards unlocking Africa's mineral potential. Only by learning more about the power structures that shape these decisions can countries begin to map their way to more sustainable mineral wealth. © Copyright 2022 Nation Media Group. All Rights Reserved. Provided by SyndiGate Media Inc. (
