logo
The Green Party's Universal Basic Illusion

The Green Party's Universal Basic Illusion

Scoop14-07-2025
The Green Party of Aotearoa New Zealand, long considered the progressive conscience of Parliament, has proposed an Income Guarantee, a universal, unconditional payment that would replace or simplify several parts of the welfare system. Framed as a liberating policy to reduce poverty, support unpaid labour, and prepare for a future where work may be scarcer, it has garnered enthusiastic support among progressives. But this proposal is not the radical solution it pretends to be.
Instead, it reflects a greenwashed attempt to stabilise capitalism by offering just enough relief to avoid revolt. Far from challenging the structural roots of inequality, private property, wage labour, and capitalist accumulation, the Green Party's UBI functions as a sedative, dulling the sharp edges of exploitation while entrenching the system that causes it. The Green Party's UBI is a reformist containment strategy, not a pathway to liberation. Its implementation would cushion the worst aspects of capitalist life, but in doing so, it would pacify resistance, entrench private ownership, and ultimately protect the interests of capital.
What the Greens Propose
In 2023, the Green Party unveiled a rebranded version of UBI called the Income Guarantee. This scheme offers:
A weekly payment of at least NZD $385 to all adults not in paid work, including students and carers.
Higher rates for single parents and families with children.
A restructuring of existing welfare benefits, replacing Jobseeker, Sole Parent Support, and Working for Families with a unified baseline payment.
A new agency (replacing ACC) to guarantee 80% of minimum wage for those unable to work due to illness or disability.
No work obligations, sanctions, or means-testing for this baseline.
The Greens frame this as a way to value unpaid work, decouple survival from employment, and support dignity in a time of rising precarity. They also claim that it simplifies bureaucracy and builds trust in people to use the payment in ways that work for their lives.
But while these ideas may seem empowering on paper, they carry deep contradictions, particularly when implemented within a capitalist framework.
Reforming the System That Creates Poverty
The first and most glaring issue with the Greens' Income Guarantee is that it leaves intact the very system that causes poverty and precarity in the first place. People are not poor because there is no universal income; they are poor because the means of production, land, housing, food, energy, are privately owned and controlled by a small class of capitalists.
By funnelling a state stipend into a market dominated by landlords, bosses, and corporate monopolies, the Greens' UBI model subsidises capital, not challenges it. The landlord still sets the rent. The supermarket still sets the price of bread. The corporation still determines wages and hours. A 'universal income' becomes a universal transfer of public money to private pockets.
This is not wealth redistribution, it's redistribution of dependency. The Greens imagine that by putting cash in your pocket, they are empowering you. But as long as that cash has to pass through the hands of property owners and profiteers, it simply recirculates back into the capitalist machine.
Flat Payments in an Unequal World
The Green Party's rhetoric of 'universality' masks a dangerous flattening of difference. By giving the same baseline income to all regardless of need, the policy shifts away from needs-based welfare to a market-mediated minimalism.
This sounds fair on the surface, but it has regressive implications. A wealthy investor and a single parent receive the same base rate. Meanwhile, tailored supports for disability, illness, or chronic hardship are pared back, replaced with a one-size-fits-all payment that ignores the complexity of human need.
While the Greens claim that specialised supports would still exist, the logic of simplification, driven by administrative efficiency and cost, risks future erosion of more expensive targeted benefits. This is not an idle concern. Across the world, UBI experiments have been used to justify welfare cutbacks, particularly under conservative governments that follow.
In the long run, a flat payment becomes an excuse to individualise poverty, treating everyone the same while leaving structural inequalities untouched.
UBI as Austerity in Disguise
UBI can become a tool of austerity, not generosity. By packaging welfare reform as 'universal empowerment,' the state absolves itself of responsibility for meeting complex needs. It shifts risk back onto the individual giving them a cash payment, but removing the broader safety net that once protected people from market volatility.
In practice, this leads to privatised hardship - disabled people navigating inaccessible housing markets on a flat income; sole parents forced to stretch meagre funds across rent, food, transport, and children's needs; sick workers unable to afford care once the specialised benefits disappear.
UBI may be universal, but its effects are not equal. It entrenches the neoliberal logic that you are responsible for surviving the system, even as the system remains rigged against you.
The Work Fetish in Reverse
A key selling point of the Green UBI is that it allows people to work less and to study, care for whanāu, volunteer, create art, or simply rest. This is undeniably attractive. For many, the dream of decoupling survival from employment is liberatory.
However, UBI doesn't abolish work, it just reorganises who gets to do less of it. The means of production still belong to someone else. People may reduce hours or leave exploitative jobs but they still must buy back access to life from those who own it. Without seizing control of land, housing, food systems, and workplaces, UBI only offers a slower treadmill, not a way off.
True liberation from work requires not just the absence of compulsion, but the presence of collective power to shape what, how, and why we produce. Under capitalism, UBI is not freedom from work it is still just freedom to consume what others profit from.
Automation and the Myth of Post-Work Capitalism
Another justification for UBI is the coming wave of automation. As jobs are replaced by AI and machines, we are told, we need a universal income to ensure people aren't left behind.
This argument is both outdated and naïve. Automation is not new it has always accompanied capitalism. And rather than freeing us from labour, it has consistently resulted in:
Job displacement for the many,
Wealth concentration for the few,
And a race to the bottom for those still working.
Without changing the ownership of technology and the surplus it generates, automation becomes a weapon against workers, not a liberation. UBI does not challenge this, it merely proposes a bribe to stay quiet while the rich get richer from robotic productivity.
If we want automation to free us, we must demand common ownership of its fruits, not a state-managed allowance.
Depoliticising the Class Struggle
UBI has a profoundly depoliticising function. By providing everyone a basic income, it suggests that class conflict can be solved through technocratic redistribution, rather than collective struggle. It individualises economic survival and replaces mutual aid with state-administered charity.
The Greens often present this as 'trusting people.' But in truth, it is a move away from politics altogether, away from strikes, occupations, assemblies, and direct action. It encourages people to become passive consumers of state policy rather than active agents of transformation.
This is no accident. UBI fits comfortably within the liberal logic of non-confrontational progressivism - small gains, managed well, with no need to question who owns what or why.
But anarcho-communists know that liberation is not granted it is seized. The abolition of wage labour, rent, and bosses does not come from a Treasury paper. It comes from resistance, solidarity, and revolt.
The Green Fetish for Policy Without Revolution
Ultimately, the Green Party's UBI is a reflection of their broader political project - a capitalism with a conscience. Their aim is to regulate, reform, and humanise the existing system not to overturn it.
This is the great tragedy of Green politics: it mobilises the language of justice to protect the architecture of oppression. They speak of liberation while fearing confrontation. They dream of balance sheets, not barricades.
The Income Guarantee is not a step toward socialism. It is a safety valve for capitalism, designed to prevent breakdown by making survival just bearable enough to forestall uprising.
As long as the Greens seek legitimacy in Parliament, they will remain managers of compromise, not agents of emancipation.
Toward a Real Alternative
Anarcho-communists do not oppose the idea of everyone having their needs met. But we reject the idea that this must come in the form of a wage or income. We do not want better access to markets we want a world without them.
Imagine a society where housing is free because it is collectively owned. Where food is grown and shared in community gardens, not bought. Where care work is respected and supported through mutual aid, not commodified. Where education, transport, and health are decommodified. Where people work not for profit, but for one another.
This is not utopia. It exists in fragments already in marae, solidarity kitchens, workers' co-ops, and mutual aid networks. These are the embryos of a post-capitalist future.
We don't need a basic income. We need basic expropriation. We need the end of property, not its pacification.
No Wages, No Compromise
The Green Party's UBI plan, however well-intentioned, is not a solution to poverty. It is a reformist illusion, an elegant attempt to stabilise a decaying system without addressing the violence at its core. It replaces welfare with technocracy, struggle with dependence, and solidarity with state charity.
We say: No wages. No landlords. No bosses. No income guarantees only freedom from all need for income at all.
We do not ask for a universal basic income.
We demand a universal reclaiming of life itself.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle
All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle

Scoop

time13 hours ago

  • Scoop

All Aboard For Passenger Rail In The Golden Triangle

New Zealand's national passenger rail advocacy group, The Future is Rail, has announced its strong support for the Green Party's proposal to establish a new passenger rail service connecting Auckland and Tauranga. The group is calling the service a vital link that would serve nearly half of the nation's population and build on the proven success of inter-regional rail. 'This service is a logical and vital next step for New Zealand's transport network,' said Dr. Roger Blakeley, Chair of The Future is Rail. 'By linking Auckland, Hamilton, and Tauranga via the existing rail corridor, the train would serve up to 2.5 million people. It's time to connect our country's most significant economic and population centres with modern, efficient transport.' The proposed service would complement and extend the existing Te Huia train, which connects Hamilton and Auckland seven days a week. 'Te Huia's ahead-of-schedule ridership growth is evidence that Kiwis will embrace inter-regional rail when it's provided,' Spokesperson, Lindsey Horne, said. 'We see this as completing a critical missing link in our national transport system.' The Future is Rail highlighted the significant advantages passenger rail has over current travel options between the two cities. 'Currently, the 225km journey between Tauranga and Auckland forces people onto roads or into expensive flights,' Ms Horne stated. 'Passenger rail offers a better alternative that is safer, greener, more affordable, and more comfortable. It allows for a productive journey with significantly lower carbon emissions, where passengers can work or relax instead of facing the stress of driving.' South Island Spokesperson, Dave Macpherson, noted that the project aligns with a growing 'passenger rail renaissance' in New Zealand, citing broad public and political support. 'There is a growing public demand for passenger rail, from campaigns to re-establish the Southerner train between Christchurch and Invercargill to upgrades for the Capital Connection and Wairarapa rail services. Investing in passenger rail has wide and growing support from across the political spectrum, and this project is a perfect opportunity to deliver what New Zealanders are asking for.' About The Future is Rail: The Future is Rail is a national advocacy group dedicated to promoting the benefits and expansion of passenger and freight rail services throughout New Zealand.

Greens Launch Petition For Regional Passenger Rail
Greens Launch Petition For Regional Passenger Rail

Scoop

time14 hours ago

  • Scoop

Greens Launch Petition For Regional Passenger Rail

The Green Party has launched a petition calling on the Rail Minister Winston Peters to reinstate passenger rail services across the country. 'New Zealanders have shown they want rail and will use it. It's time to give the people what they want,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Transport, Julie Anne Genter. 'We already have a rail network stretching across the motu – it's time to use it properly and bring back passenger rail. 'We're launching this petition in Tauranga because people here want passenger rail reconnected to Hamilton and Auckland. Our petition, which you can sign here, also calls for a night train with modern, comfortable sleeper cars between Auckland and Wellington to be reinstated, and for the Southerner connection between Christchurch and Dunedin to be brought back on a regular basis. 'New Zealanders deserve a modern, efficient transport system with real choices for how they get around – whether it's driving, taking a bus, flying, or taking a train. 'We are in a climate crisis, so moving away from fossil fuels towards modes of transport like trains is a no-brainer. But also, driving in cars is becoming very expensive and traffic congestion is getting worse. 'We've proven the demand for rail through the Te Huia service between Hamilton and Auckland: it regularly exceeds patronage targets, has reduced emissions, and has high levels of customer satisfaction. 'It's time to invest further in this network. Under the fully costed plan in our recently released Green Budget, we allow for five and a half billion over about five years, which is 80 percent less than the current Government's proposed spending on expensive highways,' says Julie Anne Genter.

Govt's Electoral Reform Weakens Democracy
Govt's Electoral Reform Weakens Democracy

Scoop

time15 hours ago

  • Scoop

Govt's Electoral Reform Weakens Democracy

The Government is weakening our democracy by restricting voting rights and making it easier for the wealthy to donate to political campaigns under the cover of anonymity. 'These changes represent a dark day for our democracy,' says the Green Party's spokesperson for Democracy and Electoral Reform, Celia Wade Brown. 'What we do with our democracy matters; who we shut out and who we afford special privileges shapes the decisions made in Parliament and the direction this country is taken in. 'Requiring enrolments before voting starts will see even more people miss out from expressing their democratic right. In the last General Election, over 200,000 people enrolled to vote or updated their details in the last 12 days. These changes would see all of these people miss out on having their say. 'We are deeply concerned to see the prisoner voting ban brought back. The Supreme Court and the Waitangi Tribunal have both been clear that blocking people from prison from voting is a breach of their fundamental rights. 'While the Government has taken away votes from people in prison and made it harder to vote in general, it has made it easier for wealthy people to donate to political parties from the shadows by raising the disclosure threshold to $6,000. 'Big money in politics is a problem for our democracy, but something that benefits the coalition, which might explain the decision to allow the wealthy to donate more money anonymously. 'A Green Government will restore the right to vote for all New Zealanders, restore same-day enrolment, and keep big money out of politics by reforming election funding in line with the recommendations of the Independent Electoral Review.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store