
Apple's new investment in US may be just enough to appease Trump, for now at least
Apple
must feel like it is stuck stuck between the Wall Street rock and an increasing tough, tariff-filled hard place.
The company made a move to try to stave off the worst of the
US tariff
repercussions this week when it announced it would invest an additional $100 billion (€860 million) in the US over four years, beefing up its American manufacturing capabilities. That is on top of the $500 billion it already announced in February.
It may be enough to side-step the worst of the tariffs hit - for now. But is it enough to keep the US president happy long term? On the face of it, this is good news for the president and his agenda. An extra $100 billion makes for some good headlines.
Apple chief executive
Tim Cook
outlined big plans for the company's $2.5 billion investment in Corning in Kentucky, where displays for its iPhones and Apple Watches are currently made. The plan is eventually to have all glass for the devices made at the facility.
READ MORE
There was also a lot he didn't say. He didn't specify if this additional investment would lead to any new jobs at Apple itself, with much of the focus instead on its manufacturing partnerships. Though any jobs created as a result of Apple's extra investment in these companies will go down as a plus for the tech giant.
[
Trump hails additional $100bn Apple investment in US
Opens in new window
]
Apple has already said it will create 20,000 jobs in the US over the coming four years, as part of the February announcement that saw it commit to producing AI servers in the US. The company has traditionally been more conservative about hiring, and in an environment where tech companies are continuing to trim headcount, it seems wise not to over-promise on that front.
The Apple chief also didn't commit to any sort of timeline for US-made iPhones, saying only that it would be 'elsewhere for a while'. But is anyone really expecting Apple to pack up its manufacturing abroad and shift it to the US to avoid tariffs?
Even if Apple wanted to, there are several reasons why that plan won't work. Or at least, not on the timeline Trump is seeking.
Like many companies that manufacture at scale, Apple has built up a significant and complex manufacturing operation abroad. Much of that is in China, although the company has been moving some production to India and Vietnam in response to
Donald Trump
's tariff plans.
Trying to replicate that operation and its associated supply chains in the US would take time; building up the expertise alone is a huge undertaking. And given the reaction of Wall Street when the matter was raised a few months ago, investors would be unlikely to welcome the plan with open arms.
Even if Apple could avoid tariffs by assembling devices – at greater cost, thanks to higher wages – in the US, some components will need to made overseas and imported anyway, and inevitably be hit by the tariffs along the way. That will inevitably raise costs for American consumers.
According to a note by Bank of America analyst Wamsi Mohan, assembling iPhones in the US would increase costs by about a quarter, and that is before the impact of potential reciprocal tariffs on imported components is taken into account.
Apple may have built its reputation on making 'magical' devices, but even the tech giant would find it difficult to master this particular trick.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Examiner
11 minutes ago
- Irish Examiner
Europe stresses Ukraine support ahead of Trump-Putin summit
The path to peace in Ukraine 'cannot be decided without Ukraine', European leaders have said, as US President Donald Trump prepares to meet Russian President Vladimir Putin for talks on Friday. In a joint statement, British prime minister Keir Starmer, with the leaders of France, Italy, Germany, Poland, Finland and the European Commission, said that the current line of contact between Russia and Ukraine could only be a 'starting point of negotiations'. They said: 'Ukraine has the freedom of choice over its own destiny. Meaningful negotiations can only take place in the context of a ceasefire or reduction of hostilities. 'The path to peace in Ukraine cannot be decided without Ukraine. 'We remain committed to the principle that international borders must not be changed by force.' The statement comes a day after Mr Trump announced that he would meet Mr Putin in Alaska on Friday, as he seeks an end to a conflict he had promised he could finish on his first day in office. The US president had earlier suggested that any peace deal was likely to involve 'some swapping of territories', with reports suggesting this could involve Ukraine giving up its Donetsk region. But President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has already rejected any proposal that would compromise Ukraine's territorial integrity, something that is forbidden by Ukraine's constitution. He said Mr Putin wanted to 'exchange a pause in the war, in the killing, for the legalisation of the occupation of our land – he wants to get territorial spoils for the second time'. The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace Mr Zelenskyy added: 'We will not allow this second attempt to partition Ukraine. Knowing Russia, where there is a second, there will be a third.' He also said that any peace agreement that excluded Ukraine would be a decision 'against peace'. In their statement, the European leaders said they welcomed Mr Trump's 'work to stop the killing in Ukraine, end the Russian Federation's war of aggression and achieve just and lasting peace and security for Ukraine'. Adding that they were 'ready to support this work diplomatically' and through military and financial support for Kyiv, they reiterated the need for 'robust and credible security guarantees' for Ukraine and their own 'unwavering support' for the country. The statement also comes after UK Foreign Secretary David Lammy hosted a meeting of top Ukrainian officials and European national security advisers alongside US vice-president JD Vance on Saturday. Saturday's meeting of national security advisers was co-hosted by US vice-president JD Vance (Suzanne Plunkett/PA) The meeting took place at the Foreign Secretary's official country retreat, Chevening, in Kent, where Mr Vance is staying at the start of a UK holiday. After the meeting, Mr Lammy said: 'The UK's support for Ukraine remains ironclad as we continue working towards a just and lasting peace.' It is understood that the meeting had been called at Washington's request, and included representatives from the US, Ukraine, France, Germany, Italy, Finland and Poland as well as the UK. Ukraine was represented by Rustem Umerov, secretary of the country's national security and defence council, and the head of Mr Zelenskyy's office, Andriy Yermak. In a post on social media, Mr Yermak said the allies' positions were 'clear' that 'a reliable, lasting peace is only possible with Ukraine at the negotiating table, with full respect for our sovereignty and without recognising the occupation'. Ahead of the meeting at Chevening, Mr Starmer discussed the talks in a call with Mr Zelenskyy on Saturday, and also spoke to French President Emmanuel Macron. Meanwhile, the conflict continues, with Ukrainian authorities reporting four people killed and 16 wounded in Russian drone strikes on Saturday in the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions.


Irish Examiner
an hour ago
- Irish Examiner
John Whelan: Ireland's financial sector needs a new strategy to meet the Four D challenge
Finance minister Paschal Donohoe believes Ireland's financial services industry needs a new strategy and has launched a consultation paper, 'Ireland for Finance Strategy 2026-2030'. In introducing it, the minister coined a new catchphrase, the Four Ds — deglobalisation, digitalisation, decarbonisation, and demographics. He says his department recognises the Four Ds are reshaping the global economy and resulting in a complex set of challenges for the financial services industry, a key platform of growth in the Irish economy over the past decade. Brexit benefits Brexit supercharged the Irish financial services industry as UK-based corporations shifted their European offices to Dublin to ensure they could continue a free flow of assets and funds across the EU. According to data from EY's financial services Brexit tracker, at the end of 2021, over 400 UK financial services role relocations to Europe were announced, taking the total number of jobs leaving London to maintain access to EU markets to over 7,500 to date. The financial services boost from the Brexit shift from London to Dublin has continued, and the sector now employs 140,000 people in Ireland, 60,000 of them in the IFSC — now ranked the third leading financial centre in Western Europe, after London and Frankfurt, according to the global financial centres index. Financial services The financial services industry is big business for Ireland, with over €4.9 trillion in assets under management. More than 1,000 fund managers from 50-plus countries have assets administered in Ireland, including 17 of the top 20 global asset managers. But the minister is right: The challenges of the Four Ds could derail the sector. The deglobalisation strategy being pursued by the Trump administration in so many areas as they drive to 'make America great again' could be shifted at any time from tariffs on products made outside the US, to a focus on financial services, with a demand on US corporations to bring home service jobs to the US. What gives these teeth is that a significant number of those employed in the Irish financial services sector are in US banks such as Citibank, Bank of America, JPMorgan, and US Bancorp. But many jobs in the sector are created by US tech companies located here, such as Airbnb, eBay, Facebook, Indeed, LinkedIn, Microsoft, PayPal, X, (Twitter) and Google. Fragmented landscape for foreign firms The changed geopolitical environment, fuelled by the Trump administration's protectionist agenda, has fed into other countries taking a similar strategy, resulting in a fragmented landscape for international corporations located in the IFSC. And whereas digitalisation will continue to reshape how financial services businesses operate, the need to keep up to speed in the AI and cybersecurity space will be challenging, requiring trained staff with a fusion of technology and financial skills at a premium. At the heart of decarbonisation and the associated green transition are the commitments of Ireland and the EU on climate and sustainability objectives. These present fresh challenges as the Trump administration pivots towards continuity of fossil fuels. Pivot from green agenda Pivoting away from the green agenda is already underway, particularly with US corporations, leaving many in the financial services sector who have been channelling investment towards projects aimed at meeting these sustainability objectives in an embarrassing bind. Demographic challenges in the EU and, in particular, in Ireland, are also impacting the sector. These range from low female participation to population ageing, and a shrinking working-age population. But perhaps the most intractable challenge is that the need for acceptance of more ethnic diversity in our working population will increasingly be necessary to support employment in all sectors, in particular in the financial services sector. However, the minister is probably aware of these challenges and is more interested in getting some indications of where the opportunities are in financial services. He is asking all stakeholders in the sector to submit their views by September 19 on how Ireland can maintain and grow its position as a leading global hub for international financial services. Top of the list is likely to be homegrown 'unicorns', startups that have reached a valuation of €1bn or more. Some prominent Irish examples include Intercom, Fenergo, TransferMate, Wayflyer, and of course Stripe.


Irish Examiner
2 hours ago
- Irish Examiner
David McNamara: US economy may be succumbing to uncertainty
Following a bumper week of macro data and tariff announcements, the durability of the US economy to the current uncertainty is being called into question by markets and forecasters for the first time since the post Liberation Day period in April. A strong economy has supported markets and the US dollar of late, but this unwound somewhat at the end of last week, as investors were roiled by an exceptionally weak US jobs report. Looking at the trade deals which have been rapidly concluded in recent weeks, they suggest the landing zone for US tariffs is not far from those announced on Liberation Day in April. For example, the 15% rate agreed with the EU, Japan, and South Korea compares to an initial range of 20% to 25% in April, while other major trading partners, such as Canada, have received sharply higher rates of 35% on some sectors. According to the Yale Budget Lab, this leaves the average effective US tariff at 16%, compared to the pre-Trump rate 2.5% — a historically rapid increase which brings the US tariff regime back to 1930s' levels. More pertinently, macro data and the Fed's actions (or lack of) have been the primary drivers of the currency over the past week. Investors interpreted chair Jerome Powell's equivocating comments on a rate cut as a hawkish tilt in guidance. Market rate expectations firmed in the aftermath of Powell's comments, reflecting the lack of any clear signal about a September cut. However, that weak jobs report on Friday has now reset rate expectations to below where they were at the start of the week, with more than two 25bp cuts now priced in by end-2025, compared to just one following the Fed meeting. The data showed the US economy added a meagre 35,000 per month on average between May and July. This sharp downward provision prompted a 'shoot the messenger' order by US president Donald Trump, removing the head of the statistics agency which compiles the labour market data. All in, there remains risks on both sides to the US economy. The economy has continued to grow at a solid rate so far this year, boosted by exceptional investment in areas such as AI. However, markets are now focusing once more on tentative trade deals which might unravel in the coming months, including the uneasy truce with China. The unusual split among the Fed's Board of Governors on monetary policy last week (two rebels voted for a 25bp cut) also highlights the nascent risk to the independence of US monetary policy as the government piles pressure on chair Powell in the final months of his term, and candidates jockey for position in the race to be the next chair. While Mr Trump is riding high on his political wins (trade deals, tax bill), the dollar is still about 12% lower against the euro year-to-date, and its recent gains have proved somewhat fleeting in the face of a weak jobs data. David McNamara is chief economist at AIB