logo
Defective data yields flawed policies

Defective data yields flawed policies

EDITORIAL: The finance minister has expressed frustration and anger over the formulation of economic policies and decision-making based on outdated data. This has rightly brought the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) into the spotlight. Its officials must be held accountable.
The controversy began with strong criticism — including from this publication — of the flawed GDP growth figures, where PBS estimated over 5 percent growth in the last quarter of FY25 on an utterly unjustified basis. Additionally, the poverty and employment data are outdated, while the government's estimates significantly diverge from those of the World Bank and independent economists.
There are clear indications of an attempt to overstate GDP growth in FY25. A prime example is livestock, which accounts for nearly two-thirds of agriculture. While important crops are declining by 13.5 percent, PBS estimates livestock growth at 4.8 percent.
However, the last livestock survey was conducted in 2005-06. A new survey, originally scheduled for completion in FY21, has faced repeated delays and remains incomplete. When questioned, the chief statistician absurdly blamed political uncertainty for the five-year delay.
He then tried to justify the livestock growth figures based on annual fodder consumption. But how can fodder consumption grow at such high rates when fodder crop production is declining? According to the methodology published on the PBS website, livestock estimates are derived using 2015-16 constant prices, factoring in natural growth and regeneration. Yet, neither the growth figures nor the PBS's explanations make sense.
There are other notable discrepancies as well. For instance, in the industrial sector, Small-Scale Manufacturing (SSM) is reported to have grown by 8.8 percent, whereas Large-Scale Manufacturing (LSM) declined by 1.5 percent. How can SSM grow when the downstream segment – LSM — is shrinking? That is akin to saying auto parts assemblers are booming while car production and sales are falling. The math simply does not add up.
Similarly, the construction sector is estimated to have grown by 6.6 percent, while its proxy indicator — local cement dispatches — is down by 3 percent. PBS justifies this by assuming full utilisation of the budgeted Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), which is implausible given the government's push for a primary fiscal surplus. PSDP was in fact severely underutilised in 9MFY25, a fact known at the time PBS released the growth data.
Another glaring example is the electricity, gas, and utility sector, which PBS claims grew by 29 percent — implying over 100 percent growth in the last quarter alone. However, NTDC (National Transmission and Dispatch Company) data shows that power generation fell by 0.3 percent in 11MFY25. Meanwhile, a reported 10 percent growth in public administration and social security is also questionable when current expenditure is stagnating in real terms.
It appears there was a deliberate effort to overstate GDP growth by PBS, which operates under the Planning Ministry. Now, the finance minister is publicly criticising them.
It is a compelling need to reform PBS and restore the integrity of national data. The flaws at PBS extend well beyond GDP estimates. Serious doubts persist around other indicators such as household income, unemployment, poverty, and population data — all of which directly influence socioeconomic policymaking.
PBS suffers from serious capacity issues. Though it is supposed to function autonomously — like the State Bank of Pakistan. However, it lacks depth and independence. The current chief statistician appears arrogant and defensive, often justifying clear errors. This is too critical a position to be handled so carelessly.
The government must take notice. Competent professionals with integrity and independence must be appointed to ensure that both public and private sectors receive accurate data to support informed decision-making.
Copyright Business Recorder, 2025
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

18 near-completion projects in FY26L NHA allocated Rs20.5bn against Rs56.9bn demand
18 near-completion projects in FY26L NHA allocated Rs20.5bn against Rs56.9bn demand

Business Recorder

time3 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

18 near-completion projects in FY26L NHA allocated Rs20.5bn against Rs56.9bn demand

ISLAMABAD: For 18 near completion projects, National Highways Authority (NHA) gets a budgetary allocation of Rs20.5 billion against the demand of Rs56.9 billion in FY26. According to NHA documents, in the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP), the authority requested 56.9 billion for projects which completed by almost 70 percent, so the early completion of these projects would be ensured. Among these projects for land acquisition affected properties compensation and relocation of utilities for the construction of 959km Karachi-Lahore Motorway (KLM) Rs4.25 billion was proposed in the PSDP, whereas, only Rs500 million was approved. For improvement, upgradation and widening of Jaglot-Skardu Road (S-1, 167 km) against the proposal of Rs5.3 billion only Rs1 billion was approved. For the construction of motorway from Burhan/Hakia on M-1 to DI Khan Rs500 million allocated against the request of Rs2.57 billion. For the construction of two-lane Highway from Basmia to Khuzdar (length 106 km) Rs2.5 billion was allocated against the demand of Rs7.23 billion. For the construction of overhead bridge at Imamia Colony Railway Crossing Shahdra revised Rs200 million was allocated against the request of Rs863 million. Among other near completion projects of strategic nature construction of Gwadar-Ratodero Road Project (M-8) Rs3 billion was allocated against the demand of Rs4.94 billion. For the rehabilitation and upgradation 54.80 km long Awaran Jhalijao road and dualisation and improvement of Old Bannu Road, allocation of Rs1.04 billion and Rs988 million was made as per of their 100 percent demand. Construction of Kot Pindi Das Interchange on Motorway M-2 in District Sheikupura also gets the full allocation of Rs251 million as per the demand. Dualisation of Indus Highway (N-55) Sarai Gamila to Kohat Section also gets the full allocation of Rs1.5 billion as per demand. Construction of bridge on River Ravi at Syed Wala also gets the full allocation of Rs324 million against the demand of the same amount. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

Are stabilisation measures backfiring?
Are stabilisation measures backfiring?

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

Are stabilisation measures backfiring?

Under the emerging situation, the people are facing unemployment and underemployment and this scenario is grave from the socio-political point of view. photo: file Listen to article The stabilisation measures have impacted the real economy a great deal. The market economy has been growing slowly, as indicated by the statistics of GDP. The current account surplus from July to May 2025 remained around $1.8 billion. This surplus has been achieved at the expense of imports, where deliberate attempts have been made to scale down imports in the last couple of years. In addition, remittances of around $38 billion also helped in achieving the surplus. The massive import compression, started in FY2023 to stabilise the economy, has produced results. This compression played an important role in bolstering the foreign exchange reserves held by the State Bank of Pakistan (SBP), which have crossed $14 billion. If the economy operates at the current level, foreign exchange reserves will cover around 2.5 months of merchandise imports, since imports remained around $58 billion in FY2025. Apart from rollover of commercial loans from China, the SBP intervened in the foreign exchange market to fulfil the target of foreign exchange reserves agreed with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). On the monetary front, the SBP has kept the policy rate at 11% to attract international financial capital. This high rate will attract hot money to finance the current account in the event it turns into deficit. The growth in imports is linked with the growth in the real economy, which will turn the current account surplus into a deficit. As the level of aggregate demand is low, business firms cannot sell their products to consumers. Furthermore, the level of aggregate demand remained low owing to regressive taxation and high energy costs. The gas prices have been revised upward in FY2026, while electricity prices are already at an elevated level. The higher international crude oil prices have started to affect the masses. The salaried class has paid around Rs550 billion in income tax in FY2025, and the tally would remain around this level in the current financial year. All these measures have reduced the purchasing power of consumers. Many firms have invested in treasury bills, bonds, and Sukuk, since these firms intend to remain liquid. A whopping Rs13.5 trillion has been parked by the corporate sector in bills, bonds, and Sukuk till December 2024. Business firms did not enhance investment in the capital development of the country. As a result, the index of the Large-Scale Manufacturing sector has decelerated by 1.2% in the eleven months of FY2025. The government did spend around Rs1,050 billion through the Public Sector Development Programme (PSDP) in FY2025. The tight-fisted Ministry of Finance (MoF) allowed the release of a large chunk of the budgeted funds in the last quarter. The development funds have been diverted from development projects to meet the primary budget surplus. The tight fiscal and monetary policies have also reduced the level of economic activity a great deal. The high debt servicing cost has further reduced the fiscal space of the government. Under the Extended Fund Facility (EFF), the government intends to bring down the fiscal deficit to around 6%. This reduction in the fiscal deficit can be achieved by scaling down development expenditure. The impact of low development expenditure has already affected the cement, steel, glass, and allied manufacturing sub-sectors. In addition, the construction sector remained dull in the outgoing financial year. In a nutshell, stabilisation measures have started to implicate the masses a great deal. Under the emerging situation, the people are facing unemployment and underemployment. The level of unemployment is high for university graduates. This situation is grave from the socio-political point of view. Will policymakers take stock of the situation? THE WRITER IS AN INDEPENDENT ECONOMIST

Gas tariffs: Will the PBS see it (right)?
Gas tariffs: Will the PBS see it (right)?

Business Recorder

timea day ago

  • Business Recorder

Gas tariffs: Will the PBS see it (right)?

Earlier this month, BR Research highlighted how millions of domestic gas consumers are facing a significant hike in their monthly bills — even in the absence of any change in base tariffs. The shift came not through the headline rate per MMBTU, but more subtly through higher minimum charges and a sharp increase in fixed monthly fees. With the July 1 gas sales price notification now in effect, early signs from the Pakistan Bureau of Statistics (PBS) suggest the impact may again be flying under the radar. The latest Sensitive Price Index (SPI) update released on July 18, 2025, showed no change in gas prices — despite the fact that minimum monthly charges for protected consumers have risen from Rs645 to Rs968, and for unprotected users from Rs1,436 to Rs2,350, largely driven by increased fixed charges and a recalibrated floor based on first-slab energy usage. In previous instances — notably during the last two tariff revisions — the PBS revised its gas price index within two weeks of the respective notifications (dated 8th and 15th of the month). This time, the notification was issued on the 1st of July, yet three weeks in, the price index remains unchanged. While this may be the result of a procedural lag — perhaps PBS logs utility tariff changes in the following calendar month (last two instances do not support this lenient view) — the omission is worth flagging, particularly because the nature of this change is less visible. Importantly, this isn't about assigning blame. But the concern is valid, especially when more than half of all domestic gas consumers — 55 percent (4.1 million of 7.1 million) by latest SNGPL data — fall in the protected category, and the percentage increase in their minimum payable bills is the highest. The SPI only covers prices for the bottom quintile – all of which invariably falls within the protected category. (More on the ills of blanket 'protected' and 'non-protected' on different regions, later in these columns). The piece dated July 9, 2025 had emphasized the importance of accurately capturing these changes in inflation reporting. With both fixed charges and minimum billing methodology quietly revised, the net effect on consumers is material, even though headline tariffs remain unchanged. That subtlety increases the risk of the change being statistically missed — and with it, the risk of understating inflation for the lower three consumption quintiles, where most of these users reside. Here's a soft reminder to the PBS: this time the change may not be loud, but it is real — and it matters. Get it right, and get it in time. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store