
Tim Franks: How I realised that being Jewish really does affect my Middle East reporting at the BBC
So this is one Jew's attempt to be useful.
On one level, it's dead easy. All BBC journalists know the price of entry: when you come to work, you leave your proclivities at the door. That's the blood oath, tattooed across our chests. What I have come to realise, in a selectively quotable phrase that will be catnip to the conspiracists, is that my Jewishness is informing my journalism. And, perhaps more strangely to some, my journalism is informing my Jewish identity.
This, I grant, is a change. These are words I never thought I'd think, let alone utter. What's changed is that I've changed.
Back in 1944, Jean-Paul Sartre wrote a short book on anti-Semitism. It's at times brilliantly incisive, at others clankingly off. One of his more penetrating observations is that Jews can be 'over-determined'. He meant that their motives are always under scrutiny. And that, in itself, can be disabling: Jews can feel trapped in the cage of others' preconceptions.
When I started my tour of duty as the BBC's Middle East correspondent almost 20 years ago, I was extremely dubious about the gig. I felt profoundly unprepared and ignorant. Up to that point, I hadn't really tried to navigate the raging currents of opinion across the region; I'd just tried to bypass them. Even if, somehow, I could reach a point where I might think myself sufficiently well-informed, could I trust my subconscious tendencies?
Lots of people very publicly offered their own answers to this question even before I took up the role. They said that it was inevitable I'd be biased one way or another, tilting the balance either for good or for ill. Or that I was on a mission impossible: trying to occupy simultaneous states of Jew and journalist.
In 2008 I was a year or so into my posting and hoovering down lunch at the back of our old, scruffy bureau on Jaffa Street. I heard screaming outside and looked out of the third floor window. A front-loader tractor appeared to have hit a bus. A moment later, it was clear it was no accident. I watched the tractor reverse and then smash back into the bus, so that it tipped over.
A colleague and I raced down the stairs and out onto the street. We pursued the tractor, against the fleeing crowds, as it careened into, and even over, cars and pedestrians. Eventually, a passer-by managed to climb on to the outside of the cab and shoot the driver at point-blank range. We filmed the killing, close up.
Back in the bureau, I drew breath and started broadcasting. 'So Tim,' asked one presenter down the line from London. 'Was this terrorism?'
'I don't know if the man in that tractor cab belonged to a militant group,' I said. 'But what I can say is that what just happened on the street outside sowed terror among those who were there.'
So far, so unexceptional. Except that within hours, there was both condemnation that the BBC – that I – had failed to call it 'terrorISM', and also condemnation that we were giving this one deadly incident disproportionate airtime because it happened to take place on our doorstep.
In other words, I was taking flak from both sides.
For my critics the report simply added to what, in their minds, was the substantial body of evidence that – as they took pains to tell me – I was either a self-hating Jew with obvious political proclivities, or, in the message from one listener, a hook-nosed parasite erupting from the bowels of honest journalism.
I was more than willing to engage with audience criticism of what I was covering and how I was covering it. Often there could be a reasonable doubt to address – a context I had failed to make clear, a shorthand that had been too short. But often that criticism had first to be picked out of a slagheap of causation: that my choice of words, the story I had chosen to report had betrayed my filthy prejudices.
In response, I chose simply to deflect, not to engage, to meet the rage with a neutral glance.
As far as I was concerned, my Jewishness and my journalism were like two sets of kosher cutlery: one for the meat, one for the milk; different drawers, never mixed – and that was vital, given the toxic brew of identity politics, blood-letting in the Middle East, and boiling fury over the BBC.
This strategy seemed to work, at least for me, then and in the years since, as I repeatedly returned to the region, and in my current role as presenter of Newshour, the main news and current affairs programme on the BBC World Service.
Recently, however, I've had a revelation: I've been deluding myself.
This revelation came as I scuffed away at a hitherto unknown family history. As I discovered forebears of mine scattered across centuries and continents, the reporter within me started to interrogate them, and the Jew within me realised I was no dispassionate observer.
Why had cousin Diz – you may know him as Benjamin Disraeli – apparently faked his familial back-story so that, outrageously, my rather more mundane family line had not been included in his genealogy?
What did it say about the place of Jews in the lands where they have settled, and the evergreen lure of fantasies about Jewish power?
In an 1890s political pamphlet Abraham Mendes Chumaceiro (pictured above on a stamp) wrote: 'Where is it written that all Jews think the same?'
And while it was quite right that, decades after his unremarked death, another cousin – Abraham Mendes Chumaceiro – was celebrated for his championing of black civil rights with a bust, a stamp and a street-name, I found myself drawn to a throwaway sentence he wrote in an 1890s political pamphlet: 'Where is it written that all Jews think the same?'
That remains a question for the ages.
I have always known that I am blessed that I do a job I love in a country where I can openly practise my faith. It's a given that neither was always the case for my ancestors from Lisbon to Amsterdam, from Lithuania to Curaçao.
But unshrouding this family history made me see that what fuels the Jew within me also fuels the journalist within me, and vice versa: the struggle to understand, a sense of injustice, of wonder, of humility about how much we know and how much we are almost certainly getting wrong, and a certain base level of set-jawed bloody-mindedness.
So: I'm a Jewish journalist at the BBC, and this is what I think. My job is to be questioning, and self-questioning. It may not be easy. But it is that simple.
Tim Franks's book, The Lines We Draw: The Journalist, The Jew And An Argument About Identity, is published by Bloomsbury at £20. To order your copy, call 0330 173 0523 or visit Telegraph Books
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
29 minutes ago
- The Guardian
US issues sanctions against Francesca Albanese, UN official investigating abuses in Gaza
The Trump administration announced on Wednesday it was issuing sanctions against an independent official tasked with investigating human rights abuses in the Palestinian territories, the latest effort by the United States to punish critics of Israel's 21-month war in Gaza. The state department's decision to sanction Francesca Albanese, the UN special rapporteur for the West Bank and Gaza, comes after a recent US pressure campaign to force the international body to remove her from her post failed. Albanese, a human rights lawyer, has been vocal in calling for an end to what she describes as the 'genocide' that Israel is waging against Palestinians in Gaza. Both Israel and the US, which provides military support, have strongly denied that accusation. Israel has faced accusations of genocide at the International Court of Justice and of war crimes at the ICC over its devastating military assault on Gaza. Albanese's position has also been backed by leading genocide scholars and rights organisations. In a post on X late on Wednesday, Albanese wrote that she stood 'firmly and convincingly on the side of justice, as I have always done,' without directly mentioning the US sanctions. In a text message to Al Jazeera, she was quoted as dismissing the US move as 'mafia style intimidation techniques.' In recent weeks, Albanese has issued a series of letters, urging other countries to pressure Israel, including through sanctions, to end its deadly bombardment of the Gaza Strip. The Italian national has also been a strong supporter of the international criminal court's indictment of Israeli officials, including the prime minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, for war crimes. She most recently issued a report naming several US giants among companies aiding what she described as Israel's occupation and war on Gaza. 'Albanese's campaign of political and economic warfare against the United States and Israel will no longer be tolerated,' the secretary of state, Marco Rubio, posted on social media. 'We will always stand by our partners in their right to self-defense.' Albanese has been the target of criticism from pro-Israel officials and groups in the US and in the Middle East. Last week, the US mission to the UN issued a scathing statement, calling for her removal for 'a years-long pattern of virulent antisemitism and unrelenting anti-Israel bias'. The statement said that Albanese's allegations of Israel committing genocide or apartheid are 'false and offensive'. It is the culmination of an extraordinary and sprawling campaign of nearly six months by the Trump administration to quell criticism of Israel's handling of the deadly war in Gaza, which is closing in on two years. Earlier this year, the Trump administration began arresting and deporting faculty and students of American universities who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations and other political activities. Rights experts slammed the US sanctions against Albanese. Dylan Williams, vice-president for government affairs at the Center for International Policy thinktank, labeled them as 'rogue state behavior' while Amnesty International said special rapporteurs must be supported and not sanctioned. 'Governments around the world and all actors who believe in the rule-based order and international law must do everything in their power to mitigate and block the effect of the sanctions against Francesca Albanese and more generally to protect the work and independence of Special Rapporteurs,' Agnes Callamard, Amnesty International's secretary general and a former UN special rapporteur herself, said. The war between Israel and Hamas began on 7 October 2023, when Hamas-led militants stormed into Israel and killed nearly 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and took 251 people captive. Israel's retaliatory campaign has killed more than 57,000 Palestinians, according to Gaza's health ministry, which says women and children make up most of the dead but does not specify how many were fighters or civilians. The number is widely believed to be a huge underestimate. Nearly 21 months into the conflict that displaced the vast majority of Gaza's 2.3 million people, it is nearly impossible for the critically wounded to get the care they need, doctors and aid workers say. 'We must stop this genocide, whose short-term goal is completing the ethnic cleansing of Palestine, while also profiteering from the killing machine devised to perform it,' Albanese said in a recent post on X. 'No one is safe until everyone is safe.' With Associated Press and Reuters


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Albanese condemns antisemitism after receiving special envoy Jillian Segal's report
The prime minister, Anthony Albanese, appeared alongside the special envoy to combat antisemitism, Jillian Segal, who delivered her report to the government. 'There is no place in Australia for antisemitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we have seen on our streets recently is despicable and it won't be tolerated and I want those responsible to face the full force of the law,' Albanese said


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Universities and artists face funding threat under antisemitism plan being considered by Australian government
Universities and artists would have funding withheld if they fail to act against anti-semitism, AI tools would be banned from sharing Jewish hatred, and the government would have new grounds to deport visitors, under a wide-ranging plan put forward by Australia's anti-semitism envoy. The federal Labor government has not committed to the plan in full, with prime minister Anthony Albanese saying he would consider the recommendations of his handpicked envoy Jillian Segal, which also propose her office would 'monitor' media coverage and bolster education in schools and workplaces. But Albanese indicated he was open to parts of the plan, saying some components – which he wouldn't name at a launch event on Thursday – could be implemented quickly. Government sources expect some parts would be put into motion soon. 'There is no place in Australia for antisemitism. The kind of hatred and violence that we have seen on our streets recently is despicable and it won't be tolerated and I want those responsible to face the full force of the law,' Albanese said. Segal's report claimed antisemitism is 'ingrained and normalised' in academia and cultural spaces, and said young Australians were being 'raised on a diet of disinformation and misinformation about Jews'. Albanese said responding would require 'a long-term approach', including working with state governments and civil society. He denied the plan would see legitimate criticism of the Israeli government, including its military actions in Gaza and the deaths of thousands of Palestinian civilians, treated as antisemitism. 'I have released statements with other leaders that have been critical of the actions of the Netanyahu government … But you can put forward those views respectfully,' he said. 'Whatever your issue in the Middle East, it is not advanced by attacking people here in Australia because of who they are, because of their faith, because of their identity.' The report recommended all levels of government adopt the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance's (IHRA) working definition of antisemitism. However that definition is contested in some quarters, with some concerns it was increasingly being used to conflate antisemitism with criticism of Israel. Segal had worked on the plan for around nine months, with some Jewish community leaders eager for the government to implement a more comprehensive package of structural changes, such as to education and policing, rather than simply putting more funds into security and CCTV. The plan, launched on Thursday with Albanese and home affairs minister Tony Burke, states that antisemitism erodes 'the very foundations of a thriving democracy' and 'poses a threat not just to Jewish Australians, but to our entire nation.' 'It addresses antisemitism in many places in our laws, classrooms, universities, media, workplaces, online spaces and public institutions,' Segal said of the plan. With the report noting arson attacks at synagogues, and vandalism of Jewish schools or cultural sites, Segal said it was time to consider whether to strengthen hate crimes laws to better address incitement, vilification and 'the speaking of hatred'. The report suggests strengthening federal and state legislation on antisemitic conduct, including vilification, and 'intimidating protest activity', as well as tougher screening of visa applicants for antisemitic views, with a focus on addressing visa refusals or cancellations. Segal also wants to establish what she calls a 'report card' on universities' handling of antisemitism on campus, suggesting blocking government funding if they fail to act. Grants to universities, academics, and arts organisations could also be torn up, under the envoy's suggestions. It also calls for boosting education of antisemitism in school curriculums, using 'trusted voices to publicly refute antisemitic views' on social media, and a plan to 'monitor media organisations… to avoid accepting false or distorted narratives'. In an interview on Sky News, Segal wouldn't nominate examples of media coverage she felt breached that standard, but said Australian media outlets should represent the situation in the Middle East with 'fairness and balance'. She also raised media coverage that could boost the 'vitality of Jewish life', suggesting media organisations produce 'additional stories about the Jewish community. Government sources said they welcomed the report, and would now take time to consider its recommendations before giving a formal response and action plan. The report claims research commissioned by the Special Envoy 'highlights a stark divide between Australians under 35 and those over 35' on attitudes toward the Jewish community and 'the existence of the state of Israel', claiming younger Australians were more likely to hold antisemitic views. The envoy attributed this to differences in media consumption, noting 'generational differences in the understanding of the Holocaust and its impacts on society'.