Australia called to lift on global health as US yields
That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats.
The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance.
About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research.
The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said.
"Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said.
"Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded."
Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out.
"What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP.
Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region.
But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years.
The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said.
It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide.
Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch".
"It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said.
"Because when they pull out, this is what happens."
The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea.
Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle.
"As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.
Australia must come to the party with more money to combat climate-related health issues, antimicrobial resistance and future pandemics.
That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats.
The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance.
About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research.
The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said.
"Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said.
"Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded."
Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out.
"What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP.
Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region.
But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years.
The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said.
It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide.
Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch".
"It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said.
"Because when they pull out, this is what happens."
The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea.
Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle.
"As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.
Australia must come to the party with more money to combat climate-related health issues, antimicrobial resistance and future pandemics.
That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats.
The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance.
About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research.
The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said.
"Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said.
"Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded."
Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out.
"What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP.
Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region.
But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years.
The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said.
It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide.
Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch".
"It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said.
"Because when they pull out, this is what happens."
The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea.
Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle.
"As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.
Australia must come to the party with more money to combat climate-related health issues, antimicrobial resistance and future pandemics.
That's the bottom line of research that indicates the well-off nation is not pulling enough weight on the world stage to understand, anticipate and respond to emerging international health threats.
The Australian government spent just under $630 billion on health between 2017 and 2023, according to a report commissioned by the Australian Global Health Alliance.
About $35 billion was directed to health and medical research but just $2 billion was specifically set aside for global research.
The country must increase and realign its funding to address and anticipate global health challenges more effectively, the report said.
"Despite commendable efforts, Australia's investment in global health research lags behind its international peers," it said.
"Key areas such as the impact of climate change on health, antimicrobial resistance, and pandemic preparedness are notably underfunded."
Alliance executive director Selina Namchee Lo said the global scientific community was successful in rapidly delivering vaccines and treatments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
But where it fell short was equity, with some of the hardest-hit countries missing out.
"What we're saying is equity is not optional for global health," Dr Lo told AAP.
Another report, also commissioned by the alliance with Pacific Friends of Global Health, detailed the impact of two Australian-backed global public private partnerships in the Indo-Pacific.
Australia has collectively poured more than $2.5 billion into The Global Fund and Gavi since 2000, helping to immunise more than 100 million children and save lives in the region.
But the country's level of foreign aid has been been in "significant decline" since 2012, stagnating at $US3 billion annually over the past seven years.
The multilateral aid landscape is "under pressure" after the US and UK reduced their commitments, the report said.
It comes after US President Donald Trump's administration dismantled the US Agency for International Development, cutting funding to its aid programs worldwide.
Dr Lo, who has nearly three decades experience in global and international health, said the abrupt exit of USAID left communities "in the lurch".
"It's never good to have one group, whether it's a philanthropist or a country, be a monopoly," she said.
"Because when they pull out, this is what happens."
The Indo-Pacific still accounts for 25 per cent of global infections, with 6.7 million people in the region living with HIV and malaria rampant in Papua New Guinea.
Pacific Friends of Global Health chair Brendan Crabb wants Australia to take up the mantle.
"As the US administration dramatically steps back from global health leadership, Australia has a critical opportunity to convene and partner with Asia Pacific countries to advance the health priorities of the region," the Burnet Institute chief executive said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
44 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Government ‘determined' to support women's health in Australia
Health Minister Mark Butler responded to questions regarding the support in health care choice for women in Australia by the Albanese government. 'You can't be serious about strengthening Medicare if you're not serious about supporting women's health,' Mr Butler said during Question Time on Tuesday. 'Women consume about 60 per cent of health services in this country. 'We are determined to do more because to the prime minister's comments. The Australian people said yes to even cheaper medicines.'
Sydney Morning Herald
an hour ago
- Sydney Morning Herald
Israel's leader claims no one in Gaza is starving. Data and witnesses disagree
The World Health Organisation said on Sunday there had been 63 malnutrition-related deaths in Gaza this month, including 24 children under the age of five – up from 11 deaths total the previous six months of the year. Gaza's Health Ministry puts the number even higher, reporting 82 deaths this month of malnutrition-related causes: 24 children and 58 adults. On Monday, it said that 14 deaths were reported in the past 24 hours. The ministry, which operates under the Hamas government, is headed by medical professionals and is seen by the UN as the most reliable source of data on casualties. UN agencies also often confirm numbers through other partners on the ground. The Patient's Friends Hospital, the main emergency centre for malnourished children in northern Gaza, says this month it saw, for the first time, malnutrition deaths in children who had no pre-existing conditions. Some adults who died suffered from such illnesses as diabetes or had heart or kidney ailments made worse by starvation, Gaza medical officials said. The WHO also says that acute malnutrition in northern Gaza tripled this month, reaching nearly one in five children under the age of five, and has doubled in central and southern Gaza. The UN says Gaza's only four specialised treatment centres for malnutrition are 'overwhelmed'. The leading international authority on food crises, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, has warned of famine for months in Gaza but has not formally declared one, citing the lack of data as Israel restricts access to the territory. Aid trucks are overrun The measures announced by Israel late on Saturday include 10-hour daily humanitarian pauses in fighting in three heavily populated areas so that UN trucks can more easily distribute food. Still, UN World Food Program spokesperson Martin Penner said the agency's 55 trucks of aid that entered Gaza on Monday via the Zikim and Kerem Shalom crossings were looted by starving people before they reached WFP warehouses. Experts say that airdrops, another measure Israel announced, are insufficient for the immense need in Gaza and dangerous to people on the ground. Israel's military says 48 food packages were dropped on Sunday and Monday. Palestinians say they want a full return to the UN-led aid distribution system that was in place throughout the war, rather than the Israeli-backed mechanism that began in May. Witnesses and health workers say Israeli forces have killed hundreds of people by opening fire on Palestinians trying to reach those food distribution hubs or while they crowded around arriving aid trucks. Israel's military says it has fired warning shots to disperse threats. The UN and partners say the best way to bring food into Gaza is by truck, and they have called repeatedly for Israel to loosen restrictions on their entry. A truck carries about 19 tons of supplies. Israel's military says that as of July 21, some 95,435 trucks of aid have entered Gaza since the war began. That's an average of 146 a day, and far below the 500 to 600 the UN says are needed. The rate has sometimes been as low as half of that for several months at a time. Nothing went in for 2½ months starting in March because Israel imposed a complete blockade on food, fuel and other supplies entering Gaza. Distribution is difficult and slow The UN says that delivering aid that is permitted into Gaza has become increasingly difficult. When aid enters, it is left just inside the border in Gaza, and the UN must get Israeli military permission to send trucks to pick it up. But the UN says the military has denied or impeded just over half of the movement requests for its trucks in the past three months. If the UN succeeds in picking up the aid, hungry crowds and armed gangs swarm the convoys and strip them of supplies. The Hamas-run civilian police once provided security along some routes, but that stopped after Israel targeted them with airstrikes.
The Age
an hour ago
- The Age
Gaza starvation: Netanyahu denies famine as aid deliveries fail and malnutrition deaths rise
The World Health Organisation said on Sunday there had been 63 malnutrition-related deaths in Gaza this month, including 24 children under the age of five – up from 11 deaths total the previous six months of the year. Gaza's Health Ministry puts the number even higher, reporting 82 deaths this month of malnutrition-related causes: 24 children and 58 adults. On Monday, it said that 14 deaths were reported in the past 24 hours. The ministry, which operates under the Hamas government, is headed by medical professionals and is seen by the UN as the most reliable source of data on casualties. Malnourished Yazan Abu Ful, 2, sits at his family home in the Shati refugee camp in Gaza City. Credit: AP UN agencies also often confirm numbers through other partners on the ground. The Patient's Friends Hospital, the main emergency centre for malnourished children in northern Gaza, says this month it saw, for the first time, malnutrition deaths in children who had no pre-existing conditions. Some adults who died suffered from such illnesses as diabetes or had heart or kidney ailments made worse by starvation, Gaza medical officials said. The WHO also says that acute malnutrition in northern Gaza tripled this month, reaching nearly one in five children under the age of five, and has doubled in central and southern Gaza. The UN says Gaza's only four specialised treatment centres for malnutrition are 'overwhelmed'. The leading international authority on food crises, the Integrated Food Security Phase Classification, has warned of famine for months in Gaza but has not formally declared one, citing the lack of data as Israel restricts access to the territory. Aid trucks are overrun The measures announced by Israel late on Saturday include 10-hour daily humanitarian pauses in fighting in three heavily populated areas so that UN trucks can more easily distribute food. Still, UN World Food Program spokesperson Martin Penner said the agency's 55 trucks of aid that entered Gaza on Monday via the Zikim and Kerem Shalom crossings were looted by starving people before they reached WFP warehouses. Palestinians inspect a site struck by an Israeli bombardment in Muwasi. Credit: AP Experts say that airdrops, another measure Israel announced, are insufficient for the immense need in Gaza and dangerous to people on the ground. Israel's military says 48 food packages were dropped on Sunday and Monday. Palestinians say they want a full return to the UN-led aid distribution system that was in place throughout the war, rather than the Israeli-backed mechanism that began in May. Witnesses and health workers say Israeli forces have killed hundreds of people by opening fire on Palestinians trying to reach those food distribution hubs or while they crowded around arriving aid trucks. Israel's military says it has fired warning shots to disperse threats. The UN and partners say the best way to bring food into Gaza is by truck, and they have called repeatedly for Israel to loosen restrictions on their entry. A truck carries about 19 tons of supplies. Israel's military says that as of July 21, some 95,435 trucks of aid have entered Gaza since the war began. That's an average of 146 a day, and far below the 500 to 600 the UN says are needed. The rate has sometimes been as low as half of that for several months at a time. Nothing went in for 2½ months starting in March because Israel imposed a complete blockade on food, fuel and other supplies entering Gaza. Distribution is difficult and slow The UN says that delivering aid that is permitted into Gaza has become increasingly difficult. When aid enters, it is left just inside the border in Gaza, and the UN must get Israeli military permission to send trucks to pick it up. But the UN says the military has denied or impeded just over half of the movement requests for its trucks in the past three months. If the UN succeeds in picking up the aid, hungry crowds and armed gangs swarm the convoys and strip them of supplies. The Hamas-run civilian police once provided security along some routes, but that stopped after Israel targeted them with airstrikes.
