
Markets poised for a near-term dip, crude can worsen the sentiment
US President Donald Trump announced that Washington has carried out strikes on three nuclear facilities in Iran, marking a direct involvement in the campaign initiated by Israel last week to dismantle Iran's nuclear infrastructure.
Since the war started two weeks ago, the Nifty 50 and the Sensex 30 index have gained 1.59%. At the same time, crude oil prices have gained 2.19% to $76.57 per barrel.
The US has long been watchful about Iran's expanding nuclear programme, with tensions rising especially a couple of years ago when Iran's uranium enrichment neared 83.7% (very close to weapons-grade, 90% enrichment), said Alok Agarwal, head-Quant and Fund Manager at Alchemy Capital Management. 'This concern has now escalated to the point of direct US military action, making the situation more volatile, in our view," he added.
Read more: US strike on Iran raises oil shock, capital flow risks for India's economy
From an Indian investment perspective, the primary concern isn't just the geopolitical tension itself—which mostly affects market sentiment—but the potential surge in crude oil prices, which would have a direct economic impact, Agarwal added. Moreover, a sharp spike—especially beyond the $100/barrel mark—would be a major concern for Indian markets, as India imports over 80% of its crude requirements.
Crude price impact
Aniruddha Sarkar, CIO at Quest Investment Advisors, said that the key concern for the market is the impact of rising crude prices, which could widen the current account deficit, fuel inflation, and weaken the rupee due to higher forex outflows owing to a higher fuel bill and foreign institutional investors (FII) selling in risk-off mode from emerging markets.
The second stage impact, which could happen if the war persists for long, would be on sectors like oil marketing companies (OMCs), paints, and aviation, which could face cost pressures and perform negatively as crude prices climb, Sarkar added. However, he said that these impacts could remain short-lived as the war may not continue for a long time.
While other experts believe that no further retaliation by Iran might actually lead to an upside in the Indian markets.
"If Iran doesn't retaliate in a way that is surprising or nasty, markets could actually rally as investors reckon the tensions would abate, but if there are attacks on the Strait of Hormuz or on US bases, tensions could actually escalate and all bets would be off the table," said Nirmal Bhanwarlal Jain, founder of IIFL Group and managing director at IIFL Finance.
Anthony Heredia, MD & CEO, Mahindra Manulife Investment Managers, said, 'If there is no escalatory move from Iran now or over the next few days, you may actually see positivity extending as in a risk-on market environment, people anecdotally find reasons to be optimistic rather than the other way around."
Taking advantage
Markets have shown remarkable resilience so far in the face of international skirmishes and tariff threats, and if there could be further escalation of tensions in the coming weeks if Iran were to retaliate, investors would do well to keep the powder dry to take advantage of any market correction, said Sandeep Bagla, CEO, TRUST Mutual Fund.
Read more: Mint Explainer | Strait of Hormuz: Will Iran shut the vital oil artery of the world?
George Thomas, fund manager at Quantum Mutual Fund, said that in the coming few days, markets are expected to be very volatile. Hence, investors should invest in a staggered manner, as it helps average out the cost and reduces risk.
The India VIX index has fallen 9.13% since 13 June, when the war started.
From a technical standpoint, the prolonged phase of consolidation has notably impacted key indicators, said Sudeep Shah, deputy vice president, head - Technical & Derivatives Research at SBI Securities.
'The upward slope of the short and medium-term moving averages has slowed down, reflecting a loss of momentum. Simultaneously, the daily RSI (Relative Strength Index) continues to move sideways, in line with the RSI range shift concept that suggests a lack of directional bias. Further, the trend strength indicator – ADX (Average Directional Index), is currently quoting near the 13 level, which was the lowest level since July 2024, which shows a lack of strength in either direction," Shah added.
Shah added that the zone of 24,880-24,850 will act as immediate support for the Nifty 50 index. While on the upside, the zone of 25,200-25,250 will act as a crucial hurdle for the index, he said.
However, India is in a better place than other times when there has been tension, experts say.
'While we find ourselves in a more inflationary than disinflationary environment, India has never been in a better place than it is now to handle the repercussions of the latest round of tensions," said Kenneth Andrade, founder and CIO of Old Bridge Capital Management.
Even the Asian indices closed higher on Friday. The Hang Seng index closed 1.29% higher, the Kospi index closed 1.48% higher, and the CSI 300 index ended 0.09% higher.
Where's oil headed?
Under the severe outcome, oil prices could surge to $120-130 per barrel if the Strait of Hormuz is closed or there is a general Middle East conflagration, which could ignite retaliatory responses from major oil-producing countries, said JP Morgan in a report on 12 June.
Concerns are that if Iran closes the Strait of Hormuz, the global oil supply will be disrupted, which in turn will cause a rally in oil prices.
Read more: Donald Trump's war dilemma: Should America put boots on the ground in Iran or not?
However, historically, Iran has never fully closed the Strait of Hormuz, even during major conflicts like the Iran-Iraq War (1980-1988), the rise in US-Iran tensions after 2011, or the fallout from the Iran nuclear deal (2018-2020).
Experts say that this is because doing so would hurt Iran more than help it.
About 20% of the world's oil passes through the Strait of Hormuz, which is also a key path for liquefied natural gas exports, especially from Qatar, one of the biggest suppliers.
'US naval forces in the Persian Gulf act as a strong military deterrent, and any closure attempt by Iran would risk severe retaliation," said Yes Institutional Equities in a report dated 18 June. It further added that Iran depends heavily on the Strait for its own oil exports and critical imports, making a blockade counterproductive.
'Moreover, shutting the Strait would harm regional allies like Qatar and Iraq, who also rely on the waterway, potentially straining Iran's strategic relationships. It would also violate international maritime law, further isolating Iran diplomatically," Yes Institutional Equities said.
Hence, experts say that Iran has often used the threat of closing the Strait as a political tool to gain leverage in talks—without actually going through with it.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
15 minutes ago
- India Today
Rajnath Singh likely to meet Chinese counterpart on sidelines of Shanghai meet
Amid rising tensions between US, Iran and Israel, Defence Minister Rajnath Singh and National Security Advisor (NSA) Ajit Doval will be visiting China this week to attend several meetings of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO). While Rajnath Singh will attend the meeting of defence ministers of member nations in Qingdao from June 25 to 27, Doval will attend a meeting of national security advisers ahead of the SCO summit. advertisementThis visit would mark the first ministerial-level engagement between India and China since relations began improving after the October 2024 agreement to de-escalate tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). The visit of both Singh and Doval coincides with the departure of the first batch of Indian pilgrims to Kailash Mansarovar, a significant pilgrimage site in SCO meeting will focus on regional security cooperation, counter-terrorism, and connectivity among member nations. Rajnath Singh may also hold a bilateral meeting with Chinese Defence Minister Admiral Dong Jun on the sidelines of the SCO visit is seen as part of a broader effort by both sides to restore normalcy in bilateral relations after the military standoff in eastern Ladakh began in May 2020. On the other hand, Ajit Doval will engage in Special Representative-level talks with Chinese officials to further de-escalate tensions along the Line of Actual Control (LAC) and work towards a boundary visits mark an important step in India-China relations, which have been strained since the 2020 military standoff in eastern Ladakh. Both countries are working towards restoring normalcy and trust through diplomatic Watch


Hindustan Times
17 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Donald Trump calls for regime change in Iran; favorite to replace Ali Khamenei comes up
Jun 23, 2025 02:45 AM IST President Donald Trump called for a regime change in Iran a day after the US struck three nuclear sites in the Middle Eastern country. L: Iran Supreme Leader Ali Khamenei | R: US President Donald Trump (Reuters photos) 'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social.


India.com
33 minutes ago
- India.com
Iran-Israel Conflict: What Gamble Has U.S President Donald Trump Taken By Striking Tehran's Nuclear Facilities?
New Delhi: In January, US President Donald Trump returned to office projecting himself as a man of peace. But less than six months into his term, that image is facing its biggest test yet. By ordering direct U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear sites, he has entered a volatile conflict between Israel and Iran and dragged Washington into its most dangerous Middle Eastern escalation in years. Just two hours after American warplanes struck targets in Iran, Trump addressed the nation from the White House. With Vice President J.D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth by his side, he called the strike a 'resounding success'. He claimed it would stop Iran's nuclear ambitions and pave the way for a more stable future. Iran, however, downplayed the attack, stating only minor damage occurred at its Fordow nuclear facility. Whether Trump's assessment holds true remains to be seen. The U.S. president did not stop at celebration. He issued a warning to Tehran – abandon your nuclear program or the next attacks will be 'more devastating and much easier'. He added that many of Iran's military sites remain on the radar and could be hit with 'speed, precision and skill'. But the boldness of the move raises real fears. UN Secretary-General António Guterres has cautioned that such a strike could spark a dangerous cycle of escalation. The Middle East, already on edge, now risks slipping into a new phase of instability. Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei had earlier warned that any U.S. strike would not go unanswered. Now the world waits to see whether Iran retaliates and how far this conflict might spiral. From 'Two Weeks' to Two Days Just days ago, Trump had said Iran would have 'two weeks' to comply. That ultimatum dissolved in less than 48 hours. On June 22, the president announced the operation had already taken place. Was the two-week deadline just a ruse? A diplomatic bluff to lull Tehran into a false sense of safety? Or had the back-channel efforts led by Trump's peace envoy, Steve Witkoff, already collapsed? So far, few details have emerged. Trump's public remarks framed the strike as an effort to open the door for negotiations. But that may be overly optimistic. Israel's recent military moves against Iran were meant to weaken Tehran's capabilities. Yet Iran still has missiles and allies ready to respond. With the Fordow facility hit, Iran now has even greater incentive to strike back. Trump hopes Iran will now come to the table and offer concessions. But it is unclear why a nation that refused diplomacy after Israeli airstrikes would suddenly bow after American bombs. And if these latest attacks failed to cause significant damage to Iran's deeply buried nuclear sites, pressure will grow for Trump to launch more strikes. That could force him into a bigger gamble with unpredictable consequences. Political Fallout in the U.S. Back home, Trump's decision has ignited both Democratic outrage and skepticism from within his own 'America First' base. Critics say the president has abandoned his core promise to keep the United States out of foreign wars. Trump's decision to appear with his top aides may have been designed to show party unity. Vice President Vance, who has long championed a restrained foreign policy, recently said Trump remains a non-interventionist. If the strike remains a one-off, Trump might patch over internal rifts. But if America gets pulled deeper into conflict, the same president who once slammed endless wars may face growing rebellion within his ranks. The action of June 22 marked a dramatic shift for a leader who took pride in avoiding war during his first term. It also stood in sharp contrast to his 2024 campaign speeches, where he repeatedly criticised past presidents for entangling America in overseas military ventures. Trump has now chosen his path. What happens next may no longer be entirely in his hands.