NFLPA executive committee strongly preferred David White to Lloyd Howell
During the process that resulted in Howell being hired, the union was ridiculously secretive. No one knew who the candidates were, including the dues-paying members of the union. The board of player representatives, who had the power to vote on the next executive director, didn't know until they showed up for the meeting.
Now that Lloyd's two-year stint with the union has gone as well as Thurston's three-hour tour on the Minnow, those who refused to say anything about the process are saying plenty.
It started on Sunday afternoon, with the surprise resignation of former NFLPA president and then-NFLPA chief strategy officer JC Tretter via a lengthy interview with Jonathan Jones of CBSSports.com. From the article: 'For the first time, Tretter now reveals that Howell was not the executive committee's top choice. In a straw poll conducted prior to the candidates being presented, the committee voted 10-1 in favor of [David] White over Howell. Members of the committee did not share their preference with the board.'
It's the 'first time' it was revealed because Tretter previously refused to reveal anything. Now that the mop is out for the cleanup on Aisle Howell, Tretter's revelation has a distinct 'don't blame me' vibe to it.
And there's more. Tretter also told Jones that Tretter wasn't the one from the executive committee who voted for Howell. Tretter said he preferred White, because White had labor experience. Howell had none.
'So the idea that I was jamming anybody through was false,' Tretter said.
Making the 10-1 issue even more strange is the fact that, hours after Tretter's on-the-record quotes emerged, the Washington Post reported the same facts as if they were previously unknown, attributing the information to unnamed sources. But Tretter had already said it with his name on it; that fact wasn't mentioned in the lengthy item from the Post.
Regardless, here's the message from Tretter and whoever told the same information to the Post: Don't blame the executive committee for Howell. We wanted the other guy, but the voters never asked for our opinion.
That point was underscored by an 'unnamed union source' to Jones and sprinkled into the Tretter interview: 'Maybe [the executive committee] should have given them a recommendation instead of giving the board a binder of information that they won't read, while they golf and drink, to make a decision.'
It's hard not to wonder whether the unnamed union source is the same guy who was on the record throughout the article. Routinely, people who are being interviewed will say that certain things are off the record. If those off-the-record comments make it into the final article, they get attributed to an unnamed source.
Whether it was or wasn't Tretter, the broader points are these: (1) Tretter seems to be trying to distance himself from the hiring of Howell; and (2) Tretter seems to be blaming the player representatives for picking the wrong guy.
There's one last point to make. Given the possibility if not likelihood that Howell resigned because he knew ESPN was about to report on the strip-club expense-report misadventure, it's also possible that Tretter caught wind that the Post would be dropping something about Howell's hiring on Sunday night or Monday morning. Tretter possibly decided to force the issue by preemptively handing to Jones the '10-1" wrinkle that became the first topic of the Post story — and which has been the subject of at least five tweets from the reporter who wrote it.
To put it as simply as possible, if Tretter knew the Post would be reporting that the executive committee overwhelmingly supported White over Howell and that Tretter, as NFLPA president at the time, didn't convey that information to the players who voted, Tretter may have concluded that he had no chance of becoming the interim executive director.
Which made it the perfect time to declare victory and retreat. After, of course, scooping the Post by handing the biggest news nugget in its story to CBS.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
7 hours ago
- New York Post
Schools must make classrooms sane again — and ditch ‘restorative justice'
For nearly a decade, New York City placed ideology over evidence in its approach to school discipline. Restorative Justice, imposed for the sake of racial 'equity,' was supposed to strengthen school culture — but instead it removed the boundaries kids need to learn and thrive. That left too many classrooms without clear expectations, consistent follow-through or real consequences, with students told to discuss or meditate on unruly school behavior rather than receiving detention, suspension or loss of privileges. Advertisement My recent Manhattan Institute report shows how NYC spent nearly $100 million on RJ programs in less than a decade — yet classroom disruptions, police interventions and absenteeism only worsened. Eliminating meaningful consequences set school administrators and teachers adrift, forced to react to emergencies instead of preventing them. Structure in a classroom means clear routines, like when to listen or when it's time to work — with posted rules explaining what students should do and what happens when rules are broken, enforced by consistent adult follow-through. Advertisement Clarity and consistency, not abstract ideals, create safe and orderly classrooms. Extensive research confirms this commonsense concept. But with RJ, teachers must manage disruptions through scripted conversations, asking students to reflect on their feelings rather than issuing consequences. They've had to 'build relationships,' not set rules and enforce expectations — so expectations disappeared from our schools. Schools can't function without structure. Every student deserves a safe, orderly classroom, and teachers need tools to achieve this. Advertisement But RJ didn't supplement school discipline; it replaced it, leaving schools without tools to manage behavior. And the students who need structure most are the ones most harmed. Every morning, the NY POSTcast offers a deep dive into the headlines with the Post's signature mix of politics, business, pop culture, true crime and everything in between. Subscribe here! As the city approaches another mayoral election, voters should be asking: Who's willing to rebuild our schools' structure? Advertisement Who's willing to say that kids need boundaries, not just conversations? Democratic mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani has endorsed more of the same. 'As mayor,' he told Chalkbeat, 'I will focus on . . . restorative-justice models, which allow our students to remain in schools, learn from mistakes, grow conflict resolution skills and improve academic outcomes.' As the largest school system in the country, NYC sets a tone for the rest of the nation. Today that tone is one of failure and discouragement. Restorative justice has done enough damage. It's time for our schools to reestablish rules, order and accountability. First, we must set clear expectations and consequences across all schools, empowering principals and teachers to intervene when students jeopardize learning or safety — without waiting for central office approval. Teachers need that backup if we want them to give our kids consistency. Teachers also need training in evidence-based behavioral strategies, such as encouraging appropriate behavior, de-escalating disruptions and following through with reliable consequences. Let's redirect funding away from RJ to give teachers those tools. Advertisement Get opinions and commentary from our columnists Subscribe to our daily Post Opinion newsletter! Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters To restore public trust, we need regular audits using measurable outcomes — reductions in repeat offenses, fewer emergency calls and increases in uninterrupted instructional time, for example — and to make the results public. Within the city's classrooms, daily structure is a must. Students can't learn in chaotic environments. Classrooms need clear routines, posted behavior expectations and consistent follow-through when rules are broken. Advertisement Finally, we must recognize that Title 1 schools, which serve the city's neediest and most vulnerable children, have been hit hardest by the breakdown of discipline. They should be first in line for training and resources to restore order and protect student learning. The collapse of order in our schools is a nationwide issue, as President Donald Trump recognizes: His April executive order directed the federal Education Department to promote behavior-based discipline measures. The order instructs federal agencies to roll back past guidance discouraging suspensions and reprimands over racial-equity concerns — guidance that spurred the rise of RJ in the city and elsewhere. Advertisement As Trump's order makes clear, imposing consequences isn't about punishment. It's about creating predictable environments in which students understand expectations and know adults will follow through. It's about striking a balance between compassion and clarity, and recognizing that boundaries are a form of care. New Yorkers should make school discipline a priority as they consider their vote for mayor. Advertisement Until the city rebuilds a system where all students can learn in calm, focused classrooms, children who need the most support will continue to receive the least. Restoring disciplinary structure gives every student a better chance to succeed — and New York City should lead the way. Jennifer Weber is the cofounder and co-owner of KIT Educational Consulting.
NBC Sports
a day ago
- NBC Sports
Who are the candidates for NFLPA interim executive director? No one knows
The NFL Players Association needs an executive director. Before that, the NFLPA needs an interim executive director. At this point, no one knows who the more immediate hire will be. Or when it will happen. The internal document obtained by ESPN that became the centerpiece of a report regarding potential criminal investigation mentions five potential, but not actual, candidates. Three currently work for the NFLPA: senior director of player affairs Lester Archambeau, chief player officers Don Davis, and chief operating officer Teri Smith. The other two are former NFLPA presidents — Domonique Foxworth and Eric Winston. ESPN also reports that former executive director DeMaurice Smith could be a candidate to return and to get things under contract. Per the same report, however, Smith isn't interested. It's still not known who's interested in the job and, more importantly, the persons in whom the NFLPA is interested. Who's currently running things? Who's making decisions? Who's vetting candidates for the interim job? Who will be negotiating with them? The messier the situation becomes, the more expensive it could become to find someone competent to fix it. We still think they should contact former (as of Friday) Packers CEO Mark Murphy. He has run a multi-billion-dollar football operation for 17 years, he played in the NFL, he served as a player rep, and he was employed by the NFLPA after he retired from the NFL, both as an assistant executive director and as a vice president. He also helped negotiate the 2011 CBA on behalf of the NFL. He'd be the perfect candidate to restore order to the union — and to strike fear in the hearts of his recently former business partners.
Newsweek
2 days ago
- Newsweek
Trump's FCC Head Reacts To Paramount Merger Criticism: 'Time For A Change'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. President Donald Trump's Federal Communications Commission (FCC) chairman, Brendan Carr, reacted on Friday to widespread criticism over the terms and conditions of the $8.4 billion merger between Paramount and Skydance that the FCC approved on Thursday. "I think it's time for a change," he said when asked about the conditions and timing of the deal, which critics have described as an effort by the government to exert political influence over the press. Why It Matters Thursday's decision from the FCC capped months of uncertainty about whether the massive merger would be approved. The deal was approved after Skydance pledged that it would root out "bias" at Paramount's CBS News division, not implement new diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives and install an ombudsman to ensure ideological balance in CBS's news coverage. The FCC's decision also came after Paramount agreed to pay $16 million to settle a lawsuit Trump filed alleging that CBS deceptively edited a 60 Minutes interview that then-Democratic presidential nominee Kamala Harris did during the 2024 election. Critics have said the settlement amounted to a capitulation by the media to Trump's personal agenda, and that the timeline between that and the FCC's approval signals an unprecedented intervention by the government in the editorial operations of the independent press. Brendan Carr testifies during a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee hearing on President Biden's broadband takeover, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, November 30, 2023. Brendan Carr testifies during a House Energy and Commerce Subcommittee hearing on President Biden's broadband takeover, at the U.S. Capitol, in Washington, D.C., on Thursday, November 30, 2023. Sipa via AP Images What To Know Carr appeared on CNBC's Squawk Box on Friday morning and was asked about criticism of the merger and its timing, including comments made by his fellow FCC Commissioner Anna Gomez, who dissented to the deal's approval in Thursday's 2-1 vote. Anchor David Faber quoted from Gomez's dissent, saying: "You're imposing never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment in direct violation of the First Amendment." Faber then asked Carr to respond to his colleague's argument, to which Carr said: "I think it's time for a change." He added: "And the procedures that we put in place in this deal have lots of precedent. For instance, there have been ombudsmen put in place by the FCC before. We're putting a bias ombudsman in place here. We're addressing DEI." Carr's comments in defense of Trump were the latest example of his fealty to the president. The FCC chairman once wore a golden lapel pin of Trump's head and has opened investigations into a number of media outlets the president has criticized since he became the head of the historically independent agency. Carr continued defending the terms and conditions of the Paramount-Skydance merger during his Squawk Box interview Friday, saying the FCC is reversing the "pro-DEI commitments" that were made under the Biden administration. "We're unwinding that type of approach and we're frankly taking a trust-but-verify perspective here," he told Faber. Carr went on to claim the media has "undermined itself" and took aim at CBS's The Late Show With Stephen Colbert, which the network canceled last week while citing "purely financial" reasons. Colbert's cancellation came shortly after the longtime comedian described Paramount's $16 million settlement as a "big, fat bribe" on the air, and days before the FCC greenlit the $8.4 billion Paramount-Skydance merger. "When you look at the stuff that Colbert is doing, the idea that a partisan carnival makes economic sense—these are business decisions at the end of the day," Carr told Squawk Box. What People Are Saying Gomez said in her dissent: "After months of cowardly capitulation to this Administration, Paramount finally got what it wanted. Unfortunately, it is the American public who will ultimately pay the price for its actions. "In an unprecedented move, this once-independent FCC used its vast power to pressure Paramount to broker a private legal settlement and further erode press freedom ... Even more alarming, it is now imposing never-before-seen controls over newsroom decisions and editorial judgment, in direct violation of the First Amendment and the law." Democratic Senator Elizabeth Warren of Massachusetts wrote on X: "BREAKING NEWS: Trump's government just approved Paramount's merger with Skydance. Sure looks like they paid Donald Trump $36 MILLION for this merger. Bribery is illegal no matter who is president." What Happens Next Despite the FCC's approval, Paramount's headaches may not be quite over as it faces sharp blowback from its own TV shows over Colbert's cancellation and its dealings with the Trump administration. "The Daily Show" host Jon Stewart delivered a blistering monologue on Monday, ripping his corporate bosses for settling with Trump and subsequently cancelling Colbert's show. And on Wednesday night, the iconic satirical comedy show "South Park" premiered its 27th season with an episode that made fun of the president's genitalia while comparing him to the former Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. The "South Park" episode was particularly remarkable given that it came one day after the show's creators inked a $1.5 billion streaming deal with Paramount.
