Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin shake hands in Alaska as Ukraine war talks begin
They gripped hands for an extended period of time, with both men smiling, and Mr Putin eventually grinned and pointed skyward while their hands were still clasped.
US President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)
Uniformed military members stood at attention nearby at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, and B-2s and F-22s — military aircraft designed to oppose Russia during the Cold War — flew over to mark the moment.
Reporters nearby yelled, 'President Putin, will you stop killing civilians?' and Mr Putin put his hand up to his ear but did not answer.
Mr Trump and Mr Putin both climbed in the US presidential limo, with Mr Putin grinning widely as the vehicle rolled past the cameras.
White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said the previously planned one-on-one meeting between Mr Trump and Mr Putin is now a three-on-three meeting that will include US secretary of state Marco Rubio and special envoy Steve Witkoff.
The change indicates that the White House is taking a more guarded approach than it did during a 2018 meeting in Helsinki, when Mr Trump and Mr Putin first met privately just with their interpreters for two hours.
US President Donald Trump greets Russia's President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)
The Kremlin says the summit will also include the two delegations meeting and talks continuing over lunch.
The pair are expected to hold a joint press conference.
The Kremlin shared two clips of Mr Putin and Mr Trump smiling and talking before talks began, alongside Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov and Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser Yuri Ushakov.
Russian media outlets also shared images that appeared to show a bemused Mr Putin raising his eyebrows in response to shouted questions from assembled reporters.
At one point, Mr Putin cupped his hands around his mouth and appeared to say something, although his voice could not be heard.
US President Donald Trump meets with Russia's President Vladimir Putin at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, Alaska (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)
Interviewed by Bret Baier of Fox News Channel aboard Air Force One as he flew to Alaska, Mr Trump said he would like to walk away from the meeting with a ceasefire.
He also said he would like a second meeting on Russia's war in Ukraine.
'I wouldn't be thrilled if I didn't get it,' Mr Trump said of a halt to hostilities between the countries.
He said everyone tells him he will not get a ceasefire until a second meeting.
'So, we'll see what happens. I'm going to be, I won't be happy if I walk away without some form of a ceasefire,' he said.
Russian President Vladimir Putin speaks as he meets with President Donald Trump (Julia Demaree Nikhinson/AP)
Mr Trump earlier joked that he 'might start liking Hillary Clinton again' after the former secretary of state said she would nominate Mr Trump for a Nobel Peace Prize herself if he negotiates an end to Russia's war on Ukraine without Ukraine having to give up territory.
'Well, that was very nice,' Mr Trump said when asked about Ms Clinton's comment during an in-flight interview with Fox News Channel.
'I may have to start liking her again.'
Mr Trump and Mr Clinton were presidential rivals in 2016 and have had a contentious relationship.
Mr Trump has also been angling to be awarded the prestigious peace prize.
If Donald Trump negotiates an end to Putin's war on Ukraine without Ukraine having to cede territory, I'll nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize myself. https://t.co/SYXKhhLqkS
— Hillary Clinton (@HillaryClinton) August 15, 2025
The sit-down gives Mr Trump a chance to prove to the world that he is both a master dealmaker and a global peacemaker.
He and his allies have cast him as a heavyweight negotiator who can find a way to bring the slaughter to a close — something he used to boast he could do quickly.
For Mr Putin, a summit with Mr Trump offers a long-sought opportunity to try to negotiate a deal that would cement Russia's gains, block Kyiv's bid to join the Nato military alliance and eventually pull Ukraine back into Moscow's orbit.
Despite having so much at stake, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky and European leaders are not invited.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
18 minutes ago
- Reuters
Americans worry democracy in danger amid gerrymandering fights, Reuters/Ipsos poll finds
WASHINGTON, Aug 21 (Reuters) - Most Americans believe that efforts to redraw U.S. House of Representatives districts to maximize partisan gains, like those under way in Texas and California, are bad for democracy, a new Reuters/Ipsos poll found. More than half of respondents -- 57% -- said they feared that American democracy itself was in danger, a view held by eight in 10 Democrats and four in 10 in President Donald Trump's Republican Party. The six-day survey of 4,446 U.S. adults, which closed on Monday, showed deep unease with the growing political divisions in Washington -- where Republicans control both chambers of Congress -- and state capitals. The poll found that 55% of respondents, including 71% of Democrats and 46% of Republicans, agreed that ongoing redistricting plans - such as those hatched by governors in Texas and California in a process known as gerrymandering - were "bad for democracy." At Trump's urging, Republican Texas Governor Greg Abbott has called a special session of the state legislature to redraw the state's congressional maps ahead of the 2026 midterm elections, aiming to help Republicans defend their 219-212 U.S. House majority. Incumbent presidents' parties typically lose House seats in midterms, which can block their legislative agendas and in Trump's first term led to two impeachment probes. California Democratic Governor Gavin Newsom, a White House hopeful in 2028, has threatened to try to redraw his state's district map in response, adding five Democratic seats to offset Republicans' expected Texas gains. The practice is not new but has gained attention because it is happening mid-decade rather than following a census. It has meant that the vast majority of House races are not competitive in general elections; in recent decades about two-thirds of them were won by more than 20 percentage points. As president, Trump has flouted democratic norms with steps including directing the U.S. Justice Department to pursue his political adversaries, pressuring the independent Federal Reserve to lower rates and seizing control of Washington, D.C.'s police force. In interviews, Texas Republicans who participated in the poll largely supported the state's potential redistricting, while Democrats described it as 'cheating' but supported the idea of Democratic states trying to respond in kind. The poll had a margin of error of about 2 percentage points when describing the views of all Americans and about 3 points for the views of Republicans and Democrats. Amanda Kelley, 51, an insurance fraud investigator in Dallas, was the rare Republican to criticize the Texas effort. "I don't like it when either side tries to do that. I think that's shady business," Kelley said. "The optics of it happening in the middle of the term when you would draw district lines, that leaves kind of a bad taste in my mouth." Paul Wehrmann, 57, an attorney in Dallas who described himself as an independent voter, also opposed it. "It's unfair, and it sets a bad precedent," said Wehrmann, who worries it could spiral into states redrawing maps every election cycle instead of every decade. Partisan gerrymandering "is bad all around, but I think that it is fair for Democrats to try to counterbalance what Republicans are doing. "They need to stop bringing a knife to a gunfight.' Americans of both parties have long disliked elected leaders of the rival party, but the Reuters/Ipsos poll found that they also distrust regular people who align with the opposing party. Some 55% of Democrats agreed with a statement that "people who are Republican are NOT to be trusted," while 32% disagreed. Republicans were split, with 43% agreeing that Democrats were untrustworthy and 44% saying they disagreed. The poll also showed politics weighing more on people's everyday lives than in past years, particularly among Democrats. Some 27% of Democrats said last year's presidential election has negatively affected their friendships. A Reuters/Ipsos poll in April 2017, early in Trump's first term, showed a smaller share of Democrats - 18% - reported fraying friendships because of the election. Only 10% of Republicans said this month that politics weighed on their friendships, largely unchanged from 2017. Jeffrey Larson, a 64-year-old toxicologist and Republican voter in Seabrook, Texas, said he and his wife, a Democrat, agreed not to discuss politics. 'I might not agree with what the Democrats are doing, but I don't think that they're trying to specifically destroy my life or destroy America,' Larson said. Close to half of Democrats - or 46% - said their party had lost its way, compared to 19% of Republicans who said the same of their party. Sandy Ogden, 71, a tech executive from Sunnyvale, California and self-described Democrat, said she faulted her party's leaders. 'I think the Democratic Party members are united in what we believe, but the leaders are ineffective in mounting an opposition that works,' Ogden said. Analysts said that ordinary Democrats' greater mistrust of Republicans and friction with friends suggests a reluctance among Democrats to engage with Republicans that could harm the party's chances at regaining political standing. 'Democracy involves a willingness to allow people with differing views to express those views,' said Whit Ayres, a veteran Republican pollster. Michael Ceraso, a longtime Democratic operative, found the poll results frustrating. "The majority of Democrats believe our democracy is failing and nearly half of them don't want to talk to the opposition party," Ceraso said. "We have to be better."
Rhyl Journal
an hour ago
- Rhyl Journal
Russia launches missile attack on Ukraine as Zelensky seeks security guarantees
The attack mostly targeted western regions of the country, it said. The strikes killed at least one person and injured 15 others, according to officials. Ukraine's foreign minister, Andrii Sybiha, said Russia struck a 'major American electronics manufacturer' in western Ukraine. He provided no further details. Western parts of Ukraine are far from the battlefield's front line in the east and south of the country. Much of the military aid provided by Ukraine's Western allies is believed to be transported and stored there. It was Russia's third largest aerial attack this year in terms of the number of drones fired and the eighth-largest in terms of missiles, according to official figures. The strikes occurred during a renewed US-led effort to reach a peace settlement in the three-year war following Russia's invasion of its neighbour. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky condemned the attack, saying it was carried out 'as if nothing were changing at all'. Moscow has shown no signs of pursuing meaningful negotiations to end the war and urged the international community to respond with stronger pressure, including tougher sanctions and tariffs, he said. Russia 'wasted several cruise missiles against an American business', he said, noting it was a regular civilian enterprise producing domestic utilities, such as coffee machines. 'And that too became a target for Russia. Very telling.' Earlier, Mr Zelensky said Ukraine will hold intensive meetings to understand what kind of security guarantees its allies are willing to provide after receiving signals that the United States would back reinvigorated discussions seeking an end to war. The details are being hammered out among national security advisers and military officials and Mr Zelensky thinks they will take clearer shape within 10 days. He then expects to be ready to hold direct talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin for the first time since the full-scale invasion. The talks could also be conducted in a trilateral format alongside US President Donald Trump, Mr Zelensky said. 'We want to have an understanding of the security guarantees architecture within seven to 10 days. And based on that understanding, we aim to hold a trilateral meeting. That was my logic,' Mr Zelensky said, speaking to reporters on Wednesday after his trip to Washington along with Europe's top leaders. Russian foreign minister Sergey Lavrov said working on security arrangements in Ukraine without Moscow's involvement would not work, according to state news agency RIA Novosti. 'We cannot agree with the fact that it is now proposed to resolve collective security issues without the Russian Federation. This will not work. We have already explained more than once that Russia does not overstate its interests, but we will ensure our legitimate interests firmly and harshly,' Mr Lavrov said at a news conference on Wednesday.
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Trump touts his peace deal between ‘Aberbaijan and Albania' – getting both countries' names wrong
President Trump was caught tongue-tied as he touted brokering a peace deal between Armenia and Azerbaijan. 'For the Aberbaijan – that was a big one going on for 34, 35 years, er Albania, I mean, think of that, going on for years, and I got to know the heads and I got to know them through trade. I was dealing with them a little bit and saying, 'Why are you guys fighting?'' Trump said during The Mark Levin Show on Tuesday, where he also repeated claims that he had ended 'seven wars.' Earlier this month, Trump announced a peace deal, ending decades of conflict between Azerbaijan and Armenia, two nations who have been in a state of tension since the 1980s. 'And I said, 'I'm not going to do a trade deal if you guys are going to fight – it's crazy. Anyway, one thing led to another, and I got that one settled,' the commander-in-chief added. 'At the end of an hour, they were hugging and congratulating each other. It was beautiful to see, actually,' he said. Negotiations initially kicked off in March, when the two governments said they were prepared to end the nearly forty-year conflict. However, it wasn't until the Trump administration hosted the leaders of the two nations at the White House on August 8 that they agreed to a peace deal. The agreement includes a joint declaration of peace, a joint request to dissolve the OSCE Minsk Group, and a provision granting the United States sole development rights over a transit route from the Nakhchivan exclave through southern Armenia to Azerbaijan, referred to as the 'Trump Route for International Peace and Prosperity,' according to the Council of Foreign Relations. The president's opponents on social media were quick to jump on this latest faux pas, with the account Republicans Against Trump branding him as 'Dementia Don.' Other users slammed him for double standards after he spent months lambasting former President Joe Biden for his cognitive issues. 'Dementia Don strikes again. Trump claims he solved the conflict between 'Aber-baijan and Albania. (He meant Armenia and Azerbaijan, but close enough, right?),' the account wrote Wednesday. One X user said, 'It's so unfair to Trump that so many countries choose to have names beginning with the same letter. But of course, with just 26 letters in the alphabet, it's tricky. But that's probably Biden's fault.' Another said, 'If Biden had said this, MAGA would scream dementia Joe Trump's mistake, they stay silent #Hypocrisy.' Azerbaijan and Armenia sparred over Nagorno-Karabakh, an ethnically Armenian enclave in Azerbaijan, in the 1980s and 1990s. The first Karabakh war, from 1988 to 1994, resulted in roughly thirty thousand casualties and created hundreds of thousands of refugees. Upon brokering the peace deal this month, Trump said Armenia and Azerbaijan had promised to stop all fighting "forever" as well as open up travel, business, and diplomatic relations. "We are today establishing peace in the Caucasus," Azerbaijan's President Ilham Aliyev said. "We lost a lot of years being preoccupied with wars and occupation and bloodshed."
