
4 Strategies to Help New Leaders Give Feedback
As a former C-Level executive turned CEO and executive coach, I've faced this challenge firsthand and have supported many leaders in navigating this critical phase. Here are four strategies to help new leaders approach feedback with confidence and clarity.
1. Assess the landscape.
A few weeks into his new role, I met Barry*, a divisional CFO, for an executive coaching session focused on helping him maximize his early impact. He reflected on a pattern from earlier in his career: his tendency to act quickly in new roles, an approach that had created resistance and strained relationships.
As a new leader, it's tempting to jump straight into action, pushing for quick wins to demonstrate your value. But without understanding the broader context, even the most well-intentioned moves can backfire.
To navigate this tension between speed and context, new leaders can benefit from creating a structured learning plan across four domains: technical, interpersonal, cultural, and political. This framework, drawn from Michael Watkins' The First 90 Days, helps leaders explore not just systems and roles, but also values, norms, informal power structures, and hidden dynamics. Within each domain, ask questions about the past (What's led to this team's success—or setbacks?), the present (Who's influential? What's the team's operating rhythm?), and the future (What changes are on the horizon? What barriers exist?).
You'll rarely have complete clarity, but after you've triangulated perspectives across different levels and sources, the picture starts to sharpen. If multiple people are raising similar themes and that is consistent with what you observe, you're likely on firmer ground. The goal isn't to gather all the information, but to gather enough to give feedback that is informed, contextualized, and constructive. Understanding the landscape—beyond the data—allows you to deliver feedback that is informed and effective. It helps you avoid missteps that can erode trust before it's built.
As he started his new role, Barry made a personal commitment to notice his instinct to move quickly and take more deliberate action. That opportunity came quickly when he noticed that his head of accounting, Luis, lacked the strategic capabilities required for the role. Avoiding his first instinct to deliver tough feedback immediately, Barry gathered more context. Over the next couple of weeks, he observed team interactions, asked thoughtful questions, and sought input from Luis's peers. He learned that Luis was a 17-year company veteran who was widely respected, collaborative, and instrumental in mentoring younger talent. With this broader understanding, Barry delivered candid feedback about the skill gap and offered a transition into a newly created role that honored Luis's strengths while addressing the business's needs.
2. Fast-track trust.
To ensure your feedback is not just heard but acted upon, you need to build a foundation of trust. While trust naturally builds over time, exceptional leaders take deliberate steps to fast-track it.
One strategy I recommend is inspired by Patrick Lencioni's The Five Dysfunctions of a Team, which emphasizes that vulnerability is a core building block of trust. You could practice this by sharing your greatest strengths with your team along with the potential 'dark sides' of those strengths. For example, decisiveness can sometimes manifest as impatience, while collaboration can inadvertently lead to slower decision-making. When leaders acknowledge these inherit downsides of their strengths, they signal to the team that it's safe to be imperfect and self-aware.
I facilitated this exercise with a newly restructured leadership team seeking to build trust and improve collaboration. Each leader shared their top strengths and the downsides when those strengths were overused or misapplied. Because everyone participated, the vulnerability felt derisked. The result was faster trust, deeper understanding, and a foundation for more candid feedback going forward.
By modeling openness and creating intentional moments of vulnerability, leaders lay the groundwork for psychological safety, making future feedback more likely to be received with openness and goodwill.
3. Understand your team members' aspirations.
In your first few weeks, schedule one-on-one meetings with your direct reports that are focused on getting to know them, their aspirations, and their perspectives. What motivates them? What are their career aspirations? What kind of support do they need from you to thrive? Ask them about their best bosses and what those leaders did to help them succeed. These conversations lay the groundwork for trust and make future feedback easier to deliver, as it can be positioned around helping them achieve their goals.
When my client Divya became the head of global sales, she scheduled one-on-one career talks with each team member. During one conversation Maria, a top-performing regional sales leader, shared her ambition to one day lead a larger sales organization.
A few weeks later, Divya noticed that Maria tended to dominate discussions in team meetings, unintentionally stifling input from others. When Divya gave her feedback, she framed it in terms of Maria's goals: 'Leading on a larger stage will mean fostering collaboration and creating space for others' ideas to shine. Let's work on strategies to build that skill now.' Maria took the feedback to heart. In subsequent meetings, she shifted her approach—asking more questions, drawing out quieter voices, and consistently enrolling her team before offering her own perspective. When Divya checked in with a few of Maria's colleagues, they shared that they felt more heard and included. By aligning feedback with Maria's aspirations, Divya made it easier to receive and more motivating to act on.
4. Set aside your ego.
It's natural for a new leader to want to prove they were the right hire. But this can lead to an ego-driven feedback trap, such as being overly blunt or aggressive to score quick wins, or overly passive to avoid ruffling feathers. Exceptional leaders understand that you can be clear and direct while showing care and respect— it's not an either/or choice.
Take my client Michael, a recently promoted director at a tech startup. One of his senior engineers, Shana, had missed several deadlines, putting a key product launch at risk. Michael couldn't avoid addressing the issue, but he also didn't want to come across as harsh in his first major feedback conversation. In their one-on-one, he began by acknowledging Shana's expertise and her significant contributions to past successes. Then, he shared his observations: 'Shana, I've noticed the missed deadlines on your recent deliverables. I know you're committed to the success of this product, and I want to make sure you have what you need to get back on track. Can you share what's been challenging, and let's talk about how I can support you?'
This combination of direct feedback and empathetic inquiry led to an honest conversation. Shana explained that a new process had created bottlenecks in her workflow. Together, they developed a plan to adjust her responsibilities and streamline the process, preventing future delays. By addressing the issue head-on with care and respect, Michael reinforced accountability while strengthening trust.
To strike this balance, structure your feedback intentionally. Most leaders naturally skew toward either empathy or directness. Knowing your default lets you prepare in advance so you can dial up the side that doesn't come as easily. Striking this balance sets the tone for a culture of honesty, accountability, and growth. Feedback becomes a tool for development, not a threat to relationships.
Giving feedback when you're new to your role can feel like a minefield, but it's also an opportunity to establish your leadership foundation. By assessing the landscape, fast-tracking trust, understanding your team's aspirations, and setting aside your ego, you can navigate this challenge effectively. In doing so, you'll not only drive performance but also create a team culture built on trust, candor, and mutual success—essential ingredients for any leader's legacy.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
3 charts that illustrate market overvaluation concerns
Valuation concerns are rising as market metrics flash levels not seen since the dot-com era. Yahoo Finance Reporter Josh Schafer joins Market Catalysts anchor Julie Hyman to break down what could trigger a market pullback from here. To watch more expert insights and analysis on the latest market action, check out more Market Catalysts here. Are we sort of at a top at this point, after we've had this big rally? Are stocks too expensive? So, this is a chart from Barry Bannister, what he's looking at here is, as it says there, the enterprise valuation relative to economic profit, essentially how much am I paying for stocks based on what the companies are actually producing in some ways. And you can see here, it has not been this overvalued, as Bannister estimates it, since 2000, 1999. What is that, of course? The dot-com bubble, right? And so that is kind of the classic comparison I think we're seeing right now, is the question when you think about this AI-led rally, is okay, is it a dot-com bubble style thing? And at least by this metric, you could at least argue from a valuation perspective, it's looking a little similar. Right. I mean, Barry is a noted bear on the market. I mean, there are those who would say markets don't just roll over because of overvaluation. Something has to happen, right? Right. Well, and I think you see that here, too, right? Look at where we call it overvalued in early 2000. That's a three-year period that we sat there, right? And so you could also point out, yes, we've started to creep higher here, but to your point, truly, the question would be what actually makes this matter. And you need some sort of catalyst, whether that would be economic slowing, some impact from the tariffs, et cetera. I also thought this chart from Max Grenkov at UBS was interesting. So you're looking at the discount rate proxy versus the S&P 500 forward price to earnings ratio. This would be kind of a traditional valuation metric, right? And back to Barry's chart, if you looked at the S&P 500 forward P/E, it would kind of look similar, too. We're definitely in elevated levels here, but what this gap is sort of telling us that Max explained in his commentary is essentially investors are paying a lot for AI exceptionalism. And the question is, does that sort of come through? There is a world where this gap is worth paying more for if I'm an investor, right, and stocks being more expensive, but there's also a world, as we keep talking about during earnings season, where that doesn't come to fruition, right? And then you're perhaps overpaying for stocks at that level. Okay. And what's the third one we have? Our final chart, I love this chart from Todd Sohn over at Strategas. So what he's looking at here is the S&P 500 and essentially making the argument that it's less defensive than it used to be. Well, and what I love about this chart, too, is it's the inverse of what we tend to talk about, which is that, oh, the S&P 500 is so heavily weighted to tech. Okay, so if it's so heavily weighted to tech, what is it less weighted to? And it's less weighted to consumer staples, energy, health care, and utilities. You can see that used to be 40% of the index, going back about 30 years ago. Now from a market cap weighting perspective, it's about 22%. And what I think this also tells us in this valuation discussion, normally you would pay a higher valuation for tech stocks or a tech heavy index, right? Well, the S&P 500 is a tech heavy index now. Savita Subramanian in our chart book sort of made that point that maybe it's worth paying up more and having it be quote-unquote more expensive if you're getting a different product or a different index than you were getting before. Right. Well, and you could also make the argument that things defensive isn't what it used to be, right? It doesn't, you know, there would be some who would argue that even tech has defensive characteristics, and things like health care are perhaps less defensive than they used to be in the past. So these things are all kind of scrambled over time, it feels like. They are. There's a lot of debate, always is. Makes a market. That's what makes it fun. That's what makes our jobs fun. Related Videos Three charts Wall Street pros are watching Why diversifying risk management is 'key' right now Tesla's declining Q2 car sales sparks sell-off: Chart of the Day Southwest Q2 miss: Industry faces 'revenue headwind,' CFO says Sign in to access your portfolio


Business Wire
13 hours ago
- Business Wire
Phoenix Energy Closes Applications for $15,000 Scholarship Supporting Energy Careers
IRVINE, Calif.--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Phoenix Energy One, LLC ("Phoenix Energy") announces the official closing of the 2025 Phoenix Energy Scholarship application window. This annual $15,000 award continues to attract a highly motivated and talented pool of first-year college students pursuing careers in the oil and gas industry. With dozens of strong submissions received, the 2025 cycle reinforces the company's commitment to investing in the next generation of energy leaders. The recipient of this year's scholarship will be announced in August 2025. Founded by Adam Ferrari, CEO of Phoenix Energy, the scholarship aims to support students who are passionate about shaping the future of domestic energy through careers in petroleum engineering, geology, energy finance, or related disciplines. The program reflects Phoenix Energy's dual commitment to industry innovation and responsible resource development. 'The caliber of students who applied this year gives me great hope for the future of the energy industry,' said Adam Ferrari. 'These individuals are not only academically accomplished, but also thoughtful about how the oil and gas industry can evolve to meet global challenges. That's exactly the kind of leadership we want to cultivate.' Each applicant was evaluated on academic performance, a written essay, and a demonstrated interest in advancing the energy sector through technical innovation, environmental stewardship, or community impact. The selection committee is currently reviewing submissions, and the 2025 award recipient will be named in the coming weeks. Last year's winner, Arnoldo Montanez of the Colorado School of Mines, exemplified the spirit of the scholarship through his visionary perspective on the energy sector's potential. In his application, Montanez described oil and gas as 'the cornerstone of our modern civilization,' and called for the industry to balance efficiency with social responsibility. 'Arnoldo's insights, and his commitment to progress within the energy space, set a powerful example,' Ferrari added. 'We look forward to recognizing another outstanding student who will carry that legacy forward.' The Phoenix Energy Scholarship is one of three initiatives under Phoenix Energy's FUEL Program —Fostering Unity, Empowering Leadership—which reflects the company's broader philanthropic mission to empower future innovators, support education, and promote sustainable, long-term growth in U.S. energy production. To learn more about the Phoenix Energy Scholarship and stay up to date on the upcoming recipient announcement, visit Those interested in learning more about Phoenix Energy and its CEO, Adam Ferrari, can visit the official Phoenix Energy website here.
Yahoo
15 hours ago
- Yahoo
SIGA to Host Business Update Call on August 5, 2025 Following Release of Second-Quarter 2025 Results
NEW YORK, July 29, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- SIGA Technologies, Inc. (SIGA) (Nasdaq: SIGA), a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company, today announced that management will host a webcast and conference call to provide a business update at 4:30 P.M. ET on Tuesday, August 5, 2025. Participating in the call will be Diem Nguyen, Chief Executive Officer, and Daniel Luckshire, Chief Financial Officer. A live webcast of the call will also be available on the Company's website at in the Investor Relations section of the site, or by clicking here. Please log in approximately 5-10 minutes prior to the scheduled start time. Participants may access the call by dialing 1-800-717-1738 for domestic callers or 1-646-307-1865 for international callers. A replay of the call will be available for two weeks by dialing 1-844-512-2921 for domestic callers or 1-412-317-6671 for international callers and using Conference ID: 1130215. The archived webcast will be available in the Investor Relations section of the Company's website. About SIGA SIGA is a commercial-stage pharmaceutical company and leader in global health focused on the development of innovative medicines to treat and prevent infectious diseases. With a primary focus on orthopoxviruses, we are dedicated to protecting humanity against the world's most severe infectious diseases, including those that occur naturally, accidentally, or intentionally. Through partnerships with governments and public health agencies, we work to build a healthier and safer world by providing essential countermeasures against these global health threats. Our flagship product, TPOXX® (tecovirimat), is an antiviral medicine approved in the U.S. and Canada for the treatment of smallpox and authorized in Europe, the UK, and Japan for the treatment of smallpox, mpox (monkeypox), cowpox, and vaccinia complications. For more information about SIGA, visit Contacts:Suzanne Harnettsharnett@ and Investors Media Jennifer Drew-Bear, Edison GroupJdrew-bear@ Holly Stevens, CG Lifehstevens@