Scottish Government names date for ditching two-child cap
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has said the cap – which was introduced by the Tories at Westminster – will be lifted on March 2, according to the Daily Record.
The two-child limit denies child allowances in Universal Credit and tax credits to third or subsequent children born after April 2017 and has been kept in place by Keir Starmer's Labour UK Government.
An associated so-called 'rape clause' grants exemptions for a child born as a result of 'non-consensual conception', which has remained highly controversial since it was put in place.
The Scottish Government pledged to mitigate the policy in its Budget.
READ MORE: Swinney: Independence the 'defining choice for this generation'
Under the SNP's mitigation plan, payments could work out at nearly £3500 for children affected.
Somerville has said the plan will mean there will be 20,000 fewer children in relative poverty next year.
She added it would be the fastest a Scottish social security benefit had been delivered.
She said: 'The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all.
'The Two Child Limit Payment will begin accepting applications in March next year. At less than 15 months from when we announced this in the Scottish budget, this will be the fastest that a Scottish social security benefit has been delivered.
'This builds upon the considerable action we have taken in Scotland, including delivering unparalleled financial support through our Scottish Child Payment, investing to clear school meal debts, and continuing to support almost 10,000 children by mitigating the UK Government's Benefit Cap as fully as possible."
READ MORE: UK must 'constrain Israel' after attacks on Iran, John Swinney says
Somerville added that the UK Government was still "holding back" Scotland's progress.
"Modelling published in March makes clear that if the UK Government act decisively on child poverty, they could help to take an estimated 100,000 children out of poverty this year," she said.
In April, analysis showed the cap has dragged 30,000 more children into poverty since Labour took office.
The Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) carried out research which also suggested 350,000 children would be lifted out of poverty instantly at a cost of £2 billion, while the depth of poverty would be reduced for another 800,000.
The organisation says 109 more children a day are pulled into poverty by the policy.
Due to the fact the two-child limit applies to third or subsequent children born after April 2017, it is effectively still being rolled out, with more and more children affected every day.
The number of children affected by the policy will continue to increase until 2035 when the first children born under the two-child limit turn 18.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The National
12 minutes ago
- The National
Anti-indy media fears success shows Scotland trumps Westminster
Social Justice Secretary Shirley-Anne Somerville has announced that the Scottish Government will end the two-child benefit cap in March next year. While Keir Starmer hums and haws and gets his minions to leak to the press that he is looking at lifting the cap without committing himself to anything concrete, the SNP and the Scottish Government get on with doing it. Somerville said: "The Scottish Government has consistently called on the UK Government to end the two-child cap. Reports suggest that they are looking at the impact it is having. But the evidence is clear, and families and Scotland can't wait any longer for the UK Government to make up its mind to do the right thing and scrap the cap once and for all.' READ MORE: We must show voters how things would be different with independence The controversial cap was introduced by the Conservatives under Theresa May (below) in 2017. It denies child allowances in Universal Credit and tax credits to third or subsequent children born after April 2017. The cap has been blamed for being the single biggest factor in the rise in child poverty in the UK. (Image: Hannah McKay/PA Wire)Almost one third of children across the UK are classified as living in relative poverty, 70% of whom live in households where at least one parent is in work. According to anti-poverty charity the Joseph Rowntree Foundation, current levels of poverty are around 50% higher than they were in the 1970s. Thanks to the Scottish Child Payment, introduced in February 2021, Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is decreasing. The Scottish Government is hamstrung by the limitations of the devolution settlement and cannot mitigate entirely the pernicious effects of UK Government tax, benefit, and economic policies. While child poverty in Scotland remains a serious problem, 22% of Scottish children were assessed as living in poverty in 2023/24, down from 26% the previous year. This is significantly lower than the child poverty rates in other parts of the UK. 31% of children in England and Wales are assessed as living in poverty, a figure that increases to 36% in the West Midlands. Unlike in Scotland, the rate of child poverty in England and Wales continues to rise. The reduction in child poverty in Scotland is a remarkable success for the Scottish Government. It is largely due to the introduction of the Scottish Child payment, which, unlike Westminster administered benefits, is not limited to the first two children in a family. READ MORE: UK 'feeding Scotland poison pills', John Swinney says Professor Danny Dorling of Oxford University said that the Scottish Child Payment was responsible for the biggest reduction in inequality caused by a single policy change since the collapse of the Berlin Wall. He said that he was unable to find any other policy which has had as big an impact on reducing inequality as the Scottish Child Payment. Yet the Scottish Government gets very little credit for this in the Scottish or British media, as Professor Dorling noted: "It's a remarkable story and the second remarkable story is how it hasn't been reported." It's not reported in England because Scotland might as well be the moon as far as the London-centric media is concerned. It's not reported in Scotland because Scotland's laughably imbalanced anti-independence media has an existential terror of reporting anything successful in Scotland for fear this might lead people to believe that Scotland can actually do better than Westminster at governance. Or worse, lead them to think that perhaps with independence Scotland could do even better. Note how BBC Scotland framed the news earlier this that Scotland is the only part of the UK where the rate of child poverty is falling. The BBC's headline was "Scotland misses targets on reducing child poverty." The news that the rate of child poverty in England and Wales was much higher and was rising was buried deep within a piece which did not explicitly spell out that Scotland is the only part of the UK where child poverty is falling; a Scottish success was spun as a failure. READ MORE: 2031 Scotland census planning underway as public input sought on new questions This tells us that a policy of boosting support for independence through good governance in a devolved government is never going to succeed, because the anti-independence media in Scotland, which is the overwhelming majority of media outlets in Scotland, will continue to loudly trumpet all the Scottish Government's failures and will either ignore its successes or find some angle to spin those as failures too. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment. The Scottish media has almost ignored the introduction of the Scottish Adult Disability Payment, whose streamlined, medically based assessment system is far less stressful and demeaning for disabled people than the complex and unnecessarily cruel assessment for the Personal Independence Payment which it replaced. No doubt the same will happen with the new Two Child Limit Payment, unless there are teething problems with the new benefit, in which case the Scottish media will be screaming SNP failure from the rafter In another Scottish success story which is being ignored, a new study has found that Scotland has been the top destination for foreign direct investment in the UK outside of London for a decade. Figures from EY – one of the 'big four' accounting firms – showed that in 2024 Scotland attracted 15.8% of the UK projects targeted for foreign direct investment (FDI), up from 14.4% in 2023 and above its decade average of 11.5%.
Telegraph
13 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Scotland's rubbish is England's only reward
What does the rest of the UK get in return for the 'Union dividend' – currently totalling £52 billion – the sum that Scotland receives from the UK taxpayers to help persuade it to remain part of Britain? Around 100 truckloads of rubbish to be dumped at various landfill sites throughout the North of England seems a likely answer. Despite the extra cash received by the SNP government being arguably a fair old 'bung' – the product of the four decades-old Barnett formula – the payback is shaping up to be many thousands of black bags, including commercial waste, to be sent to the likes of Cumbria and Northumberland because of SNP incompetence or arrogance. They're to be heading south because the Scottish Government does not want its green and pleasant acres spoiled by any more rubbish being buried at landfill sites north of the border after December 31. We are not talking here about just the odd black bag. One waste expert told BBC Scotland that it would require between 80 and 100 trucks running seven days per week to move up to 600,000 tons to English landfills. The only real alternative to landfill is incineration, but SNP ministers have halted the building of any more incinerators because they can't afford them, even if they're receiving what's been described as a record £52 billion 'war chest' for use in the Scottish Parliament election campaign next May. I suspect the public will find that a hard one to swallow. Energy minister Gillian Martin blamed inflation and higher material costs for the hold-up in building new incinerators, but she also cited 'outside factors' for the delay – usual SNP code to signal that the government in London is to blame. And Ms Martin didn't apologise for the fact that the lack of incinerators might last another three years, saying that getting rid of landfill sites in Scotland 'far outweighs' any downsides that might arise from sending the rubbish over the border. But as any fair-minded person might ask: who will pick up the bills? In financial terms it is Scottish business leaders who will have to pay for the trucking of their commercial waste to landfill sites in England. And in environmental terms, I can't imagine that the northern English will be overjoyed at receiving all of this Scottish muck. The whole project is an example of nationalist insensitivity at best or arrogance at worst. Many Scots are too ready to see insults – real or imagined – in the words and actions of the English yet refuse to take care when it comes to their southern neighbours' feelings. Speaking as a Scot I was pleased to see criticism of this stupid affair emanating from most parts of the political spectrum. The Lib Dems' Liam McArthur, who is the party's climate spokesman, accused the SNP of planning to make England 'their dumping ground for waste'. The Tories' Douglas Lumsden said there should be 'red faces all round among SNP ministers at this news'. I doubt if he'll get his wish, because of that other piece of embarrassing news – regarding the Scottish headteacher who banned pupils from bringing Union flags to school as they were deemed to be potentially offensive or sectarian. The flags had been brought to school for a special end of term event and the head's action in effectively banning the United Kingdom's flag provoked a storm of criticism, after she had told pupils that their action had been 'contrary to the school's values of respect and kindness.' The local council, East Renfrewshire, has issued an apology, but that hasn't prevented Jackson Carlaw, a local MSP and former Scottish Tory leader, from saying that to equate the Union flag with sectarianism was 'totally unacceptable and deeply offensive'. There has been no response from the SNP on this issue but then anyone who knows anything about the party will know that a large proportion of its members and supporters hate the Union flag; indeed many call it 'the butcher's apron'. Following his humiliating loss to Labour in the recent by-election, First Minister John Swinney has sought to keep his troops happy with yet another speech promising that he'd fight for independence. However when it comes to flags, as well as black bags, it seems his party is determined to get nothing right.
Western Telegraph
19 minutes ago
- Western Telegraph
Holocaust memorial critics warn of creating ‘monument to death and the Nazis'
Critics of the controversial scheme argue it is not too late to 'tweak' the 'botched' proposals and have vowed to continue their fight. Concerns were again raised at Westminster as legislation paving the way for the delayed development took a further step forward. The chosen site in Victoria Tower Gardens, located immediately adjacent to Parliament, has been contentious, with disquiet over the loss of green space in central London, the design of the scheme and security implications. It is not too late to tweak it and build not a monument to death and the Nazis but one dedicated to the need to preserve and understand Jewish life Baroness Deech A main obstacle to supporters was a 1900 law protecting the small triangular Grade II-listed park, which led to the quashing of planning permission after a legal battle. To overcome this, the Labour Government reintroduced the Holocaust Memorial Bill, proposed by the previous Tory administration. It will both authorise expenditure on the construction, maintenance and operation of the memorial and learning centre, and also disapply sections of the 1900 Act, removing the legal obstacle that has prevented the project from going ahead. The Bill received its third reading in the Lords on Tuesday and now goes to the Commons for MPs to consider a single change made by peers, making clear the sole purpose of the learning centre 'must be the provision of education about the Holocaust and antisemitism'. Independent crossbencher Baroness Deech, who lost her grandparents in the Holocaust, has been a leading critic of the proposed scheme. She said: 'Once we are free of the fears of this Government that any alternative is somehow giving in to the antisemitism of which the party was accused a few years ago – that is simply not the case – we will go forward with a planning process that might yet rescue this botched plan. 'It is not too late to tweak it and build not a monument to death and the Nazis but one dedicated to the need to preserve and understand Jewish life. 'At a time when a new version of the desire to destroy Jewish life in the Middle East and elsewhere is playing out as we speak, we could have a learning centre that extended to the achievement of the survivors of the Holocaust in building what was a safe haven for Jews, a land of their own. 'Is it not ironic that this Government are so respectful of six million dead but so cavalier about the fate of seven million of their descendants in Israel right now?' She added: 'We who understand what is at stake will continue to press our case. The fight is not over.' Liberal Democrat Baroness Walmsley said: 'I thank all those who pointed out the risks and drawbacks of the choice the Government have made about the location of the learning centre and express a hope that, on reflection, the Government may in time make a different choice.' Tory former minister Lord Robathan said: 'As somebody who cares hugely about the Jewish Holocaust and the ghastly thing it is, the site for the learning centre is wrong. 'It will be cramped and is not worthy of what we wish to commemorate. 'I say to the minister and others that back this, I personally don't believe it will be built, because there are going to be so many problems once you start destroying Victoria Gardens to do this.' We have made a solemn commitment never to forget the horrors of the Holocaust and to work to ensure that it will never happen again Baroness Scott of Bybrook Independent crossbencher Lord Inglewood, who is president of Historic Buildings & Places, said: 'I have to say to the House that, the more the Bill progressed, the more I became convinced that this proposal was overdevelopment and in the wrong place. 'I do not wish to say any more, other than, with sadness, that this Bill, the Holocaust Memorial Bill, will no doubt shortly be going on the statute. In my view it is not properly named. It is the Victoria Tower Gardens Destruction Bill.' Backing the project, Tory shadow communities minister, Baroness Scott of Bybrook, said: 'We have made a solemn commitment never to forget the horrors of the Holocaust and to work to ensure that it will never happen again. 'Holocaust education is an essential part of our efforts to make good on those promises. 'It has been the policy of successive Conservative governments that we need a national Holocaust memorial and learning centre.' Communities minister Lord Khan of Burnley said: 'Through this Bill, the Government are moving a step closer to delivering on the long-standing commitment to build a national Holocaust memorial and learning centre next to Parliament, where it rightly belongs.' He added: 'I think there are still some outstanding concerns, but let me reassure members who have them that, subject to the passage of the Bill in the other House and on to the statute book, there will be a process for people to put their representations, views and ideas forward about prospective future planning.'
