US treasury chief says status quo with China 'working pretty well'
"China is right now the biggest revenue line in the tariff income," Bessent said in an interview on Fox News' "The Ingraham Angle" show.
"We have had very good talks with China, I imagine we will be seeing them again before November," he added.
"I think right now the status quo is working pretty well."
Last week, Washington and Beijing extended a tariff truce for another 90 days to November, staving off triple-digit duties on each other's goods.
The two sides initially announced a truce in their trade dispute in May after talks in Geneva, agreeing to a 90-day period to allow further talks. They met again in Sweden in late July after which U.S. negotiators returned to Washington with a recommendation that President Donald Trump extend the deadline.
Washington has also been urging Beijing to stop buying Russian oil to pressure Moscow over its war in Ukraine, but Trump said on Friday there were no imminent plans to impose retaliatory tariffs on China, in light of talks on ending the war.
Trump held a summit with Russian President Vladimir Putin in Alaska on Friday and a meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy, as well as NATO and European leaders, at the White House on Monday.
After those meetings, he said Zelenskiy and Putin will hold a bilateral meeting before a trilateral meeting that would also include Trump.
Bessent was asked on Fox News about reporting that Budapest could be a possible city for the three-way talks. He said that "could be" the case but that the bilateral meeting needed to happen first.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
23 minutes ago
- Times
Men dominate boards and executive teams of companies going public
It's the 'Bro IPO' summer, according to an analysis of US listings, as men overwhelmingly dominate the boards and executive teams of newly floated companies or those preparing to go public. A study of 61 companies that filed initial public offering documents in the first two weeks of August found that nearly 88 per cent of the firms, most of which were in the technology sector, had only one or no women on their board of directors. And 93 per cent of the firms studied had only one or no women among their top level executives. Damion Rallis, co-founder of board data firm Free Float Analytics and a former analyst at MSCI, who conducted the research, said it was a'Bro IPO' summer for the stock market. 'What I'm seeing more and more of, is that men are the only ones who seem to be enriching themselves off this IPO market,' Rallis said. In total, women made up only 12 per cent of the 349 directors and 11 per cent of 205 executives identified by Rallis in the filings. Prominent stock market listings this month have included Bullish, the crypto exchange that raised $1.1 billion at a $5.4 billion valuation last week. The company lists one woman on its 12-person executive team and one woman on its six-person board. StubHub, the ticket-selling exchange that is preparing an IPO, has one female executive on its team of five and one woman across its team of 10 executives and board directors. There has been an improvement in overall female representation on US boards in recent years. At the end of June last year, women held 30 per cent of the seats on Russell 3000 company boards, up from 29 per cent in 2023 and 28 per cent in 2022 However, US boards are under less pressure to improve diversity after a US appeals court in December ruled that Nasdaq could not impose rules requiring companies listed on the exchange to have women and minority directors on their boards or to explain why they do not. President Trump has criticised corporate diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) efforts and axed government initiatives. In February, Goldman Sachs cancelled a four-year-old policy to only take public companies that had two diverse board members, citing 'legal developments related to board diversity requirements'. In February, Goldman Sachs, led by David Solomon cancelled a policy to only take public companies that had two diverse board members SETH WENIG/AP Rallis said he has noticed fewer women being appointed to boards since 'the political winds have changed in America'. He said: 'There was this kind of minimum threshold to have about three women on the board, roughly 30 per cent, and I'm noticing now that more and more boards are going down to two, they're going down to one. They just don't care as much as they used to.'
Telegraph
35 minutes ago
- Telegraph
To Americans, Britain is no longer the free country we thought it was
Every year, the US Department of State releases a report on human rights practices in other countries (CRHRP). One of my first assignments as a political officer at the US embassy was to coordinate and edit one country report. Not surprisingly, certain governments sometimes take issue with how their policies are characterised in the CRHRP. For example, South Africa claimed a recent CRHRP was 'inaccurate and deeply flawed' in criticising them for failing to 'investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses … or violence against racial minorities'. President Cyril Ramaphosa seemed bewildered in May when President Trump took him to task for the murders of white farmers. His government's defence seems to be that South Africa's horrific levels of crime afflict everyone, not just white people, and that the motives are not racist but merely criminal. That is unlikely to mollify a country impoverished under an incompetent succession of ANC leaders, nor will Ramaphosa's explanation that they haven't actually used their sweeping new Land Expropriation Act inspire commercial farmers who feed the country to invest in their farms. But I digress. China doesn't just reject US criticism, they've cheekily published their own report criticising the US for 'the chronic disease of racism,' and 'basic rights and freedoms being disregarded'. Usually, the governments taking the most criticism in the CRHRP are repressive or feckless regimes, from China to Zimbabwe, that suppress free speech, stifle religious expression, or oppress women, minority groups, and political dissidents. That doesn't sound like the England in which I was born over half a century ago. But this year, the Country Report on the UK flags Britain as a risky place to speak your mind. The CRHRP claims that 'the human rights situation worsened in the United Kingdom during the year,' citing 'credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by anti-Semitism'. The report notes restrictions on speech – even silent meditation – near abortion clinics, and the Online Safety Act's curtailment of internet speech, policed by Ofcom. It calls out government censorship of speech deemed misinformation or 'hate speech', including in relation to migrants and crimes committed by foreign nationals. It could have gone even further. In its section on Worker Rights, the CRHRP doesn't discuss the people who have been sacked or disciplined for refusing to accept the forced speech codes of gender ideology, like prison officer David Toshack or nurse Jennifer Melle; or for social media posters who have criticised government action, like teacher Simon Pearson. Like the proverbial frog in slowly heating water, perhaps Brits can't see what is happening to their freedoms. But looking from the outside, we can, and the State Department has called it out. In reaction, I expect the British Left to be as indignant and in denial as the establishment in Washington DC is about crime. Now Donald Trump has temporarily taken over local law enforcement in the city, the Leftist establishment and the national media are claiming that violent crime is lower than in recent years. This ignores some inconvenient realities. First, unreliable numbers. The city has reportedly just settled a lawsuit from a whistleblowing police officer who had alleged that her supervisors were re-classifying serious crimes as lesser offences, to flatter the city's crime statistics. Second, even the supposedly lower murder rate puts Washington among the most dangerous cities in the nation. Like the DC establishment, the British government and much of the media are happy to ignore Lucy Connolly, who is still in prison after she made an unwise online post (and then deleted it); Hamit Coskun, who was prosecuted after he burnt a book; and the thousands of ordinary Brits who have been accused of 'Non-Crime Hate Incidents,' which is at the very least an astonishing waste of police time. The Left likes to pretend that the real villains in the fight for free speech are people like Kathleen Stock, Maya Forstater, and JK Rowling, who courageously state objective truth, rather than the gender ideologues trying to force women to accept men in their changing rooms, prisons, and shelters. George Orwell, Aldous Huxley, and other writers of the early 20th century predicted a future where the populace was dumbed down, repressed, and fed information by an authoritarian state. In the dystopian futures they imagined in 1984 and Brave New World, independent, critical thinking was banned and speech violators were punished. That sounds like the logical destiny of Britain if it maintains its present course. There is already a semi-official dogma on gender ideology, immigration, and crime which it is costly to challenge. Censorship and group-think get worse if not disrupted. Instead of rejecting America's criticism in high dudgeon, I hope Britain will heed the warning of its Atlantic cousins and return to the people their right to speak their minds. For the land of Magna Carta to slowly sink into repression and state control would be a great injustice to Britain's present inhabitants, and an insult to our ancestors' work of centuries. 'The Ten Woke Commandments (You Must Not Obey)' from Academica Books.
The Guardian
38 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Target CEO steps down as company faces weak sales and customer boycott
$The CEO of Target is stepping down, as the embattled retail giant seeks to turn around its fortunes amid an ongoing customer boycott over its scaling back of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives. Brian Cornell will be replaced next year by Michael Fiddelke, Target's chief operating officer, the company said on Wednesday. Cornell helped re-energize the company when he became CEO in 2014, but has struggled to turn around weak sales in a more competitive retail landscape since the Covid pandemic. Sales at Target, which has almost 2,000 stores across the US, fell more than expected in the first quarter of 2025, and the retailer warned earlier this year that sales will continue to slip through the rest of the year. Target said people were scaling back spending over worries about the impact of tariffs and the state of the economy. The company also said customer boycotts affected sales. The company scaled back many DEI initiatives in January after they came under attack by conservative activists and the White House. The retreat created a backlash, and a poll in February found that Americans had changed their shopping habits and abandoned some stores in response to corporations shifting their policies to align with the Trump administration. The Guardian reported in July that many Black Americans were boycotting stores including Target and Amazon, and earlier this year more than 250,000 people signed a pledge to boycott Target after the Rev Jamal Bryant, pastor of New Birth Baptist church in Georgia, called for a 40-day 'Target Fast' that started at the beginning of the Lenten season. The company had previously come under fire in 2024 after it reduced its collection of LGBTQ+-themed merchandise for Pride month, in response to rightwing criticism. Target reported a 21% drop in net income in second quarter of this year. Sales were down slightly and the company reported a 1.9% dip in comparable sales – those from established physical stores and online channels. The company has seen flat or declining comparable sales in eight out of the past 10 quarters including the latest period.
