
Arsenal's gaudy transfer fee for Canadian forward Olivia Smith buzzes at home
The one million pounds (C$1.85 million) Arsenal paid Liverpool for 20-year-old forward Olivia Smith of Whitby, Ont., in the Women's Super League is the biggest price tag in women's soccer history for a transfer.
Matheson says an accelerating transfer fee market bodes well for the NSL, which kicked off this year with six teams and a mission to provide the first domestic women's pro league for Canadian and international players.
'The growth of the market really helps us sell to investors in Canada and abroad,' she said. 'The transfer market is obviously a piece of that puzzle.
'This is where the market is at that a Canadian player is going for this and how exciting is it like that we're not far around the corner now that we have a professional league, that if top Canadians choose to leave the Canadian league in the future, clubs could be selling them for a whole lot of money because we create such world-class players.'
Smith's transfer to the Gunners announced Thursday surpassed the previous high of 900,000 pounds (C$1.6 million) Chelsea paid the NWSL's San Diego Wave for American centre back Naomi Girma in January.
'To be part of a movement that's changing how the game is valued is an honour,' Smith said in a statement released by her public relations agency.
'This is a huge step forward for women's soccer and for Canadian soccer. I hope this shows young Canadian girls that anything is possible.'
Serita Thurton of the NSL's Wild FC said rumours about Smith's transfer to Arsenal before it was announced was a topic of discussion in the Calgary club's dressing room.
'Seeing a Canadian player break a record like this, it kind of just shows that Canada has a lot to offer when it comes to quality in soccer players,' said the forward from Ajax, Ont.
'It definitely makes our league look a lot better. Even though she isn't playing it, just the fact that it is a Canadian league, it does make a statement saying that Canada has quality players and that we're a football country in our own right. So yeah, it definitely has a good look in that sense.'
Matheson, who retired in 2021, says a transfer fee market for women was nonexistent for most of her career.
'The Olivia Smith transfer is an indication of the strength of the women's soccer transfer market and the overall business model,' she said.
'We all know what transfer fee market looks like on the men's side. And then the women's side, this is a fairly newer revenue stream.
'How exciting is it that like we produce so many incredible players like Olivia, what a positive indicator for women's soccer in Canada that we now have a league and these future players could be playing in Canada, and these giant transfer fees could actually be coming to Canadian clubs in the future and actually fuelling the growth of Canadian women's soccer.'
The most expensive transfer fee on the men's side was 200 million pounds (CDN $368 million) for Neymar's move from Barcelona to Paris Saint-Germain in 2017. FIFA reported US$8.59 billion was spent on men's transfers in 2024.
The women's transfer market was small by comparison at $15.6 million, but was double the amount of 2023. Given the rapid expansion, Smith might not hold the record long.
'This is a touch point on the value of the marketplace when so many people are looking for data points and growth factors,' said Cheri Bradish, an associate professor and director of Future of Sport Lab and Sport Initiatives at Toronto Metropolitan University.
'It just really validates the growth and development of the women's sports market.'
A Deloitte study predicted global revenues in women's elite sports will reach at least US$2.35 billion (C$3.2 billion) in 2025, with women's soccer accounting for 35 per cent behind basketball at 44.
Arsenal's investment in Smith is interesting on multiple fronts, says Canadian Women and Sport chief executive officer Allison Sandmeyer-Graves.
'Just knowing that Olivia's a Canadian, what a cool indicator of just the quality of Canadian talent,' she said.
'It's about the calibre of the player already, but also for the player's incredible potential going forward. They expect her star to continue rising and they expect that next time there's a trade the figure is going to be even higher, but also that she is going to be a very productive player while she's there with their team.
'We are talking wins and losses, but we're also talking about commercial value. They obviously expect that her being in their club is going to be a driver of revenue and of value for their club.'
This report by The Canadian Press was first published July 17, 2025.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
2025's Most Attractive Employers For MBAs: Finance Surges, Tech Fades
JPMorgan Chase is the most attractive employer for U.S. business students, signaling a shift to tried and true employment pipelines in an uncertain job market. What a difference a few years makes. In 2022, when tech was still flying high, business students wanted to work in FAANG – the now out-dated acronym for the five best-performing American tech stocks of the time (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, and Google.) That year, three of the top five of the were FAANG: Apple was voted the most attractive by business students followed by Google at No. 2. Amazon was No. 4 another tech behemoth – Microsoft – came in at No. 3. But in 2025? None of them cracked the top three. Facebook is now Meta. Google is Alphabet. And amid high-profile layoffs and the disruptive rise of artificial intelligence, . Business students are coming back to their finance roots. All three of the top employers in Universum's 2025 Most Attractive Employers in the U.S. ranking are bulge-bracket banks: JPMorgan Chase took the No. 1 spot for the second straight year, followed by Goldman Sachs (No. 2) and Morgan Stanley (No. 3) Universum, the global employer branding firm, surveys more than 130,000 business, engineering, and IT students across 11 key markets each year to complete its ranking. In the U.S. alone, more than 33,000 students – including thousands of MBAs and business students – shared their career preferences in the 2025 survey. This year, five of the top 10 most attractive employers for U.S. business students were banks or asset managers. Just three were in tech. JPMorgan Chase was No. 1 for the second straight year while Morgan Stanley made one of the most dramatic moves on the list. It rose 9 spots from No. 12 in 2024 to No. 3. Other newcomers to the top 10 included Deloitte, BlackRock, and Bank of America, signaling renewed interest in firms and industries with established business school pipelines. 1 JPMorgan Chase Banking 1 2 Goldman Sachs Financial Services 4 3 Morgan Stanley Financial Services 12 4 Apple Technology 3 5 Google Technology 2 6 Nike Consumer Goods 5 7 Deloitte Professional Services 11 8 Bank of America Banking 13 9 BlackRock Asset Management 14 10 Microsoft Technology 8 During the COVID-19 pandemic and the years that followed, many MBAs turned to tech and consulting for their innovation, pay, and flexibility. But tech started a very public which continued through the Business students are recalibrating. 'Now it's shifted, and it's gone the other direction. It's a very different market than just a few years ago,' said Jeff Rugg, global account director at Universum, during a recent webinar on the rankings. In an unsure job market, finance has resurged. Among the top 100 preferred U.S. employers for business students, 34 were finance-related, compared to 23 in tech and just 9 in consulting. Even the MBB firms – McKinsey (No. 27), Bain & Co. (No. 74), and Boston Consulting Group (No. 36) – fell out of the top 20. Consulting, the other big MBA-destination industry, had only 9 companies on the list. The MBB – McKinsey (ranked No. 27), Bain (No. 74), and Boston Consulting Group (No. 36) – fell out of the top 20 altogether. 'The job market is moving, but not for everyone,' says Paola Ospina, a global account manager at Universum. 'Companies are pulling back on entry-level hiring. This generation is facing an employment crisis, and landing a job has become a real challenge for many of them.' Where MBAs once targeted a short list of 'dream' companies, many are now casting wider nets. While students in past surveys emphasized purpose, flexibility, and making an impact, 2025's survey suggests business students are making more pragmatic decisions. Career growth and competitive pay are now the top two attributes business students look for in an employer, according to Universum. A respectful workplace culture ranked third. 'There's a completely frustrated pool of candidates being ghosted by employers, wasting their time,' Ospina says. 'They're not really being valued. And again, it's all over social media.' Flexibility still matters, but not necessarily remote work. Only 4% of students said they would refuse a job that didn't offer remote options. The rest either preferred flexibility or said they could adjust. 'This generation wants to go into the office,' says Ospina, noting that younger grads started college during the pandemic, when campuses were either closed down or heavily restricted. 'They are craving that in-person interaction.' As Rugg notes, companies like JPMorgan Chase and Amazon – both of which require employees to be in the office – are ranked highly by business students. 'It should give confidence to employers in the marketplace,' he said. Artificial intelligence was another hot topic in this year's survey. While 75% of students said they felt positive or curious about working for an employer that uses AI, 57% said they had not developed AI-related skills. 'So there's a bit of a disconnect,' says Nikki Trifunovic, an employer brand and talent acquisition advisor. The gap is even more pronounced for women, who reported lower levels of AI preparedness than their male peers. For employers, that's both a challenge and an opportunity. Companies that offer robust training and upskilling could be better positioned to attract and retain early-career MBA talent. The 2025 Universum rankings land at a tricky moment in the U.S. labor market. On one hand, it is still adding jobs (147,000 in June alone) while unemployment sits at 4.1%. On the other? 'There is growing uncertainty for employers on what's to happen with the tariffs and all of the policy shifts that are coming,' Ospina says. 'We'll definitely see the full effect of this as we get into the second half of the year.' In response, many employers are moving into a conservative hiring mode. Budgets are tighter. Teams are being asked to do more with less. And companies are laser focused on hiring the right talent, especially those who can drive digital transformation. For candidates, especially new grads, the result is a job market that feels pretty bleak. Only 35% of students felt confident that they would be able to find a job after graduation. The uncertainty feels a lot like the pandemic when companies froze hiring and layoffs were everywhere, Ospina says. Particularly for Generation Z. 'And in their true Gen Z fashion, they're being very vocal about it all over TikTok and social media. They're calling it like they see it – messy, and I think, literally, the worst job market ever,' she says. 'All of that frustration we're seeing online and in the media articles, it's not just noise. It's actually showing up in our data too.' Read Universum's 2025 report on the Most Attractive Employers In The United States. NEXT PAGE: The 100 most-desired employers of B-school students according to Universum's 2025 survey. Goldman Sachs was the second most attractive employer for business school students, according to Universum's 2025 ranking. Universum publishes its Most Attractive Employer Rankings every year in more than 20 countries. Rankings are a reflection of talent's overall opinion of employers in their countries. The top 100 companies as ranked by U.S. business students are listed below. 1 JPMorgan Chase Banking 1 2 Goldman Sachs Financial Services 4 3 Morgan Stanley Financial Services 12 4 Apple Technology 3 5 Google Technology 2 6 Nike Consumer Goods 5 7 Deloitte Professional Services 11 8 Bank of America Banking 13 9 BlackRock Asset Management 14 10 Microsoft Technology 8 11 Amazon E‑commerce / Technology 10 12 Netflix Media & Entertainment 6 13 Spotify Media & Entertainment 7 14 Fidelity Investments Financial Services 15 15 Charles Schwab Financial Services 20 16 EY (Ernst & Young) Professional Services 16 17 The Walt Disney Company Media & Entertainment 9 18 KPMG Professional Services 22 19 PwC Professional Services 23 20 Wells Fargo Banking 28 21 Blackstone Private Equity 43 22 L'Oréal Groupe Consumer Goods 37 23 American Express Financial Services 33 24 Lockheed Martin Aerospace & Defense 40 25 Berkshire Hathaway Conglomerate 39 26 Vanguard Financial Services 27 27 McKinsey & Company Management Consulting 36 28 Mercedes-Benz Group Automotive 26 29 The Coca-Cola Company Consumer Goods 35 30 Tesla Automotive / Tech 17 31 Capital One Financial Services 45 32 Patagonia Retail / Apparel 24 33 Delta Air Lines Airlines 18 34 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Government 30 35 Nintendo Technology / Entertainment 21 36 Boston Consulting Group (BCG) Management Consulting 44 37 Sony Technology / Entertainment 25 38 Warner Bros. Discovery Media & Entertainment 29 39 Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) Government 34 40 BMW Group Automotive 42 41 Marriott International Hospitality 38 42 Ford Motor Company Automotive 49 43 adidas Retail / Apparel 47 44 Airbnb Travel / Tech 55 45 Estée Lauder Consumer Goods 73 46 PNC Financial Services Group Banking 64 47 Toyota Automotive 41 48 Target Retail 31 49 Edward Jones Financial Services 69 50 PepsiCo Consumer Goods 59 51 Paramount Media & Entertainment 46 52 General Motors Automotive 66 53 IBM Technology 70 54 National Geographic Media / Publishing 32 55 SpaceX Aerospace 53 56 Johnson & Johnson Healthcare 87 57 Boeing Aerospace 51 58 Hilton Hospitality 58 59 Meta Technology / Social Media 85 60 Federal Reserve Government 54 61 Procter & Gamble Consumer Goods 99 62 LVMH Luxury Goods 71 63 United Airlines Airlines 48 64 United Nations International Organization 62 65 Citi Banking 86 66 American Airlines Airlines 52 67 Zara Retail / Apparel 67 68 Adobe Technology 56 69 TD Bank Group Banking — 70 S&P Global Financial Data 91 71 Starbucks Retail / Food 75 72 Mayo Clinic Healthcare 65 73 Barclays Banking — 74 Bain & Company Management Consulting 88 75 Nordstrom Retail 92 76 Southwest Airlines Airlines 63 77 Salesforce Technology — 78 State Farm Insurance Insurance 84 79 UBS Banking — 80 Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Government 60 81 Mastercard Financial Services 98 82 Under Armour Retail / Apparel 100 83 Department of Defense (DOD) Government 57 84 Northwestern Mutual Insurance — 85 Department of the Treasury (USDT) Government 90 86 Electronic Arts Entertainment / Gaming 80 87 Visa Financial Services 74 88 Oracle Technology — 89 Robinhood Fintech — 90 Deutsche Bank Banking 61 91 Intel Technology 76 92 Live Nation Entertainment Entertainment 89 93 Honda Automotive 81 94 United States Department of State (DOS) Government 96 95 National Institutes of Health (NIH) Government / Healthcare — 96 Bloomberg Financial Media 82 97 MGM Resorts International Hospitality 94 98 Walmart Retail 93 99 Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Government — 100 The Hershey Company Consumer Goods — DON'T MISS: THE SECRET STANFORD PROGRAM NO ONE'S HEARD ABOUT AND WHY THIS FASHION-TECH FOUNDER CHOSE THE DUKE FUQUA MBA TO PIVOT TO PRODUCT MANAGEMENT The post 2025's Most Attractive Employers For MBAs: Finance Surges, Tech Fades appeared first on Poets&Quants. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


USA Today
17 minutes ago
- USA Today
2026 FIFA World Cup draw to be held in Las Vegas
They say "what happens in Vegas, stays in Vegas," but FIFA might have to break the tradition when it comes to the 2026 World Cup draw. A report from ESPN says that Las Vegas will host the draw for soccer's biggest spectacle, which will be hosted at venues across the United States, Mexico, and Canada next year. FIFA has yet to officially announce a venue or date for the draw. The 2026 World Cup will be the first to include 48 teams, and the first to be hosted by three nations. 11 U.S. cities will host games, along with three Mexican cities (Guadalajara, Mexico City, and Monterrey), and two more in Canada (Toronto and Vancouver). Las Vegas submitted a bid to host matches at Allegiant Stadium, but were rejected during the voting process. The draw will be used to sort the 48 teams that qualify for the tournament into 12 groups of four. Mexico (Group A), Canada (Group B), and the U.S. (Group D) have already been placed in their respective groups. The report says that Canadian and Mexican venues were considered for the draw, but were ultimately ruled out. ESPN cited Pedro Cedillo, an executive at Mexican club CF Pachuca, that he expects to be in Sin City on December 5 to present competing teams with information about training camp bases in the Mexican state of Hidalgo. Las Vegas also hosted the draw for the 1994 World Cup, the last time the men's version of the tournament was held on U.S. soil. However, per ESPN's report, the draw is likely to be held at The Sphere, a 17,500-capacity venue featuring a unique spherical screen. The Sphere, opened in 2023, has rapidly become a Vegas landmark at events like F1's Las Vegas Grand Prix. 2026 World Cup: What to know ahead of biggest soccer tournament in the world World Cup 2026: What cities will host games? Matches at the 2026 World Cup will take place in Canada, Mexico, and the United States. Here is a full list of cities and corresponding venues: World Cup 2026: Which countries have qualified? Of the 48 spots available at the 2026 World Cup, 13 places have been claimed. Qualifying in each of FIFA's six confederations is ongoing, but in some cases teams have still clinched their place. Additionally, the final six places will be determined by an intercontinental playoff in March 2026, with six teams that narrowly missed qualifying directly getting one last shot. Here is a breakdown of who has already qualified for the 2026 World Cup: No team has yet qualified via the Confederation of African Football (CAF)'s qualifying process. Asia has one more round of qualifying that will determine the final two nations to secure an automatic berth at the World Cup, as well as the two teams that will battle for the Asian Football Confederation (AFC)'s one spot in the intercontinental playoff. No team has claimed one of UEFA's 16 berths at the 2026 World Cup. In many cases, qualifying has not even started yet, as the process is staggered based on group size. CONCACAF has not begun the decisive third round of its World Cup qualifying process, but has at least winnowed a pool of 32 entrants down to a final 12 teams. Canada, Mexico, and the United States did not have to participate in qualifying, as FIFA grants host nations an automatic berth. New Caledonia has secured a spot as Oceania's playoff representative. While Uruguay and Paraguay have not officially clinched a spot in the 2026 World Cup, both cannot fall further than seventh in CONMEBOL's qualifying process, meaning the worst either country can do is advance to the intercontinental playoff. USA TODAY Sports' 48-page special edition commemorates 30 years of Major League Soccer, from its best players to key milestones and championship dynasties to what exciting steps are next with the World Cup ahead. Order your copy today!


TechCrunch
17 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
Space Force bets on commercial entrants in $4B satcom contest
American warfighters need jam-proof communications, and the Space Force is planning to spend hundreds of millions to ensure they have them. As part of that effort, the service established the Protected Tactical Satcom program to build out secure battlefield communications via satellites. The Space Force has already awarded contracts to defense primes Boeing and Northrop Grumman to develop prototype payloads for satellites heading to far-away geostationary orbit. Now, the program is entering a new phase. On Tuesday, the Space Force awarded five additional contracts for the design and demonstration of purpose-built satellites to provide jam-resistant comms to tactical forces. The winners include previous winners Boeing, Northrop Grumman, Viasat, and Intelsat, plus a relative newcomer: Astranis, a venture-backed startup based in San Francisco. (Intelsat will buy its satellite bus from K2 Space, another venture-backed startup.) The initial awards are relatively small, totaling $37.3 million combined. But the program has a $4 billion award ceiling, so the winners could sign on to a much more lucrative defense deal. Each firm will develop its architectures through January 2026. After that, the Space Force will select one design and award an additional contract for the first satellite, with a launch planned in 2028. Additional production awards will be doled out, also in 2028. The PTS-G contracts are a notable departure from how the military has historically procured geostationary satellites, which have typically had extremely long timelines from contract award to launch, and would cost hundreds of millions to over a billion dollars per spacecraft. In contrast, the Space Force is clearly trying to leverage the speed of commercial entrants and encourage competition by selecting multiple vendors for the initial phase of the program. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW 'Our PTS-G contract transforms how SSC acquires SATCOM capability for the warfighter,' program executive officer Cordell DeLaPena Jr. said in a news release. 'The incorporation of commercial baseline designs to meet military capability significantly enhances the Space Force's speed and efficiency to add capability to meet emerging threats.'