
My test found the Honor 400 Pro's image to video AI a bit freaky, but I still think it's a fantastic mid-ranger
An exceptionally capable all-rounder. The Honor 400 Pro might not have the same mainstream appeal as its Big Three rivals, but it easily competes with them on cameras, battery and software smarts.
Pros Long-lasting battery with rapid wired and wireless charging
Colourful, engaging photos in almost all conditions
Extensive AI toolbox and upper-tier performance for everything else
Cons Some might find all the AI photography features a little creepy
A little less pre-installed bloat should be standard at this price
Introduction
Honor's mid-season smartphone launches have been blurring the line between mid-range and flagship for a while now. The formula is largely the same: show up roughly six months after the firm's tip-tier Magic model, packing the sort of spec you'd usually expect to pay a lot more for. The Honor 400 series also continues the firm's trend for starting with a cut-price Lite version, before following it up with a more potent bigger brother.
The Honor 400 Pro feels like a very different proposition to the Honor 400 Lite, though. The iPhone-imitating styling is gone, replaced with more a bespoke look; photography is even more of a focus, with an extra-large helping of AI; and the price has put it closer to big-name rivals – while still staying the right side of affordable.
At £699 (there's no US release planned, as is usual for Honor) it undercuts the Google Pixel 9 and Samsung Galaxy S25, and slips between the iPhone 16e and iPhone 16. With hardware that has all three beat in places, could it be 2025's first genuine upper-midrange model surprise?
How we test smartphones
Every phone reviewed on Stuff is used as our main device throughout the testing process. We use industry standard benchmarks and tests, as well as our own years of experience, to judge general performance, battery life, display, sound and camera image quality. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products.
Find out more about how we test and rate products.
Design & build: much more personality
My first thoughts after taking the Honor 400 Pro out of its box? 'Now this is more like it.' I'd been disappointed by the 400 Lite's 'Me too' styling, which tried way too hard to be an iPhone at pocket money pricing; the Pro feels far more unique, with a slightly rounded frame, subtle quad-curved glass up front, and a distinctive rear camera housing.
There really are three sensors underneath the three lenses this time, and it's glass on the rear rather than polycarbonate, which wraps neatly into the frame. OK, Lunar Grey and Midnight Black aren't the most exciting two colour choices, especially compared to some of Honor's more out-there offerings lately, but the materials feel suitably luxe for the money.
Honor hasn't included the AI camera button found on the 400 Lite, which only further highlights how different the two phones are, despite sharing a name. I feel it would've made a lot of sense to bring it back here, given the better camera setup; maybe next year.
At 8.1mm it's not the slimmest mid-ranger around; nor is it the lightest, tipping the scales at 205g. But it sits very comfortably in the hand and those subtly protruding camera lenses mean it slips easily in and out of a trouser pocket. It's also impressively durable, with both IP68 and IP69 resistance ratings. Protection from high pressure water jets probably isn't something you'll need on the regular, but it's still nice to have in a phone that doesn't cost four figures.
Honor has brought back its secure face recognition, via an iPhone-esque pill-shaped screen cutout, and also offers fingerprint biometrics from an under-display sensor. I liked having both configured, so I could quickly skip the lock screen regardless of lighting conditions or the angle I was holding the phone. Both worked quickly and accurately enough.
Screen & sound: easy on the eyes
The 400 Pro's bright and colourful AMOLED screen isn't a huge step down from the flagship Magic 7 Pro's. It's ever-so-slightly smaller at 6.7in, but has the same 2800×1280 resolution, and Honor has carried over the subtle 2.5D glass as well. This doesn't reflect light anywhere near as much as a properly curved-edge screen would, yet feels more in keeping with modern phone design trends – without being a carbon copy of any flat-screened rivals.
Viewing angles in general are fantastic, and given its an OLED panel underneath contrast is understandably rather brilliant. Black levels are suitably deep and inky, and the 120Hz refresh rate ensures scrolling is as smooth as silk. Streaming content was a pleasure to kick back with, particularly shows shot in HDR. Those really let the 400 Pro's extreme peak brightness shine.
5000nits is about as good as it gets in the phone world, although that figure only counts a tiny portion of the screen at a time. The phone doesn't get anywhere near as bright in everyday use, but I couldn't fault it for outdoor visibility. Even on especially sunny days, I could clearly see what was onscreen. It fared well against the impressively potent Google Pixel 9 XL, which costs considerably more.
It's great to see all of Honor's usual eye comfort tech included here. As well as dialling out extra blue light, the phone supports high frequency dimming and automatically adjusts its colour temperature to lower eye fatigue. The defocusing mode softens the screen edges to help here too, which is something you won't find on rival Androids. I liked how dark the extra dim settings gets for night-time reading, too.
The Honor 400 Pro's speakers put in a strong showing, with the earpiece tweeter and down-firing main driver delivering more than enough volume for headphone-free listening. Sound is generally clean and clear, with the usual lack of bass I expect from any phone speaker setup.
Cameras: AI video arrives
On pixel count alone, the Honor 400 Pro looks formidable. There's a 200MP lead snapper (with optical image stabilisation, naturally), backed up by a 50MP telephoto (also with OIS) equipped for 3x optical zoom. The 12MP ultrawide leans more mid-range, but also doubles as a macro shooter with a very short 2.5cm focus distance. A 50MP selfie can up front completes the set.
Sensor cropping expands the camera's reach from 0.6x to 6x before digital zoom properly comes into play, and you're offered a trio of colour modes. These either give your snaps authentic, natural-looking hues, more vivid and highly saturated shots, or an analogue film-style treatment that ups the vignetting and strips out a little warmth. I liked experimenting with them on the Magic 7 Pro at the start of 2025, so it's great to see them return here – even if a lot of owners are likely to pick one of the three and rarely stray from it. Most of my shots were taken in Vibrant mode, which is selected by default.
Honor's partnership with Studio Harcourt has also returned for the portrait mode, for moody black-and-white snaps that do a pretty decent job of preserving loose hairs and finer edge details.
Algorithms are just as important as pixels, of course, and for the most part the Honor 400 Pro delivers. The lead lens captures a glorious amount of detail as you'd expect, along with convincing and vibrant colours. Colour and exposure consistency between it and the other two lenses is rather great too, if not quite up there with the class leaders.
Dynamic range isn't quite as wide as some rivals can manage, leaving some of my most brightly-lit scenes looking a bit washed out as HDR processing exposed for both highlights and shadow detail. Outside of extremes, though, it held up rather well across all three lenses. The ultrawide definitely shows a detail drop-off compared to the other two, and the edges of the frame aren't super-sharp, but its narrow minimum focus distance meant I got some rather tidy close-up shots.
I was genuinely impressed with the clarity of the zoom at 6x, too. In some cases I thought the colours were more convincing and the contrast more true-to-life than 3x shots taken from the same spot, despite cropping the sensor to achieve them. It quickly became my favourite 'lens' for travel snaps, so long as my subjects were far enough away from me. I'd sooner reach for this than a Galaxy S25.
Honor's AI Super Zoom can take over beyond 30x, as it could on the Magic 7 Pro flagship. Your shots are optionally sent to the Cloud for processing, and come back either looking like someone took a decent stab at adding detail the sensor couldn't capture, or more like a poster illustrated version of what you saw in the viewfinder. Even without AI, there's clearly a lot of smoothing and noise reduction going on to create a usable image.
There's still a bit of work to do in low light, where the colour disparity between lenses seems stronger and the ultrawide quickly runs out of pixels to preserve fine detail. The other two hold up well for contrast and exposure, though, and aren't far off the class leaders.
Honor is also all-in on AI image editing at this point, and is first in line to bake support for Google's Leo Cloud processing straight into its gallery app. On top of the generation image expansion, smart subject cutouts, reflection and background object removal it could do previously, you now get AI image to video.
There are a few limitations, like using single subjects and it rejecting blurry snaps, but it needs just a few minutes to turn a single static image into five seconds of video. These aren't basic clips, either: as well as animating your subject, it adds camera pans, zooms, and drone-like aerial climbs. Naturally you'll have to pay for this functionality at some point – it's labelled as a 'free trial' on my review unit.
Honestly, it's freaky stuff at times: some of my test snaps looked incredibly convincing. A few were clearly AI slop, with nonsense creations and artifacts appearing mid-scene. You've also got no input over the camera movement or what your subjects are animated to perform. There's a fun side to it, but I can't ever imagine forking over cash to be able to use it.
Software experience: that's magic
Honor usually saves big updates to its Android skin for flagship phones, so the 400 Pro arrives running the same MagicOS 9 software as the 400 Lite and Magic 7 Pro I tested at the start of 2025. It's based on Android 15, though a lot of the styling feels very iOS-inspired. All your apps get spread over multiple home screens by default, notifications and quick settings are on separate pull-down menus, and a few of the icons look pretty familiar.
There's the usual extensive selection of own-brand apps, with dupes for most of Google's defaults (which are hidden away in a folder). I was also a little disappointed my review unit had so much pre-installed third-party bloat; it's a pretty common move on budget models, and was excusable on the sub-£250 Honor 400 Lite, but less so on a phone that costs a fair bit more. Your mileage may vary as the phone will be set up differently for different regions, admittedly, and it's only the work of a minute or two to erase them if you're not a fan. With a whopping 512GB of onboard storage, it's not like you're short on space right out of the box either.
Magic Portal is quickly becoming an Honor standout, letting you drag images or text to the side of the screen to bring up contextual actions and relevant apps. Highlight an address and Google Maps shows up at the top of the sidebar that appears. It's a handy way for opening two apps in multi-window, too.
I'm in two minds about the Apple-like Magic Capsule, which puts music controls, call timers and alarms around the pill-shaped camera cutout. Yup, it's Dynamic Island – except far more limiting, with no third-party app support. I'd love Honor to open up the API to app developers, or at least integrate more of its stock apps.
The firm gets a thumbs up for its long-term update support, though. Honor flagships get seven years of Android versions and seven years of security updates now. The 400 Pro isn't quite a flagship, but six years of each is still a great showing, and puts it just behind the likes of Google's Pixel 9 and the Samsung Galaxy A56.
Of course it's all the AI additions that Honor is putting the biggest emphasis on this year – and why not, given everyone else is doign the same. A lot of the various tools use Google Gemini, so of course you get Circle to Search, the Gemini voice assistant, and Gemini Live conversational AI. The writing tools, live language translation, voice transcription and subtitles are all par for the course, too.I wouldn't say they're better or worse than any rival offering, currently.
Performance & battery life: what more do you want?
The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 inside the Honor 400 Pro isn't quite cutting edge today, but you don't have to go too far back in time to the point where it was Qualcomm's class-leading silicon. Paired with a healthy 12GB of RAM, it means this phone feels every bit the high-end hero, with a near-unflappable Android experience for the most part. Apps open in a blink, multitasking is no sweat, and even demanding apps run smoothly.
It's not quite so fast in synthetic benchmarks, as single- and multi-core scores of 2046 and 6463 in Geekbench 6 show; flagship rivals with Snapdragon 8 Elites are some 2000 points quicker on the multi-core test. Single-core grunt is greater than Razr 60 Ultra flip phone, though – showing what a difference effective cooling can make on performance. At no point in real-world use did I feel like I needed any extra oomph.
Gaming was a similar story. The 3Dmark Solar Bay test churned out a score of 7665, again putting it some distance behind the fastest phones on sale today – but not so much that games from the Play Store weren't nigh-on flawless. Horror fishing adventure Dredge isn't asking an awful lot of the GPU, so it was no surprise I saw perfectly smooth gameplay, but Genshin Impact was also stutter-free. You're in no way getting a sub-par processor for your money here.
I like that the 400 Pro continues Honor's streak of offering plenty of on-board storage, too. You get 512GB as standard here, while rivals only offer 256GB – or in some cases just 128GB.
Honor also puts its competition on blast when it comes to battery capacity. Admittedly the Pixel 9 and Galaxy S25 are both physically smaller phones, but there's a big gulf between their meagre cells and the 400 Pro's 5300mAh unit. Chinese brands have been quick to adopt silicon-carbon tech, and it has made a big difference to this phone's staying power. I comfortably lasted through full days of heavy use without having to plug in, and two days was achievable with lighter use. That's an excellent showing for a phone that's otherwise so capable everywhere else.
I was never waiting around for the phone to charge, either. The 400 Pro supports 100W top-ups from a compatible power brick, so I could complete a full refuel in under ah hour. Wireless charging is impressively speedy at 50W, too, though compatible charging plates are a little rarer.
Honor 400 Pro verdict
In just a few short years, Honor has transformed its upper-midrange phones into true mainstream flagships. The 400 Pro can comfortably rub shoulders with Google and Samsung's mass market models, thanks to its capable rear camera trio, high capacity battery, and impressively wide-reaching software smarts.
Not everyone wants their photo galleries filled with AI-adjusted images, and Honor still needs to remember customers paying this sort of cash have a lower tolerance for pre-installed bloat. But the colourful screen, modern (yet still unique) styling and slightly more affordable price make it a genuine alternative for those who aren't obsessed over brand names.
Stuff Says…
Score: 4/5
An exceptionally capable all-rounder. The Honor 400 Pro might not have the same mainstream appeal as its Big Three rivals, but it easily competes with them on cameras, battery and software smarts.
Pros
Long-lasting battery with rapid wired and wireless charging
Colourful, engaging photos in almost all conditions
Extensive AI toolbox and upper-tier performance for everything else
Cons
Some might find all the AI photography features a little creepy
A little less pre-installed bloat should be standard at this price
Honor 400 Pro technical specifications
Screen 6.7in, 2800×1280 120Hz AMOLED CPU Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 Memory 12GB RAM Cameras 200MP + 50MP + 12MP rear
50MP front Storage 512GB on-board Operating system Android 15 w/ MagicOS 9 Battery 5300mAh w/ 100W wired, 50W wireless charging Dimensions 8.1mm thick
205g

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Stuff.tv
5 days ago
- Stuff.tv
The OnePlus Pad Lite is exactly where I'd start shopping for a budget Android tablet
Stuff Verdict Performance might be modest, but the OnePlus Pad Lite is otherwise a well-rounded tablet at a very appealing price. Pros Big screen with smooth scrolling Long-lasting battery, particularly on standby Clean take on Android with useful multitasking Cons Lacks the oomph of pricier tabs Not the sharpest or brightest budget tablet display A little on the heavy side, funnily enough Introduction With Apple all but dominating the spicier end of the tablet price spectrum and a few recognisable Android brands duking it out in the mid-range, the more affordable territory has become a bit of a wild west. A quick scroll through Amazon throws up dozens of no-name slates for very little cash, running older versions of Android and archaic hardware. The OnePlus Pad Lite is the antidote to all of that. Arriving at £199 (there's no US launch planned currently), this 11in tablet brings a big battery, streamlined software, and an update promise that won't leave you marooned on an outdated OS mere months after clicking the buy button. It'll run all your apps without any fuss, too – unlike an Amazon Fire Tablet. There are a few shortcuts and shortcomings to keep costs in check, sure – but I still walked away from a week of testing impressed by how much value you're getting. How we test tablets Every tablet reviewed on Stuff is used as our main device throughout the testing process. We use industry-standard benchmarks and tests, as well as our own years of experience, to judge general performance, battery life, display, sound and camera image quality. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products. Find out more about how we test and rate products. Design & build: test of metal Plenty of budget tablets are still made from cheap-feeling polycarbonate plastic, so the OnePlus Pad Lite's all-aluminium build feels positively luxurious in comparison. It's only available in a single colour, Aero Blue, but I'm a fan of its distinctive appearance and fingerprint-busting matte finish. This Pad is Lite only in name, weighing a substantial 530g. I didn't find it uncomfortable to hold one-handed for short stints, but wouldn't fancy trying to read an ebook from cover to cover in a single sitting. IP42 resistance might not sound like much to shout about, but an IP rating of any kind is pretty rare at this price. Basically it's not a disaster if you leave it on the patio table during a brief rain shower. The flat sides are in keeping with the newer, high-end OnePlus Pad 3, but the single central camera lens at the rear more closely mimics the look of the original Pad and Pad 2. There's also a 5MP webcam squeezed into the display bezel up front. Don't expect brilliant results from either: my test snaps were lacking in detail and colours leaned overly cool. Still, they'll do in a pinch for document scanning or video calls. Other telltale signs this is an affordable slate include the slightly chunkier screen bezels, and lack of fingerprint sensor. You do at least get basic facial recognition, so can avoid having to put in a PIN or password every time you go to unlock the tablet. There's no microSD expansion or stylus support, either, but impressively OnePlus does offer LTE connectivity; a lot of tablets are just Wi-Fi only at this price point. You've got to pay a little extra, but £229 is still very keen – and you get a bump to 8GB of memory in the process. Screen & sound: fits the bill With a multimedia-friendly 16:10 aspect ratio, the OnePlus Pad Lite's 11in display is a natural fit for streaming video. While some rivals have higher resolutions, they typically also have lower refresh rates: you're getting smoother 90Hz scrolling here, and the 1920×1200 panel doesn't look majorly blocky or lacking in detail. Especially small text could stand to look a little crisper, but images are still well defined. Brightness in general is OK, getting pretty close to OnePlus' 500 nits peak claim. That's fine for indoor use, but I struggled a bit when stepping outside on a particularly sunny day. Contrast isn't too shabby and black levels look pretty good, given the panel is using LCD tech. Viewing angles are merely OK, and colour vibrancy is perhaps just a little lacking, with no alternate profiles to swap to in the settings menus – just basic warm and cool temperatures. Pump up the brightness a bit and things still look impactful enough. It comfortably holds up against rivals costing similar cash. The stereo speakers are a great match to the screen, getting plenty loud and with a good amount of separation. Having the grilles on the tablet's two shorter edges makes them a bit too easy to block while holding it in landscape, but adjust your positioning and you'll be happy enough with the clean and full-bodied (for a tablet) audio. Software experience: the simple approach A lot of budget tablets overload their versions of Android with bloatware, earning a kickback from the app developer to offset the low hardware price. Fair play to OnePlus for not going down the same route: the Pad Lite has zero bloat out of the box, which makes handing it over to a less tech-savvy relative far more straightforward. It helps that OxygenOS is also a pretty streamlined take on Android 15, with clearly labelled shortcuts in the Quick Settings menu and all the default Google apps you'd expect. It feels slick to navigate, with no noticeable stuttering or delay when opening apps. The dedicated kids mode is particularly handy if you're planning to hand it to your child, with screen time settings and per-app controls within very easy reach. The floating app bar at the bottom of the screen makes split screen multitasking a breeze, though you're only getting two apps side-by-side here, rather than the full Open Canvas experience. That's not a big surprise, given it doesn't have a huge amount of processing power on tap, and you can add a floating window into the mix if you want. There's plenty of cross-device functionality, and not just if you've got a OnePlus phone. The Pad Lite can sync with a Windows or Mac computer once you install the O+ Connect software. The fact that OnePlus promises four years of new Android generations and six years of security patches is another big thumbs up, as this kind of long-term support isn't always a given on cheaper tablets. Performance & battery life: keep it casual The MediaTek Helio G100 chipset at the heart of the OnePlus Pad Lite is the biggest giveaway this is an affordable tablet. It might have eight CPU cores, but none of 'em have an awful lot of oomph – whether paired with 8GB of RAM, as per my LTE-equipped review unit, or 6GB with the Wi-Fi only version. It churns through synthetic benchmarks at quite a sluggish pace, and while affordable rivals aren't exactly any better, it still means this tablet performs best when tasked with one thing at a time. In split-screen mode and with a third floating window, you're really not getting the snappiest response or smoothest scrolling. That doesn't entirely defeat the purpose of Open Canvas, but it's something to think about if you're after a pure productivity machine. That said, single app responsiveness is more than good enough for the price, and I didn't at any point feel hobbled by the hardware for things like web browsing, email or social media scrolling. OnePlus Pad Lite benchmark scores Geekbench 6 single-core 713 Geekbench 6 multi-core 1887 Geekbench AI 902 PCMark Work 3.0 8357 Gaming in particular can be a struggle, with more demanding titles defaulting to their lowest settings and not always delivering smooth frame rates. Asphalt Legends, not the most taxing game but still quite the looker at maximum settings, felt stuttery even with all the details dropped. My usual 3D benchmarks wouldn't even run. Stick to casual games, though, and it'll get the job done. On the plus side, the modest chipset doesn't demand a huge amount of juice. When paired with a sizeable 9340mAh battery, the OnePlus Pad is able to go the distance with a full day of video streaming and web browsing. I had no trouble starting in the morning with a full charge, and with pretty much constant use I was still comfortably out of Battery Saver range at bedtime. Even better, standby time on this tablet is excellent. OnePlus reckons it'll last 54 days in isolation before finally croaking, and in real-world use that means only needing to plug in once every week if you're an occasional user. 30W wired charging isn't the fastest, especially as you'll need to supply your own power brick – and one that's compatible with OnePlus' SuperVOOC tech at that. OnePlus Pad Lite verdict The Pad Lite makes a strong case for itself with excellent battery life and build that feels anything but basic. While you don't have to spend a huge amount more to get a tablet with a more powerful processor or higher pixel count screen, few of 'em have software as stripped back as OnePlus's. I think it's the ideal first tablet, with no bloatware for mum and dad to strip out, a parental control mode for younger kids, just enough grunt for casual games and multitasking abilities that could come in handy when doing homework. For everyone else, getting a decent long-term update commitment and LTE connectivity for sensible money carries its own appeal. If you're trying to keep costs down, this is a great starting point. Stuff Says… Score: 4/5 Performance might be modest, but the OnePlus Pad Lite is otherwise a well-rounded tablet at a very appealing price. Pros Big screen with smooth scrolling Long-lasting battery, particularly on standby Clean take on Android with useful multitasking Cons Lacks the oomph of pricier tabs Not the sharpest or brightest budget tablet display A little on the heavy side, funnily enough OnePlus Pad Lite technical specifications Screen 11in, 1920×1200 LCD w/ 90Hz CPU MediaTek Helio G100 Memory 6/8GB RAM Cameras 5MP rear 5MP front Storage 128GB on-board Operating system Android 15 Battery 9340mAh w/ 33W wired charging Dimensions 255x167x7.4mm, 530g


Stuff.tv
6 days ago
- Stuff.tv
I loved the Huawei Pura 80 Ultra's clever cameras – but it's still impossible to recommend
Stuff Verdict It's got a truly outstanding set of cameras, but Huawei's hardware handicaps everywhere else puts the Pura 80 Ultra a long distance behind today's best flagship phones. Pros Phenomenal photography skills, particularly from the zoom lens Distinctive design with top-tier water resistance Rapid wired and wireless charging Cons Restrictive software if you're used to Google services Can't match other flagships on performance Hardware lags behind the competition in several areas Introduction If world-first camera hardware wets your whistle, the Pura 80 Ultra might be your 2025 phone photography highlight. It gives the best smartphones a run for their money with a two-lens telephoto camera that aims to get you closer to the action. Huawei hasn't cut any corners with the other sensors, either, and knows a thing or two about nuanced picture processing. Things aren't quite so rosy elsewhere, with familiar caveats around connectivity, processing power, and software on account of Huawei's ongoing foreign trade troubles – but this is still a flagship phone, and as such commands a flagship price. It'll set you back AED 5099 (roughly $1400/£1050) in the United Arab Emirates, one of the few places outside of China Huawei still has a big presence. After living with one for a few weeks, I've been wowed by the photos it takes – but not enough to overlook the frustrations I experienced elsewhere. How we test smartphones Every phone reviewed on Stuff is used as our main device throughout the testing process. We use industry standard benchmarks and tests, as well as our own years of experience, to judge general performance, battery life, display, sound and camera image quality. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products. Find out more about how we test and rate products. Design & build: sure to stand out Huawei has really leaned into the unique styling established by last year's Pura 70 Ultra, with one of the biggest camera bumps you'll find on any phone. It's needed to make room for the clever zoom lenses, and I like the fact the firm hasn't gone with a giant circular splodge like most other flagships from Chinese brands. The crosshatched faux leather of the outgoing phone has been swapped for an altogether more blingy finish on my Prestige Gold review unit; the sunburst effect on the camera island looks more like something you'd see on a fancy wristwatch. The Golden Black alternative is more subdued, but keeps some gold accents around the lenses – in case their sheer size wasn't already enough to draw attention. In some ways the design is a bit of a throwback, with curved-edge glass on both sides that blends into a rounded aluminium frame. Most rivals have settled on the flat glass, flat frame approach, so in some ways this is a welcome change from the norm. It fits nicely in my hand, while still providing enough to grip onto. That's handy, as this is a rather hefty handset, weighing in at 234g. The screen is covered by Huawei's second-gen Crystal Armor Kunlun glass, which is a lot more scratch-resistant than the original stuff. IP68 and IP69 ratings are also as good as it gets for protection, even if I've still yet to put my phone through enough environmental torture for that to make a difference to its survival. A side-mounted fingerprint sensor/power button combo is unusual on anything but a foldable phone these days, and is another sign Huawei has limited choice when it comes to components not made in-house. It works well enough, but I'd much rather an in-display sensor or secure facial recognition. It's also worth highlighting that the Pura 80 Ultra goes without any sort of 5G connectivity, at least on this global version, which will limit its Western appeal. Screen & sound: looking sharp At a palm-filling 6.8in, the Pura 80 Ultra's quad-curved display hasn't grown at all from its predecessor – but Huawei has managed to squeeze in a few extra rows of pixels. The 2848×1276 panel looks perfectly crisp at arms' length, packing plenty of details into your photos, and the adaptive refresh rate meant scrolling always looked buttery smooth. It's an OLED, so has the vibrant colours and deep, perfect black levels I've come to expect. Tones are more natural than some rivals, but there's a Vivid option in the settings menus if you want a little extra pop. A near enough infinite contrast ratio also works in its favour, giving videos plenty of punch. It's a shame, then, that Limited DRM support meant I was limited to SD content in my streaming apps – and without HDR. Huawei reckons this phone can hit a peak 3000 nits brightness, but it falls way short of that for real-world use. In a side-by-side with a few other current flagships, I thought this was the dimmest of the lot overall, though it still puts out enough light that outdoor visibility wasn't a major issue. The Pura 80 Ultra uses a fairly standard stereo speaker setup, with a down-firing driver doing most of the heavy lifting and an earpiece tweeter as backup. Adding an up-firing grille at the top does help create a more rounded sound, though, and it has plenty of volume on tap. Cameras: new zoom king? Each one of the Pura 80 Ultra's four cameras has some tech worth shouting about. The lead snapper uses a 1-inch sensor, putting it on par with the Oppo Find X8 Ultra and Xiaomi 15 Ultra for sheer size, but pairs it with an f/1.6-4.0 variable aperture for better controlling depth of field – something you get an awful lot of with a sensor so physically big. Laser autofocus and optical image stabilisation also make the grade. The 40MP ultrawide also has autofocus, letting it get as close as 2cm from your subject when doubling as a macro shooter. The 13MP selfie cam may not have a huge pixel count, but its generous field of view and autofocus abilities make it handy for group shots. It's the telephoto that makes the biggest impression. Not only is its 50 MP, 1/1.28in sensor about as physically big as it gets on a phone, but it swaps between two lenses on the fly using a tiny motor to give you 3.7x and 9.4x magnification – without cropping or digital enhancement, or needing two separate sensors. Effectively, this is the most optical zoom you'll get on any smartphone right now. Factor in the ultrawide's expansive field of view and you've got a seriously long focal range to pick from. On a recent foreign trip, the extra magnification really came into its own, letting me get so much closer to buildings and subjects than I'd otherwise be able to. 3.7x zoom snaps are wonderfully detailed, with very little noise and plenty of dynamic range. Swapping to the other lens retains lots of detail and colours are consistent, though the image processing is clearly doing a lot of heavy lifting for distant subjects; buildings can look overly smooth and there's more sharpening at play than I expected for optical magnification. Used for close-ups, there's a gorgeous amount of bokeh blur on show – so much so I'd regularly use it instead of the main camera, which can create dreamy depth in its sleep when using its widest aperture. Left to its own devices the main camera tends to stick around f/2.0, and you've got to dive into the Pro mode if you want to set the aperture manually. For the most part I was fine with auto mode, where it spat out some wonderfully detailed images in pretty much all lighting conditions. It helps that there's oodles of dynamic range, aided by the way it takes three frames per HDR image rather than two now. Colours are impactful, there's ample contrast, and you have a handful of distinctive photographic styles just a swipe away if you fancy a more filmic look. I did think that white balance could be a little hit-or-miss, and that was true across the board, not just the main lens. But there's no doubting it rubs shoulders with the very best cameraphones in good light. At night, the main camera continues to capture impressive amounts of detail, even without needing the extra second or two afforded by the dedicated Night mode. White balance can once again be a bit variable, but colours are otherwise pretty natural and noise is kept well in check. The telephoto is at the top of its game here, at least at 3.7x. I got some impressively clean and detailed shots of subjects who refused to stay still, despite there being very little light. At 9.4x the processing is again easier to spot, but the over-sharpening and smoothed-out details wouldn't stop me sharing my snaps on social media. Software experience: heard it all before Outside of China, the Pura 80 Ultra runs Huawei's EMUI 15 interface, on top of what's effectively Android 12 – except with all of the Google bits stripped out. You can side-load some of them back in if you're determined, and a few third-party apps make the process a bit smoother, but features like Quickshare and Google Wallet payments will always be locked off. That'll be an instant deal-breaker for the majority of Western phone buyers. Huawei has an extensive selection of own-brand apps to make up for it, and the AppGallery marketplace is there to fill the remaining gaps – except with such a small user base compared to the Google Play Store, big-name developers have little reason to get on board. There are a few recognisable apps, but I struggled to find alternatives to even half of what I have installed on my personal phone. More frustrating is how keen everything is to chuck an advert your way. The video player, ebook reader app and Themes store are desperate for your to part with some cash, and there's way too much pre-installed bloat for a flagship phone. Huawei's Celia voice assistant can't be replaced with Google Gemini, and its abilities are more limited here than on the Chinese-market handset. There's very little in the way of AI apps or features anywhere else. The overall styling doesn't feel too far removed from the previous EMUI generation, with all your apps scattered across various homescreens rather than stashed in a drawer, and split notifications and quick settings screens based on which side of the screen you swipe down from. Dig deeper and you'll find a bunch of gesture-based controls, floating shortcut menus, and a 75:25 split-screen option for multitasking. There's no word on what customers can expect in terms of long-term updates – if indeed it can expect any at all, given the outdated version of Android Huawei is forced to use on its global devices. Performance & battery life: the hand you're dealt It might've landed with a new generation of home-grown Huawei silicon, but the Pura 80 Ultra's Kirin 9020 chipset is based on comparatively old tech. The eight-core CPU is built on a 7nm architecture, while the rest of the phone world is using far more efficient 3nm. Even paired with a generous 16GB of RAM, that puts it on the back foot in terms of raw performance. Synthetic benchmark scores put it some 50% slower than the Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra and its Snapdragon 8 Elite processor. It sits behind every single flagship phone I've tested in 2025, and on paper has the oomph you'd expect from a mid-range device costing less than half the cash. There's no support for modern graphics standards like Vulkan, so I wasn't able to run some of my usual gaming tests. It also gets rather toasty when pushed for even a short amount of time, limiting its number-crunching abilities even further. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra benchmark scores Geekbench 6 single-core 1250 Geekbench 6 multi-core 3552 Geekbench AI 1454 PCMark Work 3.0 9733 3Dmark WIld Life Extreme 1534 Benchmarks and real-world performance are two different things, and for the most part the Pura 80 Ultra felt reasonably responsive when swiping through homescreens and opening apps. It just lacks the instant reaction times you expect of a flagship phone. Gaming was also mediocre, with the titles I tried largely defaulting to medium settings. The Pura 80 Ultra available outside of China has a smaller 5170mAh battery than the one on sale at home, which gets a much beefier 5700mAh cell. When combined with a processor that's a bit behind the times, that doesn't make for especially impressive longevity. I was able to make it through a day of typical use, but had to use the battery saver to make it to bedtime. Looping video sees it drain several hours faster than a Google Pixel 9 Pro XL, which isn't exactly a stamina champ itself. On the plus side, this phone is seriously quick to charge when you've got a compatible power brick or wireless charging pad. It'll manage 100W over USB-C, or 80W wirelessly – though the latter is only with a specific Huawei charging pad, which I didn't have access to for testing. A full wired top-up in under 45 minutes is still an excellent result, besting pretty much every other 2025 flagship. Huawei Pura 80 Ultra verdict As much as I was blown away by the Pura 80 Ultra's photographic ability, cameras are just one piece of the flagship phone puzzle. Taken as a whole, there are unfortunately too many hardware letdowns here, on top of the already restrictive software. There's only so much Huawei can do in-house, and without access to current-gen components, the firm has fallen behind on performance and battery life. The Pura 80 Ultra still gets plenty right, like its top-tier water resistance and lightning-fast charging speeds. I'm sure the distinctive design will earn plenty of fans, too. But for Western audiences, who take 5G connectivity as a given and use Google services on the daily, this will always be a seriously niche proposition. Stuff Says… Score: 3/5 It's got a truly outstanding set of cameras, but Huawei's hardware handicaps everywhere else puts the Pura 80 Ultra a long distance behind today's best flagship phones. Pros Phenomenal photography skills, particularly from the zoom lens Distinctive design with top-tier water resistance Rapid wired and wireless charging Cons Restrictive software if you're used to Google services Can't match other flagships on performance Hardware lags behind the competition in several areas Huawei Pura 80 Ultra technical specifications Screen 6.8in, 2848×1276 OLED w/ 1-120Hz CPU Huawei Kirin 9020 Memory 16GB RAM Cameras 50MP w/ 1-inch sensor, f/1.6-4.0 aperture, dual pixel PDAF, OIS + 50MP, f/2.4 telephoto w/ 3.7x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS – switchable to 12.5MP, f/3.6, 9.4x optical zoom + 40MP, f/2.2 ultrawide w/ autofocus rear 13MP, f/2.0 w/ autofocus front Storage 512GB/1TB on-board Operating system Android w/ EMUI Battery 5170mAh w/ 10W wired, 80W wireless charging Dimensions 163x76x8.3 mm, 234g


Stuff.tv
12-08-2025
- Stuff.tv
The Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI has my must-have gaming laptop features for sensible money
Stuff Verdict A whole lot of gaming laptop for your money, with a stunner of a screen (if you pick the right spec). The Predator Helios Neo 16S AI doesn't wow like some pricier rivals on the design front, though. Pros Plenty powerful for gaming and desktop duties Slim build and sensible weight for taking on the move Extensive connectivity for a 16in laptop Cons Design and build can't match sleeker rivals Battery life is pretty basic OLED hikes the price a lot Introduction While some gaming laptop brands take the one-and-done approach, Acer goes the other direction: across Nitro, Triton and Helios, there's seemingly something in its extensive Predator line-up to appeal to any budget. Draw a line straight through the middle and you'll probably hit the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI. Not quite a desktop replacement, not quite a super-slim travel companion, it's more a best-of-both machine – but one that hasn't skimped on hardware one bit. An Intel Core Ultra 9 processor and Nvidia RTX graphics put it squarely up against the Asus Zephyrus G16 and Razer Blade 16, except you're getting better connectivity here – and spending less cash. Considerably less if you forego the OLED screen for an IPS panel – though having now sat in front of one for the last few weeks, I think you owe it to your eyeballs to stick with the former. The bigger question is whether the Helios Neo's more mainstream styling and materials choices hold it back against the decidedly more sleek competition. How we test laptops Every laptop reviewed on Stuff is tested using industry standard benchmarks and apps to assess performance and battery life. We use our years of experience to judge display, sound and general usability. Manufacturers have no visibility on reviews before they appear online, and we never accept payment to feature products. Find out more about how we test and rate products. Design & build: corporate gig OK, the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI clearly stands out from Acer's more businesslike Aspire laptops. It has a few gaming laptop hallmarks, like the light-up predator logo etched onto the lid and the 'chin' at the rear that provides extra room for cooling kit, ventilation, and connectivity. But it's far from the most streamlined machines doing the rounds right now. The sharp angles look a bit busy in places, and the mix of materials mark it out as a more mid-range gaming laptop compared to the metal unibody builds from Asus and Razer. The lid in particular is a real fingerprint magnet. Still, Acer has done well to keep the dimensions in check, meaning this 16in machine is satisfyingly slim. Not counting the tapered edges, it's a sliver under 20mm. Even with the larger footprint created by that protruding rear section, this is a laptop I'd be happy to sling in a bag and take on the move. At 2.3kg it's not exactly a featherweight – and even less so once you take the power brick into account – but it has an edge over dedicated desktop replacement machines. Stashing the power and HDMI ports in the rear section helps minimise cable clutter when used at a desk. You also get two USB-C ports, with one able to handle display output. I'd have preferred a full-size SD card reader instead of the microSD slot Acer stuck on the left side of the laptop, along with the Ethernet port, single USB-A, and 3.5mm headset port – but that's only because my digital camera uses one. Two more USB-As on the right side complete the set. Keyboard & touchpad: squeezy does it I'm not a fan of numerical keypads being squeezed into gaming laptops; the space they take up could be filled with upward-firing speakers, or rows of customisable macro keys. The Predator Helios Neo 16S AI does at least have a few multimedia keys, and a single shortcut that loads Acer's PredatorSense software, but it still eats into the amount of room the QWERTY keys have to play with. That's not to say typing felt especially cramped; more that I felt off-centre from the screen, which isn't an issue on the Razer Blade 16. The keys themselves naturally have per-key backlighting you can customise to your heart's content; the way it shines both through and around each key means you'll never struggle to spot a particular character or symbol. They're all a good size, with a suitably bouncy action and reasonable amount of key travel. Mechanical switches aren't a thing at this price, but equally I didn't feel I had to rush for my desktop keyboard when working. One button sits in isolation above the keyboard tray, where you won't accidentally press it – unlike the power button, which is perilously close to the multimedia controls for my liking, even if you've got to hold it down for a second or two before the laptop enters sleep mode. This one either toggles through power modes (quiet, balanced, performance, turbo) when on battery power, or toggles turbo on and off while connected to the mains. I was underwhelmed by the touchpad, which feels quite plasticky and has more friction than some of the nicer glass touchpads I've tried recently. I know gamers are just going to plug in a mouse or a controller, but it's not even that great to use on the Windows desktop. Screen & sound: colour me impressed Acer has done a great job in keeping the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI's screen bezels skinny, so your attention is focused entirely on the gorgeous OLED panel. There's still some room at the top for a Windows Hello-ready 1080p webcam, which you'll want to make use of as there's no fingerprint sensor on board. The 16in display's 2560p resolution is a great pick for the GPU, not needing nearly as much grunt as a 4K panel but still being a step up in clarity from 1080p. It also means you're more likely to take advantage of the 240Hz maximum refresh rate, which is wonderfully smooth. Text, icons and images on the Windows desktop look perfectly sharp, and viewing angles are top-tier. There's plenty of hinge tilt, too. Colour coverage is fantastic, and accurate too; creative sorts will have no worries about working on this laptop. The OLED tech delivers perfect blacks and fantastic contrast, which made a big impression while I was blasting demons in Doom: The Dark Ages' dimly-lit hallways. Doubly so when you activate HDR, which gives highlights an extra boost. This isn't the brightest laptop I've tried lately, but the peak 400 nits is still a decent showing. My biggest issue is with the extremely glossy screen coating. It practically becomes a mirror if you're sat behind a window or bright light source, with really distracting reflections. The stereo speakers put in a decent performance, with reasonable volume. There's not really much in the way of bass, and it can't shout loud enough to drown out the internal fans when they're going full chat, so a headset is still the way to go. Performance & battery life: plays it safe There are a few different versions of the Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI out there, with varying amounts of RAM and storage, but most are packing Intel's Core Ultra 9 275HX processor. My review unit pairs the 24-core chip with 32GB of memory and a 2TB NVMe SSD. It's a potent combination on the Windows desktop, delivering more grunt than the equivalent AMD Ryzen CPU in most of my tests, though not by a huge margin. I've also seen rival laptops with more effective cooling – or that are more willing to provide extra volts – sore higher with the same silicon. The Medion Erazer Beast 16 X1 could be a marginally better choice if you'll be rendering a lot of videos. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI productivity benchmark scores Geekbench 6 single-core 3149 Geekbench 6 multi-core 16898 Geekbench AI 10402 The main event is of course the GeForce RTX 5070 Ti. Nvidia's third-rung laptop graphics chip has 12GB of dedicated video memory, and is perfectly equipped to handle games at the Predator's 2560×1600 native resolution. Counter Strike 2 sat comfortably in the 150+ frames per second region, which means this laptop will excel at pretty much any esport title. Older games that don't use ray tracing are no match for it, either. More demanding games see the frame rate dip under the magic 60fps, with Cyberpunk 2077 asking a lot even before you switch on ray tracing. The RT Overdrive preset tanked to 14.7fps, but Nvidia's DLSS upscaling can more than double performance with very little penalty to image quality. Multi-frame generation is new secret sauce on top, taking a 35.9fps average with purely DLSS enabled to a fantastic 117fps. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI gaming benchmark scores Native rendering (2560×1600) DLSS upscaling 3DMark Steel Nomad 3614 N/A Gears Tactics 90.0fps N/A Cyberpunk 2077 (RT Overdrive) 14.7fps 35.9fps Cyberpunk 2077 (Ultra, RT off) 51.7fps 118.3fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider (RT on) 73fps 113fps Shadow of the Tomb Raider (RT off) 114fps 148fps The Predator's cooling ability and power management aren't quite as hardcore as some of the chunkier, more desk-bound gaming laptops I've tried, so the scores here are slightly lower across the board. It does keep thermals in check, so marathon gaming sessions don't lead to performance dips, but the dual fans spin up to pretty loud levels to achieve it. Where the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI falls down slightly as a go-anywhere machine is battery life. Intel's latest-gen silicon isn't nearly as power efficient as AMD's current CPUs, and the 76Wh cell inside it isn't the biggest. I saw roughly five hours of video playback, but more typical desktop use saw it drained sooner. Gaming will eat up a charge in under two. The Ryzen-powered Razer Blade 16 remains my top pick for gaming laptop longevity. Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI verdict How much do you care about aesthetics? While I'd personally pay that little bit extra for the sleek styling of an Asus Zephyrus or Razer Blade, plenty of gamers will be more bothered about the hardware inside their laptops rather than how they look on the outside. If you fall into the latter camp, the Predator Helios Neo 16S AI is absolutely worth a look. It has ample amounts of power on tap, a GPU that's well matched to the resolution of that gorgeous OLED screen, and enough ports to replace your desktop tower – yet is still just about portable enough to take travelling. Loud fans and merely OK battery life mean it isn't fully multi-purpose, but it gets very close. Considering how much it undercuts its rivals, those are compromises you could happily live with. Stuff Says… Score: 4/5 It's a whole lot of gaming laptop for your money, with a stunner of a screen (if you pick the right spec). The Predator Helios Neo 16S AI doesn't wow like some pricier rivals on the design front, though. Pros Plenty powerful for gaming and desktop duties Slim build and sensible weight for taking on the move Extensive connectivity for a 16in laptop Cons Design and build can't match sleeker rivals Battery life is pretty basic OLED hikes the price a lot Acer Predator Helios Neo 16S AI technical specifications Screen 16in, 2560×1600 240Hz OLED Processor Intel Core Ultra 9 275HX Memory 32GB RAM Graphics Nvidia GeForce RTX 5070ti Storage 2TB SSD Operating system Windows 11 Connectivity 1x 3.2 Gen 1 Type-A, 1x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-A, 2x USB 3.2 Gen 2 Type-C, HDMI, Ethernet, 3.5mm, microSD card reader Battery 76Wh Dimensions 357x276x19.9mm 2.3kg